Gene Simmons: Michael Jackson Was Pro...

Gene Simmons: Michael Jackson Was Probably a Pedophile, Whether Fans Like it or Not

There are 927 comments on the The Hollywood Gossip story from Jul 30, 2013, titled Gene Simmons: Michael Jackson Was Probably a Pedophile, Whether Fans Like it or Not. In it, The Hollywood Gossip reports that:

Gene Simmons has rekindled his feud with Michael Jackson fans, refusing to dial down his previously-expressed belief that MJ was a child molester.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Hollywood Gossip.

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

#561 Dec 22, 2013
TripleH1976 wrote:
<quoted text>
He was??? That's new to me. When?? Give names to these different individuals??
I stand amazed she actually thinks he was interrogated. This is the same man who took the 5th Amendment, every time he was asked a question about his policy of little-boy sleepovers. Her head must be a sieve.

Since: Jun 13

Raleigh, NC

#562 Dec 22, 2013
Yeah, every time one of the fans act like he was serious about his innocence, you get no response when you ask them "well why did he plea the fifth if he was serious that nothing happened?" No response. They don't know how the court system works. They react with emotion and anger.

“Why can't you share your bed?”

Since: May 13

Canada

#563 Dec 23, 2013
Len is Disgusted wrote:
<quoted text>
No, it's actually not. The witnesses were very credible. They were only made to look like liars because Wade denied being sexually abused. But the maid gave a chilling testimony of how Michael groomed children and what she witnessed. I feel badly for her because being grilled by Mesereau and not being able to speak english very well must have been hell, for her, while she was on the stand.
I know. If Michael was interrogated without the presence of an attorney I would like to know when it happened. Because I recall he threatened to evoke the 5th Amendment. There is a Youtube video where he is being questioned, it happened in 1996, but he's got an attorney with him. The attorney told him not to answer a few questions. It would be interesting to know why the attorney told Michael to refrain from answering.

“Why can't you share your bed?”

Since: May 13

Canada

#564 Dec 23, 2013
BadMan84 wrote:
Yeah, every time one of the fans act like he was serious about his innocence, you get no response when you ask them "well why did he plea the fifth if he was serious that nothing happened?" No response. They don't know how the court system works. They react with emotion and anger.
Or they say all Americans are entitle to evoke that and it doesn't mean he's guilty. They'll latch to anything.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#568 Dec 23, 2013
Len is Disgusted wrote:
<quoted text>
No, it's actually not. The witnesses were very credible. They were only made to look like liars because Wade denied being sexually abused. But the maid gave a chilling testimony of how Michael groomed children and what she witnessed. I feel badly for her because being grilled by Mesereau and not being able to speak english very well must have been hell, for her, while she was on the stand.
Wade denied being sexually abused because he that was true. His change of tune is a lie because he is desperate for money and MJ is dead.

“Why can't you share your bed?”

Since: May 13

Canada

#570 Dec 24, 2013
goodvibrations wrote:
<quoted text>
Wade denied being sexually abused because he that was true. His change of tune is a lie because he is desperate for money and MJ is dead.
He could have made money in other way too, without accusing Jackson of sexual molestation. He could have written a book about MJ and the positive experiences he enjoyed from having his friendship. That surely would be more profitable as his fans believe anything that puts the clown in the best light. It makes no sense to flush his dancing career down the toilet, and gain the hate of MJ fans, when alternative financial options were available to him.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#572 Dec 24, 2013
TripleH1976 wrote:
<quoted text>He could have made money in other way too, without accusing Jackson of sexual molestation. He could have written a book about MJ and the positive experiences he enjoyed from having his friendship. That surely would be more profitable as his fans believe anything that puts the clown in the best light. It makes no sense to flush his dancing career down the toilet, and gain the hate of MJ fans, when alternative financial options were available to him.
Lewd lies sell for more money.

“Why can't you share your bed?”

Since: May 13

Canada

#574 Dec 24, 2013
goodvibrations wrote:
<quoted text>
Lewd lies sell for more money.
So does saying sweet and saccharin things about Michael Jackson. Aphrodite Jones made money talking good about MJ. Wade would be raking in more money writing a positive book about MJ, that's why I tend to believe this isn't all about money for him.

Since: Jun 13

Raleigh, NC

#575 Dec 24, 2013
^ Right. If it was just about money, he would've went to the tabloids like almost immediately after his death. Him going to the courts to right the wrongs he's accusing MJ of doing to him shows me that he is sincere about his past now. That he can now say that not only was he abused emotionally, mentally, psychologically and sexually by his idol but that he was also brainwashed. For him, it has to do with making sure his son doesn't meet the same fate he did when his mother send him off to Neverland and that other property MJ owned to spend "lonely time" with an unrelated adult man.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#577 Dec 25, 2013
TripleH1976 wrote:
<quoted text>So does saying sweet and saccharin things about Michael Jackson. Aphrodite Jones made money talking good about MJ. Wade would be raking in more money writing a positive book about MJ, that's why I tend to believe this isn't all about money for him.
Bad news always sells because good news is too boring.

“Why can't you share your bed?”

Since: May 13

Canada

#578 Dec 25, 2013
goodvibrations wrote:
<quoted text>
Bad news always sells because good news is too boring.
You are parroting the same nonsense MJ enjoyed saying to get people feeling sorry for him.

Since: Jun 13

Raleigh, NC

#579 Dec 25, 2013
But what some of you fans don't get is that MJ wanted the big headlines. He didn't care if it was good or bad. He was invested in PR for years on how to market himself and to make himself out to be something he probably wasn't. You can't buy into his image because that's all it was, an image. The man was way different from the image.

Since: Jul 13

Location hidden

#581 Dec 25, 2013
goodvibrations wrote:
<quoted text>
Bad news always sells because good news is too boring.
Again you cannot seem to support the unreasonable view that Wade would tarnish his career, image and life just to gain money... Like TripleH said, he would have been far better off making a positive book or statement regarding his personal life with MJ - Suing his estate is a hit or miss. Can we also just step back and reflect on MJs questionable past, and the people that witnessed Wade being molested. If you truly care more about victims than you do about celebrities, then you would give Wade a fair chance.

I must also add that I have looked deeper into Celeb Worship and I am starting to understand the psychology behind it far better. I admittedly did fall under the umbrella of Celeb Worship to some degree years ago, and I must say it does cloud your view of how you perceive the celeb. Its not just denial, its the group you surround yourself with too (fan bases), this reinforces your delusion.

All in all you can end up convincing yourself of things that would normally seem questionable. Obvious but true...

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#583 Dec 25, 2013
TripleH1976 wrote:
<quoted text>You are parroting the same nonsense MJ enjoyed saying to get people feeling sorry for him.
You never liked to hear MJ good news because it upsets you that an individual could have been blessed so much by our creator.

“Why can't you share your bed?”

Since: May 13

Canada

#584 Dec 25, 2013
goodvibrations wrote:
<quoted text>
You never liked to hear MJ good news because it upsets you that an individual could have been blessed so much by our creator.
In 1993, I did believe in Michael Jackson. I believed he was innocent and being extorted. I was confident he and his team of lawyers would expose the extortion plot and the father told the child to lie. But when he settled with the family. I could no longer believe anymore. A innocent man fights to exonerate himself. Giving them money and leaving your name dirty in no way improves your situation.

Since: Jun 13

Raleigh, NC

#585 Dec 26, 2013
The settlement and the failure of proof of an extortion was enough for a lot of people. Some others were trying to find a needle in a haystack to find any semblance of innocence in the man and were disappointed (angry and upset) when they couldn't find it. Lots of folks were.

Since: Jul 13

Location hidden

#589 Dec 26, 2013
goodvibrations wrote:
<quoted text>
You never liked to hear MJ good news because it upsets you that an individual could have been blessed so much by our creator.
You dont want to hear bad news or the truth about MJ because you would not want your delusions and illusions destroyed rather than supporting potential victims.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#590 Dec 26, 2013
Pishpash1234 wrote:
<quoted text>You dont want to hear bad news or the truth about MJ because you would not want your delusions and illusions destroyed rather than supporting potential victims.
Think about it, probably is a far cry from definite. Gene Simmon's assumptions are attention seeking moves from an extremely untalented man that made his money from being a clown.

Since: Jul 13

Location hidden

#592 Dec 26, 2013
goodvibrations wrote:
<quoted text>
Think about it, probably is a far cry from definite. Gene Simmon's assumptions are attention seeking moves from an extremely untalented man that made his money from being a clown.
Your opinions on Genes music or talent is irrelevant and pointless. Just because someone does not think the light shines out of MJs backside, doesnt mean they are demanding attention.

There has been an uncomfortable increase in media propaganda in support for MJ, and its really quite disturbing.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#594 Dec 26, 2013
Pishpash1234 wrote:
<quoted text>Your opinions on Genes music or talent is irrelevant and pointless. Just because someone does not think the light shines out of MJs backside, doesnt mean they are demanding attention.

There has been an uncomfortable increase in media propaganda in support for MJ, and its really quite disturbing.
Gene's cry out of probably is purely out his desperation to fill his greedy pockets.

The media has come to realize that Bashir and the likes have only their self interest at stake and MJ was their victim .

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Michael Jackson Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
zionist jew conspiracy against MJ 7 hr NOI 1
MJ hater trolls Jun 23 voluntaryist 2
Michael Jackson Chat Room! (Dec '12) Jun 22 voluntaryist 65
News Elvis Presley Eclipses Michael Jackson (Jul '09) Jun 21 love 53,065
News Who's the King, Michael Jackson, Elvis Presley,... (Dec '09) Jun 21 love 7,215
News Michael Jackson Called A 'wonderful Humanitarian' (Jul '09) Jun 20 Anonymous 7,645
News Stray Rats Plays No Games In Its 2016 Summer Dr... May 31 Julie Ann 1
More from around the web