Down with Child Haterz

UK

#316 Aug 19, 2013
ChasUGC wrote:
<quoted text>
That statement itself is sexually suggestive and sick.
Says the attention seeking girlie boy who supports unrelated man/boy sleepovers because he's got the hots for a dead pop star.

LOL.
Down with Child Haterz

UK

#318 Aug 19, 2013
ChasUGC wrote:
<quoted text>

Just like you call legal documents, documents that the court threw out as unlawful.
When did the court throw out evidence from the prosecution because it was unlawful?
Down with Child Haterz

UK

#319 Aug 19, 2013
ChasUGC wrote:
<quoted text>
Hearsay evidence is not legal evidence, it is unlawful. It is not legal evidence, therefore the documents cannot be legal documents. But, you will never get it, because you are going to continue to "believe what you want" to believe.
Get my point?
So you're saying that Wacko Jacko's lawyer, Thomas Mesereau broke the law when invented fake weddings at Neverland, amongst other things?
Chelsea

Buffalo, NY

#322 Aug 23, 2013
Len is Disgusted wrote:
<quoted text>
That part I have heard but I have to check it, myself. However, Ralph Chacon was the security guard who saw Michael giving oral sex to a young boy. The reasons for bringing him in as a witness are on page 23.
http://www.sbscpublicaccess.org/docs/ctdocs/1...
Kassim Abdool, another security guard, also witnessed untoward behavior, on the part of Michael. His description of bringing vaseline to Michael, who had a hard-on, and seeing a young boy in the room made me ill.
http://www.sbscpublicaccess.org/docs/ctdocs/0...
Let me give you the link to the transcripts, at mjfacts.
http://www.mjfacts.info/2005_trial_transcript...
You can find a plethora of information from the transcripts. Both men testified, at the 2005 trial.
Len is Disgusted, first and foremost I love your comments as you always provide useful links which document MJ's strange and questionable behavior.

I was wondering if you could help me with one question I have about MJ. I was recently reading a general forum and one user mentioned that MJ was applying Vaseline to one of the young boys he was sleeping with for the apparent reason this boy was suffering from constipation from eating too much junk food. The user mentioned it had something to do with Jordan Chandler's accusations and the officers investigating Jackson had actually flown out to this boys home and wanted to conduct an examination via a professional doctor to see if Vaseline had been applied to his private area. I was wondering if you could tell me if this is true and if there are any documents I can read on this matter?

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

#323 Aug 23, 2013
Chelsea wrote:
<quoted text>
Len is Disgusted, first and foremost I love your comments as you always provide useful links which document MJ's strange and questionable behavior.
I was wondering if you could help me with one question I have about MJ. I was recently reading a general forum and one user mentioned that MJ was applying Vaseline to one of the young boys he was sleeping with for the apparent reason this boy was suffering from constipation from eating too much junk food. The user mentioned it had something to do with Jordan Chandler's accusations and the officers investigating Jackson had actually flown out to this boys home and wanted to conduct an examination via a professional doctor to see if Vaseline had been applied to his private area. I was wondering if you could tell me if this is true and if there are any documents I can read on this matter?
You can read the psychiatrist's discussion with Jordan Chandler, on MJ Facts. The more descriptive sexual acts he described were deleted. But what he had to say about Brett Barnes (referred to as "Tommy.") was chilling.

http://www.mjfacts.info/jordie.php

Victor Gutierrez scanned the entire document into his book "Michael Jackson Was My Lover." This included the vaseline-on-anus discussion (*shudder*) The contents of the book were enough to make Mesereau want it kept out of court. On the list of 14 items Mesereau wanted kept out of court, the book was number 10. Had it not been of consequence, it wouldn't have even been worthy of mention. His discussion is on page 10. He didn't say the book was a lie; he claimed it was irrelevant to the case.

http://www.sbscpublicaccess.org/docs/ctdocs/0...

Below is the link to the legal documents in which the D.A. responded.

http://www.sbscpublicaccess.org/docs/ctdocs/0...

Here is a link to the legal documents in which the authorities wanted to interview Brett. The authorities took what Jordan had to say so seriously, they went all the way to Australia. Brett's parents refused to let them speak to or examine their son in any way.

http://www.sbscpublicaccess.org/docs/ctdocs/0...

Lastly, here is a link to the legal documents in which Kassim Abdool, one of the Neverland Five, discusses Michael telling security to bring a jar of vaseline to his bedroom.

http://www.sbscpublicaccess.org/docs/ctdocs/0...

The tactics Michael used to in

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

#324 Aug 23, 2013
Sorry, I hit the send button too soon.

The tactics Kassim described Michael used to intimidate him were horrifying.

“Why can't you share your bed?”

Since: May 13

Canada

#325 Aug 25, 2013
Len is Disgusted wrote:
Sorry, I hit the send button too soon.
The tactics Kassim described Michael used to intimidate him were horrifying.
I agree. Jackson's threats towards ex-maid Adrian McManus are equally horrifying. Michael Jackson was downright evil, if you got on his bad side.

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

#326 Aug 25, 2013
TripleH1976 wrote:
<quoted text>
I agree. Jackson's threats towards ex-maid Adrian McManus are equally horrifying. Michael Jackson was downright evil, if you got on his bad side.
Whatever he was when he started out, it apparently disappeared after Thriller. When people who knew him talk about him, they say he was initially a sweet albeit troubled person, who would have benefitted from counseling. By the time he became a mega-star, it was too late. He became evil itself.

“Brevity is the soule of wit”

Since: May 09

USA

#328 Aug 25, 2013
MJFREAK wrote:
Unfortunately it took Wacko Jacko's death to find out that jordy's discription of michaels penis was 'dead on'. Jordy's drawing was not 100% accurate, and in documents and questioning,
Wacko had blotchy junk, dullard. How could the kid have known that without seeing it? Can you be 100% accurate with the hundreds you've encountered, or was all you could see were their stomachs?

Now tell me again how you 'know' Jordan Chandler will be recanting and testifying in Wacko' Jacko's behalf.

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

#329 Aug 25, 2013
MJFRIEND wrote:
Unfortunately it took Jacksons death to find out that jordy's discription of michaels penis was inaccurate. Jordy's drawing was not 100% accurate, and in documents and questioning, jordy told of a story where he claimed michael told him that brett barnes was not circumcised, and that he had to "spank the monkey" in adifferent way than how he and michael did. Jordy's drawing and answers to questions depicted michael as being circumcised. In 2009 the autopsy report revealed that Michael was not circumcised.
Nothing in the flurry of legal documents between Sneddon and Mesereau mentioned foreskin. However, there was discussion of a dark blotch on Michael's penis, which so accurately matched the child's drawing and description, the D.A. wanted to bring that, along with the photos of it, into court.

You're trying to hard to deceive yourself.

“VITILIGO”

Since: Jun 10

IS A BIOTCH

#331 Aug 26, 2013
MJFRIEND wrote:
TO LEN IS DIAGUSTED : You're trying so hard to avoid the autopsy report. By doing what you do best, deflecting on to something else , avoidiing the subject. by mentioning the discoloration. How do you explain the autopsy report contradicting the photo he drew , and his "story" about brett barnes and michael.?
Eh? The autopsy contradicted a story about Brett and Michael? What did they do? Ask him a 'true or false' as he lay on the slab? And I'd love to know how anybody can draw a photo. How do people do that?

Your junk supply is greater than goodbvibration's and that one has an endless supply of crap. I'm stunned.

“Evolution is fab!”

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#332 Aug 26, 2013
J-J-Jina Wild wrote:
<quoted text>
Eh? The autopsy contradicted a story about Brett and Michael? What did they do? Ask him a 'true or false' as he lay on the slab? And I'd love to know how anybody can draw a photo. How do people do that?
Your junk supply is greater than goodbvibration's and that one has an endless supply of crap. I'm stunned.
Ooh, I can't wait to see what MJWazzock reveals about BB regarding Wackos autopsy report

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

#333 Aug 26, 2013
MJFRIEND wrote:
TO LEN IS DIAGUSTED : You're trying so hard to avoid the autopsy report. By doing what you do best, deflecting on to something else , avoidiing the subject. by mentioning the discoloration. How do you explain the autopsy report contradicting the photo he drew , and his "story" about brett barnes and michael.?
What's there to avoid? I've read the autopsy. There isn't any mention of his Thang. The only people who can honestly say they saw the drawing, description, and photos of Michael's polka-dotted pecker are the police, the defense attorneys, and the prosecuting attorney. None of them said the child inaccurately described it

If you aren't the f'loon Goodvibrations, then I'd have to say the two of you are running neck and neck for the idiot's award..

“Evolution is fab!”

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#334 Aug 27, 2013
Len is Disgusted wrote:
<quoted text>
What's there to avoid? I've read the autopsy. There isn't any mention of his Thang. The only people who can honestly say they saw the drawing, description, and photos of Michael's polka-dotted pecker are the police, the defense attorneys, and the prosecuting attorney. None of them said the child inaccurately described it
If you aren't the f'loon Goodvibrations, then I'd have to say the two of you are running neck and neck for the idiot's award..
The only mention of Wackos dingdong that I can find is on page 5 where it says:

"The genitalia are those of an adult male. The penis "appears" uncircumcised.

The next bit is on page 7 where it says:

GENTLE SYSTEM

"The prostate is moderately enlarged, with a prominent intravesical middle (median) lobe. The prostatic parenchyma is nodular. Both testicles are in the scrotum and are remarkably without trauma."

http://tmz.vo.llnwd.net/o28/newsdesk/tmz_docu...

So there is DEFINITELY no confirmation that Wackos penis was 100% uncircumcised.

But this is what those child hating floons will have you believe, on Wikipedia.

"One inconsistency was an inaccurate claim that Jackson was circumcised. Jackson's autopsy report confirmed that he had not been circumcised and his foreskin appeared naturally intact and showed no signs of having been restored from a circumcision."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1993_child_sexua...

So unless those child hating floons have got access to something else, it's probably safe to say they have completely fabricated the claim about the coroner claiming Jackson's penis was 100% uncircumcised and that there had been no attempts to restore the foreskin.

And it's definitely safe to say they have fabricated the claim that Jordie said it was circumcised in the first place.

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

#339 Aug 27, 2013
Butterballs wrote:
<quoted text>
The only mention of Wackos dingdong that I can find is on page 5 where it says:
"The genitalia are those of an adult male. The penis "appears" uncircumcised.
The next bit is on page 7 where it says:
GENTLE SYSTEM
"The prostate is moderately enlarged, with a prominent intravesical middle (median) lobe. The prostatic parenchyma is nodular. Both testicles are in the scrotum and are remarkably without trauma."
http://tmz.vo.llnwd.net/o28/newsdesk/tmz_docu...
So there is DEFINITELY no confirmation that Wackos penis was 100% uncircumcised.
But this is what those child hating floons will have you believe, on Wikipedia.
"One inconsistency was an inaccurate claim that Jackson was circumcised. Jackson's autopsy report confirmed that he had not been circumcised and his foreskin appeared naturally intact and showed no signs of having been restored from a circumcision."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1993_child_sexua...
So unless those child hating floons have got access to something else, it's probably safe to say they have completely fabricated the claim about the coroner claiming Jackson's penis was 100% uncircumcised and that there had been no attempts to restore the foreskin.
And it's definitely safe to say they have fabricated the claim that Jordie said it was circumcised in the first place.
I read page 5 and did not find that information. What I found was a list of drugs he had. Are you sure it's on that page? I'd like to read it. Regardless, by the wording you quoted, it's obvious the pathologist was not confident about foreskin.

Aside from that, there is no proof Jordan said anything about foreskin. What is important is the child's description, especially the blotches, were so accurate, the D.A. wanted to introduce the child's drawing and description into court together with the photos because the matched, as proof Michael was not of a modest nature. Mesereau never denied they matched.

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

#340 Aug 27, 2013
Butterballs wrote:
<quoted text>
The only mention of Wackos dingdong that I can find is on page 5 where it says:
"The genitalia are those of an adult male. The penis "appears" uncircumcised.
The next bit is on page 7 where it says:
GENTLE SYSTEM
"The prostate is moderately enlarged, with a prominent intravesical middle (median) lobe. The prostatic parenchyma is nodular. Both testicles are in the scrotum and are remarkably without trauma."
http://tmz.vo.llnwd.net/o28/newsdesk/tmz_docu...
So there is DEFINITELY no confirmation that Wackos penis was 100% uncircumcised.
But this is what those child hating floons will have you believe, on Wikipedia.
"One inconsistency was an inaccurate claim that Jackson was circumcised. Jackson's autopsy report confirmed that he had not been circumcised and his foreskin appeared naturally intact and showed no signs of having been restored from a circumcision."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1993_child_sexua...
So unless those child hating floons have got access to something else, it's probably safe to say they have completely fabricated the claim about the coroner claiming Jackson's penis was 100% uncircumcised and that there had been no attempts to restore the foreskin.
And it's definitely safe to say they have fabricated the claim that Jordie said it was circumcised in the first place.
Okay, I found it on page 15, not page 5. However, the word "appears" is written. Obviously, the coroner wasn't entirely sure or he would have written "IS uncircumcised."

As I said, though, unless somebody saw Jordan's drawing, read the description, and saw the photos of Michael's pecker, nobody knows if he really did say anything about foreskin. Nevermind it pulls back, during an erection, which could confuse a child. The only evidence we have about his Wang is the D.A. was so confident the child was accurate, he wanted to introduce all that material in court, and Mesereau did everything he could to keep it out of court.

Since: Jun 13

Durham, NC

#341 Aug 28, 2013
The coroner wasn't even sure of the penis when he examined MJ. The fact he said "appeared" should have been a sign. Because if he was sure it was uncircumsized, it would've just said, "uncircumsized", period.

“Brevity is the soule of wit”

Since: May 09

USA

#343 Aug 28, 2013
MJFREAK wrote:
Michael was not circumcised, niether are his brothers. the jackson brothers and michael were not circumcised.
' was not released to the public in any document.'
In that case, how are you privy to such information lurking perv?

“Brevity is the soule of wit”

Since: May 09

USA

#344 Aug 28, 2013
MJFIEND wrote:
Jordy drew a drawing of a circumcised penis. IN A story to police jordy claims michael talked as though he were circumcised. This is one of the reasons the drawing was kept out of trial because of the circumcision inconsistency with joedy
Trial? Which trial, stooge?

Tell me , pedo enabler, how many 12 year old kids do you who can accurate draw a man's junk? He knew that dirty molester had splotches.

Now tell me again how you 'know' Jordan Chandler will be recanting and testifying in Wacko' Jacko's behalf.

“Brevity is the soule of wit”

Since: May 09

USA

#347 Aug 28, 2013
MJFIEND wrote:
: you all would make a poor prosecution team. In fact, youd fail in a cour of law ? WHY? I WOULDNT WANT TOU prosecuting my case thats for sure. In a court room when your losing the case you cant bring , because you cant explain or debate the inconsistency of jordys description of michael that was always evidence He was "fibbing"
Another jailhouse lawyer!
Tell me again how you 'know' Jordan Chandler will be recanting and testifying in Wacko' Jacko's behalf.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Michael Jackson Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News A Rabbi Remembers His Relationship With Michael... 8 hr MJFRIEND 126
Child Molestation Expert: Victims Can Take 20 t... 13 hr Octopus 230
News Claim: Michael Jackson Paid at Least $200M to S... 14 hr Octopus 341
Angry deluded f'loon trolls a thread 23 hr Lisa 3
Michael Jackson Chat Room! (Dec '12) Sat Lisa 42
News Michael Jackson's Neverland Ranch could be your... Sat Len is Disgusted 46
News James Safechuck Claims Michael Jackson Kept Him... (May '14) Sat JinaWild 813
More from around the web