US school shooting revives gun debate

[Respect71]

Cathouse Mouse wrote:

I have found that Independents are often just people who are too illogical to be Democrats and too embarrassed to call themselves Republicans.
Yes, I have noticed barefoots insults as well.
That's between you two. Barefoot hasn't addressed my party as a whole negatively, therefore has not insulted me personally.
Nor, do I intend on finding myself in an insult contest with you.

“I have found that Independents are often just people who are too illogical to be Democrats and too embarrassed to call themselves Republicans.” Well stated insult… At least it’s not that of a little boy…
Regardless of how you feel about independents, they are the ones who decide elections in this Country, and as for illogical … You are mistaking that for EMOTIONAL and IRRATIONAL..
The example is being so SCARED that liberals are willing to remove rights from American citizens because they want to FEEL safe. It is not logical, it’s emotional and irrational.
To be clear I never referred to ANY “party as a whole negatively”, so what you are taking personal is by your choice alone.

[Respect71]

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
When was the highest unemployment, honey?

That’s been established… Who was president in 2009?
The question to you is What did Reagan do to cause the high unemployment?
What was the PRIMARY CAUSE of the high Unemployment?

[Respect71]

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
Don't dish it out if you can't take it, boy.

Hard to take the truth?

[Respect71]

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
dishing it out, boy.
You want the hankie now?
PS: why not ask Vince about his alien abduction site.

Why don't you answer direct questions?

[Respect71]

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
I'll remind you that I am the one who knows all the words to the Second Amendment and what they mean, and you don't know all the words and you don't know what the ones you know mean.
And of course there's the joke of what you know of Ronald Reagan.

Enlighten us… You won’t but it would be funny to read your attempt.
And the OBVIOUS of that you know nothing about Reagan or economics what so ever.

[Respect71]

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
WAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!
WAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!
I can dish it out but mommy they keep flinging it back!
WAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!

Such a little boy.

[Respect71]

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
You mean like when screamed "Prove it"! when I said Reagan had the highest unemployment and the biggest recession and I did?

What did Reagan do to cause the high unemployment?
What was the PRIMARY CAUSE of the high Unemployment?

[sociopathic Liberals]

Cathouse Mouse wrote:

I have found that Independents are often just people who are too illogical to be Democrats and too embarrassed to call themselves Republicans.
Yes, I have noticed barefoots insults as well.
That's between you two. Barefoot hasn't addressed my party as a whole negatively, therefore has not insulted me personally.
Nor, do I intend on finding myself in an insult contest with you.

liberal douchebag:
A Democrat, social parasite, or self-described 'progressive' who feels more comfortable having others do their thinking for them. The vast majority of positions espoused by liberal douchebags are merely re-repeatings of things heard from other, more vociferous liberal douchebags. Liberal douchebags are incapable of logical thinking.

There are only three requirements for being a liberal douchebag:

1. You must be superior to all others (and you must incessantly announce your perceived intelligence to the point where everyone knows you are actually a liberal douchebag, i.e. "Liberals are smarter because of the direct ingestion of same-sex genitalia."

2. You must not have any ACTUAL accomplishments in life. Anyone who has actually accomplished anything in life would have nothing to do with a liberal douchebag social parasite.

3. You MUST be untalented AND hateful to become a liberal douchebag.

[Cathouse Mouse]

Respect71 wrote:

<quoted text>
“I have found that Independents are often just people who are too illogical to be Democrats and too embarrassed to call themselves Republicans.” Well stated insult… At least it’s not that of a little boy…
Regardless of how you feel about independents, they are the ones who decide elections in this Country, and as for illogical … You are mistaking that for EMOTIONAL and IRRATIONAL..
The example is being so SCARED that liberals are willing to remove rights from American citizens because they want to FEEL safe. It is not logical, it’s emotional and irrational.
To be clear I never referred to ANY “party as a whole negatively”, so what you are taking personal is by your choice alone.

A political example of being scared is running trash ads against women who haven't even announced a run for office yet.

Wouldn't you agree?

[Cathouse Mouse]

sociopathic Liberals wrote:

<quoted text>
liberal douchebag:
A Democrat, social parasite, or self-described 'progressive' who feels more comfortable having others do their thinking for them. The vast majority of positions espoused by liberal douchebags are merely re-repeatings of things heard from other, more vociferous liberal douchebags. Liberal douchebags are incapable of logical thinking.
There are only three requirements for being a liberal douchebag:
1. You must be superior to all others (and you must incessantly announce your perceived intelligence to the point where everyone knows you are actually a liberal douchebag, i.e. "Liberals are smarter because of the direct ingestion of same-sex genitalia."
2. You must not have any ACTUAL accomplishments in life. Anyone who has actually accomplished anything in life would have nothing to do with a liberal douchebag social parasite.
3. You MUST be untalented AND hateful to become a liberal douchebag.

Like some no-name gray box is gonna insult me? Don't you have some anti-abortion rally to attend somewhere?

[Respect71]

Cathouse Mouse wrote:

<quoted text>
A political example of being scared is running trash ads against women who haven't even announced a run for office yet.
Wouldn't you agree?

I would amend that to, ANYONE “who haven't even announced a run for office yet.” And I would agree.
Do you agree that I didn’t refer to ANY “party as a whole negatively”?
Wouldn’t you agree that leftist liberals are so scared by gun violence they are willing to remove rights from American citizens, thereby showing their motivation is emotional and irrational NOT logical?

[Cathouse Mouse]

Respect71 wrote:

<quoted text>
I would amend that to, ANYONE “who haven't even announced a run for office yet.” And I would agree.

Yes, I would agre. But Karl Rove is running ads against Ashley Judd who hasn't announced any run and doesn't even live in Kentucky where his concerns lie.

_____

Respect71 wrote:

<quoted text>
Do you agree that I didn’t refer to ANY “party as a whole negatively”?

No, I would not agree.

When you say "immature, ignorant leftists" ... I tend to think you're including me.

http://www.topix.com/forum/denver/TN5SE8P0HVT...

_____

Respect71 wrote:

<quoted text>
Wouldn’t you agree that leftist liberals are so scared by gun violence they are willing to remove rights from American citizens, thereby showing their motivation is emotional and irrational NOT logical?

Hardly. Nobody is taking any rights from you. The emotional and irrational motivations are found in Alabama bunkers.

[Trolli]

sociopathic Liberals wrote:

<quoted text>
liberal douchebag:
A Democrat, social parasite, or self-described 'progressive' who feels more comfortable having others do their thinking for them. The vast majority of positions espoused by liberal douchebags are merely re-repeatings of things heard from other, more vociferous liberal douchebags. Liberal douchebags are incapable of logical thinking.
There are only three requirements for being a liberal douchebag:
1. You must be superior to all others (and you must incessantly announce your perceived intelligence to the point where everyone knows you are actually a liberal douchebag, i.e. "Liberals are smarter because of the direct ingestion of same-sex genitalia."
2. You must not have any ACTUAL accomplishments in life. Anyone who has actually accomplished anything in life would have nothing to do with a liberal douchebag social parasite.
3. You MUST be untalented AND hateful to become a liberal douchebag.

Very well stated. Would like to add -

4. You must be angry and jealous of others because they get things done while you sit on your parents couch and demand unemployment, free phones, food stamps etc. Crying about your miserable situation thats all your own dumb fault.

[Respect71]

Cathouse Mouse wrote:

<quoted text>
Yes, I would agre. But Karl Rove is running ads against Ashley Judd who hasn't announced any run and doesn't even live in Kentucky where his concerns lie.
_____
<quoted text>
No, I would not agree.
When you say "immature, ignorant leftists" ... I tend to think you're including me.
http://www.topix.com/forum/denver/TN5SE8P0HVT...
_____
<quoted text>
Hardly. Nobody is taking any rights from you. The emotional and irrational motivations are found in Alabama bunkers.

Then we agree.

Why would you think I was including you? Is there a actual “immature leftist party”? You are certainly 1000 times more mature that Barefoot2626 is…

Not based on the proposals presented by Democrat leadership… And as for the last part of your statement... It's another thing we can agree on.

[barefoot2626]

Respect71 wrote:

<quoted text>
Such a little boy.

Wipe you chin, honey.

You dish it out....

[barefoot2626]

Respect71 wrote:

<quoted text>
Enlighten us…

posted.

[barefoot2626]

Respect71 wrote:

And the OBVIOUS of that you know nothing about Reagan or economics what so ever.

I'll point to me proving you know very little and what little you know you lied about.

flagged for off topic.

[barefoot2626]

Respect71 wrote:

<quoted text>
What did Reagan do to cause the high unemployment?

Posted & still off topic.

flagged.

[barefoot2626]

Respect71 wrote:

You are certainly 1000 times more mature that Barefoot2626 is…

I have to laugh at hypocritical psses who start insulting and then cry like five year olds who have dropped their candy.

[barefoot2626]

Respect71 wrote:

Not based on the proposals presented by Democrat leadership…

Jengal: we Republicans have to stop being the stupid party...