Gene Simmons: Michael Jackson Was Pro...

Gene Simmons: Michael Jackson Was Probably a Pedophile, Whether Fans Like it or Not

There are 927 comments on the The Hollywood Gossip story from Jul 30, 2013, titled Gene Simmons: Michael Jackson Was Probably a Pedophile, Whether Fans Like it or Not. In it, The Hollywood Gossip reports that:

Gene Simmons has rekindled his feud with Michael Jackson fans, refusing to dial down his previously-expressed belief that MJ was a child molester.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Hollywood Gossip.

“Why can't you share your bed?”

Since: May 13

Canada

#1049 Mar 3, 2014
jina wild wrote:
<quoted text>
No scandal at all apart from the $7,000,000 that they sued his scrawny scrounging ar$e for.
Crawl back under your bridge, obnoxious pig.
Michael Jackson accumulated debt wherever he went those lose final years of his miserable life. The egomaniac could not handle anything then a lavish lifestyle, even though his earnings were considerably diminished since the 80's and early mid 90's.

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

#1051 Mar 3, 2014
goodvibrations wrote:
<quoted text>
The accusations against MJ were instigated by two money hungry parents. If they hadn't been such vultures MJ would never experienced the trauma he experienced.
BTW most pedophiles have a healthy interest in adults. At least 300,000 cases of child sex abuse are reported in the U.S. each year but the real number of children who are molested is likely far higher. You should be looking out for real victims instead of harassing an innocent dead man.
The exact opposite is true, with everything you posted. Read what Larry Feldman had to say about the Chandlers. Then read Kenneth Lanning's profile of a pedophile.

You really ought to stop reinventing the word "stupid."
Juggs Judy

AOL

#1053 Mar 3, 2014
goodvibrations wrote:
<quoted text>
Michael Jackson was NOT a child molester.
You're only tormenting yourself Hater.
Denying a crime or series of crimes is not synonymous with being innocent, and unless reasonable evidence is produced that the crime or crimes, did not happen it is completely reasonable to question that persons actions. In Jackson's case, we have an abundance of evidence, including physical evidence of the telltale splotch on his penis, child erotica, naked boy pictures, shocking and prolonged dishonesty, and disturbing pedophile characteristics, just to name a few. Just because there is no legal banning of taking unrelated children into a man or woman's bed that does not mean Jackson was free to do it. There is absolutely no possible reason as to why he did it for innocent reasons, but there are plenty of reasons why he would do it for sinister ones.
jina wild

Ashford, UK

#1054 Mar 4, 2014
TripleH1976 wrote:
<quoted text>
Michael Jackson accumulated debt wherever he went those lose final years of his miserable life. The egomaniac could not handle anything then a lavish lifestyle, even though his earnings were considerably diminished since the 80's and early mid 90's.
Goutvibrations thinks that, because he stayed at a palace, this is proof that he was a king. She ignores the fact that Jimmy Savile was best friends with Prince Charles. I think it's because she's thick. Poor goutvibrations.:-(

“Why can't you share your bed?”

Since: May 13

Canada

#1055 Mar 4, 2014
jina wild wrote:
<quoted text>
Goutvibrations thinks that, because he stayed at a palace, this is proof that he was a king. She ignores the fact that Jimmy Savile was best friends with Prince Charles. I think it's because she's thick. Poor goutvibrations.:-(
Goodvibrations believes society owed MJ young boys at his every beck and call. Her post become more and more disturbing every day. Her comments and excuses for MJ's abnormal behaviour almost make you want to cringe.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#1056 Mar 4, 2014
jina wild wrote:
<quoted text>
No scandal at all apart from the $7,000,000 that they sued his scrawny scrounging ar$e for.
Crawl back under your bridge, obnoxious pig.
Failing to deliver an album during the most traumatic period of his life can hardly be called a scandal more like bad luck.

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

#1057 Mar 4, 2014
goodvibrations wrote:
<quoted text>
Failing to deliver an album during the most traumatic period of his life can hardly be called a scandal more like bad luck.
Do explain yourself. This sounds like more of your f'loonspin garbage.

“Waiting for f'loons to wake up”

Since: Dec 06

Goofybaboon's Not Listening

#1058 Mar 4, 2014
goodvibrations wrote:
<quoted text>
Failing to deliver an album during the most traumatic period of his life can hardly be called a scandal more like bad luck.
Where's that Katrina Single again?

So this 'bad luck' had to be the reason for scrounging off other people for the last four years of his life, right?

Bad luck? Laughable. Try 'bad personality disorder'.
Juggs Judy

Fremont, CA

#1059 Mar 10, 2014
goodvibrations wrote:
<quoted text>
Failing to deliver an album during the most traumatic period of his life can hardly be called a scandal more like bad luck.
I see that once again you have chosen to ignore the ton of pornographic material that Jackson kept in his bathroom. The very bathroom that 2 young boys were given permission to use on a daily basis.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#1063 Mar 10, 2014
Juggs Judy wrote:
<quoted text>
I see that once again you have chosen to ignore the ton of pornographic material that Jackson kept in his bathroom. The very bathroom that 2 young boys were given permission to use on a daily basis.
Child pornography is illegal. Regardless of any child molestation charges, if he had been found to have porn involving minors he would have been arrested, charged and placed on the sex offender’s register, that simple.

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

#1065 Mar 12, 2014
goodvibrations wrote:
<quoted text>
Child pornography is illegal. Regardless of any child molestation charges, if he had been found to have porn involving minors he would have been arrested, charged and placed on the sex offender’s register, that simple.
Please explain why he would keep two NAMBLA-recommended books of nude and seminude children. You still haven't come up with a believable reason for excusing the nude photo he had of one of his special friends.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#1066 Mar 12, 2014
Len is Disgusted wrote:
<quoted text>Please explain why he would keep two NAMBLA-recommended books of nude and seminude children. You still haven't come up with a believable reason for excusing the nude photo he had of one of his special friends.
Those two books were not classified as porn let alone child porn.

If NAMBLA recommends vitamins you think they are Viagra? Art is not porn.

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

#1067 Mar 12, 2014
goodvibrations wrote:
<quoted text>
Those two books were not classified as porn let alone child porn.
If NAMBLA recommends vitamins you think they are Viagra? Art is not porn.
According to the officer who examined the evidence, those books are considered child erotica, in the hands of pedophiles. They buy it because it's legal to own. But it is still child erotica. Would you want to own a book containing photos of nude and seminude children, which are photographed by pedophiles, edited by pedophiles, and recommended by pedophiles for other pedophiles? If so, what does that say about you?

I noticed you didn't comment on the nude photo Michael had of one of his little special friends. That's because there is no decent reason why he would have something like that.

Since: Jan 10

Location hidden

#1068 Mar 12, 2014
I think MJ fans will defend MJ even if they really believe there is a good chance he was guilty.

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#1069 Mar 12, 2014
jim - wrote:
I think MJ fans will defend MJ even if they really believe there is a good chance he was guilty.
no Jim...no..I would not.

Since: Jan 10

Location hidden

#1070 Mar 12, 2014
Hey Jermaine were having a blizzard here in Lincoln Maine- about a foot of snow already! Its suppose to snow all night into tomorrow!=O
* I am so ready for warm weather to get here!!!

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#1071 Mar 12, 2014
jim - wrote:
Hey Jermaine were having a blizzard here in Lincoln Maine- about a foot of snow already! Its suppose to snow all night into tomorrow!=O
* I am so ready for warm weather to get here!!!
We have one here too...ice...wind...snow...yes. .I am ready for spring and sun..

Since: Jul 13

Location hidden

#1072 Mar 13, 2014
goodvibrations wrote:
<quoted text>
Those two books were not classified as porn let alone child porn.
If NAMBLA recommends vitamins you think they are Viagra? Art is not porn.
Well? Are you going to explain why he kept a photograph of a nude boy he had previously bedded on multiple nights?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#1073 Mar 13, 2014
Pishpash1234 wrote:
<quoted text>
Well? Are you going to explain why he kept a photograph of a nude boy he had previously bedded on multiple nights?
I don't even think that MJ knew how that photograph got into his home.

Maybe it had been some kind of prank or it was planted there.

Pity that it had not been displayed with the rest of the material that is open for the public to see.

It could NOT have been pornographic even though it was a nude. Surely the photo was discussed in court and nothing came of it. The photo was no big deal.

Since: Jul 13

Location hidden

#1074 Mar 13, 2014
goodvibrations wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't even think that MJ knew how that photograph got into his home.
Maybe it had been some kind of prank or it was planted there.
Pity that it had not been displayed with the rest of the material that is open for the public to see.
It could NOT have been pornographic even though it was a nude. Surely the photo was discussed in court and nothing came of it. The photo was no big deal.
I am not sure why you and most MJ fans defy logic and treat this debate like a court room - nudity is not illegal depending on the context its used. Ignore the courts for one second, and use your HUMAN INITIATIVE

Now answer me this question, if MJ did own those photographs would you find that questionable to any degree? If your answer is no, then why try to excuse the photograph as being a prank?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Michael Jackson Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
MJ haters slander and illegal activity against ... (Aug '13) 5 hr Spotted Wee 46
The world is a better place without Michael Jac... (Aug '13) Sun Spotted Wee 38
The Crickets Chirp On The Dead Michael Jackson ... (Jun '15) Sat Pop Tart- 79
News Profile of a Pedophile: Does Michael Jackson fit? (Dec '08) Jul 21 Spotted Wee 64,793
Wade robson paid by illuminati Jul 20 Space ace 59
Cadaver 13596 Jul 20 Spotted Wee 3
MJ fans and haters Jul 20 CAB1927 6
More from around the web