Debbie Rowe Is Furious With The Jackson Family

Apr 14, 2014 Full story: Malaysian National News Agency 89

Debbie Rowe is furious with Michael Jackson's brothers for accusing her of abandoning her children for money.

Full Story
First Prev
of 5
Next Last

“Merry Christmas!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#1 Apr 14, 2014
In 2001 Debbie applied to the court to terminate her parental rights completely, claiming it was in the children's best interest.

In 2006, Debbie changed her mind and tried to have her parental rights restored but chose to settle out of court?

Love the children Debbie that's all they ever wanted from you.

“Still the Dark Lord.”

Since: Jun 13

Everywhere.

#3 Apr 14, 2014
Quote: "CALIFORNIA, April 14 -- Debbie Rowe is furious with Michael Jackson's brothers for accusing her of abandoning her children for money."

Lol the woman has nothing to be furious about when she is guilty of exactly the same thing...

“Waiting for f'loons to wake up”

Since: Dec 06

Goofybaboon's Not Listening

#4 Apr 14, 2014
Rowe's anger is misplaced.

Octopus

Schenectady, NY

#5 Apr 14, 2014
Stormageddon wrote:
Quote: "CALIFORNIA, April 14 -- Debbie Rowe is furious with Michael Jackson's brothers for accusing her of abandoning her children for money."
Lol the woman has nothing to be furious about when she is guilty of exactly the same thing...
She has regrets?

Quite frankly, she should just be happy that Paris is willing to spend time with her. She signed those kids over to Wacko and the clown avoided her at all costs. Still, she is willing to buy the bullet to shoot Dr Murray. She did abandon those kids for money. That is why Prince will have nothing to do with her. It is her fault.

“Why can't you share your bed?”

Since: May 13

Canada

#6 Apr 14, 2014
Maybe she's furious because they don't allow her to have feast every time she visits.

Since: Jun 13

Wilson, NC

#7 Apr 14, 2014
The saddest thing about this is she was always about the money, she was never about being a mother. What good would it do now? Michael left those kids in a world of confusion when he died and it was already messed up when he was around. It just got worse as time went on.

“Still the Dark Lord.”

Since: Jun 13

Everywhere.

#8 Apr 14, 2014
Octopus wrote:
<quoted text>
She has regrets?
Quite frankly, she should just be happy that Paris is willing to spend time with her. She signed those kids over to Wacko and the clown avoided her at all costs. Still, she is willing to buy the bullet to shoot Dr Murray. She did abandon those kids for money. That is why Prince will have nothing to do with her. It is her fault.
She may possibly have some kind of regret but I really don't think so. Trying to get custody of the kids especially when the two she bore are on the verge of adulthood is a bizarre move and I think she definitely has some ulterior motive. And why is she even trying to get custody of a kid like Blanket who has nothing to do with her. I think the judge will take this whole thing as a joke.

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

#9 Apr 14, 2014
Interesting. Both sides want the children, for the money they bring in, and both accuse the other side of wanting the children, for the money. Why am I not surprised?

“Merry Christmas!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#10 Apr 14, 2014
Stormageddon wrote:
<quoted text> She may possibly have some kind of regret but I really don't think so. Trying to get custody of the kids especially when the two she bore are on the verge of adulthood is a bizarre move and I think she definitely has some ulterior motive. And why is she even trying to get custody of a kid like Blanket who has nothing to do with her. I think the judge will take this whole thing as a joke.
There has to be an ulterior motive. Unfortunately it will effect the children.

“Still the Dark Lord.”

Since: Jun 13

Everywhere.

#11 Apr 14, 2014
This nonsense of Debbie Rowe's is doomed to fail. I've read an interesting article that talks about Prince and how he is opposed to this ordeal. He wants nothing to do with Rowe and is especially concerned about his academic life being thrown into turmoil. This article even stated Prince is more than willing to take the stand and reveal information that Debbie wouldn't want known to the world. This could be interesting.

http://radaronline.com/exclusives/2014/04/mic...

“Merry Christmas!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#12 Apr 15, 2014
Stormageddon wrote:
This nonsense of Debbie Rowe's is doomed to fail. I've read an interesting article that talks about Prince and how he is opposed to this ordeal. He wants nothing to do with Rowe and is especially concerned about his academic life being thrown into turmoil. This article even stated Prince is more than willing to take the stand and reveal information that Debbie wouldn't want known to the world. This could be interesting.
http://radaronline.com/exclusives/2014/04/mic...
Debbie will destroy every opportunity to develop a close bond with her children through this custody attempt. This has to be a publicity stunt.

Since: Jun 13

Wilson, NC

#13 Apr 15, 2014
Len is Disgusted wrote:
Interesting. Both sides want the children, for the money they bring in, and both accuse the other side of wanting the children, for the money. Why am I not surprised?
It's hard to figure out who's supposedly got their best interest. Neither side does really.
Octopus

Schenectady, NY

#17 Apr 15, 2014
Stormageddon wrote:
<quoted text> She may possibly have some kind of regret but I really don't think so. Trying to get custody of the kids especially when the two she bore are on the verge of adulthood is a bizarre move and I think she definitely has some ulterior motive. And why is she even trying to get custody of a kid like Blanket who has nothing to do with her. I think the judge will take this whole thing as a joke.
I do not care what Debbie Rowe does or doesn't do but who respects a woman that gives up her children to a pedophile?

Besides, those kids are almost adults now. Too late.

“Why can't you share your bed?”

Since: May 13

Canada

#18 Apr 15, 2014
Can Prince Michael I not emancipate himself from Katherine and then become legal guardian of his younger sister and brother?? That would be the safest option for all three. I don't think Katherine Jackson or Debbie Rowe are good guardians for them.

“Still the Dark Lord.”

Since: Jun 13

Everywhere.

#19 Apr 15, 2014
TripleH1976 wrote:
Can Prince Michael I not emancipate himself from Katherine and then become legal guardian of his younger sister and brother?? That would be the safest option for all three. I don't think Katherine Jackson or Debbie Rowe are good guardians for them.
Prince is over 16 so he could definitely file for emancipation if he wanted to. In fact Wacko's kids have their own appointed attorney so that helps. As far as getting guardianship over Paris and Blanket I'm not sure. I'm inclined to say that he'd likely have to be at least 18 (I could be wrong on that) and I'm positive he would need Paris and Blanket's willingness and cooperation.

“Why can't you share your bed?”

Since: May 13

Canada

#20 Apr 16, 2014
Stormageddon wrote:
<quoted text> Prince is over 16 so he could definitely file for emancipation if he wanted to. In fact Wacko's kids have their own appointed attorney so that helps. As far as getting guardianship over Paris and Blanket I'm not sure. I'm inclined to say that he'd likely have to be at least 18 (I could be wrong on that) and I'm positive he would need Paris and Blanket's willingness and cooperation.
Then Prince Michael I should emancipate. He's got plenty money and I don't see why Paris and Blanket would not go with him, if he comes their guardian.

“Waiting for f'loons to wake up”

Since: Dec 06

Goofybaboon's Not Listening

#22 Apr 16, 2014
Jina Wild_ wrote:
<quoted text>
And yet another Jackson threatens to air their dirty laundry in public. Like purchasing father, like purchased son.....
Was it their environment, you think? Surely not!

urur

Since: Jun 13

Wilson, NC

#23 Apr 16, 2014
Mess like this is why I no longer could call myself a Michael Jackson fan. That and his lies about his involvement with children and his overall abuse and neglect of people who loved and cared for him (minus his parents and siblings). If Prince Michael I is willing to tell some mess about his "mother", then look for the other side to tell some mess about his "father" because it's gonna happen whether both sides like it or not.
Rigo

Bronx, NY

#24 Apr 16, 2014
Octopus wrote:
<quoted text>
She has regrets?
Quite frankly, she should just be happy that Paris is willing to spend time with her. She signed those kids over to Wacko and the clown avoided her at all costs. Still, she is willing to buy the bullet to shoot Dr Murray. She did abandon those kids for money. That is why Prince will have nothing to do with her. It is her fault.
They made a deal. It was a financial transaction. No different than hiring a surrogate mother. Plain and simple.

She was eager to be in MJ's orbit and would do anything for him. He could also be quite manipulative i'm sure. The money offered to Ms Rowe sure helped.

The whole marriage thing was a sham.

In hindsight. It was very foolish. He should not have brought children into the world. He couldn't be there over the long haul. Look at what happened.

Prince Jackson view is valid. But, it was a business deal.

Nobody inclduing Rowe relly thought abou the lng term.

It was also selfish of Micheal to totally cut her out of the children's life. But, i believe that were his intention all along.

He saw them as HIS children. Nobody else. Not even the natural mother Debbie Rowe. Who ironically is more closely related to the two oldest by blood than Micheal was just by virtue of the fact that she is the biological mother.
Rigo

Bronx, NY

#25 Apr 16, 2014
Nobody including Rowe really bothered to think about the long term.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 5
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Michael Jackson Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Wacko photoshoot, circa 1993 11 min MJ FRIEND 236
Young Man Believes Music Can Heal The World 47 min Jermaine 7 180
If Michael Jackson was standing in front of you... 58 min MJ FRIEND 389
Are MJ Fans Worried? 1 hr MJ FRIEND 258
Was Michael Jackson the LEGAL parent of Blanket? 1 hr Jermaine 7 36
Michael Jackson the King of Pop 2 hr Jermaine 7 4
CHRISTMAS is a time to say we Love you Michael 2 hr goodvibrations 41
More from around the web