Proof That Jordan Chandler Accurately Described Michael Jackson's Penis

Posted in the Michael Jackson Forum

First Prev
of 28
Next Last
persephone

Manassas, VA

#1 Apr 8, 2013
Yes, you heard it here first, folks. A very young teenage boy named Jordan Chandler, who was well below the age of consent could give law enforcement officers a detailed roadmap of Michael Jackson's genitals. He was able to tell them exactly where to find a horrible dark-colored mole, which was located on Michael Jackson's penis. Photos were later taken of Michael Jackson's penis, which confirmed that Jordan's description was 100% accurate.

http://www.sbscpublicaccess.org/docs/ctdocs/0...

And as for the child haters who keep using the weak excuse that it was only according to Thomas Sneddon that they matched. I have news for you!!!! Two grand juries also viewed Jordan's description and the photographs of Michael Jackson's penis and agreed that they were a perfect match. So stick that in your pipe and smoke it.

“Evolution is fab!”

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#3 Apr 9, 2013
persephone wrote:
Yes, you heard it here first, folks. A very young teenage boy named Jordan Chandler, who was well below the age of consent could give law enforcement officers a detailed roadmap of Michael Jackson's genitals. He was able to tell them exactly where to find a horrible dark-colored mole, which was located on Michael Jackson's penis. Photos were later taken of Michael Jackson's penis, which confirmed that Jordan's description was 100% accurate.
http://www.sbscpublicaccess.org/docs/ctdocs/0...
And as for the child haters who keep using the weak excuse that it was only according to Thomas Sneddon that they matched. I have news for you!!!! Two grand juries also viewed Jordan's description and the photographs of Michael Jackson's penis and agreed that they were a perfect match. So stick that in your pipe and smoke it.
Bill Dworin, the highly respected child molestation expert also confirmed that Jordy's description was 100% spot on.

He said ..... "He (Jordy Chandler) described Jackson genitalia, it was unique because of the discolouration. And then we obtained a search warrant to photograph Jackson to cooperate, what the child had said. When photographing Jackson's genitalia, it did cooperate. In other words, the boy saw Jackson naked. Does that mean Jackson molested the child? No, but it adds to the credibility of the child".

One would have thought Wacko Jacko would have raised some objections about any inaccuracies in the statement if it hadn't been true.

Why, it would have given him an opportunity to try to sue Bill Dworin for slander or libel and get hiimself a nice financial settlement of his very own.

“Evolution is fab!”

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#4 Apr 9, 2013
Here's the video clip of Michael Jackson (Wacko Jacko) being interviewed by Diane Sawyer. He is asked about the description, that was made by Jordy Chandler and the photographs that were taken by the local authorities. Rather than give an direct answer, he starts blathering on about how there was no connection and there was nothing that could match him up with these charges. He is asked directly if there were any markings on his genitals and his reply was there was no markings there was no markings. He then tries to claim that he wouldn't be sat here and giving this interview if there was.

http://www.youtube.com/watch...

Dr. Richard Strick was a doctor who was present on behalf of the local authorities during the photographing of Michael Jackson's dingdong. He said that Michael Jackson's genitalia was very oddly coloured with dark skin and light skin. He says he was later told that the boy (Jordy) description absolutely matched with the photographs that were taken.



So, who was lying? Was it Dr. Richard Strick, and the local authorities? Were they going to introduce photographs of a penis that contained zero markings? Or was it Michael Jackson a man who was notorious for telling massive and trashy lies on national television?
persephone

Mountain View, CA

#5 Apr 9, 2013
Butterballs wrote:
Here's the video clip of Michael Jackson (Wacko Jacko) being interviewed by Diane Sawyer. He is asked about the description, that was made by Jordy Chandler and the photographs that were taken by the local authorities. Rather than give an direct answer, he starts blathering on about how there was no connection and there was nothing that could match him up with these charges. He is asked directly if there were any markings on his genitals and his reply was there was no markings there was no markings. He then tries to claim that he wouldn't be sat here and giving this interview if there was.
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
Dr. Richard Strick was a doctor who was present on behalf of the local authorities during the photographing of Michael Jackson's dingdong. He said that Michael Jackson's genitalia was very oddly coloured with dark skin and light skin. He says he was later told that the boy (Jordy) description absolutely matched with the photographs that were taken.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =gHrJTrgKR1oXX
So, who was lying? Was it Dr. Richard Strick, and the local authorities? Were they going to introduce photographs of a penis that contained zero markings? Or was it Michael Jackson a man who was notorious for telling massive and trashy lies on national television?
Strick's comment "I was told" indicates that he was relying upon someone else's word that it matched, nothing that he himself could definitely verify.

Save yourself the bother of providing links to stale news that we have all seen dozens of times. There is no independent corroboration of Jordan's description.
Lee

Burbank, CA

#6 Apr 9, 2013
Butterballs wrote:
Here's the video clip of Michael Jackson (Wacko Jacko) being interviewed by Diane Sawyer. He is asked about the description, that was made by Jordy Chandler and the photographs that were taken by the local authorities. Rather than give an direct answer, he starts blathering on about how there was no connection and there was nothing that could match him up with these charges. He is asked directly if there were any markings on his genitals and his reply was there was no markings there was no markings. He then tries to claim that he wouldn't be sat here and giving this interview if there was.
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
Dr. Richard Strick was a doctor who was present on behalf of the local authorities during the photographing of Michael Jackson's dingdong. He said that Michael Jackson's genitalia was very oddly coloured with dark skin and light skin. He says he was later told that the boy (Jordy) description absolutely matched with the photographs that were taken.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =gHrJTrgKR1oXX
So, who was lying? Was it Dr. Richard Strick, and the local authorities? Were they going to introduce photographs of a penis that contained zero markings? Or was it Michael Jackson a man who was notorious for telling massive and trashy lies on national television?
Even if this were true, anyone could guess that, because he had vitiligo.
Patrick

New York, NY

#7 Apr 9, 2013
Lee wrote:
<quoted text>Even if this were true, anyone could guess that, because he had vitiligo.
You expect anyone with common sense to Beleive a 13 year old boy " guessed " that mj had splotches ???
You are delusional
Patrick

New York, NY

#8 Apr 9, 2013
persephone wrote:
<quoted text> Strick's comment "I was told" indicates that he was relying upon someone else's word that it matched, nothing that he himself could definitely verify.
Save yourself the bother of providing links to stale news that we have all seen dozens of times. There is no independent corroboration of Jordan's description.
Sorry floon
Bill dworin the lead lapd detective confirmed the match himself .
Ask yourself why in any way normal should a child see a non family member private area ???
Any other person did that they would have been convicted with that and a child testimony

“Evolution is fab!”

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#9 Apr 10, 2013
Lee wrote:
<quoted text>Even if this were true, anyone could guess that, because he had vitiligo.
I very much doubt that, Lee. Vitiligo makes your skin turn a light colour not dark. Jordy described a dark splotch in a certain position. It was a hell of a guess, if it was just a guess.

As for the video by Dr. Richard Strick, I posted that to prove once again that Michael Jackson was a compulsive liar. It was just lie after lie after lie with him. I don't know why anybody would believe him when he claimed he wouldn't hurt a child. He was such a trashy and dishonest man.

“Evolution is fab!”

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#10 Apr 10, 2013
Patrick wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry floon
Bill dworin the lead lapd detective confirmed the match himself .
Ask yourself why in any way normal should a child see a non family member private area ???
Any other person did that they would have been convicted with that and a child testimony
That's absolutely correct, Patrick. Here's another interview from Bill Dworin, you will find very interesting.

http://tinyurl.com/bpq9mf3

This quote in particular caught my eye.

“Everybody who listened to this child,‘cause he’s not only interviewed by my officers, he was interviewed by Department of Children and Family Services, he was interviewed by the district attorney’s office at a later date, we were all satisfied he was a very credible witness.”
persephone

Sunnyvale, CA

#11 Apr 10, 2013
Butterballs wrote:
<quoted text>
That's absolutely correct, Patrick. Here's another interview from Bill Dworin, you will find very interesting.
http://tinyurl.com/bpq9mf3
This quote in particular caught my eye.
“Everybody who listened to this child,‘cause he’s not only interviewed by my officers, he was interviewed by Department of Children and Family Services, he was interviewed by the district attorney’s office at a later date, we were all satisfied he was a very credible witness.”
Of course if he refuses to testify and be cross examined, we will never know just how 'credible' a witness he may or may not have been. And that's just part of the process.

There are other cases in which an innocent person was accused, arrested, convicted, and incarcerated, only to have the alleged 'victim' later recant their accusation and admit it was a lie.

So much for your perceived infallibility of professionals.
persephone

Sunnyvale, CA

#12 Apr 10, 2013
Patrick wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry floon
Bill dworin the lead lapd detective confirmed the match himself .
Ask yourself why in any way normal should a child see a non family member private area ???
Any other person did that they would have been convicted with that and a child testimony
Detectives, police, psychologists, etc., are not superhuman creatures who are incapable of misjudgments and making mistakes.
persephone

Sunnyvale, CA

#13 Apr 10, 2013
Patrick wrote:
<quoted text>
You expect anyone with common sense to Beleive a 13 year old boy " guessed " that mj had splotches ???
You are delusional
Leaving aside for the moment whether or not anything matched,(which I doubt) let's look at exactly how the drawings were made.

In what sort of situation were the drawings made? How many drawings were made and were some discarded? If so, then why? Did the prosecution allow themselves the luxury of choosing exactly which drawings were to be used?
The Credit Angel Can Help

Albany, NY

#14 Apr 10, 2013
persephone wrote:
<quoted text> Leaving aside for the moment whether or not anything matched,(which I doubt) let's look at exactly how the drawings were made.
In what sort of situation were the drawings made? How many drawings were made and were some discarded? If so, then why? Did the prosecution allow themselves the luxury of choosing exactly which drawings were to be used?
Where does it say that Jordan Chandler drew more than one drawing of Michael Joseph Jackson's disgusting, spotted penis? And even if he did, the mole was there in the same exact location Jordan claimed it was? Of course, Michael Joseph Jackson stripped down nude and it was obvious that his filthy penis was erect because the wart was underneath. Jordan Chandler accurately described the blemish, which he would have never known about had Michael Joseph Jackson didn't take off his filthy clothes in front of him.

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

#15 Apr 10, 2013
persephone wrote:
Yes, you heard it here first, folks. A very young teenage boy named Jordan Chandler, who was well below the age of consent could give law enforcement officers a detailed roadmap of Michael Jackson's genitals. He was able to tell them exactly where to find a horrible dark-colored mole, which was located on Michael Jackson's penis. Photos were later taken of Michael Jackson's penis, which confirmed that Jordan's description was 100% accurate.
http://www.sbscpublicaccess.org/docs/ctdocs/0...
And as for the child haters who keep using the weak excuse that it was only according to Thomas Sneddon that they matched. I have news for you!!!! Two grand juries also viewed Jordan's description and the photographs of Michael Jackson's penis and agreed that they were a perfect match. So stick that in your pipe and smoke it.
You keep talking about the two grand juries. Will you please post links to legal documents, supporting your claim? What I have found is a link to the D.A., discussing how the drawing, description, and photos matched, and another to Mesereau, who never denied they matched and wanted them kept out of court.

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

#16 Apr 10, 2013
Butterballs wrote:
<quoted text>
That's absolutely correct, Patrick. Here's another interview from Bill Dworin, you will find very interesting.
http://tinyurl.com/bpq9mf3
This quote in particular caught my eye.
“Everybody who listened to this child,‘cause he’s not only interviewed by my officers, he was interviewed by Department of Children and Family Services, he was interviewed by the district attorney’s office at a later date, we were all satisfied he was a very credible witness.”
That was a very interesting interview. Thanks for posting it.

“Evolution is fab!”

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#17 Apr 12, 2013
Len is Disgusted wrote:
<quoted text>
That was a very interesting interview. Thanks for posting it.
F'loon's are always attacking Thomas Sneddon and claiming he had a personal vendetta against Jackson. But it looks like every officer who investigated Pedo Pan believed he was a child molester who sexually abused Jordy. Even the Department of Children and Family Services, believed Jordy's allegations were credible.
Zagreus

Fremont, CA

#18 Apr 18, 2013
persephone wrote:
Yes, you heard it here first, folks. A very young teenage boy named Jordan Chandler, who was well below the age of consent could give law enforcement officers a detailed roadmap of Michael Jackson's genitals. He was able to tell them exactly where to find a horrible dark-colored mole, which was located on Michael Jackson's penis. Photos were later taken of Michael Jackson's penis, which confirmed that Jordan's description was 100% accurate.
http://www.sbscpublicaccess.org/docs/ctdocs/0...
And as for the child haters who keep using the weak excuse that it was only according to Thomas Sneddon that they matched. I have news for you!!!! Two grand juries also viewed Jordan's description and the photographs of Michael Jackson's penis and agreed that they were a perfect match. So stick that in your pipe and smoke it.
Untouchable: The Strange Life and Tragic Death of Michael Jackson which is endorsed by Thomas Mesereau also confirms that Jordan Chandler accurately described the discoloration on Michael Jackson's penis and testicles. If Michael Jackson's former multimillion dollar lawyer is confirming that it matched, then what idiot is going to argue with that?
Patrick

Bristol, CT

#21 Apr 23, 2013
Len is Disgusted wrote:
<quoted text>
You keep talking about the two grand juries. Will you please post links to legal documents, supporting your claim? What I have found is a link to the D.A., discussing how the drawing, description, and photos matched, and another to Mesereau, who never denied they matched and wanted them kept out of court.
Annapolis, Md.: What are some of your scoops in the book? Please divulge.

Diane Dimond: The conduct of Juror #5 which I believe constituted juror misconduct

The actual transcripts of discussions between the 1993 boy and his psychiatrist

What that boy's mother predicts for Michael Jackson's future

How the Prosecution broke the news about the verdict to THIS boy-accuser

How MJ reacted when cops first went to Neverland with the body search warrant to take pictures of his private parts to see if they matched the boy's detailed description

What a security guard at Neverland SAW WITH HIS OWN TWO EYES between Michael Jackson and a 12 year old boy. And the guard passed TWO lie detector tests!!!

Len is this true about the security guard ??
persephone

Sunnyvale, CA

#22 Apr 23, 2013
Butterballs wrote:
<quoted text>
F'loon's are always attacking Thomas Sneddon and claiming he had a personal vendetta against Jackson. But it looks like every officer who investigated Pedo Pan believed he was a child molester who sexually abused Jordy. Even the Department of Children and Family Services, believed Jordy's allegations were credible.
And when did our system rely upon the opinions of such people to determine guilt or innocence?

Do you think that such people are beyond all human error and are incapable of being fooled or making mistakes or midjugments? Are their opinions to be regarded as infallible?

It sounds as though you might be suffering from a case of 'Hero Worhip' of such professionals.
persephone

Sunnyvale, CA

#23 Apr 23, 2013
Len is Disgusted wrote:
<quoted text>
You keep talking about the two grand juries. Will you please post links to legal documents, supporting your claim? What I have found is a link to the D.A., discussing how the drawing, description, and photos matched, and another to Mesereau, who never denied they matched and wanted them kept out of court.
Mesereau was defending MJ from the charges filed from the Arvizos, not Jordan Chandler, who, I notice, absolutely refused to be of any help whatsoever.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 28
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Michael Jackson Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Elvis Presley Jokey Jokes 4 MJfans 4 min you wish 735
Who is your favourite musician or band of all t... 59 min Stormageddon 36
Girl with Asperger Syndrome Performing Michael ... 1 hr Pop Tart- 40
Wacko's hand placement in this photograph 1 hr Pop Tart- 6
Michael Jackson Tops Forbes' List Of Top-Earnin... 2 hr Pop Tart- 59
Michael Jackson No. 1 'Top-Earning' dead celeb ... 2 hr Teri_Caddell 2
Prince Jackson Girlfriend Nikita Bess Silenced ... 3 hr Octopus 105
Michael Jackson tribute coming to Strand-Capitol 5 hr Stormageddon 207

Michael Jackson People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE