Bill Clinton calls Obama an "amateur" president

[Will Dockery]

Proof wrote:

How does this pertain to obama. He accuses everyone of posting off topic stuff and now he is posting a video of him live on stage a video on You Tube called WILL DOCKERY BANG A GONG. What the heck does that have to do with obama. If that isn't off topic I don't know what is.

That's what is known as my "Sig", you anonymous newbie... and my entire post was filled with important news about Obama and the real progress he's made over these four years:

Turns out the facts are not all in, and the point to Obama having made much more progress than is being widely reported:

http://www.topix.com/forum/city/columbus-ga/T...

"PlacitasRoy" wrote:

FACTS prove you wrong.

26 months of private employment growth
10 Quarters of GPD increases (up from Dubya's last quarter of NEGATIVE 8+%
General economic index climbed to 17.1 from April’s 6.6.(Readings greater than zero signal expansion in the index)
233,000 jobs added in the auto industry since June 2009—the most growth in a decade!
Michael Linden, Director for Tax and Budget Policy also cites these FACTS:
Federal spending is lower now than it was when President Obama took office. I’ll pause to let you absorb the news.
In January 2009, before President Obama had even taken the oath of office, annual spending was set to total 24.9 percent of gross domestic product. Total spending this year, fiscal year 2012, is expected to top out at 23.4 percent of GDP.
Here’s another interesting fact. Taxes today are lower than they were on inauguration day 2009. Back in January 2009, the CBO projected that total federal tax revenue that year would amount to 16.5 percent of GDP. This year? 15.8 percent.
One last nugget. The deficit this year is going to be lower than what it was on the day President Obama took office. Back then, the CBO said the 2009 deficit would be 8.3 percent of GDP. This year’s deficit is expected to come in at 7.6 percent."

Actually, I'm GLAD to be proven wrong!

With your permission, I'd like to repost your piece above elsewhere.

--
"Bang A Gong" / Clyde Baker Tribute show:
http://youtu.be/Sy5Ap-N5sxA

[Will Dockery]

Zack wrote:

If Bill Clinton criticizes you

Well, Clinton wanted his wife to have the job, also, of course.

Here is the important news about Obama and the real progress he's made over these four years:

Turns out the facts are not all in, and the point to Obama having made much more progress than is being widely reported:

http://www.topix.com/forum/city/columbus-ga/T...

"PlacitasRoy" wrote:

FACTS prove you wrong.

26 months of private employment growth
10 Quarters of GPD increases (up from Dubya's last quarter of NEGATIVE 8+%
General economic index climbed to 17.1 from April’s 6.6.(Readings greater than zero signal expansion in the index)
233,000 jobs added in the auto industry since June 2009—the most growth in a decade!
Michael Linden, Director for Tax and Budget Policy also cites these FACTS:
Federal spending is lower now than it was when President Obama took office. I’ll pause to let you absorb the news.
In January 2009, before President Obama had even taken the oath of office, annual spending was set to total 24.9 percent of gross domestic product. Total spending this year, fiscal year 2012, is expected to top out at 23.4 percent of GDP.
Here’s another interesting fact. Taxes today are lower than they were on inauguration day 2009. Back in January 2009, the CBO projected that total federal tax revenue that year would amount to 16.5 percent of GDP. This year? 15.8 percent.
One last nugget. The deficit this year is going to be lower than what it was on the day President Obama took office. Back then, the CBO said the 2009 deficit would be 8.3 percent of GDP. This year’s deficit is expected to come in at 7.6 percent."

Actually, I'm GLAD to be proven wrong!

With your permission, I'd like to repost your piece above elsewhere.

--
"Bang A Gong" / Clyde Baker Tribute show:
http://youtu.be/Sy5Ap-N5sxA

[Will Dockery]

SPACKLING SPAM wrote:

<quoted text>
Will Dockery is

Your biggest obsession, obviously, you anonymous little Troll.

Fact is, my post was on-topic, it just reveals facts that you and your Ron Paul worshipping ilk just don't want to hear.

Here is what I wrote since you accidentally snipped it:

Turns out the facts are not all in, and the point to Obama having made much more progress than is being widely reported:
http://www.topix.com/forum/city/columbus-ga/T...
"PlacitasRoy" wrote:
FACTS prove you wrong.
26 months of private employment growth
10 Quarters of GPD increases (up from Dubya's last quarter of NEGATIVE 8+%
General economic index climbed to 17.1 from April’s 6.6.(Readings greater than zero signal expansion in the index)
233,000 jobs added in the auto industry since June 2009—the most growth in a decade!
Michael Linden, Director for Tax and Budget Policy also cites these FACTS:
Federal spending is lower now than it was when President Obama took office. I’ll pause to let you absorb the news.
In January 2009, before President Obama had even taken the oath of office, annual spending was set to total 24.9 percent of gross domestic product. Total spending this year, fiscal year 2012, is expected to top out at 23.4 percent of GDP.
Here’s another interesting fact. Taxes today are lower than they were on inauguration day 2009. Back in January 2009, the CBO projected that total federal tax revenue that year would amount to 16.5 percent of GDP. This year? 15.8 percent.
One last nugget. The deficit this year is going to be lower than what it was on the day President Obama took office. Back then, the CBO said the 2009 deficit would be 8.3 percent of GDP. This year’s deficit is expected to come in at 7.6 percent."
Actually, I'm GLAD to be proven wrong!
With your permission, I'd like to repost your piece above elsewhere.

Glad to clear that up for you, my fake named, anonymous little Troll pal.

--
"Bang A Gong" / Clyde Baker Tribute show:
http://youtu.be/Sy5Ap-N5sxA

[Will Dockery]

Listen good wrote:

I listened to the video several times.

Heh... well thanks for having a listen.

Turns out the facts are not all in, and the point to Obama having made much more progress than is being widely reported:
http://www.topix.com/forum/city/columbus-ga/T...
"PlacitasRoy" wrote:
FACTS prove you wrong.
26 months of private employment growth
10 Quarters of GPD increases (up from Dubya's last quarter of NEGATIVE 8+%
General economic index climbed to 17.1 from April’s 6.6.(Readings greater than zero signal expansion in the index)
233,000 jobs added in the auto industry since June 2009—the most growth in a decade!
Michael Linden, Director for Tax and Budget Policy also cites these FACTS:
Federal spending is lower now than it was when President Obama took office. I’ll pause to let you absorb the news.
In January 2009, before President Obama had even taken the oath of office, annual spending was set to total 24.9 percent of gross domestic product. Total spending this year, fiscal year 2012, is expected to top out at 23.4 percent of GDP.
Here’s another interesting fact. Taxes today are lower than they were on inauguration day 2009. Back in January 2009, the CBO projected that total federal tax revenue that year would amount to 16.5 percent of GDP. This year? 15.8 percent.
One last nugget. The deficit this year is going to be lower than what it was on the day President Obama took office. Back then, the CBO said the 2009 deficit would be 8.3 percent of GDP. This year’s deficit is expected to come in at 7.6 percent."
Actually, I'm GLAD to be proven wrong!
With your permission, I'd like to repost your piece above elsewhere.

Glad to clear that up for you, my fake named, anonymous little Troll pal.

--
"Bang A Gong" / Clyde Baker Tribute show:
http://youtu.be/Sy5Ap-N5sxA

[danny555]

In Bill Clinton's 2nd election, there was a new vote put on the ballot. it said "Who would want to have sex with Bill Clinton?" At the end of the election, 85%of the women who voted marked "Not Again" on the ballot

[Jim R Pickens]

Will Dockery wrote:

<quoted text>
Heh... well thanks for having a listen.
Turns out the facts...

None of these same statements about President Obama you keep posting over and over can be verified or backed up yet you continue to post them, over and over.
Why is that? Do you think by posting something that isn't true over and over it will become true?
I am surprised at the childishness and immaturity you are showing here this evening.

[Will Dockery]

Jim R Pickens wrote:

<quoted text>
None of these same statements about President Obama you keep posting over and over can be verified or backed up

Jim, if they can't be backed up then I want to know that, let's see proof otherwise.

If these facts *can* be backed up, then we want to see that, as well.

Just as simple as that... this has been put out so we can see and judge all sides of the story, rather than your usual smear tactics.

--
Music & poetry from Will Dockery:
http://www.reverbnation.com/willdockery

[Will Dockery]

danny555 wrote:

In Bill Clinton's 2nd election, there was a new vote put on the ballot. it said "Who would want to have sex with Bill Clinton?" At the end of the election, 85%of the women who voted marked "Not Again" on the ballot

Bill Clinton...*Bang-A-Gong*, man!

--
Music & poetry from Will Dockery:
http://www.reverbnation.com/willdockery

[Will Dockery]

Jim R Pickens wrote:

<quoted text>
Do you think by posting something that isn't true over and over it will become true?

No, Jim.

I expect you to prove them wrong, rather than your posting over and over how much you're not so fond of Obama.

If Obama has failed, post proof.

If Obama has made a slight bit of progress over the inept George Bush and his eight years of trashing the American economy, then post proof.

A simple enough concept, don't you agree?

--
Music & poetry from Will Dockery:
http://www.reverbnation.com/willdockery

[RayOne]

Bill & Hil should oversee the dry-cleaning of Ms Firestone.
A Kenya birth is easy to resolve by releasing the records.

[Will Dockery]

Hank wrote:

Jim R Pickens posts factual verifiable information accompanied with links to back up his posts.

Actually, Jim's just been posting his opinions about Obama and his worship of Bush, no proof of anything except cluelessness.

[Will Dockery]

Hank wrote:

Jim R Pickens posts factual verifiable information accompanied with links to back up his posts.

Here's Jim, "Hank"... note the lack of a link to back up his post:

"Jim R Pickens" wrote:

"This should have happened. Clinton would have won the Democrat primaries easily, and America would have been assured of a competent leader..."

This is Jim's *opinion*, "Hank", not verifiable information.

[Will Dockery]

Truth wrote:

<quoted text>
Obama and the dumbazz democrats had their shot and put us in this mess

No, Obama and the Democrats had their shot at getting us *out* of the mess George Bush put us into.

Glad to clear up your confusion on this, "Truth".

[Will Dockery]

Dr Rain wrote:

Wait a minute. If Obama was such an "amateur" then how come he demolished the Clinton's (and republicans) in 2008?
Sounds like bitterness by Clinton more than anything.
Just the facts.

Same thing I pointed out, that obviously Clinton wanted his wife to win.

[Will Dockery]

Hank wrote:

Jim R Pickens posts factual verifiable information accompanied with links to back up his posts.

Here's Jim's second post on this thread, "Hank"... note that there's still the lack of a link to back up his post:

"Jim R Pickens" wrote:

I am someone working to make sure the most "amateurish" inept president is NOT reelected.

No, nothing but clueless opinions from Jim on this thread.

[10 Cent Cigar]

Hank wrote:

Well I should have said Jim creates threads with factual verifiable information accompanied with links to back up those threads. Of course any post in a thread after that would be considered an opinion you big dummy. As far as that goes, anyone with a brain would accept Jim's opinion over that of a parrot who copy pastes another liberal idiots BS without facts to back it up over and over.
What I said about you, Will Dockery remains true. I left out the liberal idiot part though you big dummy.
So there you go, Will Dockery is another liberals useful idiot, AKA as a parrot.
Signed, "Hank".

Will Dockery thinks everyone one here that criticizes him is the same person anyway.

[danny555]

Bill Clinton, George Bush, a spectacular looking blonde woman and an enormously large woman with an unfriendly scowl are in a train car. The train passes through a tunnel, and in the darkness the unmistakable sound of a slap is heard. As the train pulls out of the tunnel, the daylight reveals a big red slap mark on Clinton's cheek.

The blonde thinks: "That rascal Clinton wanted to touch me and by mistake, he must have put his hand on the fat lady, who must have slapped his face"
The fat lady thinks: "That dirty old Bill Clinton touched the blonde and she smacked him."

Bill Clinton thinks: "George put his hand on that blonde and by mistake she slapped me."
George Bush thinks: "I hope there's another tunnel soon so I can smack Clinton again."

[Columbus Native]

Will Dockery wrote:

<quoted text>
No, Jim.
I expect you to prove them wrong, rather than your posting over and over how much you're not so fond of Obama.
If Obama has failed, post proof.
If Obama has made a slight bit of progress over the inept George Bush and his eight years of trashing the American economy, then post proof.
A simple enough concept, don't you agree?
--
Music & poetry from Will Dockery:
http://www.reverbnation.com/willdockery

Ol'Jim's picture looks like a fatcat republican especially after Congress could somehow come up with a way to do away with any minimum wage. You see Ol'Jim's family way back were Plantation owners. Yeh they worked the masses all day with no health care, no minimum wage, no unemployment insurance, no worker's compensation. Yes Ol' Jim wishes his folks would have won the Civil War and then they would have us white folks in the same fields with the black folks picking cotton for his family while they sit on their big porch and sip mint julips all day.

[Stanley]

Columbus Native wrote:

<quoted text>Ol'Jim's picture looks like a fatcat republican especially after Congress could somehow come up with a way to do away with any minimum wage. You see Ol'Jim's family way back were Plantation owners. Yeh they worked the masses all day with no health care, no minimum wage, no unemployment insurance, no worker's compensation. Yes Ol' Jim wishes his folks would have won the Civil War and then they would have us white folks in the same fields with the black folks picking cotton for his family while they sit on their big porch and sip mint julips all day.

You just don't like Jim cuz he shows you the truth. And you can't handle the truth, Okie

[Will Dockery]

Hank wrote:

Well I should have said Jim creates threads with factual verifiable information accompanied with links

Which I have also done many, many times here and elsewhere.

Links showing how George Bush ruined all the progress Bill Clinton had left him with, links showing the racist and Anti-Semitic supporters of Ron Paul, and his lack of objection to them, to give two very well known examples.

I haven't seen you do anything but post about *me* so far, "Hank", using that fake name and the many other anonymous monikers you employ in your trollish obsession.

--
The Will Dockery Project / "Seems To Be No Time":
http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/22662480/highl...