Hillary Clinton Supports Gay Marriage

Full story: wsj.com 168
Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton became the latest politician to come out in favor of same-sex marriage on Monday, echoing similar shifts by President Barack Obama and other potential White House hopefuls as the issue gains public approval. Full Story

Since: Aug 09

Saint Louis, MO

#101 Mar 27, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>how'd that work for you on that marriage is not a right thing you had going?
what a tool!
Slick Willy said Hitlery has eatne more you know what than he has eaten. That is a lot of you know what eating.
Common Sense

Miami, FL

#102 Mar 27, 2013
Hillary's a dyke and we've all known this for quite some time. What's the surprise?

Since: Aug 09

Saint Louis, MO

#103 Mar 27, 2013
Common Sense wrote:
Hillary's a dyke and we've all known this for quite some time. What's the surprise?
I have supected for awhile. But, I am still surprised to find so much evidence to prove it. Knowlege is power. This information gives ut the power to payback for this and many other Clinton insults: http://www.youtube.com/watch... . All we need to do is get the word among black voters and tat will endher chances of being elected. It is time to hold those dogs accountable.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#104 Mar 27, 2013
Abdurratln wrote:
<quoted text>
Slick Willy said Hitlery has eatne more you know what than he has eaten. That is a lot of you know what eating.
Yeah...I'd stick with your off topic, third grade level posts.

it's nice to be good at something...

Since: Aug 09

Saint Louis, MO

#105 Mar 27, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>Yeah...I'd stick with your off topic, third grade level posts.
it's nice to be good at something...
We are talking about lesbian marriages. Right? Ain't Hitlery married to Slick Willy? Ain't she a lesbian? And ain't this right on time?

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#106 Mar 27, 2013
Abdurratln wrote:
<quoted text>
We are talking about lesbian marriages. Right? Ain't Hitlery married to Slick Willy? Ain't she a lesbian? And ain't this right on time?
your 'proof' that she is a lesbian is not even worthy of the jerry Springer show...and what would it matter if she was?

yeah, stick to that level of discussion, you can't hack it with the adults...that has been proven.

Since: Aug 09

Saint Louis, MO

#108 Mar 27, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>your 'proof' that she is a lesbian is not even worthy of the jerry Springer show...and what would it matter if she was?
I never claimed that it is "proof beyond a shadow of a doubt". It is circumstantial evidence that "proves beyond a reasonable doubt." You really have to bend over backwards to deny that where there is so much smoke, there must be a fire. Furthermore, it is obvious that the public records have been cleansed. In other words, somebody has gone in there and hidden and taken out a lot of evidence in order to create the false impr4ession that she is worthy to be president. She is scum. And she is not qualified to ne president although I am certain that you "gay" people will support her just like you support Obama. But in her case, your support will not be enough because the Movement to defend Marriage is going to claim a lot of black votes. And by her being white, she will not get black support as a default. Black have 4 long years to think about her and hold her accountable for all the screw-ups she has made in the past. And, I will beging to educate people about her now. For example, you can expect to see this video a lot in the next four years:
&fe ature=player_detailpage. Plus, Rand Paul has already begun to challenge her and to criticize every move she makes. Yep. We have seen the last of Hitlery and it is about time. She should have retired 20 years ago.

“ROCK ON ROCKERS!!”

Since: Mar 11

Rockin' USA ;)

#109 Mar 27, 2013
SAME SEX MARRIAGE... is getting as much HYPE ad Roe Vs. Wade..AND...EVERY CELEBRITY.. wants in on the action!!... JUST Pass the Law to LEGALIZE IT!..And Be Done With It!!!

Since: Aug 09

Saint Louis, MO

#111 Mar 27, 2013
Colorado Chick wrote:
SAME SEX MARRIAGE... is getting as much HYPE ad Roe Vs. Wade..AND...EVERY CELEBRITY.. wants in on the action!!... JUST Pass the Law to LEGALIZE IT!..And Be Done With It!!!
That's the coward's way out.
bman

Commack, NY

#112 Mar 27, 2013
Rick in Kansas wrote:
<quoted text>So, basically, you oppose our rights, not because you can think of a legitimate reason as to why we should not have them, but because you are frightened by the possibility of incestuous marriages and plural marriages being approved as a result. Well rest your frightened little head. As individuals in this country, we do have a right to be married in the eyes of the state and it can only be limited in instances where a compelling interest of the state is served by it. Incestuous marriages will be remain prohibited, because the state has an interest in preventing children born of such relationships and an interest in maintaining marriage as a contract between legal strangers. Plural marriage will remain prohibited because the state has an interest in being able to regulate marriage and divorce and ANY limit above one spouse per person at a time is indefensibly arbitrary. Nowhere in the world where same sex marriage has been enacted over the last decade or so have these scary to you forms of marriage followed as a result.
So what gives you or the state the right to discriminate people from marrying who they like? If the definition of marriage is between two people who love each other, then how can that prevent incestuous marriage? Don't get me wrong, incestuous marriage is wrong, but if we keep changing the definition of marriage it can evolve into other forms of marriages. 30 years ago no one would have imagined two men being able to get married. There are relatives already calling for their right to be married. Lets keep the definition of marriage the way it's been for hundreds of years- between a man and a woman. Sure, gays can be together and have relationships, but the status of marriage should be left alone and reserved for a man and woman. It's the natural law of the world and making marriage more artificial can devalue the institution.

“Happiness comes through giving”

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#113 Mar 27, 2013
Abdurratln wrote:
<quoted text>
I am just quoting what Slick Wily said. If anybody knows for sure that Hilary is a lesbian, it would be Slick Willy. What did he say? Well, I cannot quoted it directly 'cause he uses a bad cuss word. But you follow my drift. He said Hilary has eaten more you know what than he has. Wow!!! That is a lot of lesbianism.
And you're a lot of diahrrea, but that's diahrrea's nature.

“Happiness comes through giving”

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#114 Mar 27, 2013
Colorado Chick wrote:
SAME SEX MARRIAGE... is getting as much HYPE ad Roe Vs. Wade..AND...EVERY CELEBRITY.. wants in on the action!!... JUST Pass the Law to LEGALIZE IT!..And Be Done With It!!!
It wouldn't threaten your special relationship with a wombat.

Since: Aug 09

Saint Louis, MO

#115 Mar 27, 2013
bman wrote:
<quoted text>
So what gives you or the state the right to discriminate people from marrying who they like? If the definition of marriage is between two people who love each other, then how can that prevent incestuous marriage? Don't get me wrong, incestuous marriage is wrong, but if we keep changing the definition of marriage it can evolve into other forms of marriages. 30 years ago no one would have imagined two men being able to get married. There are relatives already calling for their right to be married. Lets keep the definition of marriage the way it's been for hundreds of years- between a man and a woman. Sure, gays can be together and have relationships, but the status of marriage should be left alone and reserved for a man and woman. It's the natural law of the world and making marriage more artificial can devalue the institution.
I do not think "gays" ought to be allowed to live together. We have to draw te line somewhere because some people do not know when to quit
Lilith_Satans_wh o_re

Bellevue, WA

#117 Mar 27, 2013
Abdurratln wrote:
<quoted text>
I do not think "gays" ought to be allowed to live together. We have to draw te line somewhere because some people do not know when to quit
hey islamic terrorist ni @@er... stfu or blow yourself up... Your Allah was a child pedaphile and I smear c#nt juice on your Koran before I burn it
Lilith_Satans_wh o_re

Bellevue, WA

#118 Mar 27, 2013
Abdurratln wrote:
<quoted text>
I do not think "gays" ought to be allowed to live together. We have to draw te line somewhere because some people do not know when to quit
hey why was allah such a pedophile??? and Muhommad a murdering criminal

“ROCK ON ROCKERS!!”

Since: Mar 11

Rockin' USA ;)

#119 Mar 27, 2013
Abdurratln wrote:
<quoted text>
I do not think "gays" ought to be allowed to live together. We have to draw te line somewhere because some people do not know when to quit
JUST WHO "GAVE" You the right to make this decision???

“ reality, what a concept”

Since: Nov 07

this one

#120 Mar 28, 2013
bman wrote:
<quoted text>
So what gives you or the state the right to discriminate people from marrying who they like? If the definition of marriage is between two people who love each other, then how can that prevent incestuous marriage? Don't get me wrong, incestuous marriage is wrong, but if we keep changing the definition of marriage it can evolve into other forms of marriages. 30 years ago no one would have imagined two men being able to get married. There are relatives already calling for their right to be married. Lets keep the definition of marriage the way it's been for hundreds of years- between a man and a woman. Sure, gays can be together and have relationships, but the status of marriage should be left alone and reserved for a man and woman. It's the natural law of the world and making marriage more artificial can devalue the institution.
While as individuals we have the right to be married, the state has the power to limit that right to us, IF it serves a compelling interest of the state to do so. The state has a compelling interest in protecting minors, so they can limit the individual's right to marry one. The state has a compelling interest in being able regulate marriages and divorces as being similarly situated, so they can limit the individual's right to marry to one spouse per person at a time. The state has the compelling interest in maintaining marriage as a contract, so they can limit the right to marry to those able to provide the required legal consent to one, no dogs, no lawn furniture. The state has a compelling interest in maintaining marriage as a contract between legal strangers for the right to be each others next of kin, so they can limit the right to marry to those already your next of kin. Nowhere where same sex marriage has been legally approved in the world over the last decade has it yet to be followed by ANY of the marriages that would give you the serious willies. So limiting our right, where there is no compelling or any other interest served by doing so, just because that which hasn't happened yet and doesn't look like its ever going to makes you nervous is a pretty lame excuse if you ask me.

Bottom line, your "issues" with the concept of legally recognized same sex marriages, no longer our problem. Marriage is a right which can ONLY be limited when a compelling interest of the state is served by doing so, fear of your choice of bogeymen, not one. Think about this, our right to marry has been found to include pretty much any of the incarcerated felons of our dreams. Being in prison, even for life/death, not a basis for denying the right to marry to all prisoners. Tell me, what is the point in telling someone that they can't marry the recidivist felon of their dreams, just because they are the wrong sex?

“ reality, what a concept”

Since: Nov 07

this one

#121 Mar 28, 2013
Abdurratln wrote:
I do not think "gays" ought to be allowed to live together. We have to draw te line somewhere because some people do not know when to quit
That's sweet of you dear. It's not the least bit surprising to hear that you do not think though, that's pretty much been the consensus of everyone responding to you. I'm glad you finally caught up. Cupcake, your "issues" with homosexuals/homosexuality/your own homoerotic fantasies, your problem. You're just going to have to work on your coping skills, because its only going to get rougher for immature twits like you.
NoQ

Oklahoma City, OK

#122 Mar 28, 2013
Rick in Kansas wrote:
<quoted text>That's sweet of you dear. It's not the least bit surprising to hear that you do not think though, that's pretty much been the consensus of everyone responding to you. I'm glad you finally caught up. Cupcake, your "issues" with homosexuals/homosexuality/your own homoerotic fantasies, your problem. You're just going to have to work on your coping skills, because its only going to get rougher for immature twits like you.
Fck you ShitEating Ricky.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#123 Mar 28, 2013
Abdurratln wrote:
<quoted text>
I do not think "gays" ought to be allowed to live together. We have to draw te line somewhere because some people do not know when to quit
dude, you don't even 'think' at all. we've shown what a stupid fool you are already now you are just driving the nail home..

go back to your porn pages, fool...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Hillary Clinton Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Christie lags Hillary in his home state of New ... 4 hr Randy 1
Can Obama's presidency be saved? 17 hr spocko 968
Michele Bachmann: Obama Won Because He's Black ... (Feb '14) Wed Swedenforever 405
Why Democrats Are So Confident Dec 22 wild child 7
After being impeached in 1998, Clinton said he ... Dec 21 Obamakare is goo... 34
Limbaugh: Hillary/Jeb 2016 'The Perfect Ticket' Dec 20 Retired SOF 17
Bought Some Coochie on Backpage... Dec 17 Casa 1
More from around the web