New York City Mayor Takes Anti-Gun Campaign To Illinois

Feb 8, 2013 | Posted by: roboblogger | Full story: National Public Radio

Guns are now a key issue in the race to replace former Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr. . Gun violence plagues some of the Chicago neighborhoods that are part of the district, and New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg's anti-gun political action committee is targeting one of the contenders for the seat.

Comments
1 - 18 of 18 Comments Last updated Feb 11, 2013

“Proud To Be An American”

Since: Apr 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1
Feb 8, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

2

What's the difference between bloomberg and a bag of manure? Nothing.
btw

Cantonment, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2
Feb 8, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

not even cops should have guns then

check out the wacko murderer in cali

“Obama Shames the USA”

Since: Apr 09

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#4
Feb 9, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Can you say "Retarded Midget?"
I knew you could.
pogue mahone

Sayville, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5
Feb 9, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

1

Will he be taking his armed guards with him?
pogue mahone

Sayville, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#6
Feb 9, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

1

JohnInLa wrote:
What's the difference between bloomberg and a bag of manure? Nothing.
Don't insult the bag of manure.
Bluntforce

Aurora, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7
Feb 9, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Maybe Doomberg and Rahm can play pattycake at those after hours "down low" places that Rahm liked to frequent with his boy toy Barry back in the day.
Not For Hunting

Phoenix, AZ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#8
Feb 9, 2013
 

Judged:

3

1

1

"Gun violence plagues some of the Chicago neighborhoods", so in response, Doochburg will propose restrictions on people who don't cause problems with firearms, so that the gangbangers can feel free to attack anyone without meaningful resistance. Okay Mayor Blunderburg, why not show up without your armed guards with full auto gear so you can contribute to the reduction in "gun violence"? Since guns cause crime, you should disarm to show us a good example. Right.
You hypocritic, stinking sack of crap.
Go stick your head in a snow bank, a-hole.
Teddy R

Mclean, VA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#9
Feb 9, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Portrait of an anti-gun, Obama-loving, Piers Morgan supporting hero of the left:

http://www.scpr.org/blogs/news/2013/02/08/124...

Responsibility

San Mateo, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10
Feb 9, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

Not For Hunting wrote:
"Gun violence plagues some of the Chicago neighborhoods", so in response, Doochburg will propose restrictions on people who don't cause problems with firearms, so that the gangbangers can feel free to attack anyone without meaningful resistance. Okay Mayor Blunderburg, why not show up without your armed guards with full auto gear so you can contribute to the reduction in "gun violence"? Since guns cause crime, you should disarm to show us a good example. Right.
You hypocritic, stinking sack of crap.
Go stick your head in a snow bank, a-hole.
Typical of the non-dialogue of the gun-huggers. Amerikkka not be proud.
Responsibility

San Mateo, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#11
Feb 9, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

fake marine corp pat wrote:
I endorse obama, even though he is a failure.
Seems like the election and the favorable poll numbers speak a different result. Perhaps you are talking about Mitt (47 percenter) Romney and all those fact-less republicant bobbleheads who gave Romney all that mmmmmmmomentum! LOLL
Voluntarist

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#12
Feb 9, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Responsibility wrote:
<quoted text>
Seems like the election and the favorable poll numbers speak a different result. Perhaps you are talking about Mitt (47 percenter) Romney and all those fact-less republicant bobbleheads who gave Romney all that mmmmmmmomentum! LOLL
The real court of public opinion thinks otherwise.

Are you ok with all of the drone strikes?

“So long to you, Righties”

Since: Jan 12

keep suckin' and whiffin'!

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#13
Feb 9, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Responsibility wrote:
<quoted text>
Typical of the non-dialogue of the gun-huggers. Amerikkka not be proud.
Yup - first NINE posts were all idiotic garbage. Not a record, certainly, but pretty bad.
Voluntarist

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#14
Feb 9, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

tha Professor wrote:
<quoted text>
Yup - first NINE posts were all idiotic garbage. Not a record, certainly, but pretty bad.
Do you enjoy controlling others?
Ken

Zephyrhills, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#15
Feb 9, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Responsibility wrote:
<quoted text>
Seems like the election and the favorable poll numbers speak a different result. Perhaps you are talking about Mitt (47 percenter) Romney and all those fact-less republicant bobbleheads who gave Romney all that mmmmmmmomentum! LOLL
Well since the media covered up Obama's incompetent handling of Bengahzi, fails to ask him real question for fear of being labeled racist or even bring up the fact that ObamaCare, as confirmed by the Supreme Court is a tax ...... I guess we can consider ourselves lucky that he didn't suspend the constitution yet
Responsibility

San Mateo, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#16
Feb 9, 2013
 
Ken wrote:
<quoted text>
I guess we can consider ourselves lucky that he didn't suspend the constitution yet
wot wot, the contitution is still intact?

Awwww shucks! LOLL

Since: Dec 06

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#17
Feb 10, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Responsibility wrote:
<quoted text>
Seems like the election and the favorable poll numbers speak a different result. Perhaps you are talking about Mitt (47 percenter) Romney and all those fact-less republicant bobbleheads who gave Romney all that mmmmmmmomentum! LOLL
There was a time when most of the nation favored slavery too.
It merely reflected the fact that most of the idiots were on the same side, same as now.
Teddy R

Mclean, VA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#18
Feb 10, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

OId Sailor wrote:
<quoted text>
There was a time when most of the nation favored slavery too.
It merely reflected the fact that most of the idiots were on the same side, same as now.
Actually, it merely reflected the fact that most of the nation's wealth and population were in the southern States, with their slave-based agrarian economies.

When that changed, and most of the nation's population and wealth were in the Northern States, so did the nation's attitude towards slavery.

By the time the Civil War came, its outcome was a foregone conclusion - the South never had a chance.

Idiots have always been equally represented on either side in any partisan political contest, in my experience.
DemocRatocracy

Phoenix, AZ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#19
Feb 11, 2013
 
Responsibility wrote:
<quoted text>
Typical of the non-dialogue of the gun-huggers. Amerikkka not be proud.
Typical of the brain dead liberal - Ignore reality.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Other Recent Michael Bloomberh Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Global warming's going to cost a ton, billionai... Jun '14 SpaceBlues 4
The cost of climate change Jun '14 Gary 1
Micro apartments - the next big thing? (Jul '12) Jun '14 Go Blue Forever 5
New York mayor promises IDs for undocumented im... (Feb '14) May '14 Amigo 427
NYPD searching for suspect in fatal East Villag... May '14 Disgusted guy 3
Which U.S. cities are the most vulnerable to th... May '14 Bloody Bill Anderson 2
Bloomberg and racism drive election to replace ... (Feb '13) May '14 BigRabbit 4

Search the Michael Bloomberh Forum:
•••
•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••