stay away michael
First Prev
of 3
Next Last
Baby Dangler

Port Jefferson Station, NY

#42 Jul 31, 2006
Killer Thriller wrote:
<quoted text>
I dont want or need a definition smart @r$£, I am talking about judging somebody without knowing facts, or knowing them...
It's still judging, dummy. This was just pointed out to you by the person who posted dictionary proof.

We believe there is plenty of proof he acted inappropriately with kids.

YOu believe in myths that cannot be confirmed. We're both judging him, teeny bopper. You're just doing it because you're an emotional little kid who can't understand what constitutes proof.
Baby Dangler

Port Jefferson Station, NY

#43 Jul 31, 2006
Killer Thriller wrote:
<quoted text>
If you read that what I wrote carefuly, I wrote, without knowing facts, aswell aswell, without knowing somebody, in this case I meant facts. Up yours buddy.
Yep, F'loon logic. You must make yourself sound even dumber with each post.
Mike

India

#44 Jul 31, 2006
Baby Dangler wrote:
<quoted text>
We believe there is plenty of proof he acted inappropriately with kids.
There is plenty of proof he acted inappropriately with young boys! There was all kinds of evidences in the case against MJ. He isn't innocent.
The Lies Continue

Santa Ana, CA

#45 Jul 31, 2006
Killer Thriller wrote:
<quoted text>
I dont want or need a definition smart @r$£, I am talking about judging somebody without knowing facts, or knowing them...
Okay... Let's say we don't know any facts, and someone has been accused of being a molester on at least a dozen different occasions - with different victims in each case.

What will be your predisposed opinion of this "someone"?
Killer Thriller

India

#46 Aug 19, 2006
The Lies Continue wrote:
<quoted text>
Okay... Let's say we don't know any facts, and someone has been accused of being a molester on at least a dozen different occasions - with different victims in each case.
What will be your predisposed opinion of this "someone"?
I wouldn't judge them until a fair trial had been given, and the truth had then been prevailed. If I knew the accused, or knew a lot about the accused, I may well be able to build my own ideas, but I wouln't form a solid conclusion until I did have facts.
The accused being Michael Jackson in this case, I believed right from the start he would most likely be proven innocent at the end of it all because although I dont know him personally, I know of his sensitive, loving, charitable nature and knew he had friendships with many children as he believed they wouldn't deceive him and let him down, like adults, and the media, it's just a shame he became friends with the likes of say, Jordan Chandler, the daft kid obviously for some reason didn't realise he was being controlled by his money hungry, malicious, greedy family of liars; but then again he must have known he was talking complete rubbish about Michael so I will never understand why he made the accusations...
RealityAwaits

Pompano Beach, FL

#49 Aug 19, 2006
MJ signed on the line, deal.
ShadowDancer

Columbia, MO

#50 Aug 19, 2006
Yes, remember not guilty untill proven guilty?
Well, has MJJ been proven guilty yet?
RealityAwaits

Pompano Beach, FL

#51 Aug 19, 2006
ShadowDancer wrote:
Yes, remember not guilty untill proven guilty?
Well, has MJJ been proven guilty yet?
The deadbeat's assets are dwindling fast, if not already exhausted. He's guilty and the world isn't buying him any more.
Deal again.
Killer Thriller

India

#52 Aug 20, 2006
RealityAwaits wrote:
<quoted text>
The deadbeat's assets are dwindling fast, if not already exhausted. He's guilty and the world isn't buying him any more.
Deal again.
http://youtube.com/watch...

Exhausted?
I think not dear...
Samantha

Morgan Hill, CA

#53 Aug 20, 2006
Again, notice the floon mentality. When they are backed into a corner with an actual fact, they resort to name calling and backtracking their thread meanings. I think there must be a floon manual somewhere because they all act the same.
Killer Thriller wrote:
<quoted text>
I dont want or need a definition smart @r$£, I am talking about judging somebody without knowing facts, or knowing them...
Aachaa-Oooh_MJfa n

India

#54 Aug 21, 2006
Samantha wrote:
Again, notice the floon mentality. When they are backed into a corner with an actual fact, they resort to name calling and backtracking their thread meanings. I think there must be a floon manual somewhere because they all act the same.
<quoted text>
It seems to me that all haters act the same, spurting out total bull when THEY are faced with facts.
For example:
"Michael Jackson is not guilty" - Fan
"Oh no he's not, hes a child molestor" - Hater
It appears to be that the fans have actual back up for what they say, Michael went through a gruelling trial, had his home searched and destroyed by police and guess what, HE WAS STILL FOUND TO BE NOT GUILTY, ON EACH AND EVERY COUNT AGAINST HIM, NOT TO MENTION HIS ACCUSERS WERE FOUND TO BE COMPULSIVE LIARS!
What do haters have as ACTUAL PROOF of his guilt? I'm not talking about the fact that he paid off a couple of braindead kids, that proves absolutley nothing, if you were in that position, and could use money to avoid further invasive investigations by the police, such as the photographing of your naked body, then I have no doubt you would do the same as him! Not that you will admit it.
jam

Sydney, Australia

#55 Aug 21, 2006
The fact remains that what people critisize Michael for is required of a woman in the world today.

People harrass Michael for his plastic surgeries, when millions upon millions of women get the same thing done to them daily. They get nose jobs, breast implants, put on make up, botox injections, etc etc. No one ever comments about how weird or freakish that is, do they?

The same goes for Michael having a fondness for children. If a woman was in the same position as Michael, that is, let kids stay at her house, play games with them, allows them to sleep over, had a never ending wish to adopt kids etc, society would applaud her for the work she has done for children. It's so rediculous that in the world today a man cannot show any affection for children other than his own without being labelled a pedophile.

Society as a whole needs therapy, because what's perfectly normal for a woman is frowned upon for a man. How did the world get like this?
Sadie

India

#56 Aug 21, 2006
jam wrote:
The fact remains that what people critisize Michael for is required of a woman in the world today.
People harrass Michael for his plastic surgeries, when millions upon millions of women get the same thing done to them daily. They get nose jobs, breast implants, put on make up, botox injections, etc etc. No one ever comments about how weird or freakish that is, do they?
The same goes for Michael having a fondness for children. If a woman was in the same position as Michael, that is, let kids stay at her house, play games with them, allows them to sleep over, had a never ending wish to adopt kids etc, society would applaud her for the work she has done for children. It's so rediculous that in the world today a man cannot show any affection for children other than his own without being labelled a pedophile.
Society as a whole needs therapy, because what's perfectly normal for a woman is frowned upon for a man. How did the world get like this?
I agree.
Michael wasn't always labelled a pedophile, think back to the days of Emanuelle Lewis, when his nose was almost all natural, he was still black, around the thriller era, he was seen as a normal, child loving, charitable guy. But as soon as the plastic surgery kicked in, and his vitiligo condition begun to show, he was suddenly classed as a freak, it was almost as if because his face looked different he MUST have abused children.
If he still looked as he did back then he wouldnt have got anywhere near as much abuse about the allegations.
I dont understand why people wont just let him move on, and live whats left of his life with his children, he has been proven not guilty, that should have been an end to it, but to this day people still ramble on about it, and have this ongoing hatred for him.
jam

Sydney, Australia

#57 Aug 21, 2006
Sadie wrote:
<quoted text>
I agree.
Michael wasn't always labelled a pedophile, think back to the days of Emanuelle Lewis, when his nose was almost all natural, he was still black, around the thriller era, he was seen as a normal, child loving, charitable guy. But as soon as the plastic surgery kicked in, and his vitiligo condition begun to show, he was suddenly classed as a freak, it was almost as if because his face looked different he MUST have abused children.

If he still looked as he did back then he wouldnt have got anywhere near as much abuse about the allegations.
I dont understand why people wont just let him move on, and live whats left of his life with his children, he has been proven not guilty, that should have been an end to it, but to this day people still ramble on about it, and have this ongoing hatred for him.
Michael Jackson is a controversial person in society. You either love him or hate him. This is the way it is and it is the way it always will be. There will be haters and their will be fans. The fact remains that at the end of the day, he will be remembered for his exceptional entertainment, and not for his personal life. Most of the haters have never truly experienced any kind of Michael Jackson entertainment and therefore don't understand the musical genius he is. Oh well, they are the ones missing out in my opinion.
Viola MJ Fan

Schwäbisch Gmünd, Germany

#58 Aug 21, 2006
Hey,
are you ok? You are all stupid people. You don´t know Michael Jackson, but you treat him as an criminal.
You all have no brain.
Michael Jackson is a very nice and lovely man. He only want´s to help. So shut up
Michael Jackson is the King of Pop 4ever!!!!
Krisi

Wissen, Germany

#59 Aug 21, 2006
Michael Jackson ... the KING OF POP for ever !
Germany 21.08.06
RealityAwaits

United States

#60 Aug 21, 2006
Michael Jackson....PEDERAST forevermore!
His time in prison or assylum is coming soon.
Elizondo

Mexico

#61 Sep 3, 2006
Send MJ to Mexico and we put him with Pablo who like girlyman. MJ is girlyman.
MICHAEL I WANT YOU BACK

UK

#62 Jan 14, 2014
Michael.com e back.you are the sweetest and most wonderful person.and an incredible human being
There is only one word for people as sweet as Michael.an angel.we love you Michaelx
Octopus

Albany, NY

#63 Jan 14, 2014
And it looks like Michael is indeed staying away because he is still dead.

But whatever, Donna.

You say you work?

Your floon ways are really disturbing being that you are digging up eight year old threads. Wow.

I thought the cushion thing was bad but you are really beyond ever being sane.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 3
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Michael Jackson Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Paul McCartney fights to get back his songs 10 hr Pliez 200
MJ hater trolls 17 hr persephone 3
One of MJ's "special friends" disclosed on MJ's... (Jul '13) Jul 12 Justice 125
zionist jew conspiracy against MJ Jul 8 Pop Tart- 2
Michael Jackson had semen stains from other mal... (Sep '12) Jul 7 Justice 1,877
News Elvis Presley Eclipses Michael Jackson (Jul '09) Jun '16 love 53,065
News Who's the King, Michael Jackson, Elvis Presley,... (Dec '09) Jun '16 love 7,215
More from around the web