Michael Jackson had semen stains from other males on his bed

Posted in the Michael Jackson Forum

Comments (Page 59)

Showing posts 1,161 - 1,180 of1,766
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:

Since: Jul 13

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1321
Jul 29, 2013
 
MJFRIEND wrote:
Rosalinda there is nothing suspicious about male body fluids on someones mattress in the privacy of their home. Suspicion resides only in a sinister mind. There was no library of pornographic books. Michaels library of thousands of books on art, psycology, geography,and history was pulled apart in the search of porno material. Nothing was found except a very old collecters book of illustrations of boys depicting happiness and playing out doors this was a very old book I cant even tell you the year It was given to MIchael as a gift and signed by a female fan. Playboy magazines were found but not unusual for a single man to have in his home.
Do you even hear yourself? You believe your idol was a saint and that it's perfectly normal for him to have semen from the other males along with his on his mattress. There were only a few Playboys found and those were to get adolescent boys in a sexual mood if his child erotica books didn't work, they boys weren't gay and the Playboys weren't kept near his bed- instead the child erotica books were, along with a book of naked gay men in every possible homosexual position. He wasn't looking at the child erotica to see their facial expressions, if so why weren't they wearing CLOTHES! Child erotica is not art. Your comments are heinous.

Since: Jun 13

Wilson, NC

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1322
Jul 29, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

Yeah, if the boys looked at any porn, it was straight porn/nude books featuring adult females because most of the boys MJ messed with or befriended were straight anyway (Wade, Jordan, Gavin, Jimmy, Aaron, Feldman, etc.) When Wade was presented with the "art books" featuring boys and the gay porn, he was taken aback by this because he was never shown this by MJ but it was in MJ's possession.

Since: Jul 13

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1323
Jul 29, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

BadMan84 wrote:
Yeah, if the boys looked at any porn, it was straight porn/nude books featuring adult females because most of the boys MJ messed with or befriended were straight anyway (Wade, Jordan, Gavin, Jimmy, Aaron, Feldman, etc.) When Wade was presented with the "art books" featuring boys and the gay porn, he was taken aback by this because he was never shown this by MJ but it was in MJ's possession.
Exactly. He sometimes resorted to Playboys when trying to excite adolescent boys. Unfortunately, they ended up being personally invaded by MJ- emotionally and physically. Disgusting. F'loons desperately use the Playboy thing as their proof MJ was straight, which is a joke. And a damn shame, too. I mean, he could have had almost any woman on earth at one point in his life, instead he chose little boys? Freakshow if I ever saw one man! Of course come the 90's his selection of beautiful women would have been winding down as his one man circus show began and he started actually looking like a woman himself.

“Why can't you share your bed?”

Since: May 13

Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1324
Jul 29, 2013
 
BadMan84 wrote:
Yeah, if the boys looked at any porn, it was straight porn/nude books featuring adult females because most of the boys MJ messed with or befriended were straight anyway (Wade, Jordan, Gavin, Jimmy, Aaron, Feldman, etc.) When Wade was presented with the "art books" featuring boys and the gay porn, he was taken aback by this because he was never shown this by MJ but it was in MJ's possession.
I'm encountering f'loons on Youtube saying Michael's art books were innocuous and are collected by non-pedophiles as well. The excuses never stops flowing for them.

Since: Jun 13

Wilson, NC

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1325
Jul 30, 2013
 
TripleH1976 wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm encountering f'loons on Youtube saying Michael's art books were innocuous and are collected by non-pedophiles as well. The excuses never stops flowing for them.
LOL they are that delusional. There's nothing "artistic" about those books, especially that one that's titled "Boys Will Be Boys"...

Since: Jul 13

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1327
Jul 30, 2013
 
MJFRIEND wrote:
I feel sorry for all of you. You all sound like you are discussing tabloid rumors and headlines. And one can feel the hate you have for a human being you never met, never spoke to , and never spent time with. Nor have any of you met Wade , aaron, Macauley, or any others. There,s alot you do not know.. Trust me. This is why Im hoping for another trial so Jacksons side can come out again in a court of law. Oh, and by the way folks, some of the names you rattle off, are not speaking kindly of Wade right now. Also, I would not use Jordy Chandlers name to defend your thinking right now. There's a few former friends of Jacksons preparing to issue statements to the press regarding Wade . Have a lovely day folks!
Since you mentioned Aaron Carter, what do you think about him being offered wine by MJ? & What do you think of MJ and him smoking weed together?

http://www.youtube.com/watch...

“Evolution is fab!”

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1328
Jul 30, 2013
 
TripleH1976 wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm encountering f'loons on Youtube saying Michael's art books were innocuous and are collected by non-pedophiles as well. The excuses never stops flowing for them.
I've seen floons leave positive comments on Amazon and other sites on a book with the same title as "Boys Will Be Boys" which was actually published sometime in the early 2000 and not the NAMBLA recommended 60s version that Wacko Jacko owned. They all claim it contains no photos of naked boys and completely vindicates Michael of ever owning such material lol. Floons really are that stupid.

Since: Jul 13

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1329
Jul 30, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Butterballs wrote:
<quoted text>
I've seen floons leave positive comments on Amazon and other sites on a book with the same title as "Boys Will Be Boys" which was actually published sometime in the early 2000 and not the NAMBLA recommended 60s version that Wacko Jacko owned. They all claim it contains no photos of naked boys and completely vindicates Michael of ever owning such material lol. Floons really are that stupid.
Lol, That just screams desperate to me. They truly believe that the likely pedophiles that visit Amazon to purchase those books are really going to care about their comments regarding another pedophile. They are beyond deluded.

Since: Jun 13

Wilson, NC

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1330
Jul 30, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

^ Deluded and out of touch.

Since: Jul 13

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1331
Jul 30, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

TripleH1976 wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm encountering f'loons on Youtube saying Michael's art books were innocuous and are collected by non-pedophiles as well. The excuses never stops flowing for them.
lmao!!! Same thing happened to me several times, you tube is f'loon central man. And naked kids are NOT art for f**k's sake! They make excuses for every damn thing, and they're all absurd. Nobody looks at naked kids as art except pedophiles. They say he was looking at facial expressions... then why the hell weren't they wearing clothes!!! He was such an obvious pedophile, most obvious of all time.

Since: Jul 13

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1332
Jul 30, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Butterballs wrote:
<quoted text>
I've seen floons leave positive comments on Amazon and other sites on a book with the same title as "Boys Will Be Boys" which was actually published sometime in the early 2000 and not the NAMBLA recommended 60s version that Wacko Jacko owned. They all claim it contains no photos of naked boys and completely vindicates Michael of ever owning such material lol. Floons really are that stupid.
Yep, they really are that stupid! They've done scoured the internet defending a damn child molester. Even on Amazon, they go on every book against MJ and write bad reviews without even reading it. Then they rate pro MJ books 5 stars. They're idiots, to put it mildly.
persephone

Mountain View, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1333
Jul 30, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

Butterballs wrote:
<quoted text>
I've seen floons leave positive comments on Amazon and other sites on a book with the same title as "Boys Will Be Boys" which was actually published sometime in the early 2000 and not the NAMBLA recommended 60s version that Wacko Jacko owned. They all claim it contains no photos of naked boys and completely vindicates Michael of ever owning such material lol. Floons really are that stupid.
Do you think that all depictions of nudity should always be viewed as erotic, regardless of the context?
persephone

Mountain View, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1334
Jul 30, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

3

MJFRIEND wrote:
I feel sorry for all of you. You all sound like you are discussing tabloid rumors and headlines. And one can feel the hate you have for a human being you never met, never spoke to , and never spent time with. Nor have any of you met Wade , aaron, Macauley, or any others. There,s alot you do not know.. Trust me. This is why Im hoping for another trial so Jacksons side can come out again in a court of law. Oh, and by the way folks, some of the names you rattle off, are not speaking kindly of Wade right now. Also, I would not use Jordy Chandlers name to defend your thinking right now. There's a few former friends of Jacksons preparing to issue statements to the press regarding Wade . Have a lovely day folks!
I've heard that even people who don't particularly like MJ, are VERY skeptical and suspicious about Robson's sudden flip-flop. One hopes that no one else is swayed or intimidated by the power of AEG to join the Robson party of lies.

Since: Jul 13

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1335
Jul 30, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

persephone wrote:
<quoted text> Do you think that all depictions of nudity should always be viewed as erotic, regardless of the context?
Do you think NAMBLA recommended books are simply art? If so, I pray you don't have children or are anywhere near children.

Since: Jul 13

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1336
Jul 30, 2013
 

Judged:

3

2

1

persephone wrote:
<quoted text> I've heard that even people who don't particularly like MJ, are VERY skeptical and suspicious about Robson's sudden flip-flop. One hopes that no one else is swayed or intimidated by the power of AEG to join the Robson party of lies.
Shame on you and anyone who calls a victim a liar.

“Brevity is the soule of wit. ”

Since: May 09

USA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1337
Jul 30, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

persephony wrote:
<quoted text> I've heard that even people who don't particularly like MJ, are VERY skeptical and suspicious about Robson's shat no one else is swayed or intimidated by the power of AEG to join the Robson party of lies.
How many children 'lied' about you at YOUR trial?
rosalinda de la quatch

Sweden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1338
Jul 30, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

persephone wrote:
<quoted text> Do you think that all depictions of nudity should always be viewed as erotic, regardless of the context?
Has it not occurred to you that people are questioning the books in question that MJ owned because they were recommended by pedophile organization of North America and that MJ himself had a thing for young boys Yes?

Also you seem to be the one who is sexualizing them YES? You have not come here and said that those books that MJ owned were in no way sexual yes? You are saying that some people [like those who sleep with boys] could view those books as a child erotica yes?

There is nudity as in the nudity of art yes? That usually involves fully grown adults or marble or concrete statues - yes? In no way in your statement did you ever refer to those books as art books correct? And nowhere on the front cover of those books were they ever referred to as art books correct?

Also if MJ truly cared and had respect for children he would not be collecting books that were made by a suspected pedophile - and as recommended by North American pedophile organization correct? Only somebody with shit-4-brains would disagree with my statement correct?

Since: Jul 13

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1340
Jul 30, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

MJFRIEND wrote:
Obviously many of you have not had access to the court documents. ALSO, to MJisguilty there is no proof that Wade is a victim. There are two many questions circling around him.. Wade was not abused in the way we all think of abuse. We think of an innocent and naeive child. Forced to participate in an horrendous activity. Wade hung out with a child hollywood crowd. Smoking pot drinking partying and so forth. Someone mentioned that WAde and others watched porn movies and that wade was shocked to find a gay porn magazine at michaels house. Red Flag right here : wouldnt these pictures seem familiar to him if he was doing this stuff as he claims with michael? Why would he be shocked? IM HOPING AN ATTORNIE PICKED UP ON THIS ONE? I,m hoping this goes to trial another win for michael.
Wrong. We've read court documents and applied common sense and have the decency to believe abuse victims. All of the nonsense you wrote in f'loon fantasy. All of it.

Since: Jul 13

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1341
Jul 30, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

1

MJFRIEND wrote:
Obviously many of you have not had access to the court documents. ALSO, to MJisguilty there is no proof that Wade is a victim. There are two many questions circling around him.. Wade was not abused in the way we all think of abuse. We think of an innocent and naeive child. Forced to participate in an horrendous activity. Wade hung out with a child hollywood crowd. Smoking pot drinking partying and so forth. Someone mentioned that WAde and others watched porn movies and that wade was shocked to find a gay porn magazine at michaels house. Red Flag right here : wouldnt these pictures seem familiar to him if he was doing this stuff as he claims with michael? Why would he be shocked? IM HOPING AN ATTORNIE PICKED UP ON THIS ONE? I,m hoping this goes to trial another win for michael.
Forgot to remind you, MJ smoked pot and drank and watched porn. Your comment is not only fantasy it's hypocritical, as fanatics typically are. Furthermore, you don't know if Robson was shocked or not, it's all perception and since you adamantly defend MJ no matter what the evidence is you'll believe any source that portrays him in as innocent. Instead of defending a perpetrator, you should research pedophile and child molester traits as well as the complexities of abuse victims. Robson is not lying. Have you even considered you might be wrong, in which case you're defending a child molester? Do you realize how hard it is for abuse victims to come to terms with being sexually molested? Obviously I believe MJ was guilty, but even if I didn't I'd never call a victim a liar. There's far too much evidence to the contrary. It's better to admit you've been wrong all along than it is to make excuses for someone who hurt so many people.

“Evolution is fab!”

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1344
Jul 31, 2013
 
Pishpash1234 wrote:
<quoted text>
Lol, That just screams desperate to me. They truly believe that the likely pedophiles that visit Amazon to purchase those books are really going to care about their comments regarding another pedophile. They are beyond deluded.
Here's the 2004 version of "Boys Will Be Boys" on Amazon.

http://tinyurl.com/mrmlng5

Check out the dumb floon comments at the bottom of the page.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 1,161 - 1,180 of1,766
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••
•••
•••
•••
•••