That jesus juice has pickled your brain too much. Michael's behavior is exactly what Kenneth Lanning described. And if you think Jonathan Spence is perfectly fine, did he personally tell you this? Otherwise, it's just your opinion. It wouldn't matter which adult had a nude photo of him. There is something wrong when an adult sleeps with somebody else's child and keeps a nude photo of aforementioned child. My molester took those kinds of photos, too. The good news is I wasn't nude. The bad news is I was scantily clad. Those are the photos of children Michael kept, in abundance.<quoted text>
You would find something wrong even if Spence had been clothed but the fact that he was nude still doesn't make it wrong only in the sick mind that makes it so.
Spence denied that he was molested as a child and still does as a man. He is leading a happy and well adjusted life and obviously suffered no trauma from his friendship with MJ. Why can't you believe him? I am sure that Kenneth Lanning doesn't apply his theory to everyone because we are all different individuals. MJ did explain his relationship with young boys often and he even explained it in a song he wrote.
"Have you seen my Childhood?
I'm searching for the world that I come from
'Cause I've been looking around
In the lost and found of my heart...
No one understands me"
Michael Jackson quoted from the bible to show that he did have a conscience and that there was nothing immoral in what he did. He sidestepped nothing, that's your off interpretation because you refuse to believe that he never molested children.
I honestly hope that you find love soon because that is what will heal you.
Insofar as the song "Have You Seen My Childhood" is concerned, that was a weak excuse for trying to justify his untoward behavior.