Issa seeks deposition from Benghazi r...

Issa seeks deposition from Benghazi review chairs

There are 15 comments on the Democratic Underground Latest Breaking News story from May 12, 2013, titled Issa seeks deposition from Benghazi review chairs. In it, Democratic Underground Latest Breaking News reports that:

The Republican chairman of a House panel looking into the attacks on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya, wants to take depositions from the leaders of an earlier review board.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Democratic Underground Latest Breaking News.

Your Ex

United States

#1 May 12, 2013
You mean the thing Pickering volunteered to do weeks ago?
conservative crapola

Orefield, PA

#2 May 12, 2013
"Issa defended the Bush administration’s criminal destruction of White House email records, saying that they weren’t intentionally deleted, but lost because of a software glitch (a charge he was later forced to retract). In fact, nearly every time the Bush White House came under scrutiny, there was Congressman Issa riding in on his white horse."

nutjob teabeggar fakeriot

hahahahahahahahaha

Since: Dec 07

Frankston, TX

#3 May 12, 2013
Your Ex wrote:
You mean the thing Pickering volunteered to do weeks ago?
You mean the Pickering who tried to help his boss Hillary cover it up??

Why he did not care to talk to the person who was in charge in Tripolis????… just listening to the lying crew around Hillary and Obama …. what a great Pickering … and he really wants to defend it … shame on him (may be he was just too old? for the job)… just start over with the investigation
.

“My Commander-in-Chi ef!”

Since: Jun 07

Obama got Osama!

#4 May 12, 2013
Your Ex wrote:
You mean the thing Pickering volunteered to do weeks ago?
Pickering destroyed that imbecile Issa this morning on Meet The Press… the right has over-played their hands and they are to bitter, bigoted and ignorant to realize it. You could see that Issa was desperately trying to make his foaming at the mouth obsession over Benghazi make sense with every question that David Gregory asked…

They lost the election and they can’t get over the fact that the Black guy won.
BandMaster

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#5 May 12, 2013
conservative crapola wrote:
"Issa defended the Bush administration’s criminal destruction of White House email records, saying that they weren’t intentionally deleted, but lost because of a software glitch (a charge he was later forced to retract). In fact, nearly every time the Bush White House came under scrutiny, there was Congressman Issa riding in on his white horse."
nutjob teabeggar fakeriot
hahahahahahahahaha
BENGHAZI..Told ya. That's all we are all talking about. That's a dangerous place for Barack Hussein and Hillbilly to be. BENGHAZI. It's in the news.
BandMaster

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#6 May 12, 2013
Benghazi was Barack's House of Horrors.

Since: Aug 10

Buffalo, NY

#7 May 12, 2013
Now issa can sprend months to come to the same conclusion he did with fast and furious
Your Ex

United States

#8 May 12, 2013
Bluebonnets-Thistle wrote:
<quoted text>
You mean the Pickering who tried to help his boss Hillary cover it up??
Why he did not care to talk to the person who was in charge in Tripolis????… just listening to the lying crew around Hillary and Obama …. what a great Pickering … and he really wants to defend it … shame on him (may be he was just too old? for the job)… just start over with the investigation
.
Yes, the internationally lauded, 50yr career in the state dept., one of the smartest guys in the room, Career Ambassador Pickering.
The handed Issa=Asshat his lying ass on platter this Sunday AM Career Ambassador Pickering.
The same Career Ambassador Pickering who will bytch-slap Issa=Asshat in the "private hearing" that we won't get to enjoy.
ttttttt3

Noblesville, IN

#9 May 12, 2013
Bluebonnets-Thistle wrote:
<quoted text>
You mean the Pickering who tried to help his boss Hillary cover it up??
Why he did not care to talk to the person who was in charge in Tripolis????… just listening to the lying crew around Hillary and Obama …. what a great Pickering … and he really wants to defend it … shame on him (may be he was just too old? for the job)… just start over with the investigation
.
demo underground newseum.org ;-00

Since: Dec 07

Frankston, TX

#10 May 12, 2013
Your Ex wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, the internationally lauded, 50yr career in the state dept., one of the smartest guys in the room, Career Ambassador Pickering.
The handed Issa=Asshat his lying ass on platter this Sunday AM Career Ambassador Pickering.
The same Career Ambassador Pickering who will bytch-slap Issa=Asshat in the "private hearing" that we won't get to enjoy.
LMAO--bullshit

Pickering cherry picked pro Obama people to interview and admitted he didn't even look into the phony talking points. In other words, Mullens and Pickering wrote a sham report proving they're political hacks for Obama .

Pickering is one of Bill Clinton's guys... and MSNBC presents him as an "independent investigator". Hilarious

DARRELL ISSA: Well, as the ambassador just said, the day before the hearing, if the White House said, "We'd like to have him," there's a procedure. He could have been the Democratic witness, and we would have allowed him. The Democrats requested no witness.... I'm delighted to have a long-serving, career diplomat willing to come before us. I don't think it was his decision to say no, but we were told no until just before the hearing.

Issa schooled Pickering on his story changing...

Since: Dec 07

Frankston, TX

#11 May 12, 2013
Your Ex wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, the internationally lauded, 50yr career in the state dept., one of the smartest guys in the room, Career Ambassador Pickering.
The handed Issa=Asshat his lying ass on platter this Sunday AM Career Ambassador Pickering.
The same Career Ambassador Pickering who will bytch-slap Issa=Asshat in the "private hearing" that we won't get to enjoy.
google soros and pickering at the same time....don't spill your drink on your keyboard..

Wake up.

[email protected]

Since: Dec 07

Location hidden

#12 May 13, 2013
Bluebonnets-Thistle wrote:
<quoted text>
You mean the Pickering who tried to help his boss Hillary cover it up??
Why he did not care to talk to the person who was in charge in Tripolis????… just listening to the lying crew around Hillary and Obama …. what a great Pickering … and he really wants to defend it … shame on him (may be he was just too old? for the job)… just start over with the investigation
.
Blue, Blue, Blue.... really? the republican appointed career diplomat wants to cover for the big bad evil socialist democrats?

You have to forgive me if I take his word over yours. You know...since he has no reason to lie about his report on the security aspects and timeline of the attack.
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#13 May 13, 2013
lol! Issa is such a political hack...

.... well, an idiot as well!

[email protected]

Since: Dec 07

Location hidden

#14 May 13, 2013
Bluebonnets-Thistle wrote:
<quoted text>
LMAO--bullshit
Pickering cherry picked pro Obama people to interview and admitted he didn't even look into the phony talking points. In other words, Mullens and Pickering wrote a sham report proving they're political hacks for Obama .
Pickering is one of Bill Clinton's guys... and MSNBC presents him as an "independent investigator". Hilarious
DARRELL ISSA: Well, as the ambassador just said, the day before the hearing, if the White House said, "We'd like to have him," there's a procedure. He could have been the Democratic witness, and we would have allowed him. The Democrats requested no witness.... I'm delighted to have a long-serving, career diplomat willing to come before us. I don't think it was his decision to say no, but we were told no until just before the hearing.
Issa schooled Pickering on his story changing...
Blue, Blue, Blue... really you are too much at times.

What does the talking points have to do with the attack? after all it was Pickering's job along with the rest of the panel to look into security failings that allowed 4 Americans to die.

It was never their job to see if the administration's talking points were correct, because you know that is political nonsense and a time waster when all facts point to their deaths were not preventable after the attack had taken place.

but it does however cover the biggest nonsense charge leveled at the Administration and that was their was no wrong doings by Obama or Clinton that led to their deaths.

You know, because after someone else spills milk and how you tell how the milk fell isn't really how the milk fell doesn't change the fact that someone else spilled the milk.

And don't you find it odd that for someone like Issa to claim to be seeking the truth in an un-bias way would suggest that it has to be the democrats that have to include the Pickering's has their witness instead of using his chairmanship to streamline Pickering's place in his little hearings. You know, because he is only interested in the truth right? How odd indeed...

But keep barking up that wrong tree.
Your Ex

United States

#15 May 13, 2013
Bluebonnets-Thistle wrote:
<quoted text>
LMAO--bullshit
Pickering cherry picked pro Obama people to interview and admitted he didn't even look into the phony talking points. In other words, Mullens and Pickering wrote a sham report proving they're political hacks for Obama .
Pickering is one of Bill Clinton's guys... and MSNBC presents him as an "independent investigator". Hilarious
DARRELL ISSA: Well, as the ambassador just said, the day before the hearing, if the White House said, "We'd like to have him," there's a procedure. He could have been the Democratic witness, and we would have allowed him. The Democrats requested no witness.... I'm delighted to have a long-serving, career diplomat willing to come before us. I don't think it was his decision to say no, but we were told no until just before the hearing.
Issa schooled Pickering on his story changing...
So, by “refused to come before our committee,” Issa meant “was not invited, by the people who weren’t running the hearings.”
Good of him to clear that up.
Pickering just peed all over your witch-hunt, again, this Monday AM.
How much of the taxpayers $$$ are the "fiscal conservatives" going to spend on this obvious, shameful, partisan, fiasco?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Hillary Clinton Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Trump Isn't Bluffing, He'll Deport 11 Million P... 5 min Mikey 5,268
News Hillary Clinton picks Tim Kaine as vice preside... 7 min woodtick57 159
News Despite her many roles, Hillary Clinton still h... 8 min WeTheSheeple 148
News Hillary Clinton wavers on Second Amendment righ... 11 min Science Teacher 1,481
News Ohio's Kasich urges working together at NAACP c... 14 min Go Blue Forever 126
News Political World Awaits Hillary Clinton's Pick F... 15 min Le Jimbo 6
News DNC chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz will not spe... 17 min Le Jimbo 13
More from around the web