the outrage is real,Obama allowed his own citizens to be murdered by Muslim savages,not happy with that Obama and his regime invented a bogus "spontaneous protest" to COVER UP the fact that he sat on his hands while Americans died.<quoted text>
No one said Bush "covered them up," only that attacks on our diplomatic facilities and personnel are ongoing, and that 'outrage' over this attack is fake, partisan and Republican in nature. Those are the facts, like them or not (in your case, I'm sure the answer is 'not').
There's as yet NO evidence of a "coverup" of the Benghazi attack, or anything but confusion and a series of dumb mistakes on the talking points worked out in response to the attack. It was not a spontaneous demonstration due to outrage over the video, but an attack by a terrorist group which may or may not have taken advantage of said demonstrations elsewhere.
Clear now, or do you need another mallet blow to the head?:)
curious,you say "It was not a spontaneous demonstration due to outrage over the video"
yet Susan Rice one of Obama's mouthpiece's was keen to tell the world it was,in her own words
"“What happened this week in Cairo, in Benghazi, in many other parts of the region was a result, a direct result of a heinous and offensive video that was widely disseminated, that the U.S. Government had nothing to do with, which we have made clear is reprehensible and disgusting.”– Susan Rice, 9/16/12
OK Ace i know you struggle so ill give you a clue,the big give away is when she says "a direct result of a heinous and offensive video that was widely disseminated"
you understand the meaning of the words "DIRECT" and "RESULT" don't you?