Parker, Broderick expecting twins by ...

Parker, Broderick expecting twins by surrogate

There are 12 comments on the Newsday story from Apr 29, 2009, titled Parker, Broderick expecting twins by surrogate. In it, Newsday reports that:

Sarah Jessica Parker and Matthew Broderick will be taking on new roles: parents of twin girls.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

“Go Ahead Liberal, Make My Day”

Since: Dec 07

Florida...home of Trump

#1 Apr 29, 2009
is this really necessary ?
morticia

AOL

#2 Apr 29, 2009
?
Ponderous

Oakdale, NY

#3 Apr 29, 2009
LOL, I guess that's the "other" woman he was spotted with a while back.
Jimmy Crack Corn

Brooklyn, NY

#4 Apr 29, 2009
Truly a revolting couple, doing revolting things while their equally revolting fans clap like the empty-headed morons they truly are.
Annie

Lake Hopatcong, NJ

#5 Apr 29, 2009
Ponderous wrote:
LOL, I guess that's the "other" woman he was spotted with a while back.
Perhaps the other man for Matt
Jennifer Watts

Roxboro, NC

#7 Apr 29, 2009
cool
Oh OK

Mineola, NY

#10 Apr 29, 2009
More Hollywood Liberal Freaks procreating and further polluting our society.

Thank you!
Fran

Valhalla, NY

#12 Apr 29, 2009
Very nice! They seem like really nice people I ran into them last summer out in the hamptons and they just sat and chatted with us for awhile very down to earth and friendly.
mbm

Hempstead, NY

#14 Apr 29, 2009
I have a question, why did they have to resort to a surrogate ?

anybody remember the Mary Beth Whitehead case?(she was a surrogate for a couple)
After Whitehead had the baby for this couple, she wouldn't give it up!
It was a national major case (years and years ago)
Why can't Broderick and Parker adopt?
Oh OK

Mineola, NY

#15 Apr 29, 2009
mbm wrote:
I have a question, why did they have to resort to a surrogate ?
anybody remember the Mary Beth Whitehead case?(she was a surrogate for a couple)
After Whitehead had the baby for this couple, she wouldn't give it up!
It was a national major case (years and years ago)
Why can't Broderick and Parker adopt?
They can't adopt because they are liberal hollywood freaks. No agency in their right mind would give these 2 clowns a hot dog, let alone a little ssssshit!

Thank you!
Ponderous

Oakdale, NY

#16 Apr 29, 2009
mbm wrote:
I have a question, why did they have to resort to a surrogate ?
anybody remember the Mary Beth Whitehead case?(she was a surrogate for a couple)
After Whitehead had the baby for this couple, she wouldn't give it up!
It was a national major case (years and years ago)
Why can't Broderick and Parker adopt?
Wasn't the egg Marybeth's in that case? Maybe they just using a surrogate belly (don't want to be stretched out for SATC II.
cant sleep

Ormond Beach, FL

#17 May 7, 2009
The surrogate has made thousands and is behind in child support and has been for years.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Matthew Broderick Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Jimmy Kimmel Correctly Notes That Donald Trump ... (Mar '16) Mar '16 Drumpf Will Ruin ... 1
News REVIEW: It's all good at Stage 3 Theatre's 'Bri... (Mar '13) Mar '13 Peter 1
News True blue (Mar '13) Mar '13 Peter 1
News First Look: Matthew Broderick Guest Stars on NB... (Mar '13) Mar '13 Peter 1
News 'Ferris Bueller's Day Off': Where are they now? (Mar '13) Mar '13 Peter 1
News 10 of the best movies filmed in Chicago (Jul '12) Aug '12 Saluki Rod 12
News It's side by side by Gershwin on B'way (Apr '12) Apr '12 john Collings 1