Proof That Jordan Chandler Accurately...
Lee

United States

#520 Sep 26, 2013
TripleH1976 wrote:
<quoted text>
Jordan Chandler didn't admit anything dip shit. The so-called admission was fabricated by a Jackson fan who published it n on a blog, which then caught wind by moronic Jackson fans and it spread out from there. It contained ZERO verification it came from Jordan Chandler. It never reached the reputable mainstream media. Today the admission is only available on MJ blogs, sites, and message boards.
NO it was true. Jordan Chandler said he lied.

Since: Jul 13

Location hidden

#521 Sep 26, 2013
Lee wrote:
<quoted text>
NO it was true. Jordan Chandler said he lied.
No it wasnt. It was proven to be a false report, hence why no respectable media outlet had published the story.

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

#523 Sep 26, 2013
Lee wrote:
<quoted text>
NO it was true. Jordan Chandler said he lied.
That rumor was proven false almost as soon as it appeared, and you still believe it?
Juggs Judy

United States

#524 Sep 27, 2013
Lee wrote:
<quoted text>
NO it was true. Jordan Chandler said he lied.
Oh, and just where is this big "confession" that Jordan Chandler allegedly made? Is a stupid and ignorant hater like you going tell me that every single major new source in the entire world just conveniently overlooked it? They didn't want to put this massive "confession" on their TV shows, newspapers, websites and magazines and potentially make thousands or even millions from such a massive story.

The fact is there was no confession. The only place this confession exist is in the minds of stupid and ignorant HATERZ like you.

Jordan Chandler was deemed credible by every single expert in the field of pedophilia, and could describe unique dark blemishes on Michael Jackson's erect penis which has been confirmed through 2 grand juries.

Trust a stupid and ignorant hater to conveniently ignore physical evidence.
FOREVER MICHAEL

UK

#526 Sep 30, 2013
Leave Michael Jackson alone,you are all quick to judge,Michaels not guilty.he has not done anything wrong.he has not said one bad word about anybody.Michael has NOT got one bad bone in his body.just because people couldnt understand Michael,its not his fault.and you have all Misjudged him .if something have some respect for this wonderful man.leave him alone

With all my heart I Love you MJ
Juggs Judy

United States

#527 Oct 2, 2013
FOREVER MICHAEL wrote:
Leave Michael Jackson alone,you are all quick to judge,Michaels not guilty.he has not done anything wrong.he has not said one bad word about anybody.Michael has NOT got one bad bone in his body.just because people couldnt understand Michael,its not his fault.and you have all Misjudged him .if something have some respect for this wonderful man.leave him alone
With all my heart I Love you MJ
Do you think if you keep saying "not guilty" it makes it the factual truth? Our courts have never been foolproof and there are plenty of guilty people who are set free every single day in the United States of America. If you have money just like that pervert Jackson had then you can hire the sleaziest lawyer money can buy. That's exactly what Jackson did and got away with it because all his sleazy lawyer had to do was bamboozle a couple of kids and falsify information on those who had accused him.

Trust a stupid and ignorant hater like you to conveniently overlook such an important fact, just like you stupid and ignorant haterz keep ignoring that two grand jury's confirmed that Jordan's description absolutely matched.
FOREVER MICHAEL

Croydon, UK

#529 Oct 3, 2013
Michael is not guilty.cant you handle the truth?Michael been a victim.of gossip selfish and wicked Lies.how much more can that poor and Innocent man have to go through?Michael is a sweet and wonderful person.he done so much for so many people..Michael knows I am always there for him.and he will always have me to Love him

Miss you Michael.every single second..every single minitue.every single hour every single day.
MICHAEL JACKSON I LOVE YOU BABE
(*LOVE HUGS KISS FOR ONLY MICHAEL
MICHAEL SUCH A SWEETHEART
MIJACology

New York, NY

#531 Oct 3, 2013
There was no splotch. How do we know? The strip search photographer reportedly said that he simply missed taking a photo of the splotch. But Michael was made to, ahem, readjust himself for different camera angles. What does that mean? There was NO splotch.

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

#533 Oct 4, 2013
MIJACology wrote:
There was no splotch. How do we know? The strip search photographer reportedly said that he simply missed taking a photo of the splotch. But Michael was made to, ahem, readjust himself for different camera angles. What does that mean? There was NO splotch.
Ha! There was a splotch. The D.A. planned to introduce it into court because the child's drawing and description matched the photos of it.

http://www.sbscpublicaccess.org/docs/ctdocs/0...

In his rebuttal to keep the evidence out of court, Mesereau never denied it was a match.

http://www.sbscpublicaccess.org/docs/ctdocs/0...

Even Judge Meville agreed it was a match, not hearsay. Read page 45 of his discussion with attorneys.

http://webmail.c.earthlink.net/wam/msg.jsp...

Read it and weep, while I laugh.
MIJACology

United States

#534 Oct 8, 2013
Len is Disgusted wrote:
<quoted text>
Ha! There was a splotch. The D.A. planned to introduce it into court because the child's drawing and description matched the photos of it.
http://www.sbscpublicaccess.org/docs/ctdocs/0...
In his rebuttal to keep the evidence out of court, Mesereau never denied it was a match.
http://www.sbscpublicaccess.org/docs/ctdocs/0...
Even Judge Meville agreed it was a match, not hearsay. Read page 45 of his discussion with attorneys.
http://webmail.c.earthlink.net/wam/msg.jsp...
Read it and weep, while I laugh.
LOL, SSSneddon is a LAWYER. Read carefully what the deceptive idiot said...

He said the photos reveal a MARK at "about" the same "relative" location as the dark BLEMISH. Were they in the same location or not?

MARK and BLEMISH are not the same thing. A Mark could be a mole. A Blemish could be a light splotch or dark splotch. Whatever SSSneddon meant, you can't semantically decipher it because he speaketh with a forked tongue. He is COMPLETELY covered in the way he worded his statement. You couldn't convict him of perjury under any circumstances no matter what was ultimately discovered.

Just admit he fooled you and move on.

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

#536 Oct 8, 2013
MIJACology wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL, SSSneddon is a LAWYER. Read carefully what the deceptive idiot said...
He said the photos reveal a MARK at "about" the same "relative" location as the dark BLEMISH. Were they in the same location or not?
MARK and BLEMISH are not the same thing. A Mark could be a mole. A Blemish could be a light splotch or dark splotch. Whatever SSSneddon meant, you can't semantically decipher it because he speaketh with a forked tongue. He is COMPLETELY covered in the way he worded his statement. You couldn't convict him of perjury under any circumstances no matter what was ultimately discovered.
Just admit he fooled you and move on.
Mesereau never denied it was a match, and Judge Melville agreed Sneddon was correct; it was a match. Three professionals in that form of law knew it was a match. I'll take their word over yours.

You might want to stop deceiving yourself. Life will be a lot easier for you.

Since: Jul 13

Location hidden

#538 Oct 9, 2013
Len is Disgusted wrote:
<quoted text>
Mesereau never denied it was a match, and Judge Melville agreed Sneddon was correct; it was a match. Three professionals in that form of law knew it was a match. I'll take their word over yours.
You might want to stop deceiving yourself. Life will be a lot easier for you.
Its outrages how they accept Michael Jacksons (the notorious liar) solitary word and story, and then have the audacity to deny a piece of strong evidence even after it has been confirmed by several respectable law enforcements. I wonder if they would defend any other pedophile to this degree

“Evolution is fab!”

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#539 Oct 9, 2013
Pishpash1234 wrote:
<quoted text>
Its outrages how they accept Michael Jacksons (the notorious liar) solitary word and story, and then have the audacity to deny a piece of strong evidence even after it has been confirmed by several respectable law enforcements. I wonder if they would defend any other pedophile to this degree
Like the interview he gave to Diane Sawyer where he claimed there were no markings on his penis. Floons actually believe he was telling the truth, despite respected law enforcement officers and even people like Dr. Richard Strick saying otherwise.
persephone

Mountain View, CA

#540 Oct 9, 2013
Butterballs wrote:
<quoted text>
Like the interview he gave to Diane Sawyer where he claimed there were no markings on his penis. Floons actually believe he was telling the truth, despite respected law enforcement officers and even people like Dr. Richard Strick saying otherwise.
Apparently you arent' familiar with Dr. Strick's statement that said, in part, that "I was told that the photos matched what the child had described", which clearly indicates that he did NOT view the drawings/description himself but was taking someone else's word for it.

I wouldn't take anyone else's word for that, and that includes law enforcement.

J-J-Jina Wild

“VITILIGO”

Since: Jun 10

IS A BIOTCH

#541 Oct 9, 2013
persephone wrote:
<quoted text> Apparently you arent' familiar with Dr. Strick's statement that said, in part, that "I was told that the photos matched what the child had described", which clearly indicates that he did NOT view the drawings/description himself but was taking someone else's word for it.
I wouldn't take anyone else's word for that, and that includes law enforcement.
That's because you're fiercely determined to put all of your faith in a person who, if you were honest with yourself, you would have to admit acted in a very questionable manner and who, if you were twice honest with yourself, you couldn't genuinely defend as 100% innocent. However, don't stress because we all know that honesty is a dirty word where f'loons are concerned.

Tell us again why an adult male looking at porn with teenagers is fine and acceptable. Or better yet, tell us why it's the fault of the gawky teenager when a man with an erection shows the boy his c0ck.

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

#542 Oct 9, 2013
persephone wrote:
<quoted text> Apparently you arent' familiar with Dr. Strick's statement that said, in part, that "I was told that the photos matched what the child had described", which clearly indicates that he did NOT view the drawings/description himself but was taking someone else's word for it.
I wouldn't take anyone else's word for that, and that includes law enforcement.
Your denial is laughable. Dr. Strick supported what the child said. On the other hand, three people we definitely who saw the drawing, description, and photos were Sneddon, Mesereau, and Judge Mellville. Sneddon stated it was a match, something the child could only have known by being intimidate with Pedo Pan. Mesereau did not deny it. Most of all, Judge Melville agreed it was a match. I would be absolutely delighted to post the links for you and to give you the page numbers in which it was validated.

Nice try, no cigar.

I look forward to your next excuse.

“Evolution is fab!”

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#544 Oct 10, 2013
persephone wrote:
<quoted text> Apparently you arent' familiar with Dr. Strick's statement that said, in part, that "I was told that the photos matched what the child had described", which clearly indicates that he did NOT view the drawings/description himself but was taking someone else's word for it.
I wouldn't take anyone else's word for that, and that includes law enforcement.
Good Lordy, Good Lordy. That's twice in a row, your pi$s poor reading skills have let you down yet again, Pedophone. If you read my post carefully you would see I'm referring to the interview that wacko gave on US television where he claimed there were ABSOLUTELY no markings on his genitals. In other words he was calling Jordie and the entire police force who worked on the case liars.

I was referring to Dr. Richard Strick as he is somebody that such vile haters such as yourself cannot discredit as he was simply there on behalf of the authorities just to make sure they didn't do anything they weren't supposed to do.

Now, as you know, he gave a nice little interview after that drug addict, Pedo Pan, kicked the bucket and said that his genitalia were very oddly coloured with light skin and dark skin. Now unless you're a celebrity worshipper that sounds like the was very much indeed very noticeable markings on Wacko genitalia, despite his (WACKO) claims, wouldn't you say?

Now, rather than give me one of your repetitive and quite frankly BS claims about grand juries and so on, why don't you focus on why that creep that you worship was telling blatant lies on national television.
FOREVER MICHAEL

Croydon, UK

#545 Oct 10, 2013
The only creeps are the people who listen to all these made up stories.the Imagianation.it wasnt the childs fault..it was the parents who made the children lie.it was well planned and thought out
From the beginning.to get money out of Michael all these parents lies were complete false
Michael was telling the truth.he was a very honest man.I trust Michael..and I believe him.
Michael was a very sweet polite kind caring man
He made difference in peoples Lives
He changed the world and made the world a better place I just thank Michael for having him in our lives.

We miss you so much Michael
Really truely love you MJ
With all my heart Michael Jackson I Love you
Forever sweetest angel
Legend Legacy Lives on
Michael is our heart.Michael is perfect in every way

MICHAEL IS HERE TO STAY
MICHAEL IS FOREVER
MICHAEL IS FOR ALL TIME
MICHAEL WILL REMAINE IN OUR HEARTS FOREVER
MICHAEL IS THE SWEETEST MAN..
SWEETEST ANGEL
WE FOREVER LOVE HIM
LEAVE HIM ALONE.HE IS INNOCENT AND ALWAYS WAS.

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

#547 Oct 10, 2013
FOREVER MICHAEL wrote:
it wasnt the childs fault..it was the parents who made the children lie.it was well planned and thought out
Since Sneddon, Mesereau, and Judge Melville saw the drawing, description, and photos of Michael's wang and know they matched, I'm very interested to know how Jordan knew what It looked like.

Do explain.
hateration at its best

Valley Stream, NY

#548 Oct 11, 2013
im not really a big MJ fan. But some of the people on this site should be shot dead. You are a bunch of jealous people. Hes done so much for the music industry and for the world. get a life rather than spending your time down sizing such a good person. Im sure the ugliness you see in him is actually how you see yourselves. hes dead and cant defend himself. you all are ugly people.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Michael Jackson Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
How can anyone think Wade Robson is lying? (Jul '13) 11 hr Light 9
Michael Jackson's lover tells all (Jan '11) Nov 13 Spotted Wee 25
Deborah Ffrench troll for yrs Nov 10 Spotted Wee 1
Super F'loon Deborah Ffrench (Feb '10) Nov 10 Spotted Wee 132
More proof MJ was an vile pedophile! Nov 8 Spotted Wee 1
M.J. was great but No Hero; "Lip-Synched" almos... (Jul '09) Nov 8 Spotted Wee 151
News Rep: Prince Jackson suffers knee injury in traf... Nov 5 Please 1
More from around the web