Mary Cheney says sister is 'dead wron...

Mary Cheney says sister is 'dead wrong' on same-sex marriage

There are 168 comments on the KCRA-TV Sacramento story from Sep 1, 2013, titled Mary Cheney says sister is 'dead wrong' on same-sex marriage. In it, KCRA-TV Sacramento reports that:

Once you're logged in, at the top of each article, video or slideshow you will see a list of your Facebook friends who recently visited Choose to share stories you'e read with your friends or turn sharing OFF to keep your reading experience anonymous .

Join the discussion below, or Read more at KCRA-TV Sacramento.

First Prev
of 9
Next Last

“ WOOF ! ”

Since: Nov 12

Coolidge, AZ

#1 Sep 1, 2013
You know, Vice President Cheney came out FOR equal marriage rights for LGBT Americans LONG BEFORE The Obamaniac ever did, which did VERY RELUCTANTLY.

IMPEACH THIS BUM ! THROW STUMBLEBUM JOE IN THERE ! NEXT !
ReligionIsRidicu lous

San Francisco, CA

#2 Sep 1, 2013
Fa-Foxy wrote:
You know, Vice President Cheney came out FOR equal marriage rights for LGBT Americans LONG BEFORE The Obamaniac ever did, which did VERY RELUCTANTLY.
IMPEACH THIS BUM ! THROW STUMBLEBUM JOE IN THERE ! NEXT !
Liar. You must be a Republican.

Since: Jul 11

Location hidden

#3 Sep 1, 2013
anything's is better than Osama Been Romney-haha!

“ WOOF ! ”

Since: Nov 12

Coolidge, AZ

#4 Sep 1, 2013
ReligionIsRidiculous wrote:
<quoted text>
Liar. You must be a Republican.
No. Look it up. While Cheney was VEEP he publicly came out for marriage equality, YEARS BEFORE The Obamaniac reluctantly did.
Christsharian Law

Havertown, PA

#5 Sep 1, 2013
Mary Cheney is no better than Liz is no better than Dick. A vile stew.

Dick Cheney never supported marriage equality.

He said adults should be able to enter into whatever contracts or relationships they want to.

In a country or state without marriage equality being able to enter into a contract would not imply or confer marriage benefits.

This is obvious.

Since: Feb 09

Southern California

#6 Sep 1, 2013
ReligionIsRidiculous wrote:
<quoted text>
Liar. You must be a Republican.
He is just cousin to R1 the multi personality confused nut case.

Since: Feb 09

Southern California

#7 Sep 1, 2013
And anyway you don't see "Dick" Cheney doing anything for our cause. Obama has done a whole lot for our cause.

Since: Feb 09

Southern California

#8 Sep 1, 2013
Wow to be a republican and gay what a bad mix. Sounds like a bitter old queen.

“ WOOF ! ”

Since: Nov 12

Coolidge, AZ

#9 Sep 1, 2013
Juanpaul wrote:
And anyway you don't see "Dick" Cheney doing anything for our cause. Obama has done a whole lot for our cause.
The Obamaniac has done NOTHING for us. He says he supports us, yet he not only does NOTHING for us, but has actively worked AGAINST our fight for equality.

IMPEACH THIS BUM ! THROW STUMBLEBUM JOE IN THERE ! NEXT !

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#10 Sep 1, 2013
Say it again, Mary!

< double z-snap with a shimmy>

Since: Jan 08

Thailand

#13 Sep 2, 2013
SOMETIMES Republicans support equality when the negative aspects of inequality hits them over the head, but apparently some would still rather sell out to the baser parts of their "party" instead of supporting family members. No wonder they're so screwed up.

Since: Jun 11

AOL

#17 Sep 2, 2013
And still no legitimate governmental interest sufficient for denial of equal protections of the law as required by the constitution.

But that is because there are none.

“ WOOF ! ”

Since: Nov 12

Coolidge, AZ

#18 Sep 2, 2013
Not Yet Equal wrote:
And still no legitimate governmental interest sufficient for denial of equal protections of the law as required by the constitution.
But that is because there are none.
WRONG !

The relevant portion of the 14th Amendment is: " No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."

It does NOT say: "nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws except if there is a legitimate government interest."

You just make this stuff up as you go along, huh ?

Since: Aug 13

Bozeman, MT

#19 Sep 2, 2013
Fa-Foxy wrote:
<quoted text>
No. Look it up. While Cheney was VEEP he publicly came out for marriage equality, YEARS BEFORE The Obamaniac reluctantly did.
Yes, Obama only recently (early May, 2012) flip-fl...er...evolved to support same sex marriage when it became absolutely (politically) necessary.

Cheney voiced his support in July of 2009.

“ WOOF ! ”

Since: Nov 12

Coolidge, AZ

#20 Sep 2, 2013
Ray Donovan wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, Obama only recently (early May, 2012) flip-fl...er...evolved to support same sex marriage when it became absolutely (politically) necessary.
Cheney voiced his support in July of 2009.
LONG BEFORE The Obamaniac flip-flopped for political expediency.

Since: Jun 11

AOL

#21 Sep 2, 2013
Fa-Foxy wrote:
<quoted text>
WRONG !
The relevant portion of the 14th Amendment is: " No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."
It does NOT say: "nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws except if there is a legitimate government interest."
You just make this stuff up as you go along, huh ?
I didn't make anything up. I simply read the words: "without due process of law."

I also know, whether or not you or I like it or agree, you can't say anything you like anywhere you like. Other restrictions have been found to be constitutional, while many others have not passed that test.

“ WOOF ! ”

Since: Nov 12

Coolidge, AZ

#22 Sep 2, 2013
Not Yet Equal wrote:
<quoted text>
I didn't make anything up. I simply read the words: "without due process of law."
I also know, whether or not you or I like it or agree, you can't say anything you like anywhere you like. Other restrictions have been found to be constitutional, while many others have not passed that test.
The old "fire in a crowded theatre" canard ?

DNF

“Judge less, Love more”

Since: Apr 07

Born in Newark Ohio

#23 Sep 2, 2013
Fa-Foxy wrote:
<quoted text>
WRONG !
The relevant portion of the 14th Amendment is: " No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."
It does NOT say: "nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws except if there is a legitimate government interest."
You just make this stuff up as you go along, huh ?
Says the one who insists there is no right to vote in the Constitution!

LMAO!

DNF

“Judge less, Love more”

Since: Apr 07

Born in Newark Ohio

#24 Sep 2, 2013
Liz Cheney said last week she is "not pro-gay marriage" and believes the issues of marriage should be left up to voters in their respective states, not to judges or legislators. Problem is SCOTUS has ruled that such rights CAN NOT be put to a vote.

ARTICLE VI

This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding.

AMENDMENT IX
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

Now about voting on civil rights:
SCOTUS Majority opinion:

West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette 1943

"The very purpose of a Bill of Rights was to withdraw certain subjects from the vicissitudes of political controversy, to place them beyond the reach of majorities and officials and to establish them as legal principles to be applied by the courts. One's right to life, liberty, and property, to free speech, a free press, freedom of worship and assembly, and other fundamental rights may not be submitted to vote; they depend on the outcome of no elections."

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#25 Sep 2, 2013
DNF wrote:
<quoted text>Says the one who insists there is no right to vote in the Constitution!
LMAO!
oddly enough, the right to vote is not explicitly written out in the constitution (as many of our rights are not) the first mention of the right to vote is in the amendment describing why that right cannot be abrogated...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 9
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Dick Cheney Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News 'Sex trainer', 26, who vowed to 'break' young g... 13 hr Texxy 1
News Democrats seize on Romney fundraiser with Chene... (Jul '12) 19 hr Tennessee Prostitute 146
News Osama Bin Laden reportedly calls Obama 'powerle... (Sep '09) Mar 20 CombOver Donald 67
News Al Gore still thinks the Internet might save us... Mar 16 Faith Michigan 7
News George W. Bush's lessons for President Trump: M... Mar 13 Lawrence Wolf 8
News News Pence to address politically potent Republ... Feb 25 spocko 4
News Why Joe Biden was a most unusual - and effectiv... Jan '17 Le Jimbo 5
More from around the web