Priscilla Presley fought to save Grac...

Priscilla Presley fought to save Graceland

There are 238 comments on the Monsters and Critics story from Jan 5, 2013, titled Priscilla Presley fought to save Graceland. In it, Monsters and Critics reports that:

The actress' late ex-husband's house in Memphis, Tennessee, has been preserved as a shrine in his honour and it is now a huge tourist attraction, but Priscilla had to fight hard to keep the property and its contents after Elvis' death in 1977.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Monsters and Critics.

First Prev
of 12
Next Last
Michigan

Belleville, MI

#228 Mar 12, 2013
Lee wrote:
<quoted text>Well, where is it???
As if I should help YOU FIND IT?

I know exactly where it is, I'll give you a clue, it's not on this thread, idiot.
Lee

Los Angeles, CA

#229 Mar 12, 2013
2kingsdaughter wrote:
<quoted text> I went there and read quite a few of the posts. I had to quit, though. Too much to deal with. This sort of thing is traumatizing just to read it, much less to have to deal with it in life. I certainly do no agree with the comment here. It is [that bad]. Always, period.
Yes it's a nasty subject. We got onto it because people were coming on here calling Elvis a pedophile and because I said that they should stop going over to the Micheal Jackson forum calling Micheal a pedophile, because it made Micheal Jackson fans hate Elvis. Then it went on from there. It went on too long and got way off topic.
Lee

Los Angeles, CA

#230 Mar 12, 2013
2kingsdaughter wrote:
<quoted text>Is the post this thread? I'll look. Either way, no excuses here. The guy deserved nothing less than to lose his wife, job and even do time. That little girl was likely traumatized.
The little girl did not seem to be traumatized. The mother was very angry though.

I don't see how you think just that could make her traumatized.
Michigan

Belleville, MI

#231 Mar 12, 2013
Lee wrote:
<quoted text>Yes it's a nasty subject. We got onto it because people were coming on here calling Elvis a pedophile and because I said that they should stop going over to the Micheal Jackson forum calling Micheal a pedophile, because it made Micheal Jackson fans hate Elvis. Then it went on from there. It went on too long and got way off topic.
Yeah, and it really took off with your postings of how it doesn't always hurt the child, and some children "like it"

Since: Mar 13

Location hidden

#232 Mar 12, 2013
ENOUGH!!! Damn it people! Lee, it is ALWAYS WRONG, ALWAYS TRAUMATIZING! NO child likes it, it is always hurtful and that mom had every right to be angry. Angry? Some parents would take it beyond just being angry. This is not debatable, like Elvis, MM or any other famous person's life. This is real life, Lee. If you cannot admit that it is always wrong to sexually abuse a child, that no child enjoys it and that it is always hurtful, you have no busines here. There are laws designed to protect children from animals like this man for a reason. And it isn't just a [nasty] subject, it's deplorable! You cannot possibly believe that any child would actually be at fault for something like this. This makes me question not only your sanity but your own life experiences as well. What in the name of all that is holy,(and yes, I am one of those "Christian" types you spoke of in a past post) happened to you?
Lee

Los Angeles, CA

#233 Mar 12, 2013
Michigan wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah, and it really took off with your postings of how it doesn't always hurt the child, and some children "like it"
Why don't you put up a link to that post and show what it really said??? If I said that, you are saying it out of context.
Lee

Los Angeles, CA

#234 Mar 12, 2013
2kingsdaughter wrote:
ENOUGH!!! Damn it people! Lee, it is ALWAYS WRONG, ALWAYS TRAUMATIZING! NO child likes it, it is always hurtful and that mom had every right to be angry. Angry? Some parents would take it beyond just being angry. This is not debatable, like Elvis, MM or any other famous person's life. This is real life, Lee. If you cannot admit that it is always wrong to sexually abuse a child, that no child enjoys it and that it is always hurtful, you have no busines here. There are laws designed to protect children from animals like this man for a reason. And it isn't just a [nasty] subject, it's deplorable! You cannot possibly believe that any child would actually be at fault for something like this. This makes me question not only your sanity but your own life experiences as well. What in the name of all that is holy,(and yes, I am one of those "Christian" types you spoke of in a past post) happened to you?
Oh, here we go again..

GET THIS---I ABSOLUTELY NEVER SAID THAT IT WAS NOT ALWAYS WRONG!!!!

I DID NOT SAY THAT THE MOM SHOULD NOT BE ANGRY!!!!!!

I DID NOT SAY THAT IT WAS EVER THE CHIID'S FAULT!!!!!!

QUESTION UOUR OWN DAMN SANTITY!!!

All I said was that not every child would be traumatized!!!!

And don't say that you can read minds!!!!!
Michigan

Roseville, MI

#235 Mar 12, 2013
Lee wrote:
<quoted text>Oh, here we go again..
GET THIS---I ABSOLUTELY NEVER SAID THAT IT WAS NOT ALWAYS WRONG!!!!
I DID NOT SAY THAT THE MOM SHOULD NOT BE ANGRY!!!!!!
I DID NOT SAY THAT IT WAS EVER THE CHIID'S FAULT!!!!!!
QUESTION UOUR OWN DAMN SANTITY!!!
All I said was that not every child would be traumatized!!!!
And don't say that you can read minds!!!!!
You said they may not be traumatized "at first", but when the psychologist tells them what happened to them was wrong, oh, I mean when the STUPID psychologist tells them what happened to them was wrong, then they are traumatized. Those damn psychologist always have to spill the beans.

You also said when they realized it was "socially unacceptable"
Child sexual abuse....yeah, SOCIALLY unacceptable. Like teenage drinking, smoking.....Idiot.


All someone has to do to see even parts of your sickening thoughts is go to the Elvis MJ topix thread, and read, starting like pg 16, 17, 18. And that's only the beginning. I'm not going to go back and repost all your crap here.
Michigan

Roseville, MI

#236 Mar 12, 2013
Lee wrote:
<quoted text>Why don't you put up a link to that post and show what it really said??? If I said that, you are saying it out of context.
Here witch, I'll do this one just for you.
From Elvis MJ Topix thread
And don't say "in my case" crap. IT CONCERNS EVERYONE

LEE POST:

It is not something that I am particularly concerned about. I think the "trauma" is mostly in the heads of the psychologists. It is the psychologists who plant the idea in the heads of the victims that they should feel so traumatized. Most of them say that they did not feel bad about it until they "grew up and found out that it was wrong".

Being told by the stupid psychologists that they have participated in something that is very very bad is what is traumatizing them. If they say they were NOT traumatized, it makes them feel that they are guilty of enjoying this "awful" thing.

What else can they say, except that they were traumatized??

They average person cannot just come out and say, "it did not traumatize me, I liked it". It is not socially acceptable.

Again, I am talking about cases where there was absolutely NO coercion, trickery, betrayal, etc.

Since: Mar 13

Location hidden

#237 Mar 12, 2013
Done.
Lee

Los Angeles, CA

#238 Mar 12, 2013
Michigan wrote:
<quoted text>
You said they may not be traumatized "at first", but when the psychologist tells them what happened to them was wrong, oh, I mean when the STUPID psychologist tells them what happened to them was wrong, then they are traumatized. Those damn psychologist always have to spill the beans.
You also said when they realized it was "socially unacceptable"
Child sexual abuse....yeah, SOCIALLY unacceptable. Like teenage drinking, smoking.....Idiot.
All someone has to do to see even parts of your sickening thoughts is go to the Elvis MJ topix thread, and read, starting like pg 16, 17, 18. And that's only the beginning. I'm not going to go back and repost all your crap here.
Michigan, remember, this is the Elvis board. We filled it up with off topic stuff for too long. Everything I posted is still there for anyone to look at.

Yes, I did say those things. But they do not apply to you, they only apply to cases where there was no force, coercion, trickery, etc.

Yes, I know every psychologist since the beginning of time has agreed with you. But the one psychologist agreed with me. And it you go down and read the comments on the page, some of the so called "victims" did too.

No matter how much you scream about how "sickening" I am, I also have a right to my opinion.

And what do you think should happen to the psychologist who agreed with me??? Or the posters on the site???
Lee

Los Angeles, CA

#239 Mar 12, 2013
If you want to talk more about this, let't take it over to the site that I posted. They have a comment board. Or let's create an OFF TOPIC thread here.

It's not fair to keep cluttering up the Elvis board here.
Carly

Auckland, New Zealand

#240 Mar 12, 2013
Michigan wrote:
<quoted text>
Like talking to a brick wall, isn't it?
Oh Yeah!!! Agree Big Time
Carly

Auckland, New Zealand

#241 Mar 12, 2013
2kingsdaughter wrote:
<quoted text>She is one leaky vessel, that's for sure. I can understand her devotion to Elvis on some level, however, I cannot grasp her shear and utter delusion as to his part in the failure of his marriage. To think he had no part in it is completely beyond the scope of my imagination. To place all the blame fully on Cilla and to now show such hatred for her as well as Lisa is just completely crazy. We can't even have a simple discussion about the positive things he accomplished.
Not a leaky vessel - an empty one!
Carly

Auckland, New Zealand

#242 Mar 12, 2013
Lee wrote:
<quoted text>Kingsdaughter, remember when you first expressed positive thoughts about Priscilla???? Remember what I said to you? Something like it was good to have someone here who respected Elvis, and we could just disagree???
Why then, can you not allow ME to have my opinions without calling me crazy or stupid???
I think we can disagree without insulting each other and calling each other names.
Thats a bit rich coming from you of all people Lee - no one else is entitled to their own opinions especially if they differ from your ones - get over it!
King Elvis

Dee Why, Australia

#243 Mar 12, 2013
Hey, can you all not ruin another thread by trying to psychoanalyse the beast that is Lee and her sick beliefs about what constitutes abuse?

Please take it back over to the MJ Fans From Topix thread where it started!!

And leave it there!
Lee

Los Angeles, CA

#244 Mar 13, 2013
Michigan wrote:
<quoted text>
Here witch, I'll do this one just for you.
From Elvis MJ Topix thread
And don't say "in my case" crap. IT CONCERNS EVERYONE
LEE POST:
It is not something that I am particularly concerned about. I think the "trauma" is mostly in the heads of the psychologists. It is the psychologists who plant the idea in the heads of the victims that they should feel so traumatized. Most of them say that they did not feel bad about it until they "grew up and found out that it was wrong".
Being told by the stupid psychologists that they have participated in something that is very very bad is what is traumatizing them. If they say they were NOT traumatized, it makes them feel that they are guilty of enjoying this "awful" thing.
What else can they say, except that they were traumatized??
They average person cannot just come out and say, "it did not traumatize me, I liked it". It is not socially acceptable.
Again, I am talking about cases where there was absolutely NO coercion, trickery, betrayal, etc.
You cannot speak for EVERYONE. You are not psychic, you cannot read the mind of everyone.



Lee

Los Angeles, CA

#245 Mar 13, 2013
Please take next post to the other forum.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 12
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Elvis Presley Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Does this crazy theory have any merit 2 hr Middle Child 2
Linda Hood Sigmon dead? (Mar '12) Sat Tina 83
hoaax schemes Sat Dominic 1
call down up stairs down the stairs Aug 18 Jedd 1
why did it take so long Aug 18 victor 1
same time same place Aug 16 Ray 1
science dna hair samples Aug 16 rufus 1
More from around the web