John Edwards masterminded conspiracy ...

John Edwards masterminded conspiracy to hide affair: prosecutors

There are 278 comments on the New York Daily News story from Apr 23, 2012, titled John Edwards masterminded conspiracy to hide affair: prosecutors. In it, New York Daily News reports that:

Prosecutors and defense lawyers in the John Edwards trial were poised to begin making their case to jurors on whether the former presidential candidate violated federal campaign finance laws.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at New York Daily News.

First Prev
of 14
Next Last
PATRIOT

Carmel, ME

#276 May 7, 2012
Obama the Dog Eater wrote:
<quoted text>Don't be too hard on Harvey, his lobotomy didn't go well and now he's just kind of all f*cked up in the head.
That winnie enema didn't help him much either.
PATRIOT

Carmel, ME

#277 May 7, 2012
tha Professor wrote:
<quoted text>
His administration could and DID deal with those responsible, as I've already pointed out.
Nor did I ever say that the investigations or the impeachment prevent him from dealing with al-Qaeda AT ALL during his Presidency.
So either you're misunderstanding me, or are deliberately lying.
Gee, I'm sure I was responding to Harvey Girl on her post. BNow you come along and say "Nor did I ever say that, blah, blah, blah."

No, I don't think there is a misunderstanding. You and Harvey Girl are one and same, professorette. And everything I said about Clinton inh his first 30 days is history, which you fail to know anything about, ergo, you are not even a professorette. Oh shame.
Morgan Stanley

Monongahela, PA

#278 May 7, 2012
harvey likes it long and hard wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, I am so gay that I make myself sick.
When are you getting your taxpayer funded sex change freak?
Morgan Stanley

Monongahela, PA

#279 May 7, 2012
PATRIOT wrote:
<quoted text>
Harvey, you gay blade, you. But your wrong about trolling docks for sailors. You gay blades always did it in airports, restrooms, and street corners. Probably still do. All I want to know is how does your other half feel about your trolling ways?
Harvey has an open marriage with his wife Nick. They troll the men's bathrooms together.
harvey

Columbus, OH

#280 May 8, 2012
pURe BS wrote:
<quoted text>
Still a liar and changing others posts. Sorry I won't stoop soo low as you and your ilk to outright lying.
You get what you pay for, douchebag. Thanks for sharing your whiiiiine with us, though...:)
harvey

Columbus, OH

#281 May 8, 2012
Moanin Shirley wrote:
Harvey, I have an open marriage with my wife Nick. We troll the men's bathrooms together.
Quite the happy couple, eh? Congratulations....I guess...:)
Obama the Dog Eater

AOL

#283 May 8, 2012
PATRIOT wrote:
<quoted text>
Harvey, you gay blade, you. But your wrong about trolling docks for sailors. You gay blades always did it in airports, restrooms, and street corners. Probably still do. All I want to know is how does your other half feel about your trolling ways?
I saw Harvey hanging out in front of the 311 Club on 6th St. trolling for gays. He had a wide stance and he was tapping his foot, and it wasn't to the music being played inside.

Since: Feb 12

Tucson, AZ

#284 May 8, 2012
harvey wrote:
<quoted text>
You get what you pay for, douchebag. Thanks for sharing your whiiiiine with us, though...:)
Nope sorry but I never asked for a liar such as yourself to make crap up and lie on every post.

So keep dreaming and trying to think that you have had a coherent thought at some point in your life.

Don't whine, sorry that would be you whine and lie.

Since: Feb 12

Tucson, AZ

#285 May 8, 2012
harvey wrote:
<quoted text>
Quite the happy couple, eh? Congratulations....I guess...:)
Still Lying!

Changing other peoples posts and then quoting them.

Lowest kind of scumbag!
taxpayer

Catasauqua, PA

#286 May 9, 2012
I totally agree, put Mr. Edwards in the same cell as Blago, Newt has nothing to do with this, Edwards in on trial, typical liberals trying to divert everything on others, like Newt. Edwards will get his trial, Mrs. Edwards was pretty smart making out her will and leaving nothing to her cheating ex-husband. It's not about his affair, it's about his tampering with money and his cover up with campaign funds. If the shoe fits, wear it. Maybe Jerry Sandusky will get his, too.
Mark Winshel

Walnut Creek, CA

#288 May 9, 2012
We should have demanded an extremely high office - preferably president, but aguess we could have settled for vice president or attorney general - for John Edwards, since he is definitely qualified, in other words he is a pathological liar, demagogue, and world class phony.
Morgan Stanley

Monongahela, PA

#289 May 10, 2012
Mark Winshel wrote:
We should have demanded an extremely high office - preferably president, but aguess we could have settled for vice president or attorney general - for John Edwards, since he is definitely qualified, in other words he is a pathological liar, demagogue, and world class phony.
Wonder why BO is not sticking up for the Breck boy.
Penn Law Review

Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic

#290 Jun 6, 2012
Clearly, John Edwards was innocent. There's no longer any dispute of that simple fact.

“KONA, baby!”

Since: Jul 08

Jacksonville, FL

#291 Jun 6, 2012
Penn Law Review wrote:
Clearly, John Edwards was innocent. There's no longer any dispute of that simple fact.
Obviously, the Penn law classes are different in the DR. A hung jury does not equal innocence.
Kracku Senatu John

Tulsa, OK

#292 Jun 6, 2012
Hu gives a krap bout da law o morels, i gotta massive hardon fo ms hunta and dat all dat mattas, c my video & vote fo me

“Stop the Brain Rot”

Since: Jan 12

Take a Looonng Vacation

#293 Jun 7, 2012
Pappa wrote:
<quoted text>
Obviously, the Penn law classes are different in the DR. A hung jury does not equal innocence.
He was acquitted on the most important count and the jury was hung in favor of acquittal on the others. TECHNICALLY that's not a finding of innocence, but it sure wasn't any kind of a conviction. The jurors' comments about the case make it clear the government had NO case.
Mark Winshel

El Cerrito, CA

#294 Jun 7, 2012
Frankly, I am surprised that the extremely sleazy, but also extremely profitable, mafia that has given itself the misnomer of the legal profession has not instituted a tax on each its members so as to have a fund to provide the necessary under the table bribes so as to keep cases like this from ever going to trial, or even becoming public.

More specifically, and although Edwards was declared not guilty, however the information that was publicly disclosed as a result of this case and trial was a still a huge hit for the reputation of that sleazy mafia which refers to itself as the legal profession, but which should actually be declared as nothing more than the very sleaziest, most dangerous, and most politically protected form of organized crime.

In other words a few more big disclosures and trials like this, and after some of the other major trials of the last several years, and such as for instance our already listening to the lies and garbage from such lawyers as Bill Clinton that he did not have a sexual relationship with Monica Lewinsky, and most of the general public will eventually learn that most lawyers are not engaged in the practice of law, but instead are primarily engaged in the practice of fraud, lies, embezzling, money laundering, illegal backroom fixes, and criminal activity in general.

In fact if that sleazy mafia which likes to call itself the legal profession had appointed me as its combination director and also head of PR, I would have then, and for the longterm good of that sleazy mafia which calls itself the legal profession, ordered Bill Clinton to immediately resign as president as soon as the first rumors of his relationship with Monica Lewinsky became public, and rather than having him hang on by generating the months of lies and garbage that allowed the general public to learn that most lawyers are professional pathological liars and who also have total contempt for the law.

And my prediction is that as more and more of the general public learns that most lawyers are not engaged in the practice of law but instead are nothing more than politically protected crooks, pathological liars, drunks, and heroin and cocaine addicts with law licenses, that the rates lawyers will be able to charge will drastically fall.

(NOTE: Lawyers have far and away the highest rates of alcoholism and drug abuse of any major profession. So remember that next time they try to feed you the standard lawyers' lies and garbage, and then also ask them if they are drunk and/or on cocaine, since no sober person could ever have said anything that extremely stupid.)

“KONA, baby!”

Since: Jul 08

Jacksonville, FL

#295 Jun 7, 2012
tha Professor wrote:
<quoted text>
He was acquitted on the most important count and the jury was hung in favor of acquittal on the others. TECHNICALLY that's not a finding of innocence, but it sure wasn't any kind of a conviction. The jurors' comments about the case make it clear the government had NO case.
Translation:
Blah, blah, blah = A hung jury does not equal innonce.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 14
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

John Edwards Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Mellencamp to Walker: You're using a union supp... (Apr '14) Jun 23 Pontius Pilate 7
News Obama Criticizes Clinton on NAFTA (Nov '07) May '16 positronium 7
News Obama, Edwards lead charge against Clinton in d... (Sep '07) Apr '16 Marriage trafficking 19
News Sixteen, Pregnant - and a Hit (Feb '08) Apr '16 Rita 11
News Hillary Clinton Defends Health Care Plan - (Oct '07) Mar '16 Electra41 24
News Is the National Enquirer preparing a John Edwar... Feb '16 Mikey 2
News Clinton needs an Iowa victory to blunt Sanders'... Jan '16 Le Jimbo 10
More from around the web