created by: tomcat | Jan 26, 2012

Michael Jackson

254 votes

why is this forum dead?

Click on an option to vote

  • because wacko is
  • because the troll from Danbury is a pain
  • because nevertheless is a bitch
  • because f'loons are boring
  • too much VMJ bull
  • haters won the war
  • any other reason - please state

Comments (Page 21)

Showing posts 401 - 403 of403
|
next page >
Go to last page| Jump to page:

“Buzz Lightyear”

Since: Jun 12

to Star Command!

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#416
Sep 1, 2012
 

Judged:

3

2

2

seperate issue.
There is so much artificial stuff going on "creating babies"-
In denmark they consider a new law allowing use from donaters when they've passed on. If a wife after a husbands death, wishes to be inseminated with his semen-leftovers from the "fridge" - she should be allowed to do so.
Mother and child scrolling through the baby's first years-book;
"Yes my little sweetheart, that's daddy after the car crash... This is you in a tube..- and you were conceived ..lets see, exactly 2 yrs, 5 months and 23 hours after daddy died -..."...
Concerning Michael - Or anyone else. Children - babies need to bond with their mom. Depriving them the right and opportunity to connect with a parent - is selfish not ok to me. Not at all.
Still an MJ supporter. But not in this context.

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#417
Sep 1, 2012
 

Judged:

3

3

3

Intergalactic Clowns ll wrote:
seperate issue.
There is so much artificial stuff going on "creating babies"-
In denmark they consider a new law allowing use from donaters when they've passed on. If a wife after a husbands death, wishes to be inseminated with his semen-leftovers from the "fridge" - she should be allowed to do so.
Mother and child scrolling through the baby's first years-book;
"Yes my little sweetheart, that's daddy after the car crash... This is you in a tube..- and you were conceived ..lets see, exactly 2 yrs, 5 months and 23 hours after daddy died -..."...
Concerning Michael - Or anyone else. Children - babies need to bond with their mom. Depriving them the right and opportunity to connect with a parent - is selfish not ok to me. Not at all.
Still an MJ supporter. But not in this context.
You're intentionally sidestepping Jina's factual information, with utter nonsense, as usual.

“Buzz Lightyear”

Since: Jun 12

to Star Command!

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#418
Sep 1, 2012
 
Len is Disgusted wrote:
<quoted text>
You're intentionally sidestepping Jina's factual information, with utter nonsense, as usual.
The new laws taken into consideration are nonsense.
(If you can't capture a little dramatization of the outcome of such laws - my condolences on that limitation)
MY point was:
Yes - there are ways of conceiving children, that jeopadizes these children's rights.
However - biological children or not -the bottomline is how you treat them whether you are biological parent, foster parent etc.
I critized the lack of consideration, when you cut a child away from connecting with it's mother- in this case, for no reason other than yr own personal needs.
You know what's true "utter" nonsense?
Me replying one of you or JW's posts at all.
I tend to forget whom or rather what I'm talking to.
My bad.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 401 - 403 of403
|
next page >
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••
•••
•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••