Local Fox news anchor forced to apologize after calling Rachel Maddow an "angry young man"

Full story: WNUS-FM Vienna

The comment happened roughly one month ago, just after the debate between Vice President Joe Biden and Republican vice presidential candidate Paul Ryan An anchor for Fox affiliate WXIX-TV in Cincinnati is apologizing after calling MSNBC anchor Rachel Maddow an "angry young man" on her Facebook page.

Comments (Page 5)

Showing posts 81 - 100 of269
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
3OHY

San Jose, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#85
Nov 14, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Uve wrote:
<quoted text>
It's not your opposition to NAMBLA that I'm attacking..it's your self-righteous bigotry. Again your making generalizations about me and others like me that are incorrect. You think your giving money to help people with things like dysentery, when in actually all your doing is promoting some bigoted organization that donates money political causes like the 'Kill the Gays' bill in Uganda. I find you extremely bigoted, ignorant and you have exactly the kind of damaging ideas that children need to educated (what you think is propaganda) against. I don't need your acceptance but I'll be damned if I'll let you call me perverted because of some warped moral code that YOU have and then try and compare me to a child molester. F'K YOU!
Get some lick-a-maid like Mona to point out your logical fallacies.
Uve

Desert Hot Springs, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#86
Nov 14, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

3OHY wrote:
Exposing the intellectual depravity of Uve's posts asserting that companies with some Christian principles are avidly funding the killing of gays because their charitable outreach to dig wells goes to countries where gays are occasionally killed is not illogical. It addresses the dishonesty of those who've separated themselves from the historical norms of humanity at all levels. Commonly, those with such dishonest intellectualism will embrace increasingly polarized views and sometimes concepts of logical fallacies they cannot comprehend.
So now you can't even address me and trying for some audience? Typical..Your arguments are bigoted, dishonest, arrogant, judgmental and illogical. Historical norms? That's a joke. The cruelty of the Catholic Church and what has been done in the name of Christianity is abdominal. It pales to ANY war in history! Your the one that is spreading false information and hate that has polarized this country into embarrassment. Comprehension is NOT something you have shown in ANY of your posts and for you to judge MY comprehension is laughable, proving yourself to be (like I said previously) an ASSTROLL!
3OHY

San Jose, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#87
Nov 14, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Uve wrote:
<quoted text>
So now you can't even address me and trying for some audience? Typical..Your arguments are bigoted, dishonest, arrogant, judgmental and illogical. Historical norms? That's a joke. The cruelty of the Catholic Church and what has been done in the name of Christianity is abdominal. It pales to ANY war in history! Your the one that is spreading false information and hate that has polarized this country into embarrassment. Comprehension is NOT something you have shown in ANY of your posts and for you to judge MY comprehension is laughable, proving yourself to be (like I said previously) an ASSTROLL!
It's difficult to address both you and Mona in the same post, but I think I did a good job.

One doesn't need to be Christian to absolutely reject the affects of homosexuality in any culture. Atheist governments have been more active in making your activities illegal, even now your propaganda.
Uve

Desert Hot Springs, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#88
Nov 14, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

3OHY wrote:
<quoted text>
Get some lick-a-maid like Mona to point out your logical fallacies.
She was addressing yours! POS
3OHY

San Jose, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#89
Nov 14, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Uve wrote:
<quoted text>
She was addressing yours! POS
Appparently, you've done a lot of dope in your life. This usually leads to emotional retardation and stagnancy. This is why you're queer.

Also, I seem to have hit a nerve with you. Try to perceive these posts in a more neutral way. Your overreactions lead to acting out and we all know what that produces in emotionally stagnant perverts. If you can perceive yourself as once removed from emotionalism, you will make fewer logical fallacies, like your ridiculous assessments blaming religion for what is a common human revulsion of your behavior.
Uve

Desert Hot Springs, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#90
Nov 14, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

3OHY wrote:
<quoted text>
Appparently, you've done a lot of dope in your life. This usually leads to emotional retardation and stagnancy. This is why you're queer.
Also, I seem to have hit a nerve with you. Try to perceive these posts in a more neutral way. Your overreactions lead to acting out and we all know what that produces in emotionally stagnant perverts. If you can perceive yourself as once removed from emotionalism, you will make fewer logical fallacies, like your ridiculous assessments blaming religion for what is a common human revulsion of your behavior.
Not going to work..Your deflection and insults are a cop out. Once again your arrogance betrays your ignorant judgmental attitude.
3OHY

San Jose, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#91
Nov 14, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Uve wrote:
<quoted text>
Not going to work..Your deflection and insults are a cop out. Once again your arrogance betrays your ignorant judgmental attitude.
That's better, but still lacks insight.

It is common for the mentally ill to perceive relevant assessments of the reality of a situation as insult and any judgment of current mental capacity as unjustified. These defenses are part of any therapeutic stride toward self-awareness. The first step toward healing is the divorce from emotionalism, however.
Uve

Desert Hot Springs, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#92
Nov 14, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

3OHY wrote:
<quoted text>
It's difficult to address both you and Mona in the same post, but I think I did a good job.
One doesn't need to be Christian to absolutely reject the affects of homosexuality in any culture. Atheist governments have been more active in making your activities illegal, even now your propaganda.
Religious ignorance and arrogance at it's best..To make 'your activities illegal, even now your propaganda' illegal is the result of religious bigotry, hardly 'atheist'. I doubt Russia nor Nigeria would like to be considered atheist. Keep donating money to the NOM and Catholic political hate campaign, I'm sure they'll come around though. POS
AzAdam

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#93
Nov 14, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

luv Sarah Palin wrote:
<quoted text>
Why yes I have . I saw the host call Maddow a boy lol and later saw her aplogize on FOX and feel that she should have not aplogized. Foxy and I had a good laugh when she called Maddow an angry boy LOL.
Where do you think we ourselves got "Mr Maddow" and countless others ? From Rush and few other conservative news outlets.
Even a die hard communist like you has to admit that it is funny and cute but I now see that the left which includes Rachel Maddow has no sense of humor and can dish it out but not take it.
Rachel has said a few nasty things about FOX, like they mislead viewers , leave out half the facts and other stupid comments but low and behold , Rachel can dish it out but not take it, reminds me of you , Curtsee and Rose.
My Dear, NEVER forget that FOX is the #1 highest rated news network there is and Rachel is an insignificant joke.
I have to admit that I feel just sick over the election and perhaps this is no longer the country which I thought it was , A GREAT country.
You and Mr Maddow enjoy the destruction of this great Christian nation as you have earned it.
You don't see the difference between saying fox misleads viewers and omits facts and saying Maddow is a man?

One is an allegation who's truth can be debated. The other is an insult which makes no pretense about truthfulness.

One is designed to shape a discussion about journalistic bias. One is designed to illicit a smirk.

When she says Fox is misleading she's not joking.
Ratings don't make facts true.

“Unconvinced”

Since: Nov 09

Seattle, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#94
Nov 14, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

2

3OHY wrote:
Now that you've finally responded with what appears to be non-support of NAMBLA issues, it's only fair your name be removed from the list.
The issue on the other board is the supportive posts to the NAMBLA guy and the attacks on me for complaining about the lack of opposition amongst gays to the NAMBLA guy. You queers don't get it... by silence, humor, or outright support, it's all support. Your attempt to say there is no sub-text in these pervert's posts and reactions is absurd.
You will find me opposing assaults on gays maligned and pre-judged even by their own on other boards. Gays have a right to be perverted, but they don't have a right to continuously use any and all apparent successes in their civil status to increase the slick propaganda common in the gay community of diminishing family standards and imposing sex on children. You may live in a bubble, but gay publications and currently gays on Topix do this.
No, they sure don't. Silence and humor do NOT imply support of ANY kind.

I haven't said a WORD about Neo-Nazis building a secret moon base for manufacturing and stockpiling WMD's. That must mean I support such an idea, right?

If I make a joke about marriage equality forcing everyone into same-sex marriages whether they wanted them or not, would that mean that I truly support that?

Is every practicing Catholic supportive of raping children and hiding the perpetrators from justice? Are the producers of "The Walking Dead" supportive of a zombie apocalypse? Is every chicken crossing the road joke supportive of a worldwide network of poultry crosswalks and traffic signals?

You are simply reading what you WANT into these comments, and calling THAT "sub-text". True sub-text is a complex element, and requires a great deal of critical analysis, as well as input from the author. You are just sweeping everyone into the same dustbin, no matter how much or how little they say on the subject, because you obviously think that simply BEING gay is "perverted". You're so swept up in your own tar-and-feathering, that you actually included someone who wants to see GIRL SCOUTS STRIP as an example of gays chasing children. I mean, WTF?

I saw NO ONE supporting RustyS. He made all of THREE comments on the whole thread, no one even gave him so much as a "judge it" icon, positive or negative, after his remark about the age of consent.

You also made three comments on the entire thread, and I saw no one "attacking" you. The first reply to you was by Quest, who told you that "Like most gay folks, I've never heard of or met a nambla member". THAT'S an attack? Count me among the number of gay people who have never met a real NAMBLA member. I hope that wasn't an attack against you, too.

Your last comment there was that gay people should "govern our ranks". As if any of us have any control over individuals! Are heterosexuals crime-free? If not, then YOU'RE not governing YOUR ranks. Don't you have complete control over every heterosexual, as you expect from us? Diverse communities don't have "ranks" that can be "governed".

Your "broad-brush" slander is obvious. If you can take ONE half-coherent internet post from ONE person, and then use that to claim that we ALL "continuously use any and all apparent successes in their civil status", then you've just lost all connection to reality. You're attempting to smear ALL gay people with crimes that you WANT us to be guilty of. Using this approach, I could accuse ALL heterosexuals of raping their daughters. I could accuse ALL Christians with the crimes of the Hutaree. This could continue endlessly, until ALL humans are culpable for the misdeeds of ALL humans.

Go bitch to RustyS, if you don't like what HE says. But don't start demanding that ALL GAY PEOPLE are supportive of his point of view, just because we don't "govern" him somehow.
3OHY

San Jose, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#95
Nov 14, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Uve wrote:
<quoted text>
Religious ignorance and arrogance at it's best..To make 'your activities illegal, even now your propaganda' illegal is the result of religious bigotry, hardly 'atheist'. I doubt Russia nor Nigeria would like to be considered atheist. Keep donating money to the NOM and Catholic political hate campaign, I'm sure they'll come around though. POS
Religion is an expression of the human need to understand its nature and reasons for any set of moral prerogatives. Thus, religion can be seen as a natural, human and cultural norm. The common human rejection of homosexuality is a separate, likely genetically learned behavior linked to furtherance and stability in the human experience. This is why variable secular and widely oppositional religious views incorporate the more fundamental rejection of homosexual behaviors and irrational rejections of norms establishing certain permanences in the human fabric. Like the falsehoods of Marxism, activist homosexuals, whenever they've been allowed to thrive without clear opposition, believe they can change human nature. It's a falsehood believed at an emotional level, rationalizing behavior, rather than a solid view of life itself. Now, various perversions of human sexuality will always be evident in human experience. It is the function of humans coming together to form government of their base inclinations, that defines civilization. For many hundreds of thousands of years, this inclination to self-preservation has always striven to limit, or eliminate the impact of anarchistic views challenging the core self-perceptions of the overall human community. Homosexuality is basically destructive to all of those human inclinations. The vast majority of human beings have, at their most core understanding of culture, rejected behavior and mental infirmities challenging that understanding. Given the "freedom" you desire, which is really license, the homosexual influence has always been ultimately negative to the human community. That is why your impacts and behaviors are opposed, not because of some "religious" bigotry.
Mona Lott

Hoboken, NJ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#96
Nov 14, 2012
 

Judged:

2

1

1

3OHY wrote:
<quoted text>
Get some lick-a-maid like Mona to point out your logical fallacies.
The fallacies are all yours, bucko. Besides that, your posts make no sense whatsoever. Did you write them while having a stroke, or are you pretending to be an intellectual?
Mona Lott

Hoboken, NJ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#97
Nov 14, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

2

3OHY wrote:
<quoted text>
Religion is an expression of the human need to understand its nature and reasons for any set of moral prerogatives. Thus, religion can be seen as a natural, human and cultural norm. The common human rejection of homosexuality is a separate, likely genetically learned behavior linked to furtherance and stability in the human experience. This is why variable secular and widely oppositional religious views incorporate the more fundamental rejection of homosexual behaviors and irrational rejections of norms establishing certain permanences in the human fabric. Like the falsehoods of Marxism, activist homosexuals, whenever they've been allowed to thrive without clear opposition, believe they can change human nature. It's a falsehood believed at an emotional level, rationalizing behavior, rather than a solid view of life itself. Now, various perversions of human sexuality will always be evident in human experience. It is the function of humans coming together to form government of their base inclinations, that defines civilization. For many hundreds of thousands of years, this inclination to self-preservation has always striven to limit, or eliminate the impact of anarchistic views challenging the core self-perceptions of the overall human community. Homosexuality is basically destructive to all of those human inclinations. The vast majority of human beings have, at their most core understanding of culture, rejected behavior and mental infirmities challenging that understanding. Given the "freedom" you desire, which is really license, the homosexual influence has always been ultimately negative to the human community. That is why your impacts and behaviors are opposed, not because of some "religious" bigotry.
be be de bede be dee......

Thanks for the unprovable sweeping generalizations... I'll put them in file 13, right next to unicorns and devils.
Mona Lott

Hoboken, NJ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#98
Nov 14, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

3OHY wrote:
<quoted text>
Appparently, you've done a lot of dope in your life. This usually leads to emotional retardation and stagnancy. This is why you're queer.
Unfounded and ridiculous assumption.

Smoking dope doesn't make anyone queer.

Since: Dec 08

El Paso, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#99
Nov 14, 2012
 
How many times under how many names are you going to continue arguing your false argument.

You'refull of horse excrement right to the top of your head.

Next you'll begin telling us about your beautiful home and the children you allow to run wild all over the place and of course how well your multi million buck scams are doing.

Get lost pond scum.
3OHY wrote:
<quoted text>
Now that you've finally responded with what appears to be non-support of NAMBLA issues, it's only fair your name be removed from the list.
The issue on the other board is the supportive posts to the NAMBLA guy and the attacks on me for complaining about the lack of opposition amongst gays to the NAMBLA guy. You queers don't get it... by silence, humor, or outright support, it's all support. Your attempt to say there is no sub-text in these pervert's posts and reactions is absurd.
You will find me opposing assaults on gays maligned and pre-judged even by their own on other boards. Gays have a right to be perverted, but they don't have a right to continuously use any and all apparent successes in their civil status to increase the slick propaganda common in the gay community of diminishing family standards and imposing sex on children. You may live in a bubble, but gay publications and currently gays on Topix do this.
3OHY

San Jose, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#101
Nov 14, 2012
 
EdmondWA wrote:
<quoted text>
No, they sure don't. Silence and humor do NOT imply support of ANY kind.
I haven't said a WORD about Neo-Nazis building a secret moon base for manufacturing and stockpiling WMD's. That must mean I support such an idea, right?
If I make a joke about marriage equality forcing everyone into same-sex marriages whether they wanted them or not, would that mean that I truly support that?
Is every practicing Catholic supportive of raping children and hiding the perpetrators from justice? Are the producers of "The Walking Dead" supportive of a zombie apocalypse? Is every chicken crossing the road joke supportive of a worldwide network of poultry crosswalks and traffic signals?
You are simply reading what you WANT into these comments, and calling THAT "sub-text". True sub-text is a complex element, and requires a great deal of critical analysis, as well as input from the author. You are just sweeping everyone into the same dustbin, no matter how much or how little they say on the subject, because you obviously think that simply BEING gay is "perverted". You're so swept up in your own tar-and-feathering, that you actually included someone who wants to see GIRL SCOUTS STRIP as an example of gays chasing children. I mean, WTF?
I saw NO ONE supporting RustyS. He made all of THREE comments on the whole thread, no one even gave him so much as a "judge it" icon, positive or negative, after his remark about the age of consent.
You also made three comments on the entire thread, and I saw no one "attacking" you. The first reply to you was by Quest, who told you that "Like most gay folks, I've never heard of or met a nambla member". THAT'S an attack? Count me among the number of gay people who have never met a real NAMBLA member. I hope that wasn't an attack against you, too.
Your last comment there was that gay people should "govern our ranks". As if any of us have any control over individuals! Are heterosexuals crime-free? If not, then YOU'RE not governing YOUR ranks. Don't you have complete control over every heterosexual, as you expect from us? Diverse communities don't have "ranks" that can be "governed".
Your "broad-brush" slander is obvious. If you can take ONE half-coherent internet post from ONE person, and then use that to claim that we ALL "continuously use any and all apparent successes in their civil status", then you've just lost all connection to reality. You're attempting to smear ALL gay people with crimes that you WANT us to be guilty of. Using this approach, I could accuse ALL heterosexuals of raping their daughters. I could accuse ALL Christians with the crimes of the Hutaree. This could continue endlessly, until ALL humans are culpable for the misdeeds of ALL humans.
Go bitch to RustyS, if you don't like what HE says. But don't start demanding that ALL GAY PEOPLE are supportive of his point of view, just because we don't "govern" him somehow.
If my post directly addressing RustyS and his horrible assertions results in several other homosexuals immediately attacking me, the subtext is obvious. Otherwise and for space limitation, I assert that all humans are indeed culpable for the misdeeds of all other humans, if they are silent, or respond by attacking those making a clear oppositional statement to a criminal. This would apply to any crime against humanity at any time in human history. Me assaulting those inclined to justify in any manner something unjustifiable is not condemning all homosexuals as partakers of that specific perversion. It is directed only to them. Any other generalized views concerning homosexuality can be addressed in other ways and other discussions.

“Unconvinced”

Since: Nov 09

Seattle, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#102
Nov 14, 2012
 
3OHY wrote:
Appparently, you've done a lot of dope in your life. This usually leads to emotional retardation and stagnancy. This is why you're queer.
Is this supposed to be a logical, scientific statement? Is this an example of why you should be taken seriously?
3OHY

San Jose, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#103
Nov 14, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

EdmondWA wrote:
<quoted text>
No, they sure don't. Silence and humor do NOT imply support of ANY kind.
<clip for response>
I saw NO ONE supporting RustyS. He made all of THREE comments on the whole thread, no one even gave him so much as a "judge it" icon, positive or negative, after his remark about the age of consent.
You also made three comments on the entire thread, and I saw no one "attacking" you. The first reply to you was by Quest, who told you that "Like most gay folks, I've never heard of or met a nambla member". THAT'S an attack? Count me among the number of gay people who have never met a real NAMBLA member. I hope that wasn't an attack against you, too.
Your last comment there was that gay people should "govern our ranks". As if any of us have any control over individuals! Are heterosexuals crime-free?
<clip>
Your "broad-brush" slander is obvious. If you can take ONE half-coherent internet post from ONE person, and then use that to claim that we ALL "continuously use any and all apparent successes in their civil status", then you've just lost all connection to reality. You're attempting to smear ALL gay people with crimes that you WANT us to be guilty of. Using this approach, I could accuse ALL heterosexuals of raping their daughters. I could accuse ALL Christians with the crimes of the Hutaree. This could continue endlessly, until ALL humans are culpable for the misdeeds of ALL humans.
Go bitch to RustyS, if you don't like what HE says. But don't start demanding that ALL GAY PEOPLE are supportive of his point of view, just because we don't "govern" him somehow.
If my post directly addressing RustyS and his horrible assertions results in several other homosexuals immediately attacking me, the subtext is obvious. Likewise, queers responding to him directly with clear acceptance also defines subtext. Otherwise and for space limitation, I assert that all humans are indeed culpable for the misdeeds of all other humans, if they are silent, or respond in various degrees of approval. This would apply to any crime against humanity at any time in human history. Me assaulting those inclined to justify in any manner something unjustifiable is not condemning all homosexuals as partakers of that specific perversion. It is directed only to them. Any other generalized views concerning homosexuality can be addressed in other ways and other discussions.
Mona Lott

Hoboken, NJ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#104
Nov 14, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

3OHY wrote:
<quoted text>
If my post directly addressing RustyS and his horrible assertions results in several other homosexuals immediately attacking me, the subtext is obvious. Likewise, queers responding to him directly with clear acceptance also defines subtext. Otherwise and for space limitation, I assert that all humans are indeed culpable for the misdeeds of all other humans, if they are silent, or respond in various degrees of approval. This would apply to any crime against humanity at any time in human history. Me assaulting those inclined to justify in any manner something unjustifiable is not condemning all homosexuals as partakers of that specific perversion. It is directed only to them. Any other generalized views concerning homosexuality can be addressed in other ways and other discussions.
Back-pedalling? I thought you sounded like a circus clown.
3OHY

San Jose, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#105
Nov 14, 2012
 

Judged:

3

2

2

Mona Lott wrote:
<quoted text>
Unfounded and ridiculous assumption.
Smoking dope doesn't make anyone queer.
Nonsense. There is a clear correlation between the increased use of dope and the temporal increase in homosexuality in the same exact time-frame. Further, dope is almost universally used by homosexuals. Further yet, dope is commonly used by homosexuals to destroy and overpower natural inhibitions in their victims, those validated and sustained in a new deviant identity.

Aside from that, your logic is failing, as I said the reason for queers is "emotional retardation and stagnancy", which can be from non-dope reasons, too.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 81 - 100 of269
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••
•••
•••
•••
•••