Sheriff won't enforce gun laws

Sheriff won't enforce gun laws

There are 45 comments on the KCCI-TV Des Moines story from Jan 16, 2013, titled Sheriff won't enforce gun laws. In it, KCCI-TV Des Moines reports that:

An Oregon sheriff says he will not enforce any federal regulation that President Barack Obama lays out in his package of gun control proposals Wednesday.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at KCCI-TV Des Moines.

“Happiness comes through giving”

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#23 Jan 16, 2013
duh wrote:
<quoted text>we the people know who needs to be removed from office ant its not some local official.
No, it's every teabagger.

“Happiness comes through giving”

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#24 Jan 16, 2013
Cracker wrote:
Impeachment of Obama, it's coming ...
:)
If something's coming, get your hand away from there, pervert!

“Happiness comes through giving”

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#25 Jan 16, 2013
okimar wrote:
<quoted text>Uh,he's shot holes thru our immigration laws. Refusing to deport certain eligible illegals,ordering releases of others.
Bullshit. This is not a fiction thread, Oki.
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

#26 Jan 16, 2013
WeTheSheeple wrote:
Then the sheriff needs to be removed from office, just as any other official who refuses to follow federal law.
you are funny, don't you remember the hassel Arizona got for trying to enforce Federal Laws pertaining to illegal aliens.
The Sheriff is right, it's a Federal problem, let the feds do their job
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

#27 Jan 16, 2013
Cracker wrote:
Impeachment of Obama, it's coming ...
:)
Obama has never been a citizen of the US, very good grounds for removal.
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

#28 Jan 16, 2013
WeTheSheeple wrote:
<quoted text>
And yet you can't name a single law the President hasn't upheld.
US Constitution, Art 2, sect 1, para 5, the 14th amendment Citizenship Clause and the Civil Rights Act of 1866.
conservative crapola

Easton, PA

#29 Jan 16, 2013
Justice Dale wrote:
<quoted text>Obama has never been a citizen of the US, very good grounds for removal.
birtherpussy tried that and failed.

hahahahahaha
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

#30 Jan 16, 2013
conservative crapola wrote:
<quoted text>
birtherpussy tried that and failed.
hahahahahaha
failing is giving up.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#31 Jan 16, 2013
okimar wrote:
<quoted text>When Srtate law and Federal law conflicts Federal law has jurisdictional trump. HOWEVER it is up to the LOCAL authorities as to which they will follow. The only carrot the feds have in a case like that is the pursestrings,funding for locals to carry out the enforcement if they choose to accept the funding.
Needless to say, that usually a very effective carot.....

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#32 Jan 16, 2013
Justice Dale wrote:
<quoted text>you are funny, don't you remember the hassel Arizona got for trying to enforce Federal Laws pertaining to illegal aliens.
The Sheriff is right, it's a Federal problem, let the feds do their job
The obvious difference being it is up to the Feds to decide which federal laws local authorities can enforce. The local authorities don't get to decide that for themselves.

So while they may not be able to force the Sheriff to enforce federal law, they certainly have ways of coercing him to do so, as another poster pointed out.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#33 Jan 16, 2013
Justice Dale wrote:
<quoted text>US Constitution, Art 2, sect 1, para 5, the 14th amendment Citizenship Clause and the Civil Rights Act of 1866.
Sorry, I should have realized you're a birther nutjob.

Feel free to rant away......
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

#34 Jan 16, 2013
WeTheSheeple wrote:
<quoted text>
The obvious difference being it is up to the Feds to decide which federal laws local authorities can enforce. The local authorities don't get to decide that for themselves.
So while they may not be able to force the Sheriff to enforce federal law, they certainly have ways of coercing him to do so, as another poster pointed out.
very interesting, but you can't force anyone to do anything that is Unconstitutional.
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

#35 Jan 16, 2013
WeTheSheeple wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry, I should have realized you're a birther nutjob.
Feel free to rant away......
Sorry, not a birther, a Constitutionalists and if I did rant away, you wouldn't understand me!!

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#37 Jan 17, 2013
Justice Dale wrote:
<quoted text>very interesting, but you can't force anyone to do anything that is Unconstitutional.
Assuming it is unconstitutional, which would need to be proven.....
Proud RIGHT Winger

Falls Church, VA

#38 Jan 17, 2013
Lawrence Wolf wrote:
<quoted text>No, it's every teabagger.
LOL No, it's all you little stinkin Demonbrats.
Every child is just as important in God eyes as Obama's kids are, and should be protected from harm too!

EVEN AN UNBORN CHILD !!
Proud RIGHT Winger

Falls Church, VA

#39 Jan 17, 2013
Justice Dale wrote:
<quoted text>Obama has never been a citizen of the US, very good grounds for removal.
LOL Well, if you look around you, there are a lot of people here that are not a US citizens that are getting everything they ever wanted, so why not Obama?

Sad to say BUT..

It looks like times have changed, and not for the better.
Proud RIGHT Winger

Falls Church, VA

#40 Jan 17, 2013
Lawrence Wolf wrote:
<quoted text>If something's coming, get your hand away from there, pervert!
Tell me the truth, do ALL you Demonbrats act this stupid, or does it come natual to ALL of you lost souls?

No wonder this world is going to hell faster than God can stop it.

All you guys talk of is trash (nasty sex talk), promote baby killing, and like calling other people names..like pervert. You guys that kill babies are far worse of a person than this person you are calling names like pervert. Sad thing is, you are too stupid to even know how stupid you are acting towards other people.
Canon

Texarkana, TX

#41 Jan 17, 2013
WeTheSheeple wrote:
Then the sheriff needs to be removed from office, just as any other official who refuses to follow federal law.
You don't understand states rights, or you would not have said that.
Canon

Texarkana, TX

#42 Jan 17, 2013
Lawrence Wolf wrote:
<quoted text>No, it's every teabagger.
Tea Party is pro constitution, everyone should be pro constitution.
Canon

Texarkana, TX

#43 Jan 17, 2013
Justice Dale wrote:
<quoted text>very interesting, but you can't force anyone to do anything that is Unconstitutional.
Exactly, that's what many do not understand.....even the president...and the president is suppose to be an educated man.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Joe Biden Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Biden: Trump should retain sanctions on Russia Feb 23 About time 33
News Will Sixty Senators Vote To Protect The Second ... Feb 19 Trump your President 8
News Bridge name remains same Feb 11 better or worse 1
News Mexico, U.S. will partner with or without Trump... Feb 1 Jgs 3
News Trump musters 31,000 Californians over immigrat... (Apr '16) Jan 30 okiady 3
News Make SCOTUS Nominees Answer the Tough Questions Jan 30 DaveinMass 1
News Julia Louis-Dreyfus: I love Joe Biden (Apr '13) Jan 30 BuildTheWall 14
More from around the web