Again, if it was a match, then why do you suppose the grand juries refused to indict with Jordan's cooperation? Again, there is no one besides Sneddon who seems to have viewed both the drawings/description and the photographs and concluded that there was a match. Please do not offer up yet another example of hearsay.<quoted text>
Well,I'm pretty sure that the professional abilities of the prosecution was at least that good to differences between a match and not a match.It is better you give up your laughable stubbornness and work on a theory why Jordan was able to describe MJ's penis if he was not molested.Maybe Klein's theory is a option?
It is based on your nonsense comments and I don't think that every fan is that dense like you are.
That is pretty rich comming from the person who calls the opposite side Haters.
And since you just referred to those who defend MJ as "brain damaged" I wouldn't exactly say that you are the model of tolerance and open-mindedness.