Michigan, Pennsylvania Republicans still seek Electoral College change to gain presidency for GOP
Republicans in four GOP-controlled states-Virginia, Wisconsin, Ohio and Florida-all retreated on a plan to apportion their votes in the Electoral College by the popular presidential vote in each congressional district rather than the statewide winner-take-all approach now in place.
Join the discussion below, or Read more at Daily Kos.
#1 Mar 2, 2013
Obvious partisan machinations like these should add support for the National Popular Vote movement. If the party in control in each state is tempted every 2, 4, or 10 years (post-census) to consider rewriting election laws and redistrict with an eye to the likely politically beneficial effects for their party in the next presidential election, then the National Popular Vote system, in which all voters across the country are guaranteed to be politically relevant and treated equally, is needed now more than ever.
A survey of Pennsylvania voters showed 78% overall support for a national popular vote for President.
Support was 87% among Democrats, 68% among Republicans, and 76% among independents.
By age, support was 77% among 18-29 year olds, 73% among 30-45 year olds, 81% among 46-65 year olds, and 78% for those older than 65.
By gender, support was 85% among women and 71% among men.
The National Popular Vote bill would guarantee the Presidency to the candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 states (and DC).
Every vote, everywhere, would be politically relevant and equal in presidential elections. No more distorting and divisive red and blue state maps.
When the bill is enacted by states with a majority of the electoral votes enough electoral votes to elect a President (270 of 538), all the electoral votes from the enacting states would be awarded to the presidential candidate who receives the most popular votes in the country.
In Gallup polls since 1944, only about 20% of the public has supported the current system of awarding all of a states electoral votes to the presidential candidate who receives the most votes in each separate state (with about 70% opposed and about 10% undecided). Support for a national popular vote is strong among Republicans, Democrats, and Independent voters, as well as every demographic group in virtually every state surveyed in recent polls in recent closely divided Battleground states: CO 68%, FL 78%, IA 75%, MI 73%, MO 70%, NH 69%, NV 72%, NM 76%, NC 74%, OH 70%, PA 78%, VA 74%, and WI 71%; in Small states (3 to 5 electoral votes): AK 70%, DC 76%, DE 75%, ID 77%, ME 77%, MT 72%, NE 74%, NH 69%, NV 72%, NM 76%, OK 81%, RI 74%, SD 71%, UT 70%, VT 75%, WV 81%, and WY 69%; in Southern and Border states: AR 80%, KY- 80%, MS 77%, MO 70%, NC 74%, OK 81%, SC 71%, TN 83%, VA 74%, and WV 81%; and in other states polled: AZ 67%, CA 70%, CT 74%, MA 73%, MN 75%, NY 79%, OR 76%, and WA 77%. Americans believe that the candidate who receives the most votes should win.
The bill has passed 31 state legislative chambers in 21 states with 243 electoral votes. The bill has been enacted by 9 jurisdictions with 132 electoral votes 49% of the 270 necessary to go into effect.
Follow National Popular Vote on Facebook via NationalPopularVoteInc
#2 Mar 3, 2013
So when the party out of the WH and power, morphs into something that is no longer attractive to voters, this aspect of the Constitution, designed by the framers, is easily sacrificed/tossed aside, by self-annointed Constitutionalists, so they can pretend, in loss, they're attractive to voters by saying,'well, our candidate received X-number of electoral votes.' Gotcha.
#3 Mar 3, 2013
The Founding Fathers in the Constitution did not require states to allow their citizens to vote for president, much less award all their electoral votes based upon the vote of their citizens.
The presidential election system we have today is not in the Constitution. State-by-state winner-take-all laws to award Electoral College votes, were eventually enacted by states, using their exclusive power to do so, AFTER the Founding Fathers wrote the Constitution. Now our current system can be changed by state laws again.
Unable to agree on any particular method for selecting presidential electors, the Founding Fathers left the choice of method exclusively to the states in section 1 of Article II of the U.S. Constitution-- "Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors ..." The U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly characterized the authority of the state legislatures over the manner of awarding their electoral votes as "plenary" and "exclusive."
A national popular vote is the way to make every person's vote equal and matter to their candidate because it guarantees that the candidate who gets the most votes in all 50 states and DC becomes President.
#4 Mar 3, 2013
Tell it to Al Gore.
Add your comments below
|Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08)||1 min||VetnorsGate||1,441,515|
|Why it Matters: Voting Rights||5 min||In Got We Trust||13|
|News 25 Mins Ago Emails show machinations behin...||9 min||In Got We Trust||5|
|BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09)||26 min||Dr Guru||227,589|
|The President has failed us (Jun '12)||39 min||Cheech the Conser...||399,059|
|Donald Trump's birther nonsense||2 hr||Patriot||310|
|Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08)||3 hr||VN Vet||61,744|
Find what you want!
Search Barack Obama Forum Now
Copyright © 2016 Topix LLC