Video: Clinton: Syria weapons surrend...

Video: Clinton: Syria weapons surrender shouldn't be "excuse for delay"

There are 60 comments on the CBS News story from Sep 9, 2013, titled Video: Clinton: Syria weapons surrender shouldn't be "excuse for delay". In it, CBS News reports that:

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said if Syria's government handed over its chemical weapons to international control, "that would be an important step."

Join the discussion below, or Read more at CBS News.

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#21 Sep 9, 2013
fingiswold wrote:
<quoted text>
not until the bush regime's trials are finished, asshat..
What trials would that be, Nazicrat?
You are as mentally ill as Obama is.
ICE

Thorntown, IN

#22 Sep 9, 2013
Maybe she has another concussion ?

“Yeah, but...”

Since: Sep 11

MILKY WAY

#23 Sep 9, 2013
Responsibility wrote:
<quoted text>
Dear, just as with President Clinton, folks want to hear what they have to say - and will for year to come.
Let her write a book. I'm sure she will. Will you read it? I don't think it will have many pictures.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#24 Sep 9, 2013
okimar wrote:
<quoted text>If Hilldebeast runs,it'll be in vain. Benghazi sticks to her like stink on sh1t...... THAT will be the most run political ad ever. HER,standing before Congress,pizzed having to be there screeching "At this point what does it matter". Yeah,THAT'LL look Presidential.
and you think dancing on the graves of brave americans that served for you will win votes?

man you must be heavy into the GOP, and that really shows how out of touch they are with the US electorate...

Since: Mar 09

The Left Coast

#25 Sep 9, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>and you think dancing on the graves of brave americans that served for you will win votes?...
Hillary is counting on it.

“Yeah, but...”

Since: Sep 11

MILKY WAY

#26 Sep 9, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>and you think dancing on the graves of brave americans that served for you will win votes?
man you must be heavy into the GOP, and that really shows how out of touch they are with the US electorate...
And YOU think offering up the lives of those same military for no reason other than to save Obama's credibility will win her votes. You are aware that most Americans, by a 2-1 majority, are against action. Who is out of touch? The GOP, who are opposing Obama in this action, or the jack ass Damnocrats who are falling in line behind their party?
Cat74

United States

#27 Sep 9, 2013
The Democrats, more then the Republicans, are voting against Obama's Syrian debacle. The Defense Contractor can't buy enough members of Congress to get their way this time.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#28 Sep 9, 2013
SirPrize wrote:
<quoted text>
And YOU think offering up the lives of those same military for no reason other than to save Obama's credibility will win her votes. You are aware that most Americans, by a 2-1 majority, are against action. Who is out of touch? The GOP, who are opposing Obama in this action, or the jack ass Damnocrats who are falling in line behind their party?
who is offering up the lives of any military?

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#29 Sep 9, 2013
RustyS wrote:
<quoted text>
Hillary is counting on it.
yes she probably is, knowing that it will backfire horribly when you grave dancers try to use that in an election. the nation is tired of your disrespect for those that died in your partisan witch hunt hopes...

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#30 Sep 9, 2013
SirPrize wrote:
<quoted text>
And YOU think offering up the lives of those same military for no reason other than to save Obama's credibility will win her votes. You are aware that most Americans, by a 2-1 majority, are against action. Who is out of touch? The GOP, who are opposing Obama in this action, or the jack ass Damnocrats who are falling in line behind their party?
the democrats don't seem to be lining up to back an attack on Syria. the strongest supporters seem to be Mccain, Graham and Boehner.

facts are fun!

“Yeah, but...”

Since: Sep 11

MILKY WAY

#31 Sep 9, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>the democrats don't seem to be lining up to back an attack on Syria. the strongest supporters seem to be Mccain, Graham and Boehner.
facts are fun!
You like facts. Here are some:
Senate foreign Relations Committee resolution authorizing action agains Syria: Damnocrats in support 7 (2 against); GOP in support 3 ( 5 against).

Also, Damnocrats are far more likely to support action than the GOP.

http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2013/09/02/...

The strongest supporters are not the GOP. It's Obama's Damnocrats.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#32 Sep 9, 2013
SirPrize wrote:
<quoted text>
You like facts. Here are some:
Senate foreign Relations Committee resolution authorizing action agains Syria: Damnocrats in support 7 (2 against); GOP in support 3 ( 5 against).
Also, Damnocrats are far more likely to support action than the GOP.
http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2013/09/02/...
The strongest supporters are not the GOP. It's Obama's Damnocrats.
Really? you haven't been listening to graham and mccain talk? they're practically trying to drag obama to light the fuse himself...

and the speaker of the house is pretty strong support, isn't it?
Papillon

Sacramento, CA

#33 Sep 9, 2013
This smelly and regugnnt femnist douche bag is as useless as a hernia.

After all, she is a democRAT.

She needs to return to Deliverance County, Arkansas and resume her duties of baking possum cookies.

“Yeah, but...”

Since: Sep 11

MILKY WAY

#34 Sep 9, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>Really? you haven't been listening to graham and mccain talk? they're practically trying to drag obama to light the fuse himself...
and the speaker of the house is pretty strong support, isn't it?
Yes, really. It's true that McCain, graham and Boehner support Obama's latest insanity, but they do not have the support of the GOP or of the American people in this call to war. In fact, as I've demonstrated, it is the Damnocrats who are insisting on bringing the world to war. Perhaps, these 3 are dragging Obama to war, but it is the Damnocrats pushing and they're pushing in force.

Since: Mar 09

The Left Coast

#35 Sep 10, 2013
The big debate is nothing more than a little smoke and mirrors. If Obama can convince a few crazy old coots like McCain to go along, so be it. He's just lining up future excuses and people to blame when this goes south. Obama painted himself into a corner with his worldwide red line speech. Reid, Feinstein, Pelosi and others are supporting it, but this is Obama's war.

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#36 Sep 10, 2013
ICE wrote:
Maybe she has another concussion ?
Or maybe she fell and hit her head again.
It's amazing how well she has been since Benghazi went away.
She is a pig that eats her own excrement.

Since: Mar 09

The Left Coast

#37 Sep 10, 2013
The latest fuzzy red line news from ABC:

"I don't anticipate that you would see a succession of votes this week or anytime in the immediate future," Obama said. "So I think there will be time during the course of the debates here in the United States for the international community, the Russians and the Syrians to work with us and say is there a way to resolve this."

Shortly after Obama's comments, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, R-Nev., said on the Senate floor that he would delay a vote on authorizing military force in Syria, which was originally scheduled for Wednesday.
ICE

Thorntown, IN

#39 Sep 10, 2013
Eighthman wrote:
<quoted text>Or maybe she fell and hit her head again.
It's amazing how well she has been since Benghazi went away.
She is a pig that eats her own excrement.
Just remember ole Hill took live fire when exiting a plane in some Foreign country, that's what she said and "what difference does it make" if she made it up, it's fun and games to her anyway.

“Hillary, thirty years of lying”

Since: Nov 08

Paris

#40 Sep 10, 2013
Responsibility wrote:
<quoted text>
Eleanor, tooooooo much paranoia -
Oh yes, it's as bad as Hillary's imagined sniper fire.

“Hillary, thirty years of lying”

Since: Nov 08

Paris

#42 Sep 10, 2013
Eleanor wrote:
Wonder who's next in the PILE of politicians wanting to DESTROY the UNITED STATES??
The United States can't be blowing up parts of yet ANOTHER COUNTRY, without somebody eventually coming back to attack America and Americans all over the world !!
Syria has friends. Very serious, SUBSTANTIAL friends/allies. Russia, China, Iran.
Who here thinks that these allies won't come to the DEFENSE of Syria after an ATTACK by the U.S.A.???
These politicians, Kerry, Rice, Obama, Hillary, etc.- they ALL have SECURE PLACES to HIDE in the event of a counter-strike against the U.S.
How about you?? Where is you bunker?? Think they have room for you???
<NOT>
Watch for the MSM to start a volley of cover stories to show Obama's wisdom instead of his complete stupidity putting himself in this cluster f--k.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Hillary Clinton Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News More texts turned over from FBI agent taken off... 6 hr Baptist ism by Proxy 4
News Head of Russian outlet RT says US foreign agent... 6 hr Cordwainer Trout 13
News The reddest state: Oklahoma's long battle over ... 10 hr katzndawgs 1
News FBI is investigating the Clinton Foundation, so... 16 hr babyjesus 89
News Clinton Campaign Members Relive Stunning Electi... 18 hr inbred Genius 4
News Bannon poised to testify before US intelligence... 18 hr Trump is a joke 44
News Elite Consensus: How Transgenderism Became the ... 20 hr DifferentIsNotWrong 38
More from around the web