Wary Congress eyes fresh sanctions ag...

Wary Congress eyes fresh sanctions against Iran

There are 24 comments on the The Island Packet story from Nov 10, 2013, titled Wary Congress eyes fresh sanctions against Iran. In it, The Island Packet reports that:

Kerry tried to reassure skeptical members of Congress after negotiations in Geneva between Iran and Western powers stalled, with France turning down a list of demands on Iran, saying they were too generous to mean an easing of international sanctions.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Island Packet.

First Prev
of 2
Next Last
Acer PC

Nha Trang, Vietnam

#22 Nov 11, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>i took no propaganda from the WH. why is ti you have yet to counter even one of my factual statements? you even took the time to go on another thread to post ad hominem attacks to me, but you couldn't talk facts right here?
i guess we are done...you lose...again...
as i stated earlier, anytime...anytime.
U still thinking propaganda?!!;-000h, it's marketing tweeter!!;-00
Cordwainer Trout

Elk Horn, KY

#23 Nov 11, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>i took no propaganda from the WH. why is ti you have yet to counter even one of my factual statements? you even took the time to go on another thread to post ad hominem attacks to me, but you couldn't talk facts right here?
i guess we are done...you lose...again...
as i stated earlier, anytime...anytime.
Sure you did. The talking points you asserted came from the WH. You saying "nuh uh" doesn't make sense.

Everything you started posting has been shown to be irrelevant. You can't stay on subject. You started ad hominem. Anyone can see that. You ignore facts, as you ignore the lies from the WH.

All of the above establishes you have a thought disorder. It is obvious from other postings over time, your thought disorder comes from smoking dope, sexual deviancy and possibly sniffing glue.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#24 Nov 11, 2013
Cordwainer Trout wrote:
<quoted text>
Sure you did. The talking points you asserted came from the WH. You saying "nuh uh" doesn't make sense.
Everything you started posting has been shown to be irrelevant. You can't stay on subject. You started ad hominem. Anyone can see that. You ignore facts, as you ignore the lies from the WH.
All of the above establishes you have a thought disorder. It is obvious from other postings over time, your thought disorder comes from smoking dope, sexual deviancy and possibly sniffing glue.
no, they came from a swiss report of the proceedings.

Anytime you want to discuss the facts, you can. but since i showed you to be a fool, once again, all you do is dance around them.

you are not up to this level of discussion. you never will be no matter how hard you try.
Cordwainer Trout

Elk Horn, KY

#25 Nov 11, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>no, they came from a swiss report of the proceedings.
Anytime you want to discuss the facts, you can. but since i showed you to be a fool, once again, all you do is dance around them.
you are not up to this level of discussion. you never will be no matter how hard you try.
It is not possible that a "Swiss report of the proceedings" could in any way establish that sanctions were reduced perfunctorily by the White House for the purpose of encouraging discussions. Such a statement by you is illogical. They would have no way of knowing what the intent was, except by what the WH told them.

Obama has tried to undermine Israel time and again. He has insulted Israel time and again. Iran has tried to undermine Israel time and again. Obama gave Libya to extremists and tried to give Syria to extremists. He gave Egypt to extremists, who immediately started lobbing rockets into Israel. Obama tried to reverse the populist rejection of the Muslim Brotherhood installing Sharia law in Egypt and eradicating pluralism at any level.

Any rational person would see a consistent behavior in what Obama has done. Obama reduced sanctions on Iran to pressure Israel, not to encourage Iran, who he has done nothing but delay response to their repeated rejection of demands by the Western world.

You swallow anything these radical Communists say only because they have in some way validated your self-destructiveness in life and scholarship.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Joe Biden Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Will Sixty Senators Vote To Protect The Second ... Feb 19 Trump your President 8
News Bridge name remains same Feb 11 better or worse 1
News Mexico, U.S. will partner with or without Trump... Feb 1 Jgs 3
News Biden: Trump should retain sanctions on Russia Feb 1 George 32
News Trump musters 31,000 Californians over immigrat... (Apr '16) Jan 30 okiady 3
News Make SCOTUS Nominees Answer the Tough Questions Jan 30 DaveinMass 1
News Julia Louis-Dreyfus: I love Joe Biden (Apr '13) Jan 30 BuildTheWall 14
More from around the web