Benghazi Witness: Clinton Sought End-Run Around Counter Terror Unit

May 5, 2013 Full story: Fox News 607

On the night of Sept. 11, as the Obama administration scrambled to respond to the Benghazi terror attacks, then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and a key aide effectively tried to cut the department's own counterterrorism bureau out of the chain of reporting and decision-making, according to a "whistle-blower" witness from that bureau who will ... (more)

Full Story

Since: Feb 07

Location hidden

#563 May 23, 2013
The Clinton participation in the BenghaziDECEPTION is a low grade betrayal, I am talking about Bill.

“Science not Conservatism”

Since: Jan 12

Progress, not Denial

#564 May 23, 2013
RayOne wrote:
The Clinton participation in the BenghaziDECEPTION is a low grade betrayal, I am talking about Bill.
Your sanity is of a very low grade itself, from what I've seen...
benF

Liverpool, UK

#565 May 23, 2013
tha Professor wrote:
<quoted text>
Um, you post as two different posters, that's your other identity, yes. Normally people stick with one.
"I don't know what happened there?"
LOL
You used a sockpuppet, troll...:)
come on Ace you can do better than that.

find another post by "opopop" and you wont look stupid will you.
benF

Liverpool, UK

#566 May 23, 2013
tha Professor wrote:
<quoted text>
Keep on pretending you're making sense and scoring points, loser. Nothing for you so far...:)
you make a crazy claim that Bush had prior knowledge about 9/11 and did nothing,when i ask you for proof you refuse and revert to juvenile name calling e.g

"Kiss my arse for a link...you're not a serious debater"

well Ace if you think that's debating skill in action,you have bigger issues than i thought.

you are trying though,keep it up!
Makes sense

Dearborn, MI

#567 May 23, 2013
Ummm, 13 Benghazis Happened Under President Bush and Fox News Said Nothing

1. Jan. 22, 2002: Harkat-ul-Jihad al-Islami Attacks Indian U.S. Consulate

2. June 14, 2002: Suicide Car-Bomb Outside U.S. Consulate in Karachi

3. Oct. 12, 2002: String Of Bali Bombings Included U.S. Consulate

4. Feb. 28, 2003: Consulate in Karachi, Pakistan, Attacked For the Second Time in One Year

5. May 12, 2003: 36 People Including 9 Americans Die After Terrorists Storm U.S. Compound in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

6. July 30, 2004: Islamist Attacks U.S. Embassy in Tashkent, Uzbekistan

7. Dec. 6, 2004: Five Staff and Four Security Guards Die in U.S. consulate attack in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

8. March 2, 2006: Third Attack on Karachi U.S. Consulate Killed U.S. Diplomat

9. Sept. 12, 2006: Four Gunmen Stormed the U.S. compound in Damascus, Syria

10. Jan. 12, 2007: Greek Terrorists Fired a Rocket-Propelled Grenade at the U.S. Embassy

11. March 18, 2008: A Mortar is Fired at the U.S. Embassy in Sana’a, Yemen

12. July 9, 2008: Three Turkish Policemen were Killed When Gunman Fired on the U.S. Consulate Istanbul, Turkey

13. Sept. 17, 2008: 16 People Including 2 Americans Die in an Orchestrated Attack on the U.S. Embassy Sana’a, Yemen

http://www.policymic.com/articles/40811/13-be...
benF

Liverpool, UK

#568 May 23, 2013
Makes sense wrote:
Ummm, 13 Benghazis Happened Under President Bush and Fox News Said Nothing
1. Jan. 22, 2002: Harkat-ul-Jihad al-Islami Attacks Indian U.S. Consulate
2. June 14, 2002: Suicide Car-Bomb Outside U.S. Consulate in Karachi
3. Oct. 12, 2002: String Of Bali Bombings Included U.S. Consulate
4. Feb. 28, 2003: Consulate in Karachi, Pakistan, Attacked For the Second Time in One Year
5. May 12, 2003: 36 People Including 9 Americans Die After Terrorists Storm U.S. Compound in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
6. July 30, 2004: Islamist Attacks U.S. Embassy in Tashkent, Uzbekistan
7. Dec. 6, 2004: Five Staff and Four Security Guards Die in U.S. consulate attack in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
8. March 2, 2006: Third Attack on Karachi U.S. Consulate Killed U.S. Diplomat
9. Sept. 12, 2006: Four Gunmen Stormed the U.S. compound in Damascus, Syria
10. Jan. 12, 2007: Greek Terrorists Fired a Rocket-Propelled Grenade at the U.S. Embassy
11. March 18, 2008: A Mortar is Fired at the U.S. Embassy in Sana’a, Yemen
12. July 9, 2008: Three Turkish Policemen were Killed When Gunman Fired on the U.S. Consulate Istanbul, Turkey
13. Sept. 17, 2008: 16 People Including 2 Americans Die in an Orchestrated Attack on the U.S. Embassy Sana’a, Yemen
http://www.policymic.com/articles/40811/13-be...
interesting.

how many of them did Bush attempt to cover up ?

as you have done the research i'm sure you can provide this information.

Since: Feb 07

Location hidden

#570 May 23, 2013
benF wrote:
<quoted text>
interesting.
how many of them did Bush attempt to cover up ?
as you have done the research i'm sure you can provide this information.
The BenghaziDECEPTION needs another election to wipe the memory of MSM.
spocko

Oakland, CA

#571 May 23, 2013
benF wrote:
<quoted text>
interesting.
how many of them did Bush attempt to cover up ?
as you have done the research i'm sure you can provide this information.
That is the point ye moron, there is no Obama cover up there is only the insistence by wingnuz ...
benF

Liverpool, UK

#572 May 23, 2013
spocko wrote:
<quoted text>
That is the point ye moron, there is no Obama cover up there is only the insistence by wingnuz ...
no Benghazi cover up?

so it WAS a spontaneous reaction to a "video" and not a terrorist attack after all!

which story are you using today,i wish Obama would make your mind up.
spocko

Oakland, CA

#573 May 23, 2013
benF wrote:
<quoted text>
no Benghazi cover up?
so it WAS a spontaneous reaction to a "video" and not a terrorist attack after all!
which story are you using today,i wish Obama would make your mind up.
Huh? I that would have been "covered up" how would we know about it?
The 13 Benghazis During the Gdub Administration and the GOPers were silent!

1. Jan. 22, 2002: Harkat-ul-Jihad al-Islami Attacks Indian U.S. Consulate

2. June 14, 2002: Suicide Car-Bomb Outside U.S. Consulate in Karachi

3. Oct. 12, 2002: String Of Bali Bombings Included U.S. Consulate

4. Feb. 28, 2003: Consulate in Karachi, Pakistan, Attacked For the Second Time in One Year

5. May 12, 2003: 36 People Including 9 Americans Die After Terrorists Storm U.S. Compound in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

6. July 30, 2004: Islamist Attacks U.S. Embassy in Tashkent, Uzbekistan

7. Dec. 6, 2004: Five Staff and Four Security Guards Die in U.S. consulate attack in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

8. March 2, 2006: Third Attack on Karachi U.S. Consulate Killed U.S. Diplomat

9. Sept. 12, 2006: Four Gunmen Stormed the U.S. compound in Damascus, Syria

10. Jan. 12, 2007: Greek Terrorists Fired a Rocket-Propelled Grenade at the U.S. Embassy

11. March 18, 2008: A Mortar is Fired at the U.S. Embassy in Sana’a, Yemen

12. July 9, 2008: Three Turkish Policemen were Killed When Gunman Fired on the U.S. Consulate Istanbul, Turkey

13. Sept. 17, 2008: 16 People Including 2 Americans Die in an Orchestrated Attack on the U.S. Embassy Sana’a, Yemen
benF

Liverpool, UK

#574 May 23, 2013
spocko wrote:
<quoted text>
Huh? I that would have been "covered up" how would we know about it?
The 13 Benghazis During the Gdub Administration and the GOPers were silent!
1. Jan. 22, 2002: Harkat-ul-Jihad al-Islami Attacks Indian U.S. Consulate
2. June 14, 2002: Suicide Car-Bomb Outside U.S. Consulate in Karachi
3. Oct. 12, 2002: String Of Bali Bombings Included U.S. Consulate
4. Feb. 28, 2003: Consulate in Karachi, Pakistan, Attacked For the Second Time in One Year
5. May 12, 2003: 36 People Including 9 Americans Die After Terrorists Storm U.S. Compound in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
6. July 30, 2004: Islamist Attacks U.S. Embassy in Tashkent, Uzbekistan
7. Dec. 6, 2004: Five Staff and Four Security Guards Die in U.S. consulate attack in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
8. March 2, 2006: Third Attack on Karachi U.S. Consulate Killed U.S. Diplomat
9. Sept. 12, 2006: Four Gunmen Stormed the U.S. compound in Damascus, Syria
10. Jan. 12, 2007: Greek Terrorists Fired a Rocket-Propelled Grenade at the U.S. Embassy
11. March 18, 2008: A Mortar is Fired at the U.S. Embassy in Sana’a, Yemen
12. July 9, 2008: Three Turkish Policemen were Killed When Gunman Fired on the U.S. Consulate Istanbul, Turkey
13. Sept. 17, 2008: 16 People Including 2 Americans Die in an Orchestrated Attack on the U.S. Embassy Sana’a, Yemen
"Huh? I that would have been "covered up" how would we know about it?"

we know about it because the cover up FAILED,from day 1 the world knew the "spontaneous demonstration" excuse, was a lie.

all that your post tells us is that Islam has an inclination for terrorist violence.you do know that as an Obama supporter you actually should be playing down that fact,not highlighting it?
spocko

Oakland, CA

#575 May 23, 2013
benF wrote:
<quoted text>
"Huh? I that would have been "covered up" how would we know about it?"
we know about it because the cover up FAILED,from day 1 the world knew the "spontaneous demonstration" excuse, was a lie.
all that your post tells us is that Islam has an inclination for terrorist violence.you do know that as an Obama supporter you actually should be playing down that fact,not highlighting it?
You simply don’t get it, the video they were referring to is “The Innocents of Muslims” which caused a huge uproar throughout the Muslim world, violence and demonstrations!
http://www.rferl.org/content/innocence-of-mus...
benF

Liverpool, UK

#576 May 23, 2013
spocko wrote:
<quoted text>
You simply don’t get it, the video they were referring to is “The Innocents of Muslims” which caused a huge uproar throughout the Muslim world, violence and demonstrations!
http://www.rferl.org/content/innocence-of-mus...
looks like its you that doesn't get it.

Obama's regime attempted to pass off the Benghazi terrorist attack as a spontaneous protest over this video.

the video is a smokescreen,even Obama as stopped trying to peddle that lie.
shameful president

Coffeyville, KS

#577 May 24, 2013
spocko wrote:
<quoted text>
You simply don’t get it, the video they were referring to is “The Innocents of Muslims” which caused a huge uproar throughout the Muslim world, violence and demonstrations!
http://www.rferl.org/content/innocence-of-mus...
You simply don't seem to get it. Yes there was a video, but it was NOT the reason for the attack on the embassey in Benghazi. It may have been the reason for the uproar in Eygpt but it was certainly not the reason for Benghazi. All it is in reference to Benghazi is a bright shiney object the Obama administration is using to devert from the facts, the facts that they failed the ambassador and the other 3 American's. I actually hope it was on purpose for some reason. Even if I don't agree with it, it would be better to know that the president meant to have it work out that way rather than have to face the fact that not only the Sec of State Clinton but the president himself are that bad at their job and that incapable of doing what they are charged with doing. I think it's the latter since Obama has proven to be to incompetent to even realize who our enemy is and doesn't seem to have a clue what it will take to deal with them.

“Science not Conservatism”

Since: Jan 12

Progress, not Denial

#578 May 24, 2013
benF wrote:
<quoted text>
come on Ace you can do better than that.
find another post by "opopop" and you wont look stupid will you.
LOL...having been outed, you want me to do research on how dishonest you are?

Naw, I don't think I have to waste any time doing that, putz...:)

“Science not Conservatism”

Since: Jan 12

Progress, not Denial

#579 May 24, 2013
benF wrote:
<quoted text>
you make a crazy claim that Bush had prior knowledge about 9/11 and did nothing,when i ask you for proof you refuse and revert to juvenile name calling e.g
"Kiss my arse for a link...you're not a serious debater"
well Ace if you think that's debating skill in action,you have bigger issues than i thought.
you are trying though,keep it up!
Nothing crazy, and no, you're not getting a link, silly little boy. Or 'boys,' I suppose I should say, given that there are at least two versions of you...:)

“Science not Conservatism”

Since: Jan 12

Progress, not Denial

#580 May 24, 2013
benF wrote:
<quoted text>
interesting.
how many of them did Bush attempt to cover up ?
as you have done the research i'm sure you can provide this information.
No one said Bush "covered them up," only that attacks on our diplomatic facilities and personnel are ongoing, and that 'outrage' over this attack is fake, partisan and Republican in nature. Those are the facts, like them or not (in your case, I'm sure the answer is 'not').

There's as yet NO evidence of a "coverup" of the Benghazi attack, or anything but confusion and a series of dumb mistakes on the talking points worked out in response to the attack. It was not a spontaneous demonstration due to outrage over the video, but an attack by a terrorist group which may or may not have taken advantage of said demonstrations elsewhere.

Clear now, or do you need another mallet blow to the head?:)

“Science not Conservatism”

Since: Jan 12

Progress, not Denial

#581 May 24, 2013
shameful president wrote:
<quoted text>
You simply don't seem to get it. Yes there was a video, but it was NOT the reason for the attack on the embassey in Benghazi. It may have been the reason for the uproar in Eygpt but it was certainly not the reason for Benghazi. All it is in reference to Benghazi is a bright shiney object the Obama administration is using to devert from the facts, the facts that they failed the ambassador and the other 3 American's. I actually hope it was on purpose for some reason. Even if I don't agree with it, it would be better to know that the president meant to have it work out that way rather than have to face the fact that not only the Sec of State Clinton but the president himself are that bad at their job and that incapable of doing what they are charged with doing. I think it's the latter since Obama has proven to be to incompetent to even realize who our enemy is and doesn't seem to have a clue what it will take to deal with them.
Could you link to where the other poster SAID it was "the reason for the attack on the embassey [sic][actually a consulate] in Benghazi?" I don't think they said that.

The problem is that the far Right, in their lust to blame Obama for a terrorist attack he had nothing to do with, are pretending that the video doesn't exist or didn't have any effects in the Muslim world, which are of course both lies. Just a bit of information intended to enlighten you, IOW.

Obama doesn't know how to deal with an organization whose members he's ordered terminated and whose leader was also killed at his order?

LOL!

God-DAMN but you are stupid and/or dishonest...:)

“Science not Conservatism”

Since: Jan 12

Progress, not Denial

#582 May 24, 2013
The far, nutball, extreme Right can't seem to decide whether the video trailer for "The Innocence of Muslims"

1. Doesn't exist

2. Didn't cause massive uproar in the Muslim world

3. Caused uproar but not the Benghazi attacks

It becomes kind of a problem when you can't get your story straight, I'd say. Seems kind of inconsistent when you express your outrage about the attack and how it's 'Obama's fault.' And that's led to further talking-point problems for the Right...is it

1. Obama's fault the attacks occurred

2. Clinton's fault they occurred

3. a coverup by both Obama and Clinton

One thing for sure, I've NEVER seen any anti-Obama, anti-Clinton Righties BLAME THE TERRORISTS for this brutal attack. That's what I mean when I say you blame your own government but give terorrists a pass.

Disgusting it is, too...
benF

Liverpool, UK

#583 May 24, 2013
tha Professor wrote:
<quoted text>
Nothing crazy, and no, you're not getting a link, silly little boy. Or 'boys,' I suppose I should say, given that there are at least two versions of you...:)
come on Ace asking you for a link is rhetorical,as we all know no such link exists,don't we.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Hillary Clinton Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Their view: No clear gain in dispute over Falkl... (Mar '10) 12 min Simo2504 616
After being impeached in 1998, Clinton said he ... 5 hr RayOne 35
Clinton's economic message under scrutiny 5 hr replace the disgrace 1
Bush father, son want Jeb Bush run for White House 20 hr tee 4
Can Obama's presidency be saved? Fri spocko 936
Christie lags Hillary in his home state of New ... Thu Randy 1
Michele Bachmann: Obama Won Because He's Black ... (Feb '14) Dec 24 Swedenforever 405
More from around the web