Profile of a Pedophile: Does Michael Jackson fit?

Dec 9, 2008 | Posted by: Evil Kathy | Full story: crime.about.com

Pedophiles can be anyone -- old or young, rich or poor, educated or uneducated, non-professional or professional, and of any race. However, pedophiles often demonstrate similar characteristics, but these are merely indicators and it should not be assumed that individuals with these characteristics are pedophiles. But knowledge of these characteristics coupled with questionable behavior can be used as an alert that someone may be a pedophile.

[The part about Stockholm Syndrome is VERY interesting indeed... -ek.]

Comments
63,941 - 63,960 of 64,257 Comments Last updated Jun 28, 2014
persephone

Mountain View, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#66920
Sep 24, 2013
 

Judged:

4

4

4

ERIC CARTMAN wrote:
And who's job is it to teach children about sex. Michael jacksons? No. How would anyone of You think think if your brother or neighbor handed your child the book the joy of sex. The karma sultra. Everything you always wanted to know about sex but were afraid to ask. or a playboy mag ? My guess would be. not to happy. Then why is it okay for a self apointed educator pop singer who claimed to be a virgin up to his middle 20s to talk to children who he wasn't related to whatsoever about sex?
Books like that are available at the public library and bookstores; there are no rules preventing teenagers from looking at such books in either location.
ERIC CARTMAN

Olympia, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#66921
Sep 24, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Once again avoiding my question. Lol.---- What I expected

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#66922
Sep 24, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

ERIC CARTMAN wrote:
Once again avoiding my question. Lol.---- What I expected
Pedophone also won't answer why a gawky teenager would be in the bedroom when a naked man walks from his shower into it.

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#66923
Sep 24, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

persephone wrote:
<quoted text> Absolutely ridiculous to imply that an adult being honest and forthright about the reality of STDs is 'inappropriate' behavior.
*sniff, sniff*

I smell NAMBLA.

A grown man is not the person who should be showing and child a book filled with graphic images of men and women to an unrelated child, and then telling the child about STD's.

When I was in school, my parents had to sign a release form in order for me to attend sex education, which was done under carefully supervised circumstances.

“Depravity abounds...”

Since: Mar 13

Winter Park, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#66926
Sep 25, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

1

persephone wrote:
<quoted text>Are you able to concede that it's possible to think MJ was innocent without always attributing it to celebrity worship?
Oh well sure. But see I was talking with FOREVER MICHAEL and those comments were directly for them.

Are you saying there isn't any celebrity worship going on in FOREVER's head and that they are using logical and rational thought (untainted by emotion) to arrive at the conclusion that MJ was innocent?

See it really hurts the credibility of non-worshiping MJ defenders when you have a loon like FOREVER making it seems like all his defenders are just nuts.
ERIC CARTMAN

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#66927
Sep 25, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

I also hope the verdict goes in favor of AEG and not the jacksons. I am not on either side with this case but the family doesn't deserve a billion dollars niether
persephone

Mountain View, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#66928
Sep 25, 2013
 

Judged:

3

2

2

Len is Disgusted wrote:
<quoted text>
Pedophone also won't answer why a gawky teenager would be in the bedroom when a naked man walks from his shower into it.
What is this obsession about naked men and showers and teenagers?

Normal healthy adults shouldn't be this obsessed with the subject of nudity.
persephone

Mountain View, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#66929
Sep 25, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Len is Disgusted wrote:
<quoted text>
*sniff, sniff*
I smell NAMBLA.
A grown man is not the person who should be showing and child a book filled with graphic images of men and women to an unrelated child, and then telling the child about STD's.
When I was in school, my parents had to sign a release form in order for me to attend sex education, which was done under carefully supervised circumstances.
Do you really think that teenagers can't and don't find sex education in all sorts of venues, from public libraries, to books in other people's homes, not to mention what's on TV?
persephone

Mountain View, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#66930
Sep 25, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

TwistedHubby wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh well sure. But see I was talking with FOREVER MICHAEL and those comments were directly for them.
Are you saying there isn't any celebrity worship going on in FOREVER's head and that they are using logical and rational thought (untainted by emotion) to arrive at the conclusion that MJ was innocent?
See it really hurts the credibility of non-worshiping MJ defenders when you have a loon like FOREVER making it seems like all his defenders are just nuts.
I've been accused of being a pedophile and a member of NAMBLA by haters when they apparently run out of any solid arguments.

“Brevity is the soule of wit”

Since: May 09

USA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#66931
Sep 25, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

persephony wrote:
<quoted text> I've been accused of being a pedophile and a member of NAMBLA by haters when
You've been called that because of your vehement support of acts of pedophilia, Jugsy.
persephone

Mountain View, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#66932
Sep 25, 2013
 

Judged:

4

4

4

ERIC CARTMAN wrote:
Once again avoiding my question. Lol.---- What I expected
I did answer your question, but apparently you're just too dense to grasp it.

I don't see what's so terrible about a situation in which a teenager probably asked about sex and STDs, and MJ had a book which told the truth about possible consequences.

“Evolution is fab!”

Since: Nov 12

Deep Space 9, Alpha Quadrant

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#66933
Sep 25, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

1

persephone wrote:
<quoted text> Except that he wasn't a stranger to the boy, it was in the privacy of his own home in which the boy was a guest, it was a book which by no stretch of the imagination could be construed as 'erotic'; the book probably contained valuable information about the realities of the human sexual experience and the diseases which can result from it.
Leave to to a clueless hater to come up with a preposterous scenario in which viewing an anatomical illustration in a book is 'inappropriate' for a teenager.
Dear child hater,

Is your celebrity worshipping obsession with that hideous looking freak (Wacko) so bad that you can't even bring yourself to accept that he was wrong to show an unrelated young boy images of men and women's genitals?

Just what is the big deal? Do you have this image of pristine perfection in your head when it comes to that dead freak? Does it really affect your life so much that you can't even accept he did wrong when he did do wrong?

“Evolution is fab!”

Since: Nov 12

Deep Space 9, Alpha Quadrant

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#66934
Sep 25, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

2

Pishpash1234 wrote:
<quoted text>
The book depicted several nude men and women according to Corey. Why can you not fit the puzzle?
This is the same man who was supposedly regressed - you use this to excuse why he slept with boys night after night. You then excuse him for collecting child erotica and photographs of boys he bedded. AND now you excuse him for showing a boy graphic and inappropriate content in a sex-related book. Which man relives his child-hood teaching little boys sex education? You contradict yourself constantly.
Adding up his past suspicious behaviour, how can you not see the blatant red flags with him showing a young pre-teen boy a graphic book? Only MJ fans can be this dense
Great point, Pishpash. Were meant to believe that Wacko Jacko was this recessed man who was stuck in some kind of childlike state and slept with young boys because he felt a young boy himself. But showing a book featuring men and women's genitalia to young boy doesn't sound at all like childlike behaviour to me.

“Evolution is fab!”

Since: Nov 12

Deep Space 9, Alpha Quadrant

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#66935
Sep 25, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

2

persephone wrote:
<quoted text> And do you think books with anatomical illustrations are pornographic?
Dear Herbert from Family Guy,

Dig deep inside that miserable child hating brain of yours and try to remember when you were a young boy.

Children (especially young boys) can find even seminaked images of adults in an erotic way. It's not uncommon for young boys to look through catalogues featuring female models displaying lingerie & underwear.

Do you think by using fancy words such as "anatomical illustrations" it makes it better? I can just see your court room crap now. No your honour, I didn't show that boy images of men's penis, it was a book featuring anatomical illustrations.

Next you'll be telling us that that book Wacko show to Corey Feldman had fluffy pink bunnies on the cover and that made it better, right?

“Evolution is fab!”

Since: Nov 12

Deep Space 9, Alpha Quadrant

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#66936
Sep 25, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

1

persephone wrote:
<quoted text> Books like that are available at the public library and bookstores; there are no rules preventing teenagers from looking at such books in either location.
Really, child hater? I find it hard to believe that a minor could walk into a library and walk out with a sexually graphic book without a parent. After all, your country censors the butt cracks of TV program shown after the watershed and even once banned a children's book (Where's Waldo) because it had a small picture of boobs in it.
persephone

Mountain View, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#66937
Sep 25, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

Butterballs wrote:
<quoted text>
Great point, Pishpash. Were meant to believe that Wacko Jacko was this recessed man who was stuck in some kind of childlike state and slept with young boys because he felt a young boy himself. But showing a book featuring men and women's genitalia to young boy doesn't sound at all like childlike behaviour to me.
Showing a teenage male a book with information on STDs can also be seen as a way of giving honest information on the subject, nothing more.
persephone

Mountain View, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#66938
Sep 25, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

Butterballs wrote:
<quoted text>
Really, child hater? I find it hard to believe that a minor could walk into a library and walk out with a sexually graphic book without a parent. After all, your country censors the butt cracks of TV program shown after the watershed and even once banned a children's book (Where's Waldo) because it had a small picture of boobs in it.
Sex manuals and clinical books on sex are available in the public library. Even if they don't check them out, a teenager certainly can find them and look at them.

“Evolution is fab!”

Since: Nov 12

Deep Space 9, Alpha Quadrant

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#66939
Sep 25, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

1

Len is Disgusted wrote:
<quoted text>
*sniff, sniff*
I smell NAMBLA.
A grown man is not the person who should be showing and child a book filled with graphic images of men and women to an unrelated child, and then telling the child about STD's.
When I was in school, my parents had to sign a release form in order for me to attend sex education, which was done under carefully supervised circumstances.
Browsing this site http://sexetc.org/states/arizona/

It is required in multiple states such as Arizona for schoolchildren to have their parents permission to be educated on STDs.

So, even if that didn't apply in whatever location Wacko showed Corey that book, he Michael Jackson, the non-sex educational teacher, was never in any position to show such a book or discuss such things with a minor. He may have even broke the law by doing so.

“VITILIGO”

Since: Jun 10

IS A BIOTCH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#66940
Sep 25, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

persephone wrote:
<quoted text> Sex manuals and clinical books on sex are available in the public library. Even if they don't check them out, a teenager certainly can find them and look at them.
So what if they can? Just like so what if they look at porn on the internet? Just like, if they want a little wank, why shouldn't they go right ahead?
Why can't you begin to understand that teenagers do not need and should not have the interference or intervention of unrelated and unqualified adult males when exploring these things?

I'll tell you this from the perspective of a mother with teenage sons - if any adult male had ever taken it upon themselves to engage in viewing porn with, discussing masturbation with, showing books of genitalia to, talking about sex with any of my boys, their names would be spread around this neighbourhood faster than I can say 'your thinking is skewed you celebrity worshipping excuser'.

“VITILIGO”

Since: Jun 10

IS A BIOTCH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#66941
Sep 25, 2013
 

Judged:

3

2

2

Oh yeah, PerseSledge, that includes their own father. If I came home on night and he was sitting on the sofa encouraging the boys to have a little jerk to images of women with their legs akimbo, he'd have been out on his ear.
There are certain rights of passage that belong exclusively to teenagers, and exploring their sexuality is one of them. Formal sex education aside, the rest of it is something between them and their peers, not them and their perverts.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••
•••
•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••