Elvis, Jr., Angelique Pettyjohn was not in movie Blue Hawaii--Prove me wrong!

Posted in the Elvis Presley Forum

Comments (Page 6)

Showing posts 101 - 120 of122
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:

“elvisjrsinfo@you tube- $ibling$”

Since: Nov 09

Vancouver Island BC.. Nanaimo

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#102
Sep 8, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

King Elvis wrote:
Riiiiiight.
So Wallis did this without Parker knowing, and THEN brought Elvis BACK to Angelique?!!!
Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight.
Sure, Gordo, whatever you say.
You sick, deluded PRICK!!!
-- U don't get it.. do You.. Hal Wallis owned the movie.. Nothing to do with Colonel Parker.. at all.. He only front bumper for Elvis Presley an actor in Hal Wallis Movie.. Colonel Parker would & could have NO>> say in anything to do with Movie.. So U think Hal Wallis needs to give Colonel Parker a list of everyone in his movie..?-Take the grip.. u reaching for U need it. I believe.. Hal Wallis did it on purpose..to put Angelique back into Elvis Movie.. so she could tell on Colonel Parker about the baby.. & what happened in CLAMBAKE.. Elvis fired Colonel Tom.. & wanted out.. Just what Hal Wallis would want.. payback for Colonel Parker.. & all his BS.. U shoule understand. I am editting a new video for " elvisjrsinfo" on You tube.. will take us up to 115.. what U doing.? Nothing eh? Chaff.. lots of it around.. it is only Seed that can work or get along with Gord..or Elvis Jr. U need more quality time in front of .. " elvisjrsinfo" on you tube..U get smarte... NO.. I don't think U will.
Paul

Port Charlotte, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#103
Feb 10, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

Jim wrote:
According to Elvis, Jr., Angelique Pettyjohn was a dancer in the movie Blue Hawaii, which is when she allegedly became pregnant by Elvis Presley and on December 24, 1961, at the age of 18, gave birth to Elvis, Jr. According to the full "cast and crew" list of Blue Hawaii on IMDB.com , Angelique Pettyjohn did not appear in the movie. From everything that I have read she appeared in only one Elvis movie, being Clambake in 1967. So Elvis, Jr.'s claim that Ms. Pettyjohn appeared in Blue Hawaii has no evidence that I can find.
Blue Hawaii full cast and crew list:
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0054692/fullcredi...
Notice the list provides names of all who where part of the movie Blue Hawaii, including extras and those who were "uncredited"; however, there is no mention of Angelique Pettyjohn. If Ms. Pettyjohn was a dancer in the movie her name would be on the list.
Elvis, Jr.'s claim that Angelique Pettyjohn appeared in Blue Hawaii is a material aspect of his story and therefore should be scrutinized. If anyone would like to provide proof that Ms. Pettyjohn appeared in this movie, please feel free to provide it. Otherwise Elvis, Jr.'s claim that Ms. Pettyjohn was with Elvis Presley during the filming of Blue Hawaii in 1961 is just one more glaring defect in his dubious story claiming to be the son of Elvis Presley.
Thanks to King Elvis (Australia) for bringing this to my attention.
An article just appeared in the Pt Charlotte paper where he was appearing. When did Elvis Aron Presley Sr. add an "A" to his middle name?
Paul

Edwardsville, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#105
Apr 23, 2013
 

Judged:

1

No Judge would allow illegity to be covered up, regardless of any lawyer asking for information to be sealed.
If a judge seals evidence up which covers an illegal action, he himself has then been a party to that illegal action.
Chris Paquin

Toronto, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#107
Aug 1, 2013
 
Dolbyscat wrote:
People who were actual aquaintances of Angelique have also said she did not appear in "Blue Hawaii".
I couldn't agree with you more. In the national enquirer interview it was reported his mother met Elvis on set of the 1967 movie Clam Bake, yet he was born in 1961. Did he try to explain that disparity? It's ridiculous.
Dolbyscat

Abbotsford, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#108
Aug 2, 2013
 
Chris Paquin wrote:
<quoted text>
In the national enquirer interview it was reported his mother met Elvis on set of the 1967 movie Clam Bake, yet he was born in 1961. Did he try to explain that disparity? It's ridiculous.
Yes, you will find that statement in a few places, the reason.... because it is only true fact in the case that links Angelique with Elvis. The hope is that no-one researches further, and discovers the disparity.
Larry Blong

Folsom, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#109
Aug 13, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

No son of Elvis could do an impersonation that bad. I am not related to Elvis but Elvis friend DJ George Klein told me, "Larry, Elvis would not want to see you perform it would be too scary." GK also told writer Bill Burk that Larry must study Elvis' moves 12 hours a day.
jw mc

Cape Coral, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#110
Aug 17, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

if you did not now Deloris pettijohn audition on Hawaii set whitch was in losangeles she did not get to do the movie later in clambake she was in as dancer so think about that
Jim

Runnemede, NJ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#111
Aug 18, 2013
 
jw mc wrote:
if you did not now Deloris pettijohn audition on Hawaii set whitch was in losangeles she did not get to do the movie later in clambake she was in as dancer so think about that
So now Angelique only auditioned for the movie instead of actually appearing in the movie. From everything that Solargord and Elvis, Jr. claim, she was supposedly a dancer who actually appeared in the movie Blue Hawaii. But, Elvis, Jr. is apparently now claiming that she was just an extra in the movie Blue Hawaii.

http://www.edgertoncenter.org/retro_concerts....

So, the story has change from:

1. Angelique Pettyjohn actually appeared in the movie Blue Hawaii as a dancer; to

2. She only auditioned for the movie and did not actually appear in the movie; to

3. She was an extra who actually appeared in the movie.

It looks like Solargord and Elvis, Jr. are still making up stories in order to try to put the late Ms. Pettyjohn on the set of the Movie Blue Hawaii. But again, no one has provided any proof that Ms. Pettyjohn was anywhere near the set of Blue Hawaii and obviously there are inconsistent claims regarding her alleged appearance and participation in the movie.

Again, the bottom line is that Elvis, Jr. must prove his claims through DNA testing. Otherwise, in my opinion, he is just another crackpot who is living out a fantasy by lying to the public about being Elvis's alleged illegitimate son whose mother is Angelique Pettyjohn. How despicable!
Dolbyscat

Abbotsford, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#112
Aug 19, 2013
 
I think we have all learnt by now that every aspect of Stanic's (Elvis jr) story is suspect...Gordo's standing with Jr is also suspect, as I have always contended, he actually has no communication whatsoever with jr. I have a letter from jr's attorney that attest's to that fact....Gordo has had no contact with jr for more than a decade, and that he in no way represents jr. The letter threatens both myself, Gordo, and another former contributor to this forum with a lawsuit unless we refrain from commenting about jr, and communicating with potential business partners of his. As of now "Wilson Law" of St Marys Ohio has failed to follow thru with their threats...a shame really, I am more than prepared to go to court and face off with him. If anyone is interested in reading the long-winded, less than professional letter from "Gregory D Wilson Attorney at law", just ask and I will put it on-line and post a link. Strange that Gordo, being such a good "friend" should be threatened in such a way huh? Here is an interesting piece of trivia straight from the letter...Elvis Jr sang at the funeral of Mr Wilson's mother. Who in gods name has an Elvis impersonator sing at a funeral????....lol.
Graham Barrett

Stoke-on-trent, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#113
Aug 20, 2013
 
who gives a flying f**K !!!!
Dolbyscat

Abbotsford, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#114
Aug 20, 2013
 
Graham Barrett wrote:
who gives a flying f**K !!!!
Obviously not you!!
Kenneth Hari

Fords, NJ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#115
Aug 24, 2013
 
What about DNA testing ?
Mary

Edison, NJ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#116
Aug 27, 2013
 

Judged:

5

3

2

While the Angelique Delores Pettyjohn's name does not appear in the Blue Hawaii's Movie as extra, I believe she could have but the fact that Col. Parker, managed everything about Elvis and even orchestrated that Delores abote the child so that no one would ever know Elvis had something to do with it, I am more than sure Col Parker could have ensured the girl's name disappear from the least.
It is very sad indeed that Elvis Aaron Presley Jr. should be denied every right as Elvis's son. And a lot of people here act as if brainwashed not to support that fact about the movie in question.
I am happy Elvis Presley bore such a decent son even though out of wedlock. He really deserves recognition just as his father did. I support him 100%. The Federal Court in USA has the evidence otherwise they would not give the junior the right to use the name, Elvis Aaron Presley Jr.
"What is carried out under the roof will be proclaimed on the roof top". I respect Canada and other countries of the world who have accepted him as Elvis's son.
Paul

Collinsville, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#117
Aug 28, 2013
 
Mary wrote:
While the Angelique Delores Pettyjohn's name does not appear in the Blue Hawaii's Movie as extra, I believe she could have but the fact that Col. Parker, managed everything about Elvis and even orchestrated that Delores abote the child so that no one would ever know Elvis had something to do with it, I am more than sure Col Parker could have ensured the girl's name disappear from the least.
It is very sad indeed that Elvis Aaron Presley Jr. should be denied every right as Elvis's son. And a lot of people here act as if brainwashed not to support that fact about the movie in question.
I am happy Elvis Presley bore such a decent son even though out of wedlock. He really deserves recognition just as his father did. I support him 100%. The Federal Court in USA has the evidence otherwise they would not give the junior the right to use the name, Elvis Aaron Presley Jr.
"What is carried out under the roof will be proclaimed on the roof top". I respect Canada and other countries of the world who have accepted him as Elvis's son.
First off anyone can change their name legally to anything they wish. The judge in question allowed him to change his name, but that does not indeed give him any legal claim to being Elvis Presleys son.
There are no legal rights to be gained even if someone were an illegitimate child of Elvis, the will makes that clear by the use of the term lawful issues.... IE born in legal wedlock.
Parker could have kept her name out of a movie cast list, but not her face and not one photo or glimpse of her is seen in the film after many viewings looking for her.
Dolbyscat

Abbotsford, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#118
Aug 30, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Mary wrote:
I support him 100%..
Even though he has never produced any of the "proof" he claims to have?? This only goes to shows the level of your intelligence. After researching Jr's claims for over five years, I can tell you without doubt that all the evidence, or lack of it, points toward Jr being the son of Jacob and Annita Stanic.
Jim

Maple Shade, NJ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#119
Aug 31, 2013
 
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think Philip Stanic (a/k/a Elvis, Jr.) has produced a shred evidence that he is not the child of Jacob and Anita Stanic. He claims that many years ago he a blood type test (not DNA the same as a DNA analysis) which proves he is not the Stanic's son, but I have never seen this alleged blood typing proof.

All Philip Stanic has done is make verbal claims about allegedly being the illegitimate son of Elvis, but I have yet to see a shred of evidence proving one of his claims in this regard. It's all just a lot of story telling.
Paul

Belleville, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#121
Aug 31, 2013
 

Judged:

1

DNA samples would have to meet legal "chain of evidence" requirements to be admitted in court.
The samples would have to have a legitimate history which does not have gaps that is proven to be from Elvis.
Any other type of DNA samples, scarves with sweat, supposed medical samples of Elvis DNA that have been acquired in dubious ways, etc is not acceptable.
Lisa has never given DNA samples and will never.
Elvis' records are not legally available to anyone except Lisa. Anything stolen is not admissable.
Jim

Maple Shade, NJ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#123
Aug 31, 2013
 
Paul wrote:
DNA samples would have to meet legal "chain of evidence" requirements to be admitted in court.
The samples would have to have a legitimate history which does not have gaps that is proven to be from Elvis.
Any other type of DNA samples, scarves with sweat, supposed medical samples of Elvis DNA that have been acquired in dubious ways, etc is not acceptable.
Lisa has never given DNA samples and will never.
Elvis' records are not legally available to anyone except Lisa. Anything stolen is not admissable.
There was an individual by the name of Michael Pederson who posted in this forum, who made it clear that a very reputable lab that he is connected with in Canada has Elvis' DNA, which he said would hold up in court. Mr. Pederson offered Philip Stanic (Elvis, Jr.) an opportunity to have his DNA tested against Elvis' known (court admissible) DNA, but Jr. refused to even entertain the idea from what Mr. Peterson said. You will find these posts in this forum.

So Stanic is obviously really not interested in having his DNA tested against Elvis' known DNA.

It seems by all indications that Elvis, Jr. is a fraud.
Paul

Belleville, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#124
Aug 31, 2013
 
Jim wrote:
<quoted text>
There was an individual by the name of Michael Pederson who posted in this forum, who made it clear that a very reputable lab that he is connected with in Canada has Elvis' DNA, which he said would hold up in court. Mr. Pederson offered Philip Stanic (Elvis, Jr.) an opportunity to have his DNA tested against Elvis' known (court admissible) DNA, but Jr. refused to even entertain the idea from what Mr. Peterson said. You will find these posts in this forum.
So Stanic is obviously really not interested in having his DNA tested against Elvis' known DNA.
It seems by all indications that Elvis, Jr. is a fraud.
Thats interesting that he would not want to be tested against this sample.
Having no knowledge of how some lab in Canada would have DNA for Elvis (that is court admissable and passes the chain of evidence rules in the US) I really have no clue as to how they got it or how he decided it was court admissible.
I do know any DNA for Elvis would be a medical record and in order to have it used-Lisa and family would have to give a release for it to be used. Even if this lab had a legit reason to have the sample-that sample is legally a medical record for Elvis and those records belong to the family.
Even after death medical records are protected and only family can allow info or material from them to be released or used in anyway.
Lisa and the estate have never released any of Elvis' medical records nor consented to any type DNA testing (for obvious reasons)
Jim

Maple Shade, NJ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#125
Aug 31, 2013
 
Paul wrote:
<quoted text>
Thats interesting that he would not want to be tested against this sample.
Having no knowledge of how some lab in Canada would have DNA for Elvis (that is court admissable and passes the chain of evidence rules in the US) I really have no clue as to how they got it or how he decided it was court admissible.
I do know any DNA for Elvis would be a medical record and in order to have it used-Lisa and family would have to give a release for it to be used. Even if this lab had a legit reason to have the sample-that sample is legally a medical record for Elvis and those records belong to the family.
Even after death medical records are protected and only family can allow info or material from them to be released or used in anyway.
Lisa and the estate have never released any of Elvis' medical records nor consented to any type DNA testing (for obvious reasons)
Regardless of your speculation, the point being is that Mr. Pederson made it clear that there was a reputable lab in Canada that had Elvis' DNA profile, but Stanic was not even remotely interested in meeting Mr. Pederson or even discussing his claim that he knew of DNA that would past legal scrutiny. To the contrary, Stanic essentially ran the other way when he was confronted with the possibility of having his DNA profile compared to Elvis' profile.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 101 - 120 of122
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

24 Users are viewing the Elvis Presley Forum right now

Search the Elvis Presley Forum:
Topic Updated Last By Comments
ginger alden book (Jun '11) 23 hr Carly 117
Why didn't Priscilla marry Marco Garibaldi (Jan '09) 23 hr Carly 332
What Did Elvis' Feet Look Like? (Jan '12) 23 hr Carly 67
150 Best Selling Artists in the World! (Dec '08) Mon RICK 12,614
Elvis Presley No2 Mon Joe K 2
why do people think jon cotner is elvis (Jan '10) Apr 13 M-train 511
Britney Spears: Will She Tie The Knot In Hawaii? Apr 13 Britney Spears 1
•••
•••
•••
•••
•••
•••