But you have proven that you are a true hater by the hateful language you use towards people who may have been possible abuse victims -- correct?<quoted text> Only a deluded hater would equate that showing someone an anatomical illustration of STDs is an example of 'grooming' behavior.
You really should ask yourself just why you have such a strong need to respond to me with such lengthy, rambling posts.
Also -- how can you think it's appropriate for a grown man to start showing a book that showed men and women's private parts to an unrelated child --?
You are a very troubled and suspicious person -- correct?
Also -- if you think I am deluded for possibly believing that MJ was showing the child that book for the reason of grooming then why do you not prove me wrong --? I have read page after page after page which has been compiled by experts in the field of pedophilia -- yes? And one thing they say is pedophiles often show images of nudity to children for that sole purpose of grooming -- yes?
Also -- you should ask yourself why you have been you for years and years on the thread of the profile of a pedophile if you believe that the suspicious MJ was completely innocent of the crimes he was accused of -- yes? It should be like water off a ducks back to you if you truly believe he was innocent -- yes? But instead you use hateful language and have some kind of vendetta against children instead of trying to engage in a friendly discussion and try to put factual points across -- yes?