The lies of Tom Mesasaraeu
Posted in the Michael Jackson Forum
#1 Jan 23, 2014
1) Jimmy Safechuck's wedding
2) The insurance company paid the settlement (contradicted by MJ's own words to Martin Bashir)
3) His contention that he had witnesses lined up to say Jordy was lying if Jordy ever took the stand.
Please add more to dispel floons.
#2 Jan 23, 2014
Floon lies on vindicate mj debunked......
1. Evan and Jordan’s background as the screenwriters of “Robin Hood: Men in Tights”.
And? Their history of screenwriting means nothing. If the suggestion is that being screenwriters means they could have easily fabricated a believable story of Jacko (a man who'd been referred to as a pedophile and accused of pedophiliac behviors since at least 1991) molesting a boy, well, that's nothing more than propaganda and a silly illogicality. There is no evidence that being a writer means one could fabricate a believable story away from paper. If this line of logic could be deemed feasible, they would also have to be actors as well. Jordie Chandler, after all, convinced several therapists (including highly intelligent false child abuse expert, Dr. Richard Gardner), social workers, detectives, and prosecutors that his abuse at the hands of Michael Jackson had occurred, right down to describing Jacko's genitalia. Bravo to screenwriters, then!
In a nutshell, this is a non-point.
2. Evan’s jealously of Jordan spending more time with MJ than him., and his anger at MJ over being rejected as a 50/50 partner in MJ’s film company.
Evan Chandler being jealous of a man spending time with his son is a moot point. Jordie is Evan's son and Evan being jealous would actually be the proper response to the situation. If the implication is that Evan's jealousy caused Evan to fabricate a story of Jacko sexually abusing Jordie, that is woefully simplistic. It doesn't factor in the reality that whatever Jordie Chandler described to police, psychologists, social workers, and prosecutors resulted in an 8-figure, multi-million dollar settlement. Jealousy can be considered a reasonable impetus for action but it does not adequately explain how and why the action was successful, the success being tied to Jordie's statements to the aforementioned group of individuals.
The same response is warranted for this film company business, assuming, for argument's sake, that it is true: it makes for a decent argument explaining causation of an action but does not explain how and why the action was successful, in that whatever Jordie Chandler described to police, psychologists, social workers, and prosecutors led to a massive settlement of claims.
3. The taped telephone call between Evan and Dave Schwartz.
Another non-point. The implication here is that that taped phone conversation revealed nefarious intentions on Evan Chandler's part. It did not. The phone call was recorded under direction of Anthony Pellicano and badly, badly redacted by Pellicano. There was no admission from Evan that he had a 'plan' to make Jacko pay for 'being mean', which is why fans mention the taped conversation.
To note, what appeared in Mary Fischer's article was taken out of context.
Most interesting is that the conversation is good for Evan (and highly revealing about Jacko) to MJ Realists and bad for Evan for Jacko fans. This dual interpretation ultimately means that the conversations are neutral.
4. Evan coercing Jordan to admit to being abused right after a dental procedure, when Jordan was still heavily sedated.
There's no evidence Jordie Chandler was ever given sodium amytal. That said, the implication here is that Jordie was suggestible while under sedation, to the point that he could have been manipulated into saying he was abused by Michael Jackson. However, this does nothing to explain how Jordie Chandler was able to convince psychologists (including false child abuse expert Dr. Richard Gardner), social workers, police, and prosecutors that he had been molested and that these claims--including a detailed description of Jacko's spotty penis--resulted in a multimillion dollar settlement.
“Evolution is fab!”
Since: Nov 12
#5 Jan 29, 2014
Len has posted a legal document that shows that Thomas Mesereau made an absolutely pathetic attempted to mask Wacko's demerol drug addiction by trying to blame the blood spots that were found on his clothing (which contain nothing but demerol) on a nonexisting vitiligo treatment.
And floons think he was a trustworthy and honest defence lawyer.
Add your comments below
|Michael Jackson's doctor: 'I told the truth' (Aug '09)||2 hr||Pres Mr Donald J ...||392|
|zionist jew conspiracy against MJ (Jun '16)||7 hr||Space ace||61|
|Topix Toxic Troll is Alberton/Bobmoo||10 hr||Spotted Wee||1|
|Super F'loon Deborah Ffrench (Feb '10)||11 hr||Spotted Wee||126|
|MJ haters slander and illegal activity against ... (Aug '13)||14 hr||Spotted Wee||37|
|MJloser4life still repeating lies & hate||14 hr||Spotted Wee||1|
|What will become of Conrad Murray? (Oct '13)||14 hr||The Power Of Mast...||184|
Find what you want!
Search Michael Jackson Forum Now
Copyright © 2017 Topix LLC