Michael Jackson had semen stains from...

Since: Jul 13

Location hidden

#1321 Jul 29, 2013
MJFRIEND wrote:
Rosalinda there is nothing suspicious about male body fluids on someones mattress in the privacy of their home. Suspicion resides only in a sinister mind. There was no library of pornographic books. Michaels library of thousands of books on art, psycology, geography,and history was pulled apart in the search of porno material. Nothing was found except a very old collecters book of illustrations of boys depicting happiness and playing out doors this was a very old book I cant even tell you the year It was given to MIchael as a gift and signed by a female fan. Playboy magazines were found but not unusual for a single man to have in his home.
Do you even hear yourself? You believe your idol was a saint and that it's perfectly normal for him to have semen from the other males along with his on his mattress. There were only a few Playboys found and those were to get adolescent boys in a sexual mood if his child erotica books didn't work, they boys weren't gay and the Playboys weren't kept near his bed- instead the child erotica books were, along with a book of naked gay men in every possible homosexual position. He wasn't looking at the child erotica to see their facial expressions, if so why weren't they wearing CLOTHES! Child erotica is not art. Your comments are heinous.

Since: Jun 13

Fuquay Varina, NC

#1322 Jul 29, 2013
Yeah, if the boys looked at any porn, it was straight porn/nude books featuring adult females because most of the boys MJ messed with or befriended were straight anyway (Wade, Jordan, Gavin, Jimmy, Aaron, Feldman, etc.) When Wade was presented with the "art books" featuring boys and the gay porn, he was taken aback by this because he was never shown this by MJ but it was in MJ's possession.

Since: Jul 13

Location hidden

#1323 Jul 29, 2013
BadMan84 wrote:
Yeah, if the boys looked at any porn, it was straight porn/nude books featuring adult females because most of the boys MJ messed with or befriended were straight anyway (Wade, Jordan, Gavin, Jimmy, Aaron, Feldman, etc.) When Wade was presented with the "art books" featuring boys and the gay porn, he was taken aback by this because he was never shown this by MJ but it was in MJ's possession.
Exactly. He sometimes resorted to Playboys when trying to excite adolescent boys. Unfortunately, they ended up being personally invaded by MJ- emotionally and physically. Disgusting. F'loons desperately use the Playboy thing as their proof MJ was straight, which is a joke. And a damn shame, too. I mean, he could have had almost any woman on earth at one point in his life, instead he chose little boys? Freakshow if I ever saw one man! Of course come the 90's his selection of beautiful women would have been winding down as his one man circus show began and he started actually looking like a woman himself.

“Why can't you share your bed?”

Since: May 13

Canada

#1324 Jul 29, 2013
BadMan84 wrote:
Yeah, if the boys looked at any porn, it was straight porn/nude books featuring adult females because most of the boys MJ messed with or befriended were straight anyway (Wade, Jordan, Gavin, Jimmy, Aaron, Feldman, etc.) When Wade was presented with the "art books" featuring boys and the gay porn, he was taken aback by this because he was never shown this by MJ but it was in MJ's possession.
I'm encountering f'loons on Youtube saying Michael's art books were innocuous and are collected by non-pedophiles as well. The excuses never stops flowing for them.

Since: Jun 13

Fuquay Varina, NC

#1325 Jul 30, 2013
TripleH1976 wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm encountering f'loons on Youtube saying Michael's art books were innocuous and are collected by non-pedophiles as well. The excuses never stops flowing for them.
LOL they are that delusional. There's nothing "artistic" about those books, especially that one that's titled "Boys Will Be Boys"...

Since: Jul 13

Location hidden

#1327 Jul 30, 2013
MJFRIEND wrote:
I feel sorry for all of you. You all sound like you are discussing tabloid rumors and headlines. And one can feel the hate you have for a human being you never met, never spoke to , and never spent time with. Nor have any of you met Wade , aaron, Macauley, or any others. There,s alot you do not know.. Trust me. This is why Im hoping for another trial so Jacksons side can come out again in a court of law. Oh, and by the way folks, some of the names you rattle off, are not speaking kindly of Wade right now. Also, I would not use Jordy Chandlers name to defend your thinking right now. There's a few former friends of Jacksons preparing to issue statements to the press regarding Wade . Have a lovely day folks!
Since you mentioned Aaron Carter, what do you think about him being offered wine by MJ? & What do you think of MJ and him smoking weed together?

“Evolution is fab!”

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#1328 Jul 30, 2013
TripleH1976 wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm encountering f'loons on Youtube saying Michael's art books were innocuous and are collected by non-pedophiles as well. The excuses never stops flowing for them.
I've seen floons leave positive comments on Amazon and other sites on a book with the same title as "Boys Will Be Boys" which was actually published sometime in the early 2000 and not the NAMBLA recommended 60s version that Wacko Jacko owned. They all claim it contains no photos of naked boys and completely vindicates Michael of ever owning such material lol. Floons really are that stupid.

Since: Jul 13

Location hidden

#1329 Jul 30, 2013
Butterballs wrote:
<quoted text>
I've seen floons leave positive comments on Amazon and other sites on a book with the same title as "Boys Will Be Boys" which was actually published sometime in the early 2000 and not the NAMBLA recommended 60s version that Wacko Jacko owned. They all claim it contains no photos of naked boys and completely vindicates Michael of ever owning such material lol. Floons really are that stupid.
Lol, That just screams desperate to me. They truly believe that the likely pedophiles that visit Amazon to purchase those books are really going to care about their comments regarding another pedophile. They are beyond deluded.

Since: Jun 13

Fuquay Varina, NC

#1330 Jul 30, 2013
^ Deluded and out of touch.

Since: Jul 13

Location hidden

#1331 Jul 30, 2013
TripleH1976 wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm encountering f'loons on Youtube saying Michael's art books were innocuous and are collected by non-pedophiles as well. The excuses never stops flowing for them.
lmao!!! Same thing happened to me several times, you tube is f'loon central man. And naked kids are NOT art for f**k's sake! They make excuses for every damn thing, and they're all absurd. Nobody looks at naked kids as art except pedophiles. They say he was looking at facial expressions... then why the hell weren't they wearing clothes!!! He was such an obvious pedophile, most obvious of all time.

Since: Jul 13

Location hidden

#1332 Jul 30, 2013
Butterballs wrote:
<quoted text>
I've seen floons leave positive comments on Amazon and other sites on a book with the same title as "Boys Will Be Boys" which was actually published sometime in the early 2000 and not the NAMBLA recommended 60s version that Wacko Jacko owned. They all claim it contains no photos of naked boys and completely vindicates Michael of ever owning such material lol. Floons really are that stupid.
Yep, they really are that stupid! They've done scoured the internet defending a damn child molester. Even on Amazon, they go on every book against MJ and write bad reviews without even reading it. Then they rate pro MJ books 5 stars. They're idiots, to put it mildly.
persephone

Sunnyvale, CA

#1333 Jul 30, 2013
Butterballs wrote:
<quoted text>
I've seen floons leave positive comments on Amazon and other sites on a book with the same title as "Boys Will Be Boys" which was actually published sometime in the early 2000 and not the NAMBLA recommended 60s version that Wacko Jacko owned. They all claim it contains no photos of naked boys and completely vindicates Michael of ever owning such material lol. Floons really are that stupid.
Do you think that all depictions of nudity should always be viewed as erotic, regardless of the context?
persephone

Sunnyvale, CA

#1334 Jul 30, 2013
MJFRIEND wrote:
I feel sorry for all of you. You all sound like you are discussing tabloid rumors and headlines. And one can feel the hate you have for a human being you never met, never spoke to , and never spent time with. Nor have any of you met Wade , aaron, Macauley, or any others. There,s alot you do not know.. Trust me. This is why Im hoping for another trial so Jacksons side can come out again in a court of law. Oh, and by the way folks, some of the names you rattle off, are not speaking kindly of Wade right now. Also, I would not use Jordy Chandlers name to defend your thinking right now. There's a few former friends of Jacksons preparing to issue statements to the press regarding Wade . Have a lovely day folks!
I've heard that even people who don't particularly like MJ, are VERY skeptical and suspicious about Robson's sudden flip-flop. One hopes that no one else is swayed or intimidated by the power of AEG to join the Robson party of lies.

Since: Jul 13

Location hidden

#1335 Jul 30, 2013
persephone wrote:
<quoted text> Do you think that all depictions of nudity should always be viewed as erotic, regardless of the context?
Do you think NAMBLA recommended books are simply art? If so, I pray you don't have children or are anywhere near children.

Since: Jul 13

Location hidden

#1336 Jul 30, 2013
persephone wrote:
<quoted text> I've heard that even people who don't particularly like MJ, are VERY skeptical and suspicious about Robson's sudden flip-flop. One hopes that no one else is swayed or intimidated by the power of AEG to join the Robson party of lies.
Shame on you and anyone who calls a victim a liar.

An NFL Fan

“Brevity is the soule of wit”

Since: May 09

USA

#1337 Jul 30, 2013
persephony wrote:
<quoted text> I've heard that even people who don't particularly like MJ, are VERY skeptical and suspicious about Robson's shat no one else is swayed or intimidated by the power of AEG to join the Robson party of lies.
How many children 'lied' about you at YOUR trial?
rosalinda de la quatch

Sweden

#1338 Jul 30, 2013
persephone wrote:
<quoted text> Do you think that all depictions of nudity should always be viewed as erotic, regardless of the context?
Has it not occurred to you that people are questioning the books in question that MJ owned because they were recommended by pedophile organization of North America and that MJ himself had a thing for young boys Yes?

Also you seem to be the one who is sexualizing them YES? You have not come here and said that those books that MJ owned were in no way sexual yes? You are saying that some people [like those who sleep with boys] could view those books as a child erotica yes?

There is nudity as in the nudity of art yes? That usually involves fully grown adults or marble or concrete statues - yes? In no way in your statement did you ever refer to those books as art books correct? And nowhere on the front cover of those books were they ever referred to as art books correct?

Also if MJ truly cared and had respect for children he would not be collecting books that were made by a suspected pedophile - and as recommended by North American pedophile organization correct? Only somebody with shit-4-brains would disagree with my statement correct?

Since: Jul 13

Location hidden

#1340 Jul 30, 2013
MJFRIEND wrote:
Obviously many of you have not had access to the court documents. ALSO, to MJisguilty there is no proof that Wade is a victim. There are two many questions circling around him.. Wade was not abused in the way we all think of abuse. We think of an innocent and naeive child. Forced to participate in an horrendous activity. Wade hung out with a child hollywood crowd. Smoking pot drinking partying and so forth. Someone mentioned that WAde and others watched porn movies and that wade was shocked to find a gay porn magazine at michaels house. Red Flag right here : wouldnt these pictures seem familiar to him if he was doing this stuff as he claims with michael? Why would he be shocked? IM HOPING AN ATTORNIE PICKED UP ON THIS ONE? I,m hoping this goes to trial another win for michael.
Wrong. We've read court documents and applied common sense and have the decency to believe abuse victims. All of the nonsense you wrote in f'loon fantasy. All of it.

Since: Jul 13

Location hidden

#1341 Jul 30, 2013
MJFRIEND wrote:
Obviously many of you have not had access to the court documents. ALSO, to MJisguilty there is no proof that Wade is a victim. There are two many questions circling around him.. Wade was not abused in the way we all think of abuse. We think of an innocent and naeive child. Forced to participate in an horrendous activity. Wade hung out with a child hollywood crowd. Smoking pot drinking partying and so forth. Someone mentioned that WAde and others watched porn movies and that wade was shocked to find a gay porn magazine at michaels house. Red Flag right here : wouldnt these pictures seem familiar to him if he was doing this stuff as he claims with michael? Why would he be shocked? IM HOPING AN ATTORNIE PICKED UP ON THIS ONE? I,m hoping this goes to trial another win for michael.
Forgot to remind you, MJ smoked pot and drank and watched porn. Your comment is not only fantasy it's hypocritical, as fanatics typically are. Furthermore, you don't know if Robson was shocked or not, it's all perception and since you adamantly defend MJ no matter what the evidence is you'll believe any source that portrays him in as innocent. Instead of defending a perpetrator, you should research pedophile and child molester traits as well as the complexities of abuse victims. Robson is not lying. Have you even considered you might be wrong, in which case you're defending a child molester? Do you realize how hard it is for abuse victims to come to terms with being sexually molested? Obviously I believe MJ was guilty, but even if I didn't I'd never call a victim a liar. There's far too much evidence to the contrary. It's better to admit you've been wrong all along than it is to make excuses for someone who hurt so many people.

“Evolution is fab!”

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#1344 Jul 31, 2013
Pishpash1234 wrote:
<quoted text>
Lol, That just screams desperate to me. They truly believe that the likely pedophiles that visit Amazon to purchase those books are really going to care about their comments regarding another pedophile. They are beyond deluded.
Here's the 2004 version of "Boys Will Be Boys" on Amazon.

http://tinyurl.com/mrmlng5

Check out the dumb floon comments at the bottom of the page.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Michael Jackson Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Corey Haim said Michael Jackson assaulted him o... Sun Jake 32
News Quincy Jones Tapped for Michael Jackson, 'Man i... Jan 17 Pearl Jr 1
News Gay-porn filmmaker sues Fox over Jackson interview Jan 17 Jake 5
News Michael Jackson fan assaulted guard at Thriller... Jan 17 Jake 3
The true inventor of "Moonwalk"(dance)!!! (Apr '07) Jan 17 Jake 30
News The 50 best-selling albums of all time Jan 16 Jake 2
Michael Jackson's lover tells all (Jan '11) Jan 16 Jake 29
More from around the web