How Michael Jackson stole from John L...

How Michael Jackson stole from John Lennon

Posted in the Michael Jackson Forum

First Prev
of 2
Next Last
Diane

Astoria, NY

#1 Jun 6, 2012
Michael Jackson hid for many many years will the agreement of Yoko Ono and Paul McCartney the inheritance of a love child daughter by John Lennon. Yes folks that is what all the to do is about. The AEG trial. The truth has not come out yet but when it does you will be shocked for the rest of your life!!!!! Michael was a very very greedy man who only want more and more money. Katherine Jackson is a phoney Jerhova Witness!. She sits with pierce morgan and keeps saying what a wonderful charitable person he is. Oh really. Yeah like when he became publisher on the Beatle catalogue and did the dirty sneaky underhanded thing he did for over two decades. He helped Ono with her dirty secret lies. Yoko Ono is the head honcho in this story but Jackson followed her into the criminal act of fraud. Hiding someone's inheritance for years is criminal. Jackson knew he was going to be arressted so he chose death or maybe he is really hiding. Time was up and now he was gonna have to confess. Why because Beatle copyrights were due and someone's name was on the catalogue that he helped hide.
hater

United States

#2 Jun 6, 2012
Don't know if this is true,but I do agree that MJ was a fake sorry person who always tried to make himself out to be something he was not.He really fooled alot of people.
Jane

Astoria, NY

#4 Jun 6, 2012
Yes, the above is true! Hopefully it will come out soon. That is why the hype with Jacko was murdered by AEG music moguels. This is what the Jackson family are saying everytime I see them on the talk shows. Jacko was afraid in the end and Dr. Murry knew why. Jacko did fraud and played around with the John Lennon Will. He stole from John Lennon estate and fed his illegitimate children with formula bought from the Beatle catalogue. He was a thief and the world needs to know the truth.
Brandt Hardin

Memphis, TN

#5 Jun 8, 2012
Imagine an entire world living in peace… John saw the beauty and inherent good in humanity. I tried to do his legacy justice and channel his world-embracing and loving energy this week with a tribute portrait inspired by his music and his passion for changing the world. You can see this new work of art in memoriam on my artist’s blog at http://dregstudiosart.blogspot.com/2011/12/jo... along with some pictures showing how I created it. See John holding the Universe in his hand and spreading his message. When you stop by, let me know how his words and music have affected your life and creativity!
persephone

Sunnyvale, CA

#6 Jun 8, 2012
Diane wrote:
Michael Jackson hid for many many years will the agreement of Yoko Ono and Paul McCartney the inheritance of a love child daughter by John Lennon. Yes folks that is what all the to do is about. The AEG trial. The truth has not come out yet but when it does you will be shocked for the rest of your life!!!!! Michael was a very very greedy man who only want more and more money. Katherine Jackson is a phoney Jerhova Witness!. She sits with pierce morgan and keeps saying what a wonderful charitable person he is. Oh really. Yeah like when he became publisher on the Beatle catalogue and did the dirty sneaky underhanded thing he did for over two decades. He helped Ono with her dirty secret lies. Yoko Ono is the head honcho in this story but Jackson followed her into the criminal act of fraud. Hiding someone's inheritance for years is criminal. Jackson knew he was going to be arressted so he chose death or maybe he is really hiding. Time was up and now he was gonna have to confess. Why because Beatle copyrights were due and someone's name was on the catalogue that he helped hide.
Anybody who thinks haters aren't deranged idiots need look no further than this for believing that MJ was capable of 'hiding' someone's inheritance. I hope you're ready for the actual truth to come out--namely that none of it is even remotely true.

krackerjacks

Since: Mar 11

Location hidden

#7 Jun 8, 2012
Jane wrote:
Yes, the above is true! Hopefully it will come out soon. That is why the hype with Jacko was murdered by AEG music moguels. This is what the Jackson family are saying everytime I see them on the talk shows. Jacko was afraid in the end and Dr. Murry knew why. Jacko did fraud and played around with the John Lennon Will. He stole from John Lennon estate and fed his illegitimate children with formula bought from the Beatle catalogue. He was a thief and the world needs to know the truth.
I agree. MJ swindled those songs away from the composer and a dead man's widow. I certainly wouldn't say that AEG "murdered" MJ but they lit the fire under his drug addicted butt and this drove him over the edge. Let's not forget that while AEG was neglegent to expect a junkie like MJ to perform 50 high energy shows, MJ fans were head over heels about getting to see their hero back on stage after 10 years. Their enthusiasm is part of what killed MJ too. Jackson would rather die if he couldn't be the "King of Pop" any longer.
MJ FAN

London, UK

#8 Jun 8, 2012
Nobody knows the facts about Michael Jacksons life people are too quick to make comments about what they think they know. The facts are that Michael Jackson is the King of pop and always will be and is loved by millions of people. Let him rest in peace. I do not know any person that would use their own money to open a theme park and allow the public in for free he has also donated millions to charity not many people would do that.

krackerjacks

Since: Mar 11

Location hidden

#9 Jun 9, 2012
MJ FAN wrote:
Nobody knows the facts about Michael Jacksons life people are too quick to make comments about what they think they know. The facts are that Michael Jackson is the King of pop and always will be and is loved by millions of people. Let him rest in peace. I do not know any person that would use their own money to open a theme park and allow the public in for free he has also donated millions to charity not many people would do that.
Considering he stole millions, he should have donated millions. Only you fans respect his for that.
Jane

Astoria, NY

#10 Jun 9, 2012
Thanks Krackerjacks. You have common sense! It has long been known that Michael Jackson was publisher on the Beatle Catalogue for more than 20 years. If you look up websites on this it will come up saying Paul McCartney was outbidded by Jacko and Ono. The truth is Paul had to agree for Jacko to become publisher. Paul is half owner and the other half is Ono for John Lennon's half. She could not do this and I don't care how much money Jackson had they needed Paul's signature. Paul comes on talk shows and says Jacko tricked him and stole his copyrights. If that is so why is he holding hands and good friends with Ono now. He should hate her guts. It is because Paul and Ono as a team wanted Jackson to protect secrets on the Beatle catalogue. One secret was John Lennon have a love child daughter who he left money. The Jackson family are worried because they know this has to come out. Jacko went in on a dirty game because he wanted the royalty of the beatles music. Yoko felt secure. But eventually when you do dirty it comes back to haunt you in the end. Hopefully soon this will all come out!

krackerjacks

Since: Mar 11

Location hidden

#11 Jun 9, 2012
Jane wrote:
Thanks Krackerjacks. You have common sense! It has long been known that Michael Jackson was publisher on the Beatle Catalogue for more than 20 years. If you look up websites on this it will come up saying Paul McCartney was outbidded by Jacko and Ono. The truth is Paul had to agree for Jacko to become publisher. Paul is half owner and the other half is Ono for John Lennon's half. She could not do this and I don't care how much money Jackson had they needed Paul's signature. Paul comes on talk shows and says Jacko tricked him and stole his copyrights. If that is so why is he holding hands and good friends with Ono now. He should hate her guts. It is because Paul and Ono as a team wanted Jackson to protect secrets on the Beatle catalogue. One secret was John Lennon have a love child daughter who he left money. The Jackson family are worried because they know this has to come out. Jacko went in on a dirty game because he wanted the royalty of the beatles music. Yoko felt secure. But eventually when you do dirty it comes back to haunt you in the end. Hopefully soon this will all come out!
Check out my "Michael Jackson Sold Out The Beatles" page.

krackerjacks

Since: Mar 11

Location hidden

#12 Jun 9, 2012
MJ fans show their true colors when they condemn a man for suing his son's molester and lived off Jackson's millions but expect the world to accept what MJ did to Paul McCartney and John Lennon's widow as a savvy busniness move just shows what fickle finks they are!!
Jane

Astoria, NY

#13 Jun 10, 2012
Krackerjacks the truth is that Michael Jackson supported his whole family over the years with the Beatle Royalties that he made every year. Yoko Ono promised Jacko this if he became publisher of the Beatle Catalogue. He did back in 1984. That was a long long time ago. For years McCartney kept saying that Jacko screwed him over. McCartney is a phoney because he had to agree along with Ono to let Michael become publisher. When the copyright due date was up for some of the Beatle songs in that Catalogue Michael was panicking. Remember hearing that Michael Jackson was going bankrupt. Michael was desperate. Remember those news reports. Well fun time was over for him and then he knew he was getting caught because John Lennon had a love child daughter in his will. Ono wanted it hidden so she wanted someone she could trust on the Catalogue. Meanwhile Paul and Ono both could have got the Catalogue themselves back then but maybe this would have forced this love child daughter to be revealed. I don't know but there is a daughter of Lennon and the Jacksons have to give back the catalogue to the Beatles. This is why the Jacksons keep saying MJ was murdered for the Catalogue. Hopefully soon this all will spill out on the tv. The Beatles and the Jackson family all have to be scared rats. I would not want to be them. The world is going to crusify them when they learn of the fraud that was done.
Jane

Astoria, NY

#14 Jun 10, 2012
Yes Krakerjacks I saw your web page on this. Again McCartney used to say the MJ and Ono outbid him. Let me tell you something as an example. When you own a house with another person such as husband and wife and both names are on the deed both have to come to an agreement and both have to sign a contract in order to sell it. It does not matter how much money either one has. The same with the catalogue of the Beatles. Paul would of had to sign a paper giving Jacko the rights to lease this catalouge. Ono could not do this by herself. That is where McCartney becomes a phoney lier. It is common sense. Jacko was freightened at the end because he knew the public would find out about the hidden fraud he did to Lennon estate. They wanted the love child hidden and they got away with it for many many years. Hopefully soon this will all come out. The Jacksons are covering up the truth and Dr. Murray knew the truth. He knew that Jackson was in a scandal with the Lennon estate. Just like arnold swassenager had a love child so does Lennon and this woman is now 48 years old. Yes she is middle aged. She should of gotten her money when she was in her twenties but Jackson helped Paul and Ono hide the truth. That accumulated money from the Beatle catalogue is this woman love child daughter's money not the Jackson family and not the Beatles families.
Jane

Astoria, NY

#15 Jun 10, 2012
This love child daughter of Lennon is American. Irish French Canadian American and of course whatever Lennon was Welsh Irish. This lovechild is an innocent woman born from a dirty scandal but regardless she needs to get her truth. Lennon left her money and recognition and it has not come out yet. I thought this year it would but I don't know. It is very sad. This woman will never know her real father John Lennon but at least what he left her should be given her. People are evil today and stealing is everywhere. Wall street, Banks. Will fraud is common and Ono is a sneaky underhanded woman. She wanted full control over the Beatles music and I believe was a major factor in the Break up of the Beatles. I don't blame the public for disliking her. When they see this love child story they are going to go out of their minds with anger toward Ono and Paul and Michael. John Lennon was murdered and the only thing that counts to these three people is how much money can Lennon bring them. No respect for a dead man. Ono did not give Julain for years his inheritance either. John did put him in the will I saw it. I am in the music business and I know a lot about this story. Paul McCartney should never have been in the Queens Jubilee. He is a thief.
Hehehehehe hahaha

Fremont, CA

#16 Dec 25, 2012
Retards ! If u have some time then u can go to youtube. Beatles never owned their own songs/catalogue at that time ! They were unaware of that part of the business. They were new. Michael's wealth isn't because of beatles catalogue. Now its worth is more. Michael has donated more than $350 million to charity.
ChasUGC

Long Beach, CA

#17 Dec 25, 2012
Jane wrote:
This love child daughter of Lennon is American. Irish French Canadian American and of course whatever Lennon was Welsh Irish. This lovechild is an innocent woman born from a dirty scandal but regardless she needs to get her truth. Lennon left her money and recognition and it has not come out yet. I thought this year it would but I don't know. It is very sad. This woman will never know her real father John Lennon but at least what he left her should be given her. People are evil today and stealing is everywhere. Wall street, Banks. Will fraud is common and Ono is a sneaky underhanded woman. She wanted full control over the Beatles music and I believe was a major factor in the Break up of the Beatles. I don't blame the public for disliking her. When they see this love child story they are going to go out of their minds with anger toward Ono and Paul and Michael. John Lennon was murdered and the only thing that counts to these three people is how much money can Lennon bring them. No respect for a dead man. Ono did not give Julain for years his inheritance either. John did put him in the will I saw it. I am in the music business and I know a lot about this story. Paul McCartney should never have been in the Queens Jubilee. He is a thief.
I for one would be interested in your references for these allegations or what you base your allegations.

"No respect for a dead man."

This is an insane comment from you, considering that MJ is also one. Leave it to haterz to lose their minds over MJ.

And, they have the nerve to call MJ fans, F'loons. HA!
samantha

Astoria, NY

#18 Mar 18, 2013
Katherine Jackson continuation of the her fraud family and Michael Jackson fraud ways of life.
Now in April 2013 comes the Civil trial and she is asking for 40 billion dollars. A greedy louse of a mother who put Latoya for prostitution and let her husband Joe have a good time night after night and allowed Michael to be beat with oil and whips and chains. She should of been arrested years ago along with Joe Jackson for child abuse! Now this pig want 40 billion dollars. She is evil and give back the money that your son stole from John Lennon off the Beatle catalogue you pig!!!!!!!!!!
Sharif

Surrey, Canada

#19 Apr 27, 2013
I'm trying to follow what is being said here, but there are two things I don't understand:

1. How does anyone know such information? If this is such a secret how can anyone know that John Lennon had a lovechild in the US? I could see this being possible for sure, but I wonder how someone knows?

2. What is being said is that the lovechild is owed money, and to keep it from her, Ono got Michael Jackson, in exchange for buying the song rights, to keep it a secret. The part about this that makes no sense is that song rights are not the same as a will.

If it is written in Lennon's will, how does that relate to the rights to songs that he may have wrote but didn't own? If Ono wanted to hide it, why would she need to tell anyone? She is in charge of Lennon's estate, so she could keep such a secret all to herself without having anyone involved.

I just don't see how it's connected to the Beatles song rights, and without the song rights somehow revealing Lennon's will, then this whole story makes no sense. I just don't see how owning the song rights makes one magically know what's written in the will, since they are two different things altogether.

Since: Jun 13

Fuquay Varina, NC

#20 Jul 18, 2013
Dag, some good points have been brought out. It now begins to make some sense why Paul stopped trying to get back the catalog!

Since: Jun 13

Fuquay Varina, NC

#21 Jul 18, 2013
That said, I think the majority of the fault goes with MJ and Yoko. Paul was possibly put into a corner to either accept or else. I mean he did say after all he had no qualms over it but he still didn't like it that the songs were used for commercials.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Michael Jackson Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
zionist jew conspiracy against MJ Thu Pop Tart- 5
News Jackson's ex-doc details star's alleged attract... Jul 27 Jacko was a slime... 1
News Who's the King, Michael Jackson, Elvis Presley,... (Dec '09) Jul 27 Chaimpie 7,216
News Paul McCartney fights to get back his songs Jul 26 Pliez 200
MJ hater trolls Jul 25 Pop Tart- 2
One of MJ's "special friends" disclosed on MJ's... (Jul '13) Jul 12 Justice 125
Michael Jackson had semen stains from other mal... (Sep '12) Jul 7 Justice 1,877
More from around the web