Rove heckled at college speech

Rove heckled at college speech

There are 885 comments on the Politico story from Apr 10, 2013, titled Rove heckled at college speech. In it, Politico reports that:

Protesters repeatedly interrupted a speech by Karl Rove on Tuesday, calling the former White House adviser a "murderer" and "terrorist" for his role in the invasion of Iraq.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Politico.

Since: Oct 08

Location hidden

#819 Apr 29, 2013
Mr Big Bad John Roberts wrote:
<quoted text>Yo' birthpiss, you are just a stupid klanjig racist that has always been scared of Blacks and Hispanics. You need to get your lazy monkey azz back to servicing those truckers ya' stupid klanny tranny. Do not worry about the way I write because as long as your dumb klanjig monkey azz responds, I have hit my target.
Lol!!!!!!!!!!
Lol!!!!!!!!!!
Lol!!!!!!!!!!
And you're just a jig, short for.... keep it up, you're running out of slurs, you're just a big john, do you flush????
bottlecap

Orlando, FL

#821 Apr 29, 2013
My Portal wrote:
<quoted text>Ignore the hecklers is the first rule of giving speeches. The same is suggested for topix. None of the typical responders to you, back up their own post with proof or links to the proof.
You speak much truth fellow poster. But getting an arguement out in cyber-space can get people to thinking----after all, the International Bankers control the airways(NBC, ABC, CNN, etc.) and the Print Media(Washington Post, NY Times, Time Magazine) and Academia and Hollywood, so where-else can an average citizen be heard.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#822 Apr 30, 2013
bottlecap wrote:
---after all, the International Bankers control the airways(NBC, ABC, CNN, etc.) and the Print Media(Washington Post, NY Times, Time Magazine) and Academia and Hollywood, so where-else can an average citizen be heard.
Tell us about the black UN hellycopters, PA!
bottlecap

Orlando, FL

#823 Apr 30, 2013
Don Joe wrote:
<quoted text>
OK, we can finally agree on something. The question is, why do you support the International Banksters and their political party?
What I think we have to consider is the STRENGH of those who control the MSM-----it is Awesome. And with it they have gained control of the political system as well as the US Military.

Here is how it works! Both the Republicans and Democrats have honest, decent, intelligent people in their party who respond to the will of the people. Fine and good.

But also, they, the BANKSTERS, have their people in BOTH parties too, and it is a simple matter, with their control of the MSM, Hollywood and Academia, to ADVANCE their underlings thru the right amount of positive propaganda, at the same time nit-picking and weeding out their enemies with negative propaganda.

And since George Bush Sr., all their Presidents have been subservient to the New World Order Agenda; Bush Sr, Clinton, Bush and Obama. The same for their opponents; Bob Dole, Al Gore, John Kerry and John McCain.

And that, my friend, is the long and the short of it.
bottlecap

Orlando, FL

#824 Apr 30, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Tell us about the black UN hellycopters, PA!
I'm glad you brought that up. The UN was created by Hitler's BANKSTERS and they have done the United States great harm.



Time for those rabid dogs to pack-up and leave and for our brave men and women in the United States Military, to no longer be killed and maimed upon their orders.
bottlecap

Orlando, FL

#825 Apr 30, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Rove is a -performer-.
The audience has the right to jeer and heckle to their hearts content.
All one has to know about Rove is his forty year history of dirty tricks, e.g., spreading the rumor McCain fathered a black child in SC during the primaries.
My heart bleeds for him.
Its not just Rove who suffered at their RUDENESS, but the people who came to hear him, many who opposed his views.

Plus, thanks to the MSM covering up the identity of the hecklers, we don't even know if they were students or not.

Since: Apr 13

Location hidden

#826 Apr 30, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Rove is a -performer-.
The audience has the right to jeer and heckle to their hearts content.
All one has to know about Rove is his forty year history of dirty tricks, e.g., spreading the rumor McCain fathered a black child in SC during the primaries.
My heart bleeds for him.
It sounds like Mr. Rove and Mr. Axelrod have a lot in common.
Brad

Manchester, CT

#827 Apr 30, 2013
bottlecap wrote:
<quoted text>
Its not just Rove who suffered at their RUDENESS, but the people who came to hear him, many who opposed his views.
Plus, thanks to the MSM covering up the identity of the hecklers, we don't even know if they were students or not.
The same hecklers sit quietly and are respectful when Ayers and Ahmadinejad address them.
They even dined with the little 5 foot tall tin pot dictator after he spews his hatred towards Jews all stary eyed and mesmerized.
Higher institutes of learning????
Don Joe

Saint Paul, MN

#828 Apr 30, 2013
bottlecap wrote:
<quoted text>
What I think we have to consider is the STRENGH of those who control the MSM-----it is Awesome. And with it they have gained control of the political system as well as the US Military.
Here is how it works! Both the Republicans and Democrats have honest, decent, intelligent people in their party who respond to the will of the people. Fine and good.
But also, they, the BANKSTERS, have their people in BOTH parties too, and it is a simple matter, with their control of the MSM, Hollywood and Academia, to ADVANCE their underlings thru the right amount of positive propaganda, at the same time nit-picking and weeding out their enemies with negative propaganda.
And since George Bush Sr., all their Presidents have been subservient to the New World Order Agenda; Bush Sr, Clinton, Bush and Obama. The same for their opponents; Bob Dole, Al Gore, John Kerry and John McCain.
And that, my friend, is the long and the short of it.
The power of those who control the MSM is indeed awesome and it will be very difficult to wrest away from them.

As to good people on both sides? I don't see it. It looks to me like any good people got removed a long long time ago from both sides. I don't see anyone in congress even pretending to support the will of the people (with very few exceptions).

You can claim that since Bush sr presidents have been subservient, but Reagan also; and I would not be surprised if many before Reagan were as well. We can agree on the opponents as well.

The question becomes what to do about it.
Brad

Manchester, CT

#829 Apr 30, 2013
Don Joe wrote:
<quoted text>
The power of those who control the MSM is indeed awesome and it will be very difficult to wrest away from them.
As to good people on both sides? I don't see it. It looks to me like any good people got removed a long long time ago from both sides. I don't see anyone in congress even pretending to support the will of the people (with very few exceptions).
You can claim that since Bush sr presidents have been subservient, but Reagan also; and I would not be surprised if many before Reagan were as well. We can agree on the opponents as well.
The question becomes what to do about it.
And there it is,the million dollar question.
What to do about it?
Its what keeps these threads,and many more,active.
I say,go back to basics.
The nation was founded for the purpose of freedom and as a nation of laws.
The more diverse we get,the more we stray from our laws and re-interpret them to accommodate what we originally escaped.
I say we enforce the laws we have on the books to a "T".
No exceptions,no waivers for the elite and certainly no separate set of rules for law-makers.
bottlecap

Orlando, FL

#830 Apr 30, 2013
My Portal wrote:
<quoted text>It sounds like Mr. Rove and Mr. Axelrod have a lot in common.
True, especially after what Axelrod did to Herman Cain by smearing him with allegations of a sexual assault upon one Sharon Bialek, who just happened to live in the same building as Axelrod.

ha ha ha ha ha ha ha It was like a "pay no attention to the man behind the curtain" moment.

Since: Oct 08

Alpharetta, GA

#831 Apr 30, 2013
Brad wrote:
<quoted text>
The same hecklers sit quietly and are respectful when Ayers and Ahmadinejad address them.
They even dined with the little 5 foot tall tin pot dictator after he spews his hatred towards Jews all stary eyed and mesmerized.
Higher institutes of learning????
when cons interrupt a lib, its infringing on his right to free speech, but when a lib interrupts a con, its him using his rights to dissent....they believe in free speech, unless its something they dont agree with.
bottlecap

Orlando, FL

#832 Apr 30, 2013
Don Joe wrote:
<quoted text>
The power of those who control the MSM is indeed awesome and it will be very difficult to wrest away from them.
As to good people on both sides? I don't see it. It looks to me like any good people got removed a long long time ago from both sides. I don't see anyone in congress even pretending to support the will of the people (with very few exceptions).
You can claim that since Bush sr presidents have been subservient, but Reagan also; and I would not be surprised if many before Reagan were as well. We can agree on the opponents as well.
The question becomes what to do about it.
==========
Step 1 has to be getting information out to the public that is relevent. The MSM is trained to avoid any questions that threaten the BANKSTERS Power Structure. This is how they avoid CRITICAL Events like the slaughter of black-Africans in Libya by the US installed Muslim "rebels", OR, the 16+ TRILLION in secret loans to the BANKSTER, many Banks being Foreign.

Heck, we can't even get a COMPLETE list of ATTENDEES at the recent "Annual Press Dinner" from the press.

But, when they that wanted to force the black, blind Governor of New York, David Patterson, out of office, to get one of their own elitists in there, Andrew Cuomo, one would hsve thought that Patterson getting free tickets to New York Yankee games was the end of the world.

Step 1) Trust no one, listen to everyone, do your own research.
Don Joe

Saint Paul, MN

#833 Apr 30, 2013
bottlecap wrote:
<quoted text>
==========
Step 1 has to be getting information out to the public that is relevent. The MSM is trained to avoid any questions that threaten the BANKSTERS Power Structure. This is how they avoid CRITICAL Events like the slaughter of black-Africans in Libya by the US installed Muslim "rebels", OR, the 16+ TRILLION in secret loans to the BANKSTER, many Banks being Foreign.
Heck, we can't even get a COMPLETE list of ATTENDEES at the recent "Annual Press Dinner" from the press.
But, when they that wanted to force the black, blind Governor of New York, David Patterson, out of office, to get one of their own elitists in there, Andrew Cuomo, one would hsve thought that Patterson getting free tickets to New York Yankee games was the end of the world.
Step 1) Trust no one, listen to everyone, do your own research.
Step 1. Do your own research. Easier said than done. There is much information, much of it wrong. While I believe I can filter which is correct, and which isn't, you may feel the same way and we end up with very different world views of what is happening.

So, one of us or the other has some bad information we are accepting which is incorrect; probably both. For example, neither of us know what happened on 9/11/2001. The official story is complete hogwash, but many of the proposed alternatives are just as unbelievable. Should we believe Al Queda when they say they didn't do it; or should we believe bush the liar when he says they did?

How do we even sort the information, and overcome the massive amount of misinformation being pushed?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#834 Apr 30, 2013
bottlecap wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm glad you brought that up. The UN was created by Hitler's BANKSTERS
sure they were.

Damn... looks like BigFoot is getting into the orchard again.
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#835 Apr 30, 2013
inbred Genius wrote:
<quoted text>
when cons interrupt a lib, its infringing on his right to free speech, but when a lib interrupts a con, its him using his rights to dissent....they believe in free speech, unless its something they dont agree with.
lol! Damn straight!

Signed,

Joe Wilson, Member of the House
bottlecap

Orlando, FL

#837 Apr 30, 2013
Don Joe wrote:
<quoted text>
Step 1. Do your own research. Easier said than done. There is much information, much of it wrong. While I believe I can filter which is correct, and which isn't, you may feel the same way and we end up with very different world views of what is happening.
So, one of us or the other has some bad information we are accepting which is incorrect; probably both. For example, neither of us know what happened on 9/11/2001. The official story is complete hogwash, but many of the proposed alternatives are just as unbelievable. Should we believe Al Queda when they say they didn't do it; or should we believe bush the liar when he says they did?
How do we even sort the information, and overcome the massive amount of misinformation being pushed?
"Gulf War I" was where Bush Sr. drew a line in the sand at the Saudi Arabian border. Although the US was defending Saudi Arabia, Osama bin Laden having offered his servives to the Saudi king to defend the muslim holyland, the radical Muslims were furious at US prescence in said holyland.

This manifested itself in an attack on the World Trade Center,
on February 26, 1993.....

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1993_World_Trad...

"...a truck bomb was detonated below the North Tower of the World Trade Center in New York, NY. The 1,336 lb (606 kg) urea nitrate–hydrogen gas enhanced device[1] was intended to knock the North Tower (Tower One) into the South Tower (Tower Two), bringing both towers down and killing thousands of people.[2][3] It failed to do so, but did kill six people and injured more than a thousand."

"In March 1994, four men were convicted of carrying out the bombing: Abouhalima, Ajaj, Ayyad and Salameh. The charges included conspiracy, explosive destruction of property and interstate transportation of explosives. In November 1997, two more were convicted: Ramzi Yousef, the mastermind behind the bombings, and Eyad Ismoil, who drove the truck carrying the bomb."
==========
A starting point----although 9-11 can be debated, it is pretty well established that sick muslim religious adherents had a motive, in their minds, and a desire to bring down the WTC.

PS----I have nothing of disdain for "W", but I feel the same about Obama as both of them are on the SAME team and it is the GLOBALIST, NWO team, not the American team.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#838 Apr 30, 2013
bottlecap wrote:
<quoted text>
"Gulf War I" was where Bush Sr. drew a line in the sand at the Saudi Arabian border. Although the US was defending Saudi Arabia, Osama bin Laden having offered his servives to the Saudi king to defend the muslim holyland, the radical Muslims were furious at US prescence in said holyland.
This manifested itself in an attack on the World Trade Center,
on February 26, 1993.....
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1993_World_Trad...
"...a truck bomb was detonated below the North Tower of the World Trade Center in New York, NY. The 1,336 lb (606 kg) urea nitrate–hydrogen gas enhanced device[1] was intended to knock the North Tower (Tower One) into the South Tower (Tower Two), bringing both towers down and killing thousands of people.[2][3] It failed to do so, but did kill six people and injured more than a thousand."
"In March 1994, four men were convicted of carrying out the bombing: Abouhalima, Ajaj, Ayyad and Salameh. The charges included conspiracy, explosive destruction of property and interstate transportation of explosives. In November 1997, two more were convicted: Ramzi Yousef, the mastermind behind the bombings, and Eyad Ismoil, who drove the truck carrying the bomb."
==========
A starting point----although 9-11 can be debated, it is pretty well established that sick muslim religious adherents had a motive, in their minds, and a desire to bring down the WTC.
PS----I have nothing of disdain for "W", but I feel the same about Obama as both of them are on the SAME team and it is the GLOBALIST, NWO team, not the American team.
ummm...the gulf war was when Saddam invaded Kuwait and they, and the Suadis and other nations in the region, ASKED the US to come help.

your globalist conspiracy theories have as much fact as your history fantasies...
bottlecap

Orlando, FL

#839 Apr 30, 2013
Mr Big Bad John Roberts wrote:
<quoted text>Yo' bottlepiss, although that is a lie, you as a racist klanjig ought to appreciate your thinking a White man derailed Uncle Tom Herman Cain's campaign. It was the racist Republiklans that had done Cain in ya' stupid klanjig.
Lol!!!!!!!!!!
Lol!!!!!!!!!!
Lol!!!!!!!!!!
Not so, it was Axelrod and the dems who took Herman down with a massive propaganda campaign. Axelrod was terrified that Cain might be on the Republican ticket, because with Obama's failed Presidency they needed to play the RACE CARD to prevail.

Open your eyes----STAUNCH Democrat Gloria Allred was Sharon Bialek's attorney and she lived in Axelrod's building.

And the rascist, democratic, controled Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel editorial board savaged Cain because Cain was hesitant to accept the lies being tolded about the Libya campaign, by the Uncle Tom Obama Administration.

Do you think that the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel paper, so critical of Cain's responce on Libya, covered these stories??

http://globalciviliansforpeace.com/2011/11/22...

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#840 Apr 30, 2013
bottlecap wrote:
<quoted text>
Not so, it was Axelrod and the dems who took Herman down with a massive propaganda campaign. Axelrod was terrified that Cain might be on the Republican ticket, because with Obama's failed Presidency they needed to play the RACE CARD to prevail.
Open your eyes----STAUNCH Democrat Gloria Allred was Sharon Bialek's attorney and she lived in Axelrod's building.
And the rascist, democratic, controled Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel editorial board savaged Cain because Cain was hesitant to accept the lies being tolded about the Libya campaign, by the Uncle Tom Obama Administration.
Do you think that the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel paper, so critical of Cain's responce on Libya, covered these stories??
http://globalciviliansforpeace.com/2011/11/22...
wow! every single thing on this planet is a conspiracy to you, isn't it?

a rational person would see this pattern and question the basic premise of your thinking... you should try this. and some serious medication.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Hillary Clinton Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Republicans need to shut down Trump's election ... 3 min Le Jimbo 31
News Why Hillary Clinton's shadiness won't be fatal 4 min Synque 38
News In-person voting fraud is rare, doesn't affect ... 7 min WeTheSheeple 162
News Trump Isn't Bluffing, He'll Deport 11 Million P... 9 min abc 7,476
News Clinton blames Republican leaders for a 'paraly... 11 min swampmudd 1,499
News Why it Matters: Income inequality 12 min Le Jimbo 362
News Harry Reid calls mother of Benghazi victim 'cra... 13 min sarashopatorient 16
More from around the web