David Hyde Pierce married longtime partner

In this March 9, 2009 file photo, actor David Hyde Pierce attends the opening night of the Broadway play "33 Variations" in New York.

[calibrat]

Congrats to the happy couple did not know he was gay until the show was over but who cares?

[Nobama]

Thanks for the newsflash ... Now I can sleep better tonight ....... This was deemed newsworthy ... because?

[Clyde]

The headline should have read David "Hyde the truth" Pierce married "longtime liar" partner.

[Nobama]

Davis Hyde Pierce is gay? So? He's a remarkable talent who put most of us in a laughing fit as
Niles on "Frazier". Nobody - I mean NOBODY else could play
the part of Niles as he did. All the best to him
and his life partner. Now, leave him alone, and move along. Nothing to see here.

[Chago]

the proof that marriage was so important to the hordes of protestors is that only 36,000 bothered to marry during June to November 2008

my guess is that gays are about 1% of California's population, I did the math, look below;

source:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California
California's population (2008 est.):
36,756,666

10% of that would be:
3,675,667
36,756,666 x .1 = 3,675,666.6

0.1% of that would be:
36,757
36,756,666 x .001 = 36,756.666

according to an LA Times article;
http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-gay-m...
only 18,000 gay couples married during that 5 month window, even knowing that there was a possibility that prop 8 would past.
that means only 36,000 gay people are married

that figure is closer to 0.1% than 10%,
0.1%= 36,757

if marriage was so important to gays, why did only .001 of Californians eligible bother to marry?
could it be cold feet? a little shyness? not ready to make such a big commitment?

or could it be that gays are really only 1% or less, but because many are actors/actresses in movies/TV or activists that are so bigger than life that it makes it seem that they are really a larger proportion than their 1%?

[Handsome Harry 1]

frazier actor