Profile of a Pedophile: Does Michael ...

Profile of a Pedophile: Does Michael Jackson fit?

There are 64668 comments on the crime.about.com story from Dec 9, 2008, titled Profile of a Pedophile: Does Michael Jackson fit?. In it, crime.about.com reports that:

Pedophiles can be anyone -- old or young, rich or poor, educated or uneducated, non-professional or professional, and of any race. However, pedophiles often demonstrate similar characteristics, but these are merely indicators and it should not be assumed that individuals with these characteristics are pedophiles. But knowledge of these characteristics coupled with questionable behavior can be used as an alert that someone may be a pedophile.

[The part about Stockholm Syndrome is VERY interesting indeed... -ek.]

Join the discussion below, or Read more at crime.about.com.

“VITILIGO”

Since: Jun 10

IS A BIOTCH

#65620 Jan 14, 2013
Morisson wrote:
<quoted text>how long have you been here now? Three years? Four? Your medieval home of the brave is falling apart and still you worry about M.J.'s nose? go kill yourself. It should be easy to find a gun in your retarted 'land of the free'.
Thank you for that message of love, Van Der Valk.

You may now take your finger out of the dyke, stick it back up your arssehole and spin on it.

“Brevity is the soule of wit”

Since: May 09

USA

#65625 Jan 19, 2013
ChasUGC wrote:
So, don't pretend that you haterz care about children by hating on a dead pop star. Your constant rants against MJ are solely racist in nature and you care absolutely nothing about protecting children.
here complaining about a dead pop star.
Stop your lying you racist haterz!!
You care NOTHING for children.
Gee thanks for the sermon, pedophile supporter.

“Brevity is the soule of wit”

Since: May 09

USA

#65627 Jan 19, 2013
ChasUGC wrote:
<quoted text>

Especially when, there are innocent children in the present day being slaughtered by crazies with semi-automatic guns and rifles.
Especially when, there are innocent children, in the present day, being murdered by crazy gang members with semi automatic guns, in drive-by shootings.

im down, because you are a jealous racist.
You care absolutely nothing about children. So,stop lying to yourself and everyone else.
Still with the empty hyperbole. It shows you cannot back up your statements except with wild exaggerations, Chazzie.

Typical of you.

“Brevity is the soule of wit”

Since: May 09

USA

#65632 Jan 19, 2013
ChasUGC wrote:
<quoted text>
Anything that disrupts your racist agenda towards Michael Jackson is just empty hyperbole to you.
Yep, the children being slaughtered with semi-automatic guns is just empty gainst MJ.
Calling someone who disapproves of your penchant for pedos a racist is a cheap tactic, little man. But I guess dumb people need an angle, don't you?
I think it may be time for you to look up the word and try not to throw around your copious piles of epithets, Cazzie.

You may now go back to worshiping your dead pedophile.

“VITILIGO”

Since: Jun 10

IS A BIOTCH

#65633 Jan 20, 2013
ChasUGC wrote:
<quoted text>
Thank you for explaining how vile and disgusting haterz are.
Take a page out of Hitler and spin on it.
Haterz are the vile filth that permeates rational society.
You think I should find a gun and go kill myself with it too, do you?
Wouldn't God be upset if I threw away my precious gift of life? Oh, and wouldn't he be doubly upset if I did it on the say so of one of his faithful followers?

And drop the Hitler reference if you want any credibility, Chassy. Wise men know about Godwin's law.
Rickey Bobby

North Kingstown, RI

#65634 Jan 20, 2013
The last time ChasUgly used his uzi was on Chou Chou, bent over the pulpit.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#65635 Jan 20, 2013
Len is Disgusted wrote:
<quoted text>
Not-so-brilliant one, I read the legal documents, available at the Santa Barbara County website. I leave the nonsense to you.
On Dec 20, 1993, Jackson submitted to a 25-minute strip search.[28] Jordan Chandler had reportedly given police a description of Jackson's intimate parts, and the strip search revealed that Jordan had correctly described patchy-coloured skin of Jackson's buttocks, correctly described short pubic hair, and correctly described pink and brown markings on Jackson's testicles, however Jordan was wrong about Jackson being circumcised, though an erect penis can look circumcised, especially to a thirteen-year-old, and the doctor's examining Jackson during the strip search themselves had trouble telling if Jackson was circumcised[28]

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#65636 Jan 20, 2013
Len is Disgusted wrote:
<quoted text>
Not-so-brilliant one, I read the legal documents, available at the Santa Barbara County website. I leave the nonsense to you.
On Dec 20, 1993, Jackson submitted to a 25-minute strip search.[28] Jordan Chandler had reportedly given police a description of Jackson's intimate parts, and the strip search revealed that Jordan had correctly described patchy-coloured skin of Jackson's buttocks, correctly described short pubic hair, and correctly described pink and brown markings on Jackson's testicles, however Jordan was wrong about Jackson being circumcised, though an erect penis can look circumcised, especially to a thirteen-year-old, and the doctor's examining Jackson during the strip search themselves had trouble telling if Jackson was circumcised[28]

Jordan had reportedly drawn accurate pictures of a dark spot on Jackson’s penis that were sealed in an envelope and postmarked on a postal meter before the strip search photographs were taken.[33] Sergeant Gary Spiegel, the sheriff’s photographer, claimed to have seen the dark spot at the bottom of Jackson's penis, which was only visible when Jackson was asked to lift his penis (simulating an erection).[34] In a declaration under penalty of perjury, District Attorney Thomas W. Sneddon also confirmed that the strip search photographs "revealed a mark on the right side" of Jackson's penis "at about the same relative location as the dark blemish located by Jordan Chandler" in his drawing of Jackson's erect penis.[35] Moneytruthy (talk) 02:58, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
The Credit Angel Can Help

Schenectady, NY

#65637 Jan 20, 2013
Michael Joseph Jackson had to stand nude in front of Tom Sneddon while his men put on their rubber examination gloves and photographed Michael Joseph Jackson's filthy buttocks and spotted, odor ridden penis and cow sack. Of course, Jordan Chandler's drawing matched Michael Joseph Jackson's soiled member of dried urine. The smell nearly made Mr Tom Sneddon gag. He got a pay raise shortly after the disgusting strip search of Michael Joseph Jackson's dirty, filthy nude body inside the walls of Never Land Ranch where maids and other employees looked on.

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

#65638 Jan 20, 2013
ChasUGC wrote:
<quoted text>
Like you really care about the children you racist hater.
It is just one issue after another, showing your hatred and contempt for Michael Jackson.
Especially when, there are innocent children in the present day being slaughtered by crazies with semi-automatic guns and rifles.
Especially when, there are innocent children, in the present day, being murdered by crazy gang members with semi automatic guns, in drive-by shootings.
No, you care more about MJ's vitiligo, MJ's zoo animals. MJ's bed sheets, MJ's nose, MJ's past marriages, MJ's sexual orientation, MJ's trials, MJ's children's parents.
You care nothing about children. Your hatred is focused solely on MJ, and MJ alone.
You are just a racist and you can't stand that a black man could be so famous, so you have to tear him down, because you are a jealous racist.
You care absolutely nothing about children. So,stop lying to yourself and everyone else.
I regard violence against children to be heinous. This includes molesting them, the way your idol Michael did. I also regard it heinous when his rabid fans give him a free pass because he could sing and dance. His actions were exerable.

Hating pedophila doesn't make me a racist, f'loon. Another pedophile, named Jerry Sandusky, is going to rot in prison for the rest of his life, which he deserves, and he's white. I'm glad he'll die there.

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

#65639 Jan 20, 2013
Patricktruth wrote:
<quoted text>
On Dec 20, 1993, Jackson submitted to a 25-minute strip search.[28] Jordan Chandler had reportedly given police a description of Jackson's intimate parts, and the strip search revealed that Jordan had correctly described patchy-coloured skin of Jackson's buttocks, correctly described short pubic hair, and correctly described pink and brown markings on Jackson's testicles, however Jordan was wrong about Jackson being circumcised, though an erect penis can look circumcised, especially to a thirteen-year-old, and the doctor's examining Jackson during the strip search themselves had trouble telling if Jackson was circumcised[28]
Do you have a link to this? Is it in a legal document? Ironically, f'loons don't understand foreskin usually pulls back, during an erection. If the doctor examining Michael had a difficult time, themselves, figuring whether or not he had foreskin, then I can see why a thirteen-year-old boy with no previous sexual experience would have trouble understanding that, too.

However, with or without foreskin, the child's drawing and description were so accurate, the D.A. was willing to introduce all of the material in court. The defense attorney, on the other hand, was absolutely frantic about keeping it OUT of court. Not once in his rebuttal did he say the child's drawing and description didn't match the photos.

Nonetheless, this is, again, the link to the D.A.'s reasons for introducing the evidence.

http://www.sbscpublicaccess.org/docs/ctdocs/0...

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#65642 Jan 21, 2013
Len is Disgusted wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you have a link to this? Is it in a legal document? Ironically, f'loons don't understand foreskin usually pulls back, during an erection. If the doctor examining Michael had a difficult time, themselves, figuring whether or not he had foreskin, then I can see why a thirteen-year-old boy with no previous sexual experience would have trouble understanding that, too.
However, with or without foreskin, the child's drawing and description were so accurate, the D.A. was willing to introduce all of the material in court. The defense attorney, on the other hand, was absolutely frantic about keeping it OUT of court. Not once in his rebuttal did he say the child's drawing and description didn't match the photos.
Nonetheless, this is, again, the link to the D.A.'s reasons for introducing the evidence.
http://www.sbscpublicaccess.org/docs/ctdocs/0...
It's in money talk magazine paraphrasing the court documents ( 2012) it was submitted to to the editors of the mj Wikipedia article . The editors declined to put it in . I know not Germaine here , but the editors also declined info that mj self proclaimed himself " KOP"

“Evolution is fab!”

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#65643 Jan 21, 2013
Patricktruth wrote:
<quoted text>
It's in money talk magazine paraphrasing the court documents ( 2012) it was submitted to to the editors of the mj Wikipedia article . The editors declined to put it in . I know not Germaine here , but the editors also declined info that mj self proclaimed himself " KOP"
I wouldn't take too much notice of Wikipedia. It can be written and edited by absolutely anybody.

F'loon's can go there and edit it to make Wacko Jacko look good and to make his accusers look bad.

The circumcision claim is actually quite funny because it comes from a deleted smoking gun page, which was deleted several years back, and can now only be found on on the way back machine.

http://web.archive.org/web/20090419022809/htt...

Yes F'LOON'S are actually using a page that doesn't officially exist....LOL.

It also contains references from a f'loon called Charles Thomson, who let's just say isn't exactly an independent unbiased source.

Judged:

22

22

22

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“Evolution is fab!”

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#65644 Jan 21, 2013
Len is Disgusted wrote:
<quoted text>
However, with or without foreskin, the child's drawing and description were so accurate, the D.A. was willing to introduce all of the material in court. The defense attorney, on the other hand, was absolutely frantic about keeping it OUT of court. Not once in his rebuttal did he say the child's drawing and description didn't match the photos.
Nonetheless, this is, again, the link to the D.A.'s reasons for introducing the evidence.
http://www.sbscpublicaccess.org/docs/ctdocs/0...
Not only did Thomas Sneddon declare that Jordy Chandler's description of MJ's penis was a match, but also the lead investigator from the Los Angeles Police Department, Bill Dworin confirmed on a television documentary that Jordy's description did cooperate with the photographs of Michael Jacksons genitals.

Here's what he said.... "He described Jackson's genitalia it was unique because of the discolouration. And then we obtained a search warrant to photograph Jackson to cooperate, what the child had said. When photographing Jackson's genitalia, it did cooperate. In other words, the boy saw Jackson naked does that mean Jackson molested the child? No, but it adds to the credibility of the child".

http://youtu.be/panosN01Hrk

I don't think he would have said it cooperated, if it contained any discrepancies like a circumcision error.

Judged:

22

22

22

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#65645 Jan 21, 2013
Butterballs wrote:
<quoted text>
Not only did Thomas Sneddon declare that Jordy Chandler's description of MJ's penis was a match, but also the lead investigator from the Los Angeles Police Department, Bill Dworin confirmed on a television documentary that Jordy's description did cooperate with the photographs of Michael Jacksons genitals.
Here's what he said.... "He described Jackson's genitalia it was unique because of the discolouration. And then we obtained a search warrant to photograph Jackson to cooperate, what the child had said. When photographing Jackson's genitalia, it did cooperate. In other words, the boy saw Jackson naked does that mean Jackson molested the child? No, but it adds to the credibility of the child".
http://youtu.be/panosN01Hrk
I don't think he would have said it cooperated, if it contained any discrepancies like a circumcision error.
Well said

Judged:

22

22

22

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Internet Bully

Sydney, Australia

#65647 Jan 21, 2013
Little Suzie wrote:
Filed Under: Who Cares Now
How appropriate.

Judged:

17

17

17

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
mjlover4life

Fremont, CA

#65650 Jan 21, 2013
^^^^^^^^^^
All the comments left by Little Suzie are lies

Do not listen to her she is a sick hater.

Judged:

20

19

19

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

Since: Nov 11

Chicago, IL

#65652 Jan 21, 2013
Len is Disgusted wrote:
<quoted text>
Chas, you're out to lunch, in regards to the so-called exaggeration of the number of times Michael slept with little boys. He slept one-on-one with Brett Barnes, for about 465 nights! That's just one child.
and where were his parents those 465 nights???? I have an answer but it is not pretty an most likely is the truth.......... they were busy counting th money an partying with the money that Jacko gave them. Man some times the answer is right under your nose but as in most child abuse it is one or both parents that look the other way. Toss in drugs for good measure also. Even IF he was jus trying to relive hijs lost child hood an no sex was involved, was it appropriate for his parents to allow thi

Judged:

18

18

18

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#65655 Jan 21, 2013
Internet Bully wrote:
<quoted text>
Wake up Little Suzie.
says the man who does not know who he is...who are ya today chadrow?

Judged:

18

18

18

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Payrivk

Bronx, NY

#65656 Jan 21, 2013
Little Suzie wrote:
<quoted text>
Prove it, hypocrite,
How could you have the name mjlover4life when clearly you are an obsessed hater?
It Should be obsessed hater4life
You are a liar . Lmp never discussed there " sex life " your own tube posting states that a book is allegedly stating Lisa said your bs quotes . Lisa has always been respectful to her father ( the bigger king ) she would never say mj is the king of everything . Howard stern repeatedly asked about there sex life and she dodged it . Your gay clip proves nothing . If your gay or straight does it mean you like every gay proposal ( obv not ) lastly " the music and the madness " mj was obsessed with elvis ( which is obvious from his numerous paintings ( even one over his bed on Neverland ) and statements . FYI the book was incorrect too. Mj may have been tricked into buying a rolls Royce to compete with elvis, but he has never ever sold more records . GWR 2013 " elvis is the biggest selling solo artist in history " you fail mj floon

Judged:

18

18

17

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Michael Jackson Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Emotional Pilgrimage To Neverland 2 hr Monica 1
News 150 Best Selling Artists in the World! (Dec '08) 4 hr RICK 12,889
Michael Jackson's visit in Gabon explained via ... 6 hr BadMan84 1
Why Are MJ Fans So Hardheaded? 6 hr BadMan84 5
Poll Police find child porn on Gene Simmons computer!! Mon Len is Disgusted 2
Was Michael Jackson Mon Len is Disgusted 5
Poll Reasons why MJ'S fan's have left this forum= Mon Len is Disgusted 6
More from around the web