Comments
541 - 556 of 556 Comments Last updated Tuesday Jul 15
First Prev
of 28
Next Last

Since: Jun 13

Wilson, NC

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#681
Apr 13, 2014
 

Judged:

1

1

1

No I doubt she's that smart to spread it lol behind closed doors, Katherine knew what Michael was doing was wrong but of course, she didn't wanna destroy the goose that laid the golden age even though technically she played a part in it.

“Evolution is fab!”

Since: Nov 12

Deep Space 9, Alpha Quadrant

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#682
Apr 14, 2014
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Len is Disgusted wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you think Katherine may have spread the hoax, herself? Even if she didn't, she seized upon it and spoke in public, about it. She knows very well Jordan isn't allowed to publicly say a word about the matter, or the estate's legal team would jump all over him.
I do remember seeing a very short video clip where Jermaine (greasy face) Jackson gave an interview to a journalist about a day or two after Pedo Pan had croaked it, where he claimed that Jordan had telephoned him and confess that the allegations were a lie. I wonder if it was Katherine, who told told him to say that or whether he alone had concocted that pathetic claim. Either way, I don't recall him ever making that claim again, which is odd.

Since: Jun 13

Wilson, NC

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#683
Apr 14, 2014
 

Judged:

1

1

1

^ Yeah it was after the hoax became public. Jermaine has lied a lot of times so I doubt anyone believed it. You take whatever Jermaine says with a grain of salt.

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#684
Apr 14, 2014
 

Judged:

1

Butterballs wrote:
<quoted text>
I do remember seeing a very short video clip where Jermaine (greasy face) Jackson gave an interview to a journalist about a day or two after Pedo Pan had croaked it, where he claimed that Jordan had telephoned him and confess that the allegations were a lie. I wonder if it was Katherine, who told told him to say that or whether he alone had concocted that pathetic claim. Either way, I don't recall him ever making that claim again, which is odd.
Perhaps Jordan's attorney contacted him.
Trolls are sadists

Hellerup, Denmark

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#685
Tuesday Jun 24
 

Judged:

2

1

1

Butterballs wrote:
<quoted text>
Bill Dworin, the highly respected child molestation expert also confirmed that Jordy's description was 100% spot on.
He said ..... "He (Jordy Chandler) described Jackson genitalia, it was unique because of the discolouration. And then we obtained a search warrant to photograph Jackson to cooperate, what the child had said. When photographing Jackson's genitalia, it did cooperate. In other words, the boy saw Jackson naked. Does that mean Jackson molested the child? No, but it adds to the credibility of the child".
One would have thought Wacko Jacko would have raised some objections about any inaccuracies in the statement if it hadn't been true.
Why, it would have given him an opportunity to try to sue Bill Dworin for slander or libel and get hiimself a nice financial settlement of his very own.
https://www.youtube.com/watch...
OK, I was wrong, Jordan's description was 100% accurate.
Ghughes
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#686
Tuesday Jul 1
 

Judged:

1

1

1

persephone wrote:
Yes, you heard it here first, folks. A very young teenage boy named Jordan Chandler, who was well below the age of consent could give law enforcement officers a detailed roadmap of Michael Jackson's genitals. He was able to tell them exactly where to find a horrible dark-colored mole, which was located on Michael Jackson's penis. Photos were later taken of Michael Jackson's penis, which confirmed that Jordan's description was 100% accurate.
http://www.sbscpublicaccess.org/docs/ctdocs/0...
And as for the child haters who keep using the weak excuse that it was only according to Thomas Sneddon that they matched. I have news for you!!!! Two grand juries also viewed Jordan's description and the photographs of Michael Jackson's penis and agreed that they were a perfect match. So stick that in your pipe and smoke it.
If the description was accurate, and if the two grand juries agreed they would have handed down an indictment. That's was the proceeding was all about, to find corroborating evidence (not just hearsay). The FACT that there was no indictment, proves that they did NOT have the conclusive evidence to indict Michael Jackson. Please put this in your pipe....

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#687
Wednesday Jul 2
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Ghughes wrote:
<quoted text>
If the description was accurate, and if the two grand juries agreed they would have handed down an indictment. That's was the proceeding was all about, to find corroborating evidence (not just hearsay). The FACT that there was no indictment, proves that they did NOT have the conclusive evidence to indict Michael Jackson. Please put this in your pipe....
What two grand juries? The only judge I know who looked at the material was Judge Melville, and he knew they matched; it was not hearsay. Want me to give you links, to the legal documents and court transcripts? I love being given an opportunity to do that.
Choober

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#688
Monday Jul 14
 

Judged:

2

1

1

MJ Child molester yes or no?
Most definitely yes.
Only a guilty man pays off his accusers.
A 50 year old man Who builds a funfair to groom boys is certainly not innocent, it's like some man offering to show kids his puppies.
FOREVER MICHAEL

UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#689
Monday Jul 14
 

Judged:

1

1

1

I Love Michael Jackson.and no he did not do anything to anybody.I am not
Going to feed your lies you are so wrong
Nothing matched.Michael was Innocent
The only person I will listen to is Michael
I believe every word he said. The allegations are nothing but lies and trash.through the lies Michael was the
Truth! Michael was the most beautiful
Angel. I will always be there for him
No mattet what. Have you not heard
Lies for cash.parents make children lie
They'll do anything for money.
You wish

Avon, CT

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#693
Monday Jul 14
 

Judged:

1

1

1

persephone wrote:
<quoted text>
Sneddon did not go to the trouble of arranging the nude photography session for no reason. It was done specifically to seek a criminal indictment. It requires a grand jury to hand down a criminal indictment.
Of course I know you'll continue to be in severe denial about anything and everything that weakens your argument.
Then why did mj attorney's fight and win to keep the photographs and description out of court ?
Smh
Juggs Judy

AOL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#696
Monday Jul 14
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Ghughes wrote:
<quoted text>
If the description was accurate, and if the two grand juries agreed they would have handed down an indictment. That's was the proceeding was all about, to find corroborating evidence (not just hearsay). The FACT that there was no indictment, proves that they did NOT have the conclusive evidence to indict Michael Jackson. Please put this in your pipe....
Do you think that Jackson was infallible? Do you perhaps view him as a godlike being who could do no wrong, and was incapable of falsely denying a series of appalling crimes?

You can put as much spin as you like on Jordan's description, the fact remains that Jackson himself never denied that it was a correct match and $22,000,000 settlement arrived just weeks after his genitalia was photographed. Geez, what a surprise.
Octopus

Schenectady, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#698
Monday Jul 14
 

Judged:

1

1

1

persephone wrote:
<quoted text> It seems more likely that if he were truly guilty he would have quickly agreed to Evan Chandler's requests and avoided the whole mess altogether.
There is no evidence that Evan Chandler requested money. He simply found out that Wacko molested his kid. He actually went to the police and Jordan drew a diagram of the clown's spotted dong. Wacko paid because he was stripped searched nude and dehumanized by the honorable, Thomas Sneddon.

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#702
Monday Jul 14
 

Judged:

2

2

2

persephone wrote:
<quoted text> Do you not understand Melville's statement that it was 'irrelevant to the case at hand' and that he didn't want it to turn into a 'case within a case' scenario?
Amazing how haters refuse to acknowledge valid points even when a judge makes them.
Gawd, you're either stubborn, or you conveniently forget information you don't like. I posted an entire thread, about what really happened during that courtroom conversation, and none of it supports what you state. If I have to, I'll post a link to it. But for now, read what happened. It's from the transcripts, dated 5th of May, 2005.

http://www.mjfacts.info/transcripts/Court_Tra...

“Evolution is fab!”

Since: Nov 12

Deep Space 9, Alpha Quadrant

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#703
Tuesday Jul 15
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Octopus wrote:
<quoted text>
There is no evidence that Evan Chandler requested money. He simply found out that Wacko molested his kid. He actually went to the police and Jordan drew a diagram of the clown's spotted dong. Wacko paid because he was stripped searched nude and dehumanized by the honorable, Thomas Sneddon.
Len has posted a legal document several times clearly showing that Wacko was the one who insisted Evan and Jordan's mother receive a substantial sum of money in return for complete silence. It's also funny that floons label Evan as an extortionist, yet he had no problem sending his son to be thoroughly interviewed by police officers and one of the world's leading child molestation experts. Oh, and then there's the accurate drawing Jordy made of Michael Jackson's genitalia. I just can't imagine that any con artist would allow their child to make a description of a man's penis or be interviewed by the police if the whole thing was a lie. Evan and Jordy were very cooperative and open with the police, while the monster that was Wacko Jacko wasn't.

“Evolution is fab!”

Since: Nov 12

Deep Space 9, Alpha Quadrant

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#704
Tuesday Jul 15
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Len is Disgusted wrote:
<quoted text>
Gawd, you're either stubborn, or you conveniently forget information you don't like. I posted an entire thread, about what really happened during that courtroom conversation, and none of it supports what you state. If I have to, I'll post a link to it. But for now, read what happened. It's from the transcripts, dated 5th of May, 2005.
http://www.mjfacts.info/transcripts/Court_Tra...
Not stubbornness, Len, just an extreme case of celebrity worship syndrome. Or maybe creep-o-phone uses that line on his or hers neighbours when questions are asked about the gawky teenager in the bathroom problem he or she had.

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#708
Tuesday Jul 15
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Butterballs wrote:
<quoted text>
Not stubbornness, Len, just an extreme case of celebrity worship syndrome. Or maybe creep-o-phone uses that line on his or hers neighbours when questions are asked about the gawky teenager in the bathroom problem he or she had.
Good point. He/she never has admitted why a gawky teenager would be in the bedroom, with a naked man who has an erection.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

First Prev
of 28
Next Last
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••
•••
•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••