How Michael Jackson Made 'Bad'

How Michael Jackson Made 'Bad'

There are 48 comments on the OhNoTheyDidnt story from Sep 13, 2012, titled How Michael Jackson Made 'Bad'. In it, OhNoTheyDidnt reports that:

The story of how the landmark album, which just turned 25 and will soon be re-released in a three-disc set, was forged by the "Wacko Jacko" backlash against the pop star In 1984, he seemed to be everywhere: on MTV and in Pepsi commercials, at the Grammys and the White House, on Rolling Stone and Time magazine, and all across the United States on ... (more)

Join the discussion below, or Read more at OhNoTheyDidnt.

First Prev
of 3
Next Last

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

#1 Sep 13, 2012
The person who wrote this completely missed the real tragedy. Michael's mental health had visibly deteriorated when this one was released. I remember looking at the cover of "Bad" and being horrified by the white woman on it, named Michael Jackson. He had also become bolder and bolder about appearing in public with little boys. In 1984 he had the world at his feet. He could have maintained that with better lifestyle choices.
Kee

Bowie, MD

#2 Sep 14, 2012
I love the BAD era! The man was so sexy!
Kee

Bowie, MD

#3 Sep 14, 2012
Oh, I must have forgotren that this place is owned and stalked by hater B****** and thought that this was real MJ form! LOL! No good comments are allowed here unless it about Elvis!:)

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#4 Sep 14, 2012
Michael Jackson was 100% genius. It's sad that he allowed children's lies get to him.

He didn't realise that many of us knew the allegations were lies and still love him.

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

#5 Sep 15, 2012
goodvibrations wrote:
Michael Jackson was 100% genius. It's sad that he allowed children's lies get to him.
He didn't realise that many of us knew the allegations were lies and still love him.
Read the profile of a pedophile. The only time children lie about sexual abuse is to deny it happened or try to make it look less bad, out of embarrassment or fear they'll be punished.

Besides, if Michael had been so concerned about children lying, he wouldn't have been taking them to bed, with him.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#6 Sep 16, 2012
Len is Disgusted wrote:
<quoted text>
Read the profile of a pedophile. The only time children lie about sexual abuse is to deny it happened or try to make it look less bad, out of embarrassment or fear they'll be punished.
Besides, if Michael had been so concerned about children lying, he wouldn't have been taking them to bed, with him.
Actually it wasn't the children's lies that got to MJ because he forgave them and knew they didn't do it. Their parents were the liars and fools like you insist on believing the crap.

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#7 Sep 16, 2012
goodvibrations wrote:
Michael Jackson was 100% genius. It's sad that he allowed children's lies get to him.
He didn't realise that many of us knew the allegations were lies and still love him.
Why did he pay Jordan Chandler 20 million dollars?

The allegations were made and Tom Sneddon conducted a strip search.

All the sudden the charges were dropped after the settlement?

Hmmmmmm...

If MJ were innocent and Chandler lied, why not fight it in court?

Why be worried about something that never ever took place?

I know if I were accused of a crime I did not do, I'd fight it.

I wouldn't have paid off that accuser based on lie, would I?

The strip search had to have revealed that Jordan wasn't lying.

Otherwise, why pay for something that never happened?

The whole thing certainly makes sense to me.

Being a wealthy celebrity gave MJ a way out using crafty lawyers.

Jordan accepted the money and agreed never to discuss his ordeal.

So then we have the Gavin case some years later, right?

Mesereau made sure that all evidence in the first case wasn't used.

Very easy and simple for most of us to understand.

Yet, you still bring up parents and under aged accusers lying.

The law protected MJ in part because he had money to make deals...

By the time Gavin accused MJ, the laws had changed from the 90's.

Sex offenders could no longer pay off their victims.

You can figure out why some are still outraged by MJ's behavior.

Anyway, MJ is no longer living.

What is the big deal about him being guilty at this late date?

The damage was already done.

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#8 Sep 16, 2012
goodvibrations wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually it wasn't the children's lies that got to MJ because he forgave them and knew they didn't do it. Their parents were the liars and fools like you insist on believing the crap.
Everybody knows that Gavin and Star were running wild in Neverland.

They were freely watching porn and also stealing things from MJ.

It is obvious that their mother was hoping for her 20 million.

She was sent away on shopping sprees and Gavin was left with MJ.

Totally different situation than the Jordan Chandler case.

Gavin was shown on "Living With Michael Jackson" holding hands!

How precious.

It was fortunate that Tom Mesereau had dirt on Gavin's mother.

But Gavin and Star were still getting drunk on Jacko's Jesus juice.

MJ got lucky at that 2005 televised trial.

He was certainly wasted which everybody saw.

To me, it was another sign of his guilt in front of the court.

Tom Mesereau did a great job but he was a 20 million dollar lawyer.

Any evidence that MJ "forgave" his accusers?

All I know is that MJ went to live in the middle east soon after.

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

#9 Sep 16, 2012
goodvibrations wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually it wasn't the children's lies that got to MJ because he forgave them and knew they didn't do it. Their parents were the liars and fools like you insist on believing the crap.
Nice try, no cigar, desparate f'loon. You still haven't come up with a reason why Jordan described certain markings on Michael's Thang so accurately, the D.A. wanted to bring the drawing, description, and photos into the courtroom, during the 2005 case.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#10 Sep 16, 2012
octo wrote:
<quoted text>
Why did he pay Jordan Chandler 20 million dollars?
The allegations were made and Tom Sneddon conducted a strip search.
All the sudden the charges were dropped after the settlement?
Hmmmmmm...
If MJ were innocent and Chandler lied, why not fight it in court?
Why be worried about something that never ever took place?
I know if I were accused of a crime I did not do, I'd fight it.
I wouldn't have paid off that accuser based on lie, would I?
The strip search had to have revealed that Jordan wasn't lying.
Otherwise, why pay for something that never happened?
The whole thing certainly makes sense to me.

Being a wealthy celebrity gave MJ a way out using crafty lawyers.
Jordan accepted the money and agreed never to discuss his ordeal.
So then we have the Gavin case some years later, right?
Mesereau made sure that all evidence in the first case wasn't used.
Very easy and simple for most of us to understand.

Yet, you still bring up parents and under aged accusers lying.
The law protected MJ in part because he had money to make deals...
By the time Gavin accused MJ, the laws had changed from the 90's.
Sex offenders could no longer pay off their victims.
You can figure out why some are still outraged by MJ's behavior.
Anyway, MJ is no longer living.
What is the big deal about him being guilty at this late date?
The damage was already done.
The charges were dropped because Jordan Chandler refused to testify his father's lies in the criminal court, just in case he slipped up.

MJ paid the money because his lawyer wanted to save the defence story for the criminal court trial. The criminal court is what counts not a civil matter.

The Chandlers agreed and signed to no sexual allegations having occurred in the civil case and refused to go further in the criminal court.

That should be evidence that the allegations were never committed.

An NFL Fan

“Brevity is the soule of wit”

Since: May 09

USA

#11 Sep 16, 2012
goodvibrations wrote:
<quoted text>
The charges were dropped because Jordan Chandler refused to testify his father's lies in the criminal court, just in case he slipped up.
MJ paid the money because his lawyer wanted to save the defence story for the criminal court trial. The criminal court is what counts not a civil matter.
The Chandlers agreed and signed to no sexual allegations having occurred in the civil case and refused to go further in the criminal court.
That should be evidence that the allegations were never committed.
I notice you've been repeatedly blowing out that blarney over the past week. You know absolutely nothing of the American court system, and it shows. Typical.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#12 Sep 16, 2012
octo wrote:
<quoted text>
Why did he pay Jordan Chandler 20 million dollars?
The allegations were made and Tom Sneddon conducted a strip search.
All the sudden the charges were dropped after the settlement?
Hmmmmmm...
If MJ were innocent and Chandler lied, why not fight it in court?
Why be worried about something that never ever took place?
I know if I were accused of a crime I did not do, I'd fight it.
I wouldn't have paid off that accuser based on lie, would I?
The strip search had to have revealed that Jordan wasn't lying.
Otherwise, why pay for something that never happened?
The whole thing certainly makes sense to me.

Being a wealthy celebrity gave MJ a way out using crafty lawyers.
Jordan accepted the money and agreed never to discuss his ordeal.
So then we have the Gavin case some years later, right?
Mesereau made sure that all evidence in the first case wasn't used.
Very easy and simple for most of us to understand.
Yet, you still bring up parents and under aged accusers lying.
The law protected MJ in part because he had money to make deals...
By the time Gavin accused MJ, the laws had changed from the 90's.
Sex offenders could no longer pay off their victims.
You can figure out why some are still outraged by MJ's behavior.
Anyway, MJ is no longer living.
What is the big deal about him being guilty at this late date?
The damage was already done.
The payout was made because MJís lawyer wanted to save the best for last in the criminal court.
The charges were dropped because the Chandlers signed away to no sexual allegations having ever occurred.

The case was dropped because the Chandlers would have looked ridiculous in the criminal court after signing a agreeing to nothing happened sexually. Thatís what they came forward with initially and reneged when their money demand was handed over.

All criminal charges were dropped because Jordan Chandler refused to testify in the criminal court. Jordan would have slipped up in his fatherís lies and got him in prison and Evan would have murdered him.

The strip search was never necessary because it was lies. Jordan's allegations were unfounded and dropped by him.

Why didn't the angry Evan Chandler and his beloved son come to support the Gavin criminal case? That would have been an opportunity for Chandler's justice. Oh that's right, he was a liar just like Gavin's mother was.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#13 Sep 16, 2012
An NFL Fan wrote:
<quoted text>
I notice you've been repeatedly blowing out that blarney over the past week. You know absolutely nothing of the American court system, and it shows. Typical.
That's right I know absolutely nothing about the American court system and neither do you.

Your clueless input is so typical.derrr

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#14 Sep 16, 2012
Len is Disgusted wrote:
<quoted text>
Nice try, no cigar, desparate f'loon. You still haven't come up with a reason why Jordan described certain markings on Michael's Thang so accurately, the D.A. wanted to bring the drawing, description, and photos into the courtroom, during the 2005 case.
MJ's Thang was never described accurately. You are clinging to a feeble rumour ever so desperately. Shove your cigar.

An NFL Fan

“Brevity is the soule of wit”

Since: May 09

USA

#15 Sep 16, 2012
goodvibrations wrote:
<quoted text>
That's right I know absolutely nothing about the American court system and neither do you.
Your clueless input is so typical.derrr
These points have been gleaned through on this forum ad nauseum, and as is your wont, you shoot from the hip. Why not blither on about something you actually know? Barbie dolls are a good start for you.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#16 Sep 16, 2012
An NFL Fan wrote:
<quoted text>
These points have been gleaned through on this forum ad nauseum, and as is your wont, you shoot from the hip. Why not blither on about something you actually know? Barbie dolls are a good start for you.
I don't need your condescending advice moron. My barbies were handed down to me by my nan and mother and they are worth a fortune:))) ha ha

An NFL Fan

“Brevity is the soule of wit”

Since: May 09

USA

#17 Sep 16, 2012
goodvibrations wrote:
<quoted text>
My barbies were handed down to me by my nan and mother and they are worth a fortune:))) ha ha
So your true area of expertise is ordained.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#18 Sep 16, 2012
An NFL Fan wrote:
<quoted text>
So your true area of expertise is ordained.
I have developed an expertise in collecting. A lucrative hobby and I highly recommend it. Please accept my generous and constructive advice.

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

#19 Sep 16, 2012
goodvibrations wrote:
<quoted text>
MJ's Thang was never described accurately. You are clinging to a feeble rumour ever so desperately. Shove your cigar.
It was accurate enough for Sneddon to want to bring it all into court. It was accurate enough for Mesereau to fight tooth and nail to keep anything from the 1993 case out of court.

Besides, what you would know about Michael's pecker? Unless you were a ten-year-old boy, he would never have whipped It out, for you.

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

#20 Sep 16, 2012
An NFL Fan wrote:
<quoted text>
I notice you've been repeatedly blowing out that blarney over the past week. You know absolutely nothing of the American court system, and it shows. Typical.
She's been foaming at the mouth more than usual, ever since I posted the link to this legal document in which Sneddon explained why he wanted to bring the drawing, description, and photos of Michael's speckled pecker into court.

http://www.sbscpublicaccess.org/docs/ctdocs/0...

Screaming about everything being a lie is her last ditch at clinging to her fantasy. Do you think she'll hurt herself when she finally has a breakthrough and realizes Michael was a pedophile?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 3
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Michael Jackson Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Joe is begging for $$ to be buried next to MJ 2 hr Space ace 2
Autopsy Reveals M. Jackson had a giant 12 inch ... (Jul '09) 7 hr Hey guys 304
MJ fans and haters Sun Space ace 10
Paris jackson mkultra mind control Sun Space ace 1
The Crickets Chirp On The Dead Michael Jackson ... (Jun '15) Sat Pop Tart- 83
News 150 Best Selling Artists in the World! (Dec '08) Aug 16 RICK 12,901
News Elvis Presley Eclipses Michael Jackson (Jul '09) Aug 9 Pop Tart- 53,066
More from around the web