Was Jordan Chandler's description of ...

Was Jordan Chandler's description of Michael Jackson's genitalia accurate?

Posted in the Michael Jackson Forum

First Prev
of 62
Next Last

Since: Sep 08

Brooklyn, NY

#1 Feb 10, 2009
In 1994, sources told USA Today that "photos of Michael Jackson's genitalia do not match descriptions given by the boy who accused the singer of sexual misconduct." Because this statement came from anonymous sources, some Jackson critics are quick to dismiss the article as erroneous and continue to insist that Jordan Chandler's description was accurate. There has never been any evidence to substantiate this claim; on the other hand, the fact that no charges were ever brought against Jackson indicates that the description did NOT match. A member of the grand jury in 1994 even told CNN that "no damaging evidence was heard."
krackerjacks

United States

#2 Sep 29, 2011
“I’ve examined the drawing made by JC and the photographs taken of Defendant’s genitalia. The photographs reveal a mark on the right side of Defendant’s penis at the same location as the blemish identified by JC’s drawing. I believe the discolorations in his drawing WAS NOT something he could or would have guessed about or seen accidentally. I believe the photographs substantially corroborate JC’s graphic representation of the Defendant’s penis.”

Google: w w w . sbscpublicaccess . org/docs/ctdocs/052505pltmotch andler . pdf

It’s specifically noted in the official court documents that JC’s drawing of MJ’s penis is “substantially corroborated” by the photographs. However, the alibi provided by the Mighty MJ Machine claim it’s a lie because Jordan assumed MJ’s erect penis was circumcised and the coroner that examined his limp noodle said it wasn’t. His fans latched onto this tiny discrepancy and rode it into the mud!
Gray Wolf

Ringgold, GA

#3 Sep 29, 2011
krackerjacks wrote:
“I’ve examined the drawing made by JC and the photographs taken of Defendant’s genitalia. The photographs reveal a mark on the right side of Defendant’s penis at the same location as the blemish identified by JC’s drawing. I believe the discolorations in his drawing WAS NOT something he could or would have guessed about or seen accidentally. I believe the photographs substantially corroborate JC’s graphic representation of the Defendant’s penis.”
Google: w w w . sbscpublicaccess . org/docs/ctdocs/052505pltmotch andler . pdf
It’s specifically noted in the official court documents that JC’s drawing of MJ’s penis is “substantially corroborated” by the photographs. However, the alibi provided by the Mighty MJ Machine claim it’s a lie because Jordan assumed MJ’s erect penis was circumcised and the coroner that examined his limp noodle said it wasn’t. His fans latched onto this tiny discrepancy and rode it into the mud!
By the looks of it you are still riding it into the mud. You are still talking about it and there is a new trial going on about Michael. Oh well, maybe you will step into the future. I think the criminal trial verdict was not guilty on all counts back then.Glad to have helped you out with that. Catch up fruitcake there is another trial going on.
Gray Wolf

Ringgold, GA

#4 Sep 29, 2011
krackerjacks wrote:
“I’ve examined the drawing made by JC and the photographs taken of Defendant’s genitalia. The photographs reveal a mark on the right side of Defendant’s penis at the same location as the blemish identified by JC’s drawing. I believe the discolorations in his drawing WAS NOT something he could or would have guessed about or seen accidentally. I believe the photographs substantially corroborate JC’s graphic representation of the Defendant’s penis.”
Google: w w w . sbscpublicaccess . org/docs/ctdocs/052505pltmotch andler . pdf
It’s specifically noted in the official court documents that JC’s drawing of MJ’s penis is “substantially corroborated” by the photographs. However, the alibi provided by the Mighty MJ Machine claim it’s a lie because Jordan assumed MJ’s erect penis was circumcised and the coroner that examined his limp noodle said it wasn’t. His fans latched onto this tiny discrepancy and rode it into the mud!
Oh and fruitcake with this trial you don't have to google nothing. Just turn your tv on. LOL!!!

krackerjacks

Since: Mar 11

Location hidden

#5 Mar 20, 2012
Let’s assume that MJ fans are right and some mysterious insurance co.(That no one seems to know the name of.) were more concerned over what might be “inconvenient” for this over-pampered popstar and rushed in to rescue an innocent man from the hassle of having to defend himself.

Evan Chandler accused Michael Jackson of “Inappropriate Behavior with a Minor.”

Why would any sane insurance co. want to get involved with that? What kinda freaky insurance co. would rush in to bail out someone that might get charged with a crime?

Let’s ASS-ume it was all just an evil extortion scheme. If Chandler was nothing but a big nasty old extortionist, why didn’t he go to jail for committing this unlawful act? How evil can an extortionist be when he reported his intentions to the police and legally filed to take MJ to court??

In other words, why do you fans keep calling what Evan Chandler did “EXTORTION???”

What was it,“LEGAL EXTORTION??”

Lemme get this straight…Some unnamed insurance co. paid Chandler off to “punish him,” is that what you’re telling us?? I guess Jackson caving in to his extortionist’s demands was his defense, right??

Anyone that has ever tried to get an insurance co. to pay off on a claim knows that it’s flat out uncharacteristic for ANY insurance co. to dish out money they don’t have to, LET ALONE MILLIONS! If this phantom insurance co. had simply allowed their client to face his accuser in court and disprove the allegations against him THEY WOULDN’T HAVE TO PAY A CENT!

What’s your angle now, that Mr. Fabulous was soooo wonderful, some insurance co. couldn’t wait to pay millions to help a popstar bypass the legal process, so he could earn more millions making MJ fans wet themselves in concert??

You fans don’t care if what you believe with all yer soggy widdle hearts makes sense or not, do you??
ChasUGC

United States

#6 Mar 20, 2012
krackerjacks wrote:
“I’ve examined the drawing made by JC and the photographs taken of Defendant’s genitalia. The photographs reveal a mark on the right side of Defendant’s penis at the same location as the blemish identified by JC’s drawing. I believe the discolorations in his drawing WAS NOT something he could or would have guessed about or seen accidentally. I believe the photographs substantially corroborate JC’s graphic representation of the Defendant’s penis.”
Google: w w w . sbscpublicaccess . org/docs/ctdocs/052505pltmotch andler . pdf
It’s specifically noted in the official court documents that JC’s drawing of MJ’s penis is “substantially corroborated” by the photographs. However, the alibi provided by the Mighty MJ Machine claim it’s a lie because Jordan assumed MJ’s erect penis was circumcised and the coroner that examined his limp noodle said it wasn’t. His fans latched onto this tiny discrepancy and rode it into the mud!
Long before MJ's death, there was information that stated the discriptions didn't match. All this talk about a description of MJ's penis. Are you obsessed with MJ's penis? It seems to me that you are. Wow, how low do you haters stoop? Obsessed with a deceased mans penis. Six years after the trial which found him "Not Guilty".

It sounds liker you seriously need 72 hour psychiatric evaluation, in the least. Ever been restrained in a straight jacket?
What medication do you take?

The focus should be on you. Not on MJ's penis. Man, you're sick. Sheesh.
Man, something is so wrong with you.
ChasUGC

United States

#7 Mar 20, 2012
krackerjacks wrote:
Let’s assume that MJ fans are right and some mysterious insurance co.(That no one seems to know the name of.) were more concerned over what might be “inconvenient” for this over-pampered popstar and rushed in to rescue an innocent man from the hassle of having to defend himself.
Evan Chandler accused Michael Jackson of “Inappropriate Behavior with a Minor.”
Why would any sane insurance co. want to get involved with that? What kinda freaky insurance co. would rush in to bail out someone that might get charged with a crime?
Let’s ASS-ume it was all just an evil extortion scheme. If Chandler was nothing but a big nasty old extortionist, why didn’t he go to jail for committing this unlawful act? How evil can an extortionist be when he reported his intentions to the police and legally filed to take MJ to court??
In other words, why do you fans keep calling what Evan Chandler did “EXTORTION???”
What was it,“LEGAL EXTORTION??”
Lemme get this straight…Some unnamed insurance co. paid Chandler off to “punish him,” is that what you’re telling us?? I guess Jackson caving in to his extortionist’s demands was his defense, right??
Anyone that has ever tried to get an insurance co. to pay off on a claim knows that it’s flat out uncharacteristic for ANY insurance co. to dish out money they don’t have to, LET ALONE MILLIONS! If this phantom insurance co. had simply allowed their client to face his accuser in court and disprove the allegations against him THEY WOULDN’T HAVE TO PAY A CENT!
What’s your angle now, that Mr. Fabulous was soooo wonderful, some insurance co. couldn’t wait to pay millions to help a popstar bypass the legal process, so he could earn more millions making MJ fans wet themselves in concert??
You fans don’t care if what you believe with all yer soggy widdle hearts makes sense or not, do you??
Over and over again. Man, you are obsessed with MJ.
You spend your whole life talking about him.
Call it what you like, but it sounds like jealousy to me.

krackerjacks

Since: Mar 11

Location hidden

#8 Mar 20, 2012
ChasUGC wrote:
<quoted text>
Long before MJ's death, there was information that stated the discriptions didn't match. All this talk about a description of MJ's penis. Are you obsessed with MJ's penis? It seems to me that you are. Wow, how low do you haters stoop? Obsessed with a deceased mans penis. Six years after the trial which found him "Not Guilty".
It sounds liker you seriously need 72 hour psychiatric evaluation, in the least. Ever been restrained in a straight jacket?
What medication do you take?
The focus should be on you. Not on MJ's penis. Man, you're sick. Sheesh.
Man, something is so wrong with you.
Yep, they also said that Jacko cured Gavin's cancer!!!

What's your point?

Lemme guess, it doesn't have to make sense cuz HE'S MICHAEL JACKSON?

krackerjacks

Since: Mar 11

Location hidden

#9 Mar 20, 2012
ChasUGC wrote:
<quoted text>
Over and over again. Man, you are obsessed with MJ.
You spend your whole life talking about him.
Call it what you like, but it sounds like jealousy to me.
Just answer this, what category was the extortion Evan Chandler pulled?

I mean, he can't be in the same category as a criminal that kidnaps a rich person's family member and holds them for ransom, right??

He must have pulled some kinda "special" type of extortion!

You know, the kind that's legal?????

Would you kindly explain that one to me? Please try to put it into words that others people can understand, other than MJ fans like yourself.

Thanks bunches!

krackerjacks

Since: Mar 11

Location hidden

#10 Mar 20, 2012
ex·tor·tion [ik-stawr-shuhn]

1. an act or instance of extorting.

2. Law : the crime of obtaining money or some other thing of value by the abuse of one's office or authority.

3. oppressive or illegal exaction.

I guess I'm kinda stupid cuz I'd swear that it mentions the word "ILLEGAL" twice in this defintion!

Why didn't Evan Chandler go to prison for committing such an unlawful act??????

krackerjacks

Since: Mar 11

Location hidden

#11 Mar 20, 2012
Is that anything like how according to Aphrodite Jones, Tom Sneddon committed a federal crime tampering with evidence in a desperate attempt to wrongfully convict Michael Jackson????

Cuz we all know he's in federal prison right now!!!

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

#12 Mar 20, 2012
krackerjacks wrote:
ex·tor·tion [ik-stawr-shuhn]
1. an act or instance of extorting.
2. Law : the crime of obtaining money or some other thing of value by the abuse of one's office or authority.
3. oppressive or illegal exaction.
I guess I'm kinda stupid cuz I'd swear that it mentions the word "ILLEGAL" twice in this defintion!
Why didn't Evan Chandler go to prison for committing such an unlawful act??????
There is nothing like the cold definition of a word, for f'loons. Especially when "illegal" is thrown in there. I've been telling f'loons for quite some time extortion is a federal crime.

I'll be curious to see how they react to your post of the dictionary's definition of that word.

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

#13 Mar 20, 2012
ChasUGC wrote:
<quoted text>
Long before MJ's death, there was information that stated the discriptions didn't match. All this talk about a description of MJ's penis. Are you obsessed with MJ's penis? It seems to me that you are. Wow, how low do you haters stoop? Obsessed with a deceased mans penis. Six years after the trial which found him "Not Guilty".
It sounds liker you seriously need 72 hour psychiatric evaluation, in the least. Ever been restrained in a straight jacket?
What medication do you take?
The focus should be on you. Not on MJ's penis. Man, you're sick. Sheesh.
Man, something is so wrong with you.
The legal documents don't even discuss circumcision. Sounds like the foreskin information was just more b.s. spread by Jackson apologists.

And stop trying to twist around the fact f'loons are obsessed with Michael's spotted dick. We're just poining out how you are irrationally grasping at broken straws.

krackerjacks

Since: Mar 11

Location hidden

#14 Mar 28, 2012
You fans can go ahead and forget about the innapropriate behavior around children that MJ admitted to if you like but don't dare to dream that they rest of the world is going to be on the same page you starry eyed dreamers are.

You know that Evan Chandler was paid to drop the charges he filed against MJ in his civil case, right?

If MJ was too special to bother defending himself in civil court, why should decent law&#65279; abiding citizens call him innocent????

CUZ YOU DO???
Jermaine

Vermilion, OH

#15 Mar 28, 2012
krackerjacks wrote:
You fans can go ahead and forget about the innapropriate behavior around children that MJ admitted to if you like but don't dare to dream that they rest of the world is going to be on the same page you starry eyed dreamers are.
You know that Evan Chandler was paid to drop the charges he filed against MJ in his civil case, right?
If MJ was too special to bother defending himself in civil court, why should decent law&#65279; abiding citizens call him innocent????
CUZ YOU DO???

Give it up already. Your wrong. You need to face that.

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

#16 Apr 1, 2012
Jermaine wrote:
<quoted text>
Give it up already. Your wrong. You need to face that.
No. You are wrong. Crawl out of your mire and face that.
Jermaine

Vermilion, OH

#17 Apr 1, 2012
Len is Disgusted wrote:
<quoted text>
No. You are wrong. Crawl out of your mire and face that.

Not gonna happen. You are dead wrong. Hope you realize it one day.

krackerjacks

Since: Mar 11

Location hidden

#18 Apr 1, 2012
Jermaine wrote:
<quoted text>
Not gonna happen. You are dead wrong. Hope you realize it one day.
You mean that wonderful day when the whole world disregards the cultural norms that have been in place for millenniums to protect our kids and adults start taking unrelated children into their beds, the way Jacko did?

That must be the glorious day when the real world magically changes into Never-Never Land, and will be populated with nothing but happy kids that will never grow up, right?

Just think, without dumb old grownups around, you wouldn’t need to drink your brain into oatmeal every night anymore, cuz that wouldn’t exactly be in tune with a happy world where anyone can go to bed with strangers…

…or would it?

You see, your “KING” didn’t exactly clarify this stuff. I guess you’ll just have to establish an “anything goes” philosophy and hope your fairy tales doesn't go horribly wrong.

If it does, I suppose you'll have to resort to some pesky old grownup “rules."

:(

WAIT!! Maybe you can sprinkle some pixie dust and everything will be beautiful again!!

krackerjacks

Since: Mar 11

Location hidden

#19 Apr 1, 2012
MJ told kids that Neverland Ranch was a place where "kids were in charge." Kids there trashed the guest rooms, rode amusement park rides, played video games, ate candy all day, drank alcohol, watched porn and it was positively heavenly!!

Except for the dumb old housekeepers that had to clean up the puke off his majesty's bedroom floor.

That wasn't so nice.

And as for Pedo Pan, we all know how that story ends.
Jermaine

Vermilion, OH

#20 Apr 1, 2012
krackerjacks wrote:
MJ told kids that Neverland Ranch was a place where "kids were in charge." Kids there trashed the guest rooms, rode amusement park rides, played video games, ate candy all day, drank alcohol, watched porn and it was positively heavenly!!
Except for the dumb old housekeepers that had to clean up the puke off his majesty's bedroom floor.
That wasn't so nice.
And as for Pedo Pan, we all know how that story ends.

F off liar.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 62
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Michael Jackson Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Corey Haim said Michael Jackson assaulted him o... 1 hr Just Me 25
News Quincy Jones Tapped for Michael Jackson, 'Man i... Wed Pearl Jr 1
News Gay-porn filmmaker sues Fox over Jackson interview Wed Jake 5
News Michael Jackson fan assaulted guard at Thriller... Wed Jake 3
The true inventor of "Moonwalk"(dance)!!! (Apr '07) Wed Jake 30
News The 50 best-selling albums of all time Tue Jake 2
Michael Jackson's lover tells all (Jan '11) Tue Jake 29
More from around the web