Since: Jul 13

Location hidden

#102 Jul 23, 2013
persephone wrote:
<quoted text> How do you know? And why do you care? Do you normally go around commenting on the suspected biological paternity of other people's children?
Ask yourself the same thing, why do you care what he or anyone else discusses? Again, all you do is pick fights with strangers on Topix as evident by your countless comments and nobody is even having a conversation with you. There's a difference between having a discussion as civilized adults and relentlessly instigating folks that aren't bothering you to begin with. Get a life!
Floons son idiotas

Grand Prairie, TX

#103 Jul 23, 2013
BadMan84 wrote:
Y'know something?
Not only does Blanket look like Prudence Soloman (recent pics clearly show him looking like his mom spit him out but even pics back then showed it too) but he also looks a bit like his father...who ISN'T Michael Jackson. Y'know what? Yes, Matt Fiddes and Prudence Soloman are Blanket's parents, man!
Frank said Blanket's mom was an egg donor of Spanish and Italian descent. He said he and Michael picked her out together from a catalog.

Since: Jun 13

Durham, NC

#104 Jul 23, 2013
Floons son idiotas wrote:
<quoted text>
Frank said Blanket's mom was an egg donor of Spanish and Italian descent. He said he and Michael picked her out together from a catalog.
If that's true, Prudence was picked out from that catalog and Prudence definitely has some strong Spanish and Italian features and that's how Blanket looks.

Since: Jun 13

Durham, NC

#105 Jul 23, 2013
Mighty Max wrote:
<quoted text>
There is no denying that those court files prove Michael Jackson was a complete sleaze. In fact, they prove he was a child molester. FACT.
Yep. And the FBI files also proved it. It did little to "exonerate" him, only adds more questions than answers and it showed MJ and his people had enough power to stop the FBI from FURTHER investigating (i.e., the Reagan trip in 84).

“Why can't you share your bed?”

Since: May 13

Canada

#106 Jul 23, 2013
persephone wrote:
<quoted text> How do you know? And why do you care? Do you normally go around commenting on the suspected biological paternity of other people's children?
It's not that one cares. It's a matter of finding Michael Jackson funny and a klutz, because it's not often we witness a person customizing children and paying for them.

“Why can't you share your bed?”

Since: May 13

Canada

#107 Jul 23, 2013
persephone wrote:
<quoted text> Disagree, there are accounts of observers who were in the courtroom, and heard and saw Gavin first-hand, who did NOT f8nd him to be convincing. The same can be said for those who read the transcripts and also were not impressed.
There was no reason for MJ to admit to any wrongdoing that he did not do. Just because you have chosen to believe otherwise doesn't make it so.
Why?? Because he didn't break down and cry a flood of tears like other f'loons have told me?? Sick and twisted Michael Jackson supporters don't believe accusers when they break down and cry either. So what the hell?? It doesn't matter what emotion they display, because you refuse to believe them. Perhaps, if you didn't have your heads so inserted up Michael Jackson's anus. You might give the possibility Gavin and the other accusers are telling the truth about Michael Jackson being a hideous, perverted, monster.

“Why can't you share your bed?”

Since: May 13

Canada

#108 Jul 23, 2013
persephone wrote:
<quoted text> And I'm sure there were other jurors who were NOT convinced he was a molester, but you undoubtedly would disregard their opinions and dismiss them as being 'star-struck fans'.
According to Juror #5, Eleanor Cook, two f'loons were on the Jackson jury and whenever Cook made references Michael was a pedophile and possibly harmed young boys the f'loons replied, "Not my Michael". So long as people carry that mindset it's no wonder why Michael Jackson was difficult to throw in a jail cell. He's got too many star-struck fans, and at least 2 managed to get themselves on the 2005 jury.

Since: Jun 13

Durham, NC

#109 Jul 23, 2013
TripleH1976 wrote:
<quoted text>
Why?? Because he didn't break down and cry a flood of tears like other f'loons have told me?? Sick and twisted Michael Jackson supporters don't believe accusers when they break down and cry either. So what the hell?? It doesn't matter what emotion they display, because you refuse to believe them. Perhaps, if you didn't have your heads so inserted up Michael Jackson's anus. You might give the possibility Gavin and the other accusers are telling the truth about Michael Jackson being a hideous, perverted, monster.
Right because a physically developed 15-year-old boy should've wept like a 6-year-old girl like Michael did when talking about abuse. Not every child abuse victim is gonna react the same way no matter which gender. Roman Polanski's abuse victim didn't weep when discussing the times he got her drunk and drugged up so bad that he couldn't resist him having non-consensual sex with her.

“Why can't you share your bed?”

Since: May 13

Canada

#110 Jul 23, 2013
persephone wrote:
<quoted text> It really is astonishing just how much time haters spend on MJ.
Right and f'loons don't spend their time creating tribute videos for him and upload them to Youtube. Never seen one, because I believe the man was a piece of filth. But I know thousands of tribute videos for him are available on Youtube.
Doing Research

UK

#111 Jul 24, 2013
The friendly and nonhostile people of this forum are discussing very important matters regarding the identity of the non-biological children of MJ. And as usual those vicious and hostile so-called MJ fans come rushing in tell us we have no right. But we do have a right. This is a Michael Jackson forum and we have the right to question the truthfulness of him. What is it that they cannot understand about that? Do they think MJ had a right to go around buying babies and then telling the world they were biologically his? Do they not understand that if MJ sank so ridiculously low as to lie about such matters then molesting children was probably no big deal to him. The friendly and nonhostile members of this forum are not personally criticising or attacking those children in any way. In fact, I think the nice people of this forum generally feel sorry for those children and the way they were brought into this world. I myself find it utterly appalling that MJ basically just approached at least two women and rented their womb. What kind of disturbed and crazy individual would do such a thing? MJ cared more about himself than he cared about children. I believe those kids were just like some fashion accessory to him. He clearly never had any intention of raising them in a normal father and mother environment.

Since: Jul 13

Location hidden

#112 Jul 24, 2013
Doing Research wrote:
The friendly and nonhostile people of this forum are discussing very important matters regarding the identity of the non-biological children of MJ. And as usual those vicious and hostile so-called MJ fans come rushing in tell us we have no right. But we do have a right. This is a Michael Jackson forum and we have the right to question the truthfulness of him. What is it that they cannot understand about that? Do they think MJ had a right to go around buying babies and then telling the world they were biologically his? Do they not understand that if MJ sank so ridiculously low as to lie about such matters then molesting children was probably no big deal to him. The friendly and nonhostile members of this forum are not personally criticising or attacking those children in any way. In fact, I think the nice people of this forum generally feel sorry for those children and the way they were brought into this world. I myself find it utterly appalling that MJ basically just approached at least two women and rented their womb. What kind of disturbed and crazy individual would do such a thing? MJ cared more about himself than he cared about children. I believe those kids were just like some fashion accessory to him. He clearly never had any intention of aising them in a normal father and mother environment.
Exactly. Folks on this thread have similar interests and are simply discussing what we find to be appalling and it's safe to say all of us who know MJ was guilty look forward to finally seeing the truth be exposed about an empire of LIES and deception. What bothers me the most is seeing Robson be called a liar and treated with such hostility by f'loons and they send a horrible message to society. Speaking up for him lets f'loons know it's about time society stop making excuses for an obvious child molester. All they do is make themselves look ignorant and lame. Nothing wrong with having an adult conversation, if it bothers them so much they're free to move onto other threads.

“Why can't you share your bed?”

Since: May 13

Canada

#113 Jul 25, 2013
I have great pity for Blanket, Paris, and Prince Michael I. I may poke fun at the nickname "Blanket" but I recognize they are children and did not ask to brought into this world to a demented freak like Michael Jackson. These children are financially set for life, but given the way they brought into this world. They'll have many questions about Michael Jackson as they become older and figure out maybe he wasn't always honest to them.

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

#114 Aug 6, 2013
BadMan84 wrote:
<quoted text>
And you know he was planning to do it again. I think in the year he died, he was gonna get a fourth child in a similar way.
He probably wanted a steady of stream of children within the age he liked. So, as the others aged, there would be new ones.

Since: Jun 13

Durham, NC

#115 Aug 6, 2013
TripleH1976 wrote:
I have great pity for Blanket, Paris, and Prince Michael I. I may poke fun at the nickname "Blanket" but I recognize they are children and did not ask to brought into this world to a demented freak like Michael Jackson. These children are financially set for life, but given the way they brought into this world. They'll have many questions about Michael Jackson as they become older and figure out maybe he wasn't always honest to them.
Clearly left them in a world of confusion, that's for sure. Blanket's eyes kinda tell me he's seen everything... Paris' actions tell me she's seen everything, Prince has been trying to avoid it but it's clear on his face sometimes...

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

#116 Aug 7, 2013
BadMan84 wrote:
<quoted text>
Clearly left them in a world of confusion, that's for sure. Blanket's eyes kinda tell me he's seen everything... Paris' actions tell me she's seen everything, Prince has been trying to avoid it but it's clear on his face sometimes...
I shudder to think of what they more than likely witnessed and experienced in their young lives.

“Why can't you share your bed?”

Since: May 13

Canada

#117 Aug 7, 2013
TripleH1976 wrote:
<quoted text>
According to Juror #5, Eleanor Cook, two f'loons were on the Jackson jury and whenever Cook made references Michael was a pedophile and possibly harmed young boys the f'loons replied, "Not my Michael". So long as people carry that mindset it's no wonder why Michael Jackson was difficult to throw in a jail cell. He's got too many star-struck fans, and at least 2 managed to get themselves on the 2005 jury.
If Gavin had cried the f'loons would accuse him of putting on an act. I believe the father, David Arvizo, made an allegation Janet sent the children to acting school in preparation for the testimony in the JC Penny litigation they had 4 years prior to the trial. You can't win with f'loons. They'll find a fault in anything you do.

“Evolution is fab!”

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#118 Aug 8, 2013
TripleH1976 wrote:
<quoted text>
If Gavin had cried the f'loons would accuse him of putting on an act. I believe the father, David Arvizo, made an allegation Janet sent the children to acting school in preparation for the testimony in the JC Penny litigation they had 4 years prior to the trial. You can't win with f'loons. They'll find a fault in anything you do.
Exactly. If he had turned on the tears the child hating Wacko fans would say it was completely staged.

But all credit to the Arvizo family, they had quite some considerable time to launch a civil suit against the has-been Michael Jackson but they didn't, which proves they never wanted money from the devil himself.

“Why can't you share your bed?”

Since: May 13

Canada

#119 Aug 8, 2013
Butterballs wrote:
<quoted text>
Exactly. If he had turned on the tears the child hating Wacko fans would say it was completely staged.
But all credit to the Arvizo family, they had quite some considerable time to launch a civil suit against the has-been Michael Jackson but they didn't, which proves they never wanted money from the devil himself.
The f'loons are a bunch of loonies that'll find a fault in EVERYONE, except Michael Jackson. They're the most nauseating fans of any entertainer, alive or dead.

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

#120 Aug 8, 2013
TripleH1976 wrote:
<quoted text>
If Gavin had cried the f'loons would accuse him of putting on an act. I believe the father, David Arvizo, made an allegation Janet sent the children to acting school in preparation for the testimony in the JC Penny litigation they had 4 years prior to the trial. You can't win with f'loons. They'll find a fault in anything you do.
During the testimonies, it turned out David Arvizo was the person who was constantly trying to get money from people. Janet just wanted the child molester put in prison.

Since: Jun 13

Durham, NC

#121 Aug 8, 2013
Len is Disgusted wrote:
<quoted text>
During the testimonies, it turned out David Arvizo was the person who was constantly trying to get money from people. Janet just wanted the child molester put in prison.
Wow. No wonder... smh what a mess. From the way the media told it you'd think Janet was the mastermind...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Michael Jackson Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Jacko is in hell 4 hr Sleepingboy 5
Interesting fact of the day 4 hr Sleepingboy 14
suicidal floon 5 hr Sleepingboy 120
the purpose of jackos children 5 hr Sleepingboy 2
I'm going to be with michael. 19 hr Len is Disgusted 46
Check this out for the second time 21 hr Octopus 42
Brooke Shields reveals she denied Michael Jacks... Thu Sleepingboy 34

Michael Jackson People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE