Julian Lennon: Singer and Now Photogr...

Julian Lennon: Singer and Now Photographer

There are 41 comments on the NBC Chicago story from Sep 19, 2010, titled Julian Lennon: Singer and Now Photographer. In it, NBC Chicago reports that:

To many, Julian Lennon is best known as the son of John Lennon and a singer in his own right.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at NBC Chicago.

First Prev
of 3
Next Last
Jack Mehoff

New Hope, PA

#1 Sep 20, 2010
Why is anyone paying attention to this mediocrity who is the son of an even bigger drug addled mediocrity?
Jane

Brooklyn, NY

#2 Sep 20, 2010
Let me tell you there is a daughter of John Lennon. She is a lovechild. This is 2010 and it's funny because something big is coming in 2010! The revealing secret that hurt this daughter for years. The movie 2010 looks similar to this story here. We are in depression like in the movie 2010 the world was in turmoil. But a revelation came and everyone was shocked. Stay tuned for the Spectacular John Lennon revelation ladies and gentlemen.
emS Girl

Watertown, NY

#3 Sep 22, 2010
I AM JOHN'S DAUGHTER
JOHNA LENNON
Jane

Brooklyn, NY

#4 Sep 23, 2010
John Lennon's lovechild daughter is going to WIN! Most lovechildren in the past who have claimed to be offspring of the famous never get their truth. Society pushes them away under the rug. Remember the man who said he was JFK's son? He was interviewed on TV. He looked just like JFK. I never heard an official statement that he had a DNA test. People that interviewed made him sound delusional. If the man had a Wall street job why would he want to make it up and embarass a great paying job. I believed him when he said he was JFK's son. Cosby was suppose to have Autum Jackson but we never heard of the DNA truth with her. Only infants like Dannilynn or Francis Quinn get DNA. They are lucky! They won't have to grow up and be 40 something when they finally find the truth. Society must understand not everyone is a liar. John Lennon lovechild will win her right where others have failed because of the justice system. Alot of prejudice for lovechildren over the age of 18. It is not to say that there are no frauds either. Clark Rockerfeller was a fraud and the guy who said he was Sidney Portier's son. So I am being fair here. But finally there will be a definite one John Lennon offspring daughter. When you see how much she looks like him and her DNA test plus his signature that he approved her you will have nothing to say that she was a liar. God is on her side because he got sick and tired of seeing so many lovechildren born and everyone saying they are frauds.
John

United States

#5 Sep 23, 2010
god you are so full of shit. go away and stop posting lies all over the internet....

OR get your ass on CNN and PROVE IT.

chicken shit nutjob.
Jane

Brooklyn, NY

#6 Sep 23, 2010
I'm not the one who is the daughter. I know who the daughter is. She comes to music meetings. She is a songwriter. Yeah, she will be on CNN and they will do a documentary on her. She will have her DNA test and also the signature of the will that John Lennon signing her in years ago. By the way you are a dirty mouth low life. You are a bitter person. The Depression must be getting to you. This is the last e-mail I will write following your name because your IQ must be 20. Your age is also showing. You must be under 25 years of age because you are very immature. A grown person would not be cursing like this.
John

United States

#7 Sep 24, 2010
Got news for ya - bastard kids do not get inheritances.

The fact that you are publicising this without a shred of evidence or proof makes it less likely to be believed.

John Lennon has been dead for 30 years. In all that time no one but you has brought this up. sorry not buying it. I can assure you that no one is going to believe you at all, unless you go public and provide proof.
Jane

Brooklyn, NY

#8 Sep 24, 2010
John once again, you are talking honestly here. I definitely understand you're thinking. I think it is good you are expressing yourself here. Alot of people feel the way you do too when they hear the word Lovechild. That is why when this story finally hits the airwaves people in this country and all over the world will see really what a hurt it is to be a lovechild. I believe God wants this to happen. Family is important and so is the truth. I am the only one saying it now because I already know but people in the music business are talking to one another about this in the office where I am. This story is set to come and 2010 is going to be the time. I am really betting on October. They have given Ono a chance to gather her thoughts and get ready. This is a hard thing for her to do. You are going to see alot of tears on Oprah, Larry King. Books and movies will be done on this story. Believe me the music business is going to clean up and we are in a recession. This story has leggs and is going to go for many months just like the Anna Nicole story. Look how hard it was for Larry Burkhead to prove Dannylinn was his. I don't know if you have children but when you are a parent you have feeling for your offspring. Thank God Larry Burkhead got his right and it was proven. Can you imagine if there was no DNA, Howard Stern would have remained on Dannylinn's birth certificate. Anyway, when this story happens if you want leave your telephone number and I will invite you to some of the events. But I know you must see it first to believe it and I understand that totally. Take care and thanks for your e-mails.
Jane

Brooklyn, NY

#9 Sep 24, 2010
One more thing. You say John Lennon dead 30 years. That is why Ono is in for it. She was able to hide her side of the will because copyrights in England did not come due yet. You see John is dead over 25 years that is when copyrights bounce back from publisher to heirs of the deceased. The beatle catalogue was copyrighted in England making it go by British music law. You see Mr. Michael Jackson was publisher since 1985 on the Beatle Catlogue. You have heard that in the news. Remember they kept saying McCartney must get rights back. Well when those copyrights due date came Jackson got scared. He stalled and pleaded please give me a little more time. Latoya says Michael told her that they want to kill him for Beatle catalogue. They were warning him now you must give it up and give the daughter her share. Latoya believe that Dr. Murry purposely gave him enough drug to kill him. Go and look at Katherine Jackson now in latest Jackson news. She is bringing AEG to court saying conspiracy. You see how the Jacksons talk on tv. They say it was more than one that killed Michael. They are going to bring suit I believe on Ono soon too. I am not saying that it is definite that Michael was murdered but you can understand why they believe it is a possibility. Michael was scared and telling his family about the daughter and that rights have to go back. Look Julian Lennon is smiling. When have you seen that. I mean this is not a coincidence. Julian has to get part of the copyrights too. He knows Yoko's cover is blown. Now he is friends with her.
Teresa

Columbus, OH

#10 Jan 5, 2011
You guys are something else.John had 2 boys. 1 is John Charles Julian Lennon.He was about 5 years old when his mum and dad divorced. He saw his father mostly on weekends while John was in England.When John moved to US Jules hardly saw him at all.He was 17 when he probably saw him for the last time.John was more concerned about his new son Sean.This hurt Jules alot and has taken along time for him to get on with his life. He is an excellent photgrapher and also might possibly get back into music,if things can be done the way he wants. Julian Lennon was born April 8,1963.He has a step brother Sean and no other siblings.He never got anything after his father died.He is currently buying back any artifacts that belonged to his father.Yoko got everything and Julian never received a thing.He is friends with Sean and does not want to take further action against Yoko because of Sean. He is civil to Yoko,but not freinds.There is still alot of pain that has to heal.He also is known for charity that is for people with lupus.That is where the song Lucy comes from. Hey Jude (Jules) is 47 yrs.old and a very good man.
Jane

Brooklyn, NY

#11 Jan 5, 2011
You think you know it all Teresa. Do you thing our Government tells us everything? Of course they don't. You believe everything you read about the Beatles? Only a fool would. They have their secrets. The love child daughter is one of them. Time will prove it. When you see Julian, Sean and Ono talking about the daughter you will be in shock. I don't know why you find it hard to beleive the John Lennon had a love child. But when all this happens and the announcement comes on your gonna be freakin mad at this situation. Why do you think he is friends with Sean now. Because he is gonna see Yoko get her ass kicked with this truth of the daughter.
Teresa

Columbus, OH

#12 Jan 6, 2011
For one thing ,the relation ship between Jules and Sean is a civil one.They dont spend that much time together.If there is a so called"love child",why wait 30 years to say anything? She will never receive any money,or anything that belonged to John.Yoko handles everything and since Julian never received anything,no one else will either.The government has nothing to do with it.Why would the government want anything to do with John Lennon? This is a normal spat between a man and his first born son.I can assure you Jules would know if there was such a love child.It is too far to reach that far.The reason there is tension between Jules and Yoko is because of the possessions that Yoko would not let Jules have. He has worked at all kinds of jobs to get the money to buy the items for himself. He has been a some what regular guy to purchase these things to do with them as he pleases.He has some on sell on Amazon.com and can be bought by anyone who chooses to want to own them.Some he has decided to keep for hinself.There is still alot of pain inside of Jules and he is getting better.He has heard all kinds of things about his dad.But he wasnt wanted by his father and it makes no sense for someone to say they are Johns love child unless they think they can acquire something of monetary value.It wont happen.Julian knows that and so should everyone else.I will pose this question to whom it matters and see what he says.But it has taken along time for someone to claim such a thing and now that John is gone everyone wants a piece of him.The only one that concerns me is Jules.I can imagine that at the time of Johns passing there were alot of people claiming what you are saying.But to wait 30 years is hogwash.Get your story straight as to time,place,name and proof and we will see what comes up.We like to know who is making such allegations. I am to return to London soon and I will pose another question and see what Jules says.It will be added to the list of the rest of the questions that have come along during Johns life.
Teresa

Columbus, OH

#13 Jan 6, 2011
I do know alot more than you might think I know.I dont know it all,only Julian does.Some things he keeps inside.But I will say you will lose and this is not going to get you any closer to Jules.All I care about is Julian and he has heard it all.
Jane

Brooklyn, NY

#15 Jan 6, 2011
Julian does know it all. That is why he is doing a reunion with Sean and that witch Yoko. That is why you are seeing so much of his this year and last. He knows the daughter thing has to come out. Now I just read that Brad Pitt is going to play John Lennon in a new movie about John Lennon. Lets face it. That is a big movie star and now John Lennon again. That is what I am trying to tell everyone on these posting sites. John Lennon's big story is coming home. He has a daughter he left an inheritance to. Yoko hid it. It is going to come out and these stars know it. It already dropped in hollywood and they are preparing for this movie. Yoko is delaying what she is suppose to do. The Jackson trial in February has to start talking about this daughter because the Jackson family keep saying that Jacko was murdered because of the Beatle Catalgoue. That is because Jacko was suppose to fork over the inheritance to the daughter. Jacko got caught because papers came due in England. That is what nobody understands in these posts. I will be right. Brad Pitt playing Lennon come on people it is now 2011 Lennon's anniversary was over last year. You see they are making 2011 big with Lennon now.
Jane

Brooklyn, NY

#16 Jan 6, 2011
Teresa, I just told you Yoko hid the inheritance. Why don't you understand? Look what they did on Wall street. Before that came out about the mortgages I am sure someone was telling people there was a scam going on in Wall Street. Nobody wanted to believe it. Then it happened. Fraud was committed with the Beatle catalogue. Jackson played a manager of fraud on it and did Yoko a favor. But now Yoko has nowhere left to run. Julian looks so happy now. Don't you see how happy Julian looks. He knows Yoko is going to get her ass kicked. In truth Yoko should be going to prison soon. She is no good. When you see this you will say wow that lady on the internet site was right look at the papers. Yoko is going to face a wall of reporters and Beatle fans who are going to point fingers at her and call her a liar and a thief. They never liked her before now they are going to have reason to. People play with wills. Astor's son played with his mother's will and now he and his lawyer were sent to prison. Yoko masterminded this. When John died she took over and did tricks. She is a shrewd business woman who was raised by a father who was the President of Tokyo bank. You don't get to be the president of tokyo bank unless you are ruthless yourself. That is what he taught his daughter Yoko. John Lennon was a househusband for 5 years while Yoko ran the bank books and stock meetings. John was a schmuck. He allowed that witch to rule and control everything. John Lennon was a weak willed man who was looking for a mother. That is why Yoko was 8 to 10 years older then him. This Yoko is an agressive woman a bully.
Jane

Brooklyn, NY

#17 Jan 6, 2011
The daughter cannot approach Yoko Ono. The daughter went to lawyers already and they want proof of a paper that the daughter cannot provide. The point here is that Yoko and the John Lennon estate has to approach the daughter because of the papers John Left. A government official already knows about this and Yoko is being given a certain amount of time. It should have happened by now. What is holding it up I don't know. All you see is money. You really don't want to understand how tragic this story really is. It is tragic. The mother of the love child nearly died years ago because of this situation.

Did you ever watch Unsolved Myteries. There was a woman they claimed that had an inheritance coming to her. They were looking for her. It was years that the inheritance lay locked away. So there are stories like this. I told you this Yoko did fraud. Let me tell you if you are married or have a mother or father that has a will you can learn alot from what I am saying. Remember to keep watch on what is going on in your own home because I had a friend who tricked her sister out of a condo and put her name as power of attorney when all along it was suppose to be my friends name. The sister used white out and made other copies and put her name instead. You see how easy that was done. This country has bad laws for wills.

In Lennon will because I saw it stated that Yoko Ono have full control when I die. Stated by John Lennon. Now look she took control but Lennon still wanted his wishes to be carried out. Julian was suppose to reveive many millions but instead she gave her own son 60 million dollars. Julian got 50,000 a year. Now that is awful what she did.
Sean was spoiled from the day he was born and Julian got a kick in the ass. Julian has more talent than Sean. The love child daughter didn't receive a penny because she blanked her out totally over here but John made double copies and that date came due around the time Jacko was losing the catalogue.
Teresa

Columbus, OH

#18 Jan 6, 2011
This still does not explain WHY NOW? It is all because of things coming out about his 70th birthday and then his death 30 years ago.Before you said all was coming out in 2010,not it is 2011 and there hasnt been anything.The only person that John was with after he married Yoko was May Pang. That didnt last all that long,then he was only with Yoko.I have talked to London and what you are saying can not be proven.There is a statute of limitations and this so called love child has no proof of anything.If she did exist,she would receive nothing.There is nothing for her to get.Jules has already seen Yoko and Sean last year.His Mum and him were in New York for his opening of his photography.No other meetings have been planned.All four of them were together and had their pic taken.Nothing else was done at that time.Leave Julian alone.He has worked all his life to get some peace of mind and mend his soul.He is trying to find items that belong to John and get what he can out of the things he doesnt want. I have been told not to carry on anymore conversations with you and to stop this rubbish.What ever you have imagined in your head is never going to happen.My side of this has closed.Jules is used to this nonsense and doesnt get bothered with it so much anymore.If ANYTHING is done in anyway to hurt Julian there will be a war that you will not win.You can imagine anything you want,but without proof,you have nothing.I am going back to England tonight,so continue your little game.But there better be no one that will hurt Jules.
Teresa

Columbus, OH

#19 Jan 6, 2011
Also this has nothing to do with Michael Jackson.He had to sell the Beatles music catalog because he needed money.Julian didnt get any of the money or any copyrights.He is not friends with Yoko.He is civil to her.There hasnt been any contact with her since last year.He did not get any money at all.We never saw any $50 thousand and he is not getting anything at all and never did.You are in need of help.Do not go spreading lies about Julian.Say what you want about Yoko and Sean,but leave Julian out of this.He is doing fine without any money from his father.Why would he be trying to sell what he could if he was getting that money? Micheal Jackson had the Beatles catalog,that he bought,not the copyrights to any music.Leave Julian alone.
A reader

Medina, OH

#20 Jan 7, 2011
Teresa,

Apparently, you didn't see the threads where this all came to a head and Jane's claims have been disproven and case closed, not that we believed it anyway. Also, all of Jane's descriptions and details about the lovechild, including her name, have in actuality been about herself, therefore, she thinks she is the lovechild. Please allow me to save you any more wasted breath on her. She is more than likely mentally disturbed or possibly a faker troll.

You can check these out if you wish:

(start pg 5)
http://www.topix.com/forum/who/the-beatles/TG...

(start pg 12)
http://www.topix.com/forum/who/the-beatles/TU...

She also has some outrageous claims that leaders of the world and who's who in the music industry are all aware of John's lovechild and are getting ready for this lovechild to appear so we can have peace and make lots of money in capitalizing on her and has named some famous bands and personalities, Castro, and even the Queen of England are all waiting for Yoko to bring her out to the public.

Just wanted to let you know. Jane got upset and said she was "taking a break" but it seems she lied about that. She is relentless in her lovechild postings and she trolls almost every thread with it. She's been talking about this crap for years and it seems all the Beatles and Lennon publicity of late have stirred her up again. She hasn't convinced anyone and now her "facts" have been exposed.
Jane

Brooklyn, NY

#21 Jan 7, 2011
You people don't know what fraud is. I told you copyrights came due in England. That is why now it is coming due. Yoko got caught. She could hide it here because those other papers had this daughter's name on it and it came due. Like a policy comes due after so many years. Yoko could not wipe that out in England. Jackson trial is on now. The Jackson family keep saying over and over again. Michael was killed for the catalogue. Why was Jacko killed for the catalogue? You people are not following the statements being made by the Jackson family. Why was Jacko murdered for the catalouge? I just told you why? What is your reason that the Jackson family are saying that?
I would like to hear your views on that statement and don't overlook it. I mean Dr. Murry according to the Jacksons was sent purposely to kill Michael.
They wanted murder one. They only got manslaiughter. Now it looks like Murry did it on purpose because why would he wait one hour to call 911. I mean it looks obvious now.

You need to listen and follow everything which you people are not. Lisa Marie on Oprah said Jackso told her if he is found dead it was because of the catalogue. There has to be a reason someone would kill you for the catalouge. The reason is like I said that daughter had to get her inheritance because the papers came due in England. That is what all this talk of John Lennon is now. 70th birthday my ass. We are now in 2011 honey wake up and smell the truth. This is a new year and we are still going strong for John Lennon. Yes it is big because this has gone around high cricles. John Lennon has a daughter who is going to inherit millions. That was what Jacko was suppose to do notify her but he knew he was caught because why did he not give her the money years ago. That is the point 30 years is a long time.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 3
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Julian Lennon Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Julian Lennon explains Beatles tribute absence (Feb '14) Feb '15 Greg 16
News 'The View': Julian Lennon explains 15-year gap ... (Nov '13) Nov '13 Jane 1
News Julian Lennon Interview: New Release 'Everythin... (Oct '13) Nov '13 Jane 5
News Julian Lennon spent 10 years on album - Indiata... (Sep '13) Sep '13 Jane 2
News Q&A With Julian Lennon: 'I'm Quite Happy Where ... (Jun '13) Jun '13 Jane 1
News Julian Lennon - Julian Lennon Worried About Rep... (Apr '12) May '13 Lily 9
News People: Julian Lennon "snubbed" by Beatles and ... (Nov '11) Jan '13 Bindi Sue 93
More from around the web