U.S. court asked to invalidate Obama ...

U.S. court asked to invalidate Obama recess appointments

There are 51 comments on the Reuters story from Dec 5, 2012, titled U.S. court asked to invalidate Obama recess appointments. In it, Reuters reports that:

Businesses and Senate Republicans forced a courtroom showdown with President Barack Obama on Wednesday, asking a federal appeals court to invalidate his surprise appointments to a labor board in January.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Reuters.

Sheik Yerbouti

Doylestown, PA

#26 Dec 5, 2012
Talk about sore losers!! Hopefully the court will uphold the appointment and tell these right wing nutcases to shove it!
conservative crapola

Whitehall, PA

#27 Dec 5, 2012
au contraire wrote:
<quoted text>
Didn't work for you when you employed it for rugby. Did it, lestupid?

hahahahahahahahaha

Since: Dec 07

Spring, TX

#28 Dec 5, 2012
Marine Corp Pat wrote:
The right is continuing its hissy-fit because they lost to the Black guy… a second time… in a landslide… with a mandate, to continue to recess appoint whomever he wants.
DEAL WITH IT, LOL!
No need to deal with it, moron. The republicans kept the house, oblumber won by only 2.8% of the popular vote, GOP won more governorships, dmorats fell short of filibutster proof senate.......there isn't any mandate, stupid. Read the news and get your lips off the obama fathead on your wall for a little while, LOL
conservative crapola

Whitehall, PA

#29 Dec 5, 2012
Bluebonnets-Thistle wrote:
<quoted text>
dmorats fell short of filibutster proof senate
Harry Reid: Filibuster Changes Will Take Place In January

"There are discussions going on now [over filibuster reform], but I want to tell everybody here. I'm happy I've had a number of Republicans come to me, a few Democrats,” Reid told reporters Tuesday at his weekly press availability.“We're going to change the rules. We cannot continue in this way. I hope we can get something that the Republicans will work with us on.”

“But it won't be a handshake,” he added.“We tried that last time. It didn't work.”

Asked to confirm if his comments meant that the rules would change and Republicans can choose to be a part of that change if they want, the Nevada Democrat responded,“That's right. Yup."

hahahahahahahahaha

“Obama Shames the USA”

Since: Apr 09

Location hidden

#30 Dec 5, 2012
Benghazi

Since: Dec 07

Spring, TX

#31 Dec 5, 2012
conservative crapola wrote:
<quoted text>
Harry Reid: Filibuster Changes Will Take Place In January
"There are discussions going on now [over filibuster reform], but I want to tell everybody here. I'm happy I've had a number of Republicans come to me, a few Democrats,” Reid told reporters Tuesday at his weekly press availability.“We're going to change the rules. We cannot continue in this way. I hope we can get something that the Republicans will work with us on.”
“But it won't be a handshake,” he added.“We tried that last time. It didn't work.”
Asked to confirm if his comments meant that the rules would change and Republicans can choose to be a part of that change if they want, the Nevada Democrat responded,“That's right. Yup."
hahahahahahahahaha
If they don't want, then it won't change. Not enough votes, dummy. hahahahaha

Republicans offer solutions, democraps don't have any!(Chuckle)

Since: Dec 07

Spring, TX

#32 Dec 5, 2012
conservative crapola wrote:
<quoted text>
Harry Reid: Filibuster Changes Will Take Place In January
"There are discussions going on now [over filibuster reform], but I want to tell everybody here. I'm happy I've had a number of Republicans come to me, a few Democrats,” Reid told reporters Tuesday at his weekly press availability.“We're going to change the rules. We cannot continue in this way. I hope we can get something that the Republicans will work with us on.”
“But it won't be a handshake,” he added.“We tried that last time. It didn't work.”
Asked to confirm if his comments meant that the rules would change and Republicans can choose to be a part of that change if they want, the Nevada Democrat responded,“That's right. Yup."
hahahahahahahahaha
Let me 'splain something, Lucy! Detroit has asked for a bailout because nobama "owes them!" LMAO

A. He doesn't have tha authority.....if he did and bailed them out...all the fkn broke blue cities that voted for him especially the ones in kookoofornia and Chicago would want the same...the money ain't there, pinhead. The dems are already eating each other alive.....now the hispanics say " you owe us!" This is gonna be comical as your entitled groups start to turn on each other. Dog eat dog........the democrats.
conservative crapola

Whitehall, PA

#33 Dec 5, 2012
Bluebonnets-Thistle wrote:
<quoted text>
Hit the back seat, wrexas. 4 more years of teaflea sobbing.

hahahahahahahahahaha

“Obama Shames the USA”

Since: Apr 09

Location hidden

#34 Dec 5, 2012
Benghazi.

“have seen the years,”

Since: Mar 10

and the slow parade of fears"

#35 Dec 5, 2012
conservative crapola wrote:
<quoted text>
dead teaturd alert.
I hate to say it but her 'teaturd'-ish comments are awfully similar to those made by Cat74. Now there is another big time looneytoon with some major ignorance thrown in. Perhaps they are one and the same. There can't possibly be two of them roaming the earth spreading their trashy and oblivious "wisdom", can there? Gotta be some reason for all that hate and vitriol and I'll bet it ain't pretty.

“Obama Shames the USA”

Since: Apr 09

Location hidden

#36 Dec 5, 2012
conservative crapola wrote:
<quoted text>
Hit the back seat, wrexas. 4 more years of teaflea sobbing.
hahahahahahahahahaha
Benghazi. Obama. Coward.
Liberals r jealous

Rochester, MN

#37 Dec 5, 2012
Ninthman wrote:
<quoted text>Benghazi. Obama. Coward.
4 more yrs of Corruption and lies from the Obama admin

“I laugh at Robo Posters”

Since: Nov 08

Paris

#38 Dec 6, 2012
tha Professor wrote:
<quoted text>
Stick to the subject. Why aren't Repubs even voting on Obama nominations, as the Constitution says they should do?
Just vote. What're you afraid of?
Ask Harry Reid.

Your lying home boy is playing games with million of peoples peace of mind and bank accounts.

McConnell Offers To Vote On Obama's Fiscal Cliff Plan, Reid Objects...sure, Obama wants the cliff. It's what his first four years was all about. Distruction.
ontg

Carol Stream, IL

#39 Dec 6, 2012
Sheik Yerbouti wrote:
Talk about sore losers!! Hopefully the court will uphold the appointment and tell these right wing nutcases to shove it!
Of course than the House can start impeaching the worthless scum Obama likes to appoint. The hearings would be very informative as to what those aholes in Obanazi land are really doing.

“Obama Shames the USA”

Since: Apr 09

Location hidden

#40 Dec 6, 2012
Obama is Hitleresque except he's a big coward. Benghazi proved that.
Don Joe

Minneapolis, MN

#41 Dec 6, 2012
Liberals r jealous wrote:
<quoted text>
Lets face the fact that this Obama really isnt anything, he most likely isnt even an American
He certainly doesnt have American value's
and he never once even tried to join the US Military
Hmmm, he certainly is a republican, with a D after his name. No wonder he won't do the things that need to be done to restore America.

Since: Feb 08

Hypoluxo Fl

#42 Dec 6, 2012
Liberals r jealous wrote:
<quoted text>
Lets face the fact that this Obama really isnt anything, he most likely isnt even an American
He certainly doesnt have American value's
and he never once even tried to join the US Military
Mittens tried four times not to join the military. At that, he succeeded. Birther nutcase.
Ratliff

Orlando, FL

#43 Dec 6, 2012
au contraire wrote:
<quoted text>When they are done out of his authority granted by the constitution. Please try to keep up.
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-scien...

Why Liberals Are More Intelligent Than Conservatives
Liberals think they’re more intelligent than conservatives because they are

It is difficult to define a whole school of political ideology precisely, but one may reasonably define liberalism (as opposed to conservatism) in the contemporary United States as the genuine concern for the welfare of genetically unrelated others and the willingness to contribute larger proportions of private resources for the welfare of such others. In the modern political and economic context, this willingness usually translates into paying higher proportions of individual incomes in taxes toward the government and its social welfare programs. Liberals usually support such social welfare programs and higher taxes to finance them, and conservatives usually oppose them.

Defined as such, liberalism is evolutionarily novel. Humans (like other species) are evolutionarily designed to be altruistic toward their genetic kin, their friends and allies, and members of their deme (a group of intermarrying individuals) or ethnic group. They are not designed to be altruistic toward an indefinite number of complete strangers whom they are not likely ever to meet or interact with. This is largely because our ancestors lived in a small band of 50-150 genetically related individuals, and large cities and nations with thousands and millions of people are themselves evolutionarily novel.

The examination of the 10-volume compendium The Encyclopedia of World Cultures, which describes all human cultures known to anthropology (more than 1,500) in great detail, as well as extensive primary ethnographies of traditional societies, reveals that liberalism as defined above is absent in these traditional cultures. While sharing of resources, especially food, is quite common and often mandatory among hunter-gatherer tribes, and while trade with neighboring tribes often takes place, there is no evidence that people in contemporary hunter-gatherer bands freely share resources with members of other tribes.

Because all members of a hunter-gatherer tribe are genetic kin or at the very least friends and allies for life, sharing resources among them does not qualify as an expression of liberalism as defined above. Given its absence in the contemporary hunter-gatherer tribes, which are often used as modern-day analogs of our ancestral life, it may be reasonable to infer that sharing of resources with total strangers that one has never met or is not likely ever to meet – that is, liberalism – was not part of our ancestral life. Liberalism may therefore be evolutionarily novel, and the Hypothesis would predict that more intelligent individuals are more likely than less intelligent individuals to espouse liberalism as a value.

Analyses of large representative samples, from both the United States and the United Kingdom, confirm this prediction. In both countries, more intelligent children are more likely to grow up to be liberals than less intelligent children. For example, among the American sample, those who identify themselves as “very liberal” in early adulthood have a mean childhood IQ of 106.4, whereas those who identify themselves as “very conservative” in early adulthood have a mean childhood IQ of 94.8.
the rest of us

Saint Paul, MN

#44 Dec 6, 2012
Doctor My Eyes wrote:
<quoted text>
I hate to say it but her 'teaturd'-ish comments are awfully similar to those made by Cat74. Now there is another big time......BLAH,BLAH,FART,BLAH, FART.......
Well I don't hate to say that your comments are so much farting in the wind. Does gorgana know the amount of time you waste on here? You're risking a beatin'.

“Forever Is Promised To No One”

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#45 Dec 6, 2012
Don Joe wrote:
<quoted text>
Yea, Obama appoints a lot of republicans. He even had Petreaus as head of the CIA. Where could a republican do more damage than that?
Obama should have changed his political affiliation to republican before the election. He caves to their every whim.
Petraeus is a Democrat and his wife a liberals worker. Please go back and work on your GED. It will save me tax money eventually.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Barack Obama Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 7 min Nostrilis Waxman 1,278,145
News The President has failed us (Jun '12) 13 min Taletha 341,447
News In America, atheists are still in the closet (Apr '12) 13 min Thinking 47,880
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 17 min Dr Guru 197,079
News Obama shoots Alaska video with 'selfie' stick 20 min Joe Balls 11
News HOH: Prayer Leader Believes John Fleming Is Hal... 26 min Black Annie 1
News White House says Mount McKinley to be renamed D... 29 min Lawrence Wolf 163
More from around the web