The President has failed us

This week, I decided to list the reasons I would not vote for Barack Obama in the next election. Full Story

“Gloria Ad Caput Venire”

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

#99262 Feb 2, 2013
---Wild Irish Rose--- wrote:
<quoted text>
Huh? Would you mind re-writing that in a coherent sentence please?
Why? Learn to comprehend what is said the first time.

“Gloria Ad Caput Venire”

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

#99263 Feb 2, 2013
X -Man- wrote:
<quoted text>
So then you were threatening to take that action? Right?
No, embarking on a quest. My legal right.

“RELAX”

Since: Dec 12

EVERYTHING WILL BE ALRIGHT

#99264 Feb 2, 2013
positronium wrote:
<quoted text>As the laws stand now I am not in violation of any gun laws.
I have acquired all the firearms I own through private sales and inheritance. It's not illegal to own a firearm and there are no laws requiring me to register the firearms that I own. However, I believe that the gun control legislation being proposed is a start at forcing all law abiding citizens who have a firearm to report their weapons and pay a fee or a fine.

Currently, If I sell a firearm to an acquaintance there is no law requiring me to fill out papers or run a background check on my acquaintance. He/she simply hands me what I want and I had him/her what she wants.

If the proposed legislation turns to law, I will have to comply with the same requirements as a licensed gun dealer or face fines and perhaps imprisonment. Should I follow the law, I would have to bring my merchandise and prospective customer to a licensed dealer, pay that licensed dealer a fee and hope that licensed dealer doesn't steal my customer after passing the background check.

Not only would this legislation screw private citizens wanting to sell or trade, it would also create tens of thousands of soft targets for federal agents to make a name for themselves busting private citizens who are now criminals for doing what they have been doing for centuries.

The Agency enforcing the proposed legislation would go to congress asking for thousands of new agents needed to enforce the rampant criminal activity and congress will approve the request and borrow hundreds of billions to fund it.

This proposed legislation is not about saving lives. It's all about money, power and control for the proponents and it will not stop with assault rifles and high capacity magazines. It will only lead to the end of the 2nd amendment and the beginning of tyranny.
Psychic

Dallas, TX

#99265 Feb 2, 2013
Learn what anyone can -...
http://www.youtube.com/embed/F7pYHN9iC9I...
Snake Eyes

Long Beach, CA

#99266 Feb 2, 2013
NTRPRNR1 wrote:
<quoted text>So, you view this as a conflict between dems and pubs? There we go again. It always has to be a partisan issue. Yet, I'm absolutely positive that there are dems who oppose an assault weapons ban and pubs who support one. I know that for a fact. But, here's a Texas poll that's interesting:
http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main/2013/...
January 30, 2013
TEXANS SUPPORT ASSAULT WEAPONS BAN, MIXED ON CORNYN
...Overall on the issue of guns Texans say they trust the NRA over President Obama by a 47/43 margin.
And despite all of that 49% of Texas voters support an assault weapons ban to just 41% opposed to it. Most Democrats support it, independents favor it by a 53/34 margin, and even among Republicans 23% support it. We've found support for the assault weapons ban everywhere we've polled it, but it's particularly striking to see that voters favor it in a pro-gun, anti-Obama state like Texas.
Party Identity in a Gun Cabinet

It will come as no surprise to those with a passing interest in American politics that Republicans are more likely to own guns than Democrats. But the differences have become much more stark in recent years, with gun ownership having become one of the clearest examples of the partisan polarization in the country over the last two decades.

Read more: http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012...

Since: Feb 12

Location hidden

#99267 Feb 2, 2013
positronium wrote:
<quoted text>No, embarking on a quest. My legal right.
Well you shouldn't threaten people with your "quests", legal right or not. ;)
MrDouche

United States

#99269 Feb 2, 2013
Just wash the rotten thing Rosie for Petes sake

Since: Feb 12

Location hidden

#99270 Feb 2, 2013
MrDouche wrote:
Just wash the rotten thing Rosie for Petes sake
Coward.
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

#99271 Feb 2, 2013
Frito Bandito wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong again! The constitution is an evolutionary document containing amendments. The policing of legal or illegal aliens falls under the policy and guidelines set forth by the Attorney General that trickle down to the enforcement branches of ICE.
Due process has nothing to do with "reciprocal treaty process." All that means is if they do it to us, then we do it to them. Once here, they're subject to due process in the form of a deportation hearing, where an Immigration Judge determines what benefits, if any, are warranted and what violations have been committed.
Over 40% of illegals are overstays.
"reciprocal treaty process" has everything to do with due process, were it not for treaties this nation could not prosecute any visiting aliens, we would have to depend upon the aliens country of origin to do so.

Since: Oct 07

phos phoros

#99272 Feb 2, 2013
American Lady wrote:
<quoted text>
You mean like those COMP tests they give to "idiots" before letting them into 'technical' college.
What a cr@ppy thing to say about your hard-working fellow Americans.
ANON PROXY PUZZIE LOCATER

Canyon Country, CA

#99273 Feb 2, 2013
MrDouche wrote:
Just wash the rotten thing Rosie for Petes sake
Anonymous Proxy puzzie tactics. The last line of defense of a desperate dying breed.
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

#99274 Feb 2, 2013
_White American_ wrote:
<quoted text>It has been established that illegals are covered by our Constitution/Declaration of Independence as long as they are here.
they must obey the laws as set forth by treaties, but they are never subject to the jurisdiction of the US Constitution, only citizens are "and subject to the jurisdiction, thereof".
Illegal aliens have any rights, since they have violated all treaties between the US and their country of origin.

“Rico's Are Everywhere”

Since: Dec 09

Gangland, North America

#99275 Feb 2, 2013
---Wild Irish Rose--- wrote:
Will someone please start a remedial English Forum?
But the right wing nuts think they can spells and spokes wrong and itz OKEdoKe cuz der all aMERIKANS!!!

ROLF!!!

“Rico's Are Everywhere”

Since: Dec 09

Gangland, North America

#99276 Feb 2, 2013
American Lady wrote:
<quoted text>
You mean like those COMP tests they give to "idiots" before letting them into 'technical' college.
They're called placement testing and just about everyone has to take them. Had you gone to college, you too would have taken those exact tests. Apparently the furthest you've gone with higher education is when you get educated here on Topix.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#99277 Feb 2, 2013
EAGLE EYE1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Thats the problem with reading a fairy tale dream as opposed to what the senate and president is offering.. A pipe dream on topix is just that and the reason I will not waste the time with it..
Eagle
You seem to be wasting a lot of your time telling us what you think of the proposal being made rather than telling us what you think of what the proposal actually says.

What's so productive about that?

Immigration reform is coming and if the people don't discuss alternative ideas and put pressure on their elected representatives to include those ideas in the final outcome then we are simply going to be saddled with Washington's latest version of amnesty and a path to citizenship.

Is that what you want, because that's exactly what you're going to get if we don't get busy and get invovled.

"NO" isn't an option anymore if it ever really was in the first place and right now may be our last chance to do something about it.
Snake Eyes

Long Beach, CA

#99278 Feb 2, 2013
Rico from East Los II wrote:
<quoted text>
But the right wing nuts think they can spells and spokes wrong and itz OKEdoKe cuz der all aMERIKANS!!!
ROLF!!!
Illustrating duo creates comic book to help students master grammar

The book takes those hard-to-understand grammar concepts subjects, predicates, punctuation marks, and parts of speech and presents them as individual superheroes. Each one has specific powers to help students learn the grammar rules associated with each concept. For example, the Completion Team consists of two superheroes the Subject and the Predicate and together they form a complete sentence. The Subject has four super powers (including those of number, compound, and invisibility) that help him accomplish his goal. Preciado and Montijo have done an excellent job of using the superhero theme to explain each concept in simple terms with visual examples.

Read more: http://nbclatino.com/2013/01/30/illustrating-...
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

#99279 Feb 2, 2013
Rico from East Los II wrote:
<quoted text>
If that was so true then why were you all up in Bill Clintons sex life? Nobody seen what he was dong yet you and your voyeurist Republican party seems to want to know all about Clintons sex life.... and held hearing on it too.
Fcking perverts.
I could have cared less what Bill did, his problem wasn't sex, his problem was lying about it, when caught!
If you are going to fiddle around, make sure you fiddle with tight lipped fiddler and not in the Oval Office.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#99280 Feb 2, 2013
-Dont Panic- wrote:
<quoted text>
I have acquired all the firearms I own through private sales and inheritance. It's not illegal to own a firearm and there are no laws requiring me to register the firearms that I own. However, I believe that the gun control legislation being proposed is a start at forcing all law abiding citizens who have a firearm to report their weapons and pay a fee or a fine.
Currently, If I sell a firearm to an acquaintance there is no law requiring me to fill out papers or run a background check on my acquaintance. He/she simply hands me what I want and I had him/her what she wants.
If the proposed legislation turns to law, I will have to comply with the same requirements as a licensed gun dealer or face fines and perhaps imprisonment. Should I follow the law, I would have to bring my merchandise and prospective customer to a licensed dealer, pay that licensed dealer a fee and hope that licensed dealer doesn't steal my customer after passing the background check.
Not only would this legislation screw private citizens wanting to sell or trade, it would also create tens of thousands of soft targets for federal agents to make a name for themselves busting private citizens who are now criminals for doing what they have been doing for centuries.
The Agency enforcing the proposed legislation would go to congress asking for thousands of new agents needed to enforce the rampant criminal activity and congress will approve the request and borrow hundreds of billions to fund it.
This proposed legislation is not about saving lives. It's all about money, power and control for the proponents and it will not stop with assault rifles and high capacity magazines. It will only lead to the end of the 2nd amendment and the beginning of tyranny.
"It will only lead to the end of the 2nd amendment and the beginning of tyranny."

Rhetoric, propoganda, nonsense and paranoia, or is this more of that sarcasm that I never quite get?

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#99281 Feb 2, 2013
<propaganda>

American Lady

Danville, KY

#99282 Feb 2, 2013
Justice Dale wrote:
<quoted text>"reciprocal treaty process" has everything to do with due process, were it not for treaties this nation could not prosecute any visiting aliens, we would have to depend upon the aliens country of origin to do so.
Hi JD ...
So "HAPPY" to SEE you!

Let's Keep on KEEPING on! <3

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Barack Obama Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 2 min Right 1,126,197
Anti-gay Tenn. billboard stirs religion debate 4 min barry 1,544
Boehner Moving Toward Late-July House Vote on O... 5 min spud 7
Teen's Shooting Highlights Racial Tension 6 min foster 3,381
During Obama's Speech at Democratic Campaign Ra... 11 min Denny CranesPlace 45
Obama wants an election about the economy, not him 38 min Le Jimbo 614
Russia Can't Be Blackmailed Over Ukraine, Putin... 45 min Zeppelin 88

Barack Obama People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE