Liberals running country into ground

Kindly note, dear reader, yet another affirmation of the notion that when a liberal has no facts or empirical data to refute a conservative name calling and derision are the order of the day.

[Semi-literate]

Why don't you, personally, produce the evidence that our president is not an American citizen? Not the talk show blather, nor the innuendo, show us the hard data, and cite your sources, which YOU have seen with your own eyes, that prove your point. Otherwise, you have NOTHING, you are simply a tale-bearer. And that isn't an insult, that is a FACT!

[King Tut]

Libs are squid!!!

[Semi-literate]

King Tut wrote:

Libs are squid!!!

That is a reply? Did you have Palin write that for you?

[King Tut]

No, Sponge Bob Squarepants the socialist!!!HEHEHAHAHLOLOLO

Semi-literate wrote:

<quoted text>
That is a reply? Did you have Palin write that for you?

[King Tut in AK]

No, King Tut is an Alaskan drunk.

[Avenging Angel]

Semi-literate wrote:

Why don't you, personally, produce the evidence that our president is not an American citizen? Not the talk show blather, nor the innuendo, show us the hard data, and cite your sources, which YOU have seen with your own eyes, that prove your point. Otherwise, you have NOTHING, you are simply a tale-bearer. And that isn't an insult, that is a FACT!

Under the rules of logic, you can not prove a negative. It is therefore, the responsibility of those who say be is a native-born American citizen to prove as such beyond a reasonable doubt.

While I personally believe that Obama is a native born citizen, I think that his defenders are only adding fuel to the fire by not producing clear cut documents and proof of his status. This, then, incites the conspiracy crowds and - justifiably- encourages the belief that there is a coverup going on. Showing genuine proof, instead of heresay, is the only way to end this debate.

[gossamer]

Semi-literate wrote:

Why don't you, personally, produce the evidence that our president is not an American citizen? Not the talk show blather, nor the innuendo, show us the hard data, and cite your sources, which YOU have seen with your own eyes, that prove your point. Otherwise, you have NOTHING, you are simply a tale-bearer. And that isn't an insult, that is a FACT!

Have we seen a birth certificate?

[Keri22421]

Avenging Angel wrote:

<quoted text>
Under the rules of logic, you can not prove a negative. It is therefore, the responsibility of those who say be is a native-born American citizen to prove as such beyond a reasonable doubt.
While I personally believe that Obama is a native born citizen, I think that his defenders are only adding fuel to the fire by not producing clear cut documents and proof of his status. This, then, incites the conspiracy crowds and - justifiably- encourages the belief that there is a coverup going on. Showing genuine proof, instead of heresay, is the only way to end this debate.

He has shown his birth certificate to the satisfaction of even Congress. They've even dug up his newspaper birth announcements. The real question here is what "proof" will they finally believe enough to shut the hell up? The whole argument is ridiculous. The man's politics are enough to gripe about without having to keep going on about with this birther crap.

READ. FACT CHECK. VOTE.

[Avenging Angel]

Keri22421 wrote:

<quoted text>
He has shown his birth certificate to the satisfaction of even Congress. They've even dug up his newspaper birth announcements. The real question here is what "proof" will they finally believe enough to shut the hell up? The whole argument is ridiculous. The man's politics are enough to gripe about without having to keep going on about with this birther crap.
READ. FACT CHECK. VOTE.

Sorry, but anything that Congress approves, esp. when it is his own party in charge, if suspect. He could solve all these issues if he would allow the news media to see, verify, and publish the documents. If they have been published, please provide a link so this issue can be put to rest.

Unfortunately, there will always be some people who do not accept it though. Much in the same vein as the so called "9-11 truthers", Kennedy murder, and Halliburton conspiracy theorists.

[Jeffery Wright]

A recovering Berkeley Lib psychology (a scary combination of words if ever there was) has psychoanalyzed professional TelePrompter Reader B. Hussein Obama, trying to make sense of his bizarre and inappropriate behavior:

Giggling over unemployment numbers in a 60 Minutes interview, or giving a glib "shout out" to a member of the audience before announcing the tragic news from Fort Hood.

She also ponders the odd fact that no one seems to remember him much from his days at Columbia, or from his days at the Harvard Law Review. She considers that in his books, he confesses to not enjoying the company of other people.

She considers the conventional explanation of his behavior: narcissism; high functioning autism; schizophrenia.

Then, she examines his childhood and raises the possibility that PBO just never learned how to care about other people. He arrived in adulthood as a blank slate, ready for others to transform according to their needs.

Obama's identity seemed to have been formed when he found his clan:

Rev. Wright, Bill Ayers, and Bernadine Dohrn.

But these are disconnected people, misfits who aren't comfortable in their own skin. Their radical ideology arises from rage and alienation. They, like Obama, treat people with disdain.

I don't have any conclusions, I just found it an interesting and worthwhile article.

http://snipurl.com/t6rkv

He's as blind as he can be,
Just sees what he wants to see
Nowhere Man can you see me at all?

[Keri22421]

Avenging Angel wrote:

<quoted text>
Sorry, but anything that Congress approves, esp. when it is his own party in charge, if suspect. He could solve all these issues if he would allow the news media to see, verify, and publish the documents. If they have been published, please provide a link so this issue can be put to rest.
Unfortunately, there will always be some people who do not accept it though. Much in the same vein as the so called "9-11 truthers", Kennedy murder, and Halliburton conspiracy theorists.

Not that it will help but this is the finding from just three of the many, many fact check sites:

http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_...

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/artic...

http://ss659.fusionbot.com/cgi-bin/ss_query...

If you google fact check sites it will list them all.

[CantBeSerious]

First, the President has produced his birth certificate. It's available on the web, and you could have determined that yourself with a simple Google search.

Second, the fact that a person does not present proof to refute absurd back-handed accusations is proof of nothing. If the President held a press conference tomorrow, and started leveling absurd accusations that Bill O'Reilly had not paid his taxes last year, the fact the fact that O'Reilly refused to release his tax records would not be proof that O'Reilly did not pay his taxes.

If you want to accuse someone of something, then do it. Make your accusation, and be prepared to prove its truth. Don't just parrot absurd innuendo, and then point to the accused person to disprove your accusation. The fact that Fox News has made an art of skating just on the thing edge of slander, by making accusations through innuendo and then backing away from them, does not make those accusations are proof of anything.

[mark]

Yes, Liberals are running our country into the ground. By taking a budget surplus, and turning it into a great big deficit.
(Oh, right, that was the Bush Administration.)
And by starting an unnecessary and extremely costly war.
(Oh, that too was the Bush Administration.)
And by suppressing scientific information relevant to environmental regulations.
(Oh, Bush Administration again.)

[King Tut]

Funny silly leftist dope, KING TUT means your boot lick obama HAHAHEHEHEHLOLOLOLOLO

King Tut in AK wrote:

No, King Tut is an Alaskan drunk.

[Saved 189392627 Jobs]

CantBeSerious wrote:

First, the President has produced his birth certificate. It's available on the web, and you could have determined that yourself with a simple Google search.
Second,...

WAIT! I can't go to "second."
Your "first" statement is so blatently moronic, implying that if it's on the Web, it HAS to be true, is beyond all logic!

[sam]

Liberals cannot run the country into the ground,it was buried too deep by the Bush Administration,s love for the invasion if Iraq and the occupation that has occured.Haliburton had no exit strategy as they intend to bleed Iraq and our treasury until there is nothing left of either.Thanks Cheney.

[Keri22421]

Saved 189392627 Jobs wrote:

<quoted text>
WAIT! I can't go to "second."
Your "first" statement is so blatently moronic, implying that if it's on the Web, it HAS to be true, is beyond all logic!

http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_...

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/artic...

http://ss659.fusionbot.com/cgi-bin/ss_query...

These are fact check sites, not just some random crap on the internet.

[Semi-literate]

Avenging Angel wrote:

<quoted text>
Under the rules of logic, you can not prove a negative. It is therefore, the responsibility of those who say be is a native-born American citizen to prove as such beyond a reasonable doubt.
While I personally believe that Obama is a native born citizen, I think that his defenders are only adding fuel to the fire by not producing clear cut documents and proof of his status. This, then, incites the conspiracy crowds and - justifiably- encourages the belief that there is a coverup going on. Showing genuine proof, instead of heresay, is the only way to end this debate.

Sorry, Pal. Attempting to denegrate my statement with your first sentence comprised of pseudo-academic blather has NOTHING at all to do with this issue. I know it is the Karl Rovian and Rush Limburgian tactic to attempt to "bait and switch" on hard issues, but it won't do in this case. Stick to the topic.

[Semi-literate]

gossamer wrote:

<quoted text>
Have we seen a birth certificate?

Have we seen YOURS? How can an illegal immigrant like yourself think they have the right to question the president? Why don't you go back to Mexico, China, or New Jersey where you belong?

[Barry O]

Semi-literate wrote:

Why don't you, personally, produce the evidence that our president is not an American citizen? Not the talk show blather, nor the innuendo, show us the hard data, and cite your sources, which YOU have seen with your own eyes, that prove your point. Otherwise, you have NOTHING, you are simply a tale-bearer. And that isn't an insult, that is a FACT!

You can't prove a negative. That's why we'd like to see his birth certificate. And his college grades, term papers, etc. Barry, we hard hardly know ye.