Obama: Gun-control advocates have to listen more

Jan 27, 2013 | Posted by: roboblogger | Full story: WOI

16, 2013, file photo, President Barack Obama, accompanied by Vice President Joe Biden, talks about proposals to reduce gun violence at the White House in Washington.

Comments

Showing posts 1 - 20 of665
< prev page
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:

“Obama Shames the USA”

Since: Apr 09

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1
Jan 27, 2013
 

Judged:

5

4

4

Jun 13, 2011 –“Racism against black people may be the strongest form of racism in China."
Be careful what you wish for.

“Obama Shames the USA”

Since: Apr 09

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2
Jan 27, 2013
 

Judged:

4

4

4

Biden IS Earl Mott
;.

From Ruthless People (1986)
Carol: You get that tape of Sam Stone finishing off his wife, and that man will give us anything we want for the rest of his life!
Earl Mott: Yeah! Then we're off to Haiti.
Carol: Not Haiti, Tahiti!
Earl Mott: Oh... I knew that.
Cracker

House Springs, MO

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#3
Jan 27, 2013
 

Judged:

5

4

4

Terrorist Obama shitting on Americans again and again !
When Terrorist Obama and Hillary Traitor are hung for Treason, it should be televised for the world to see !
:)
Our defective president

San Antonio, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5
Jan 27, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Obamma says he hase a great respect for the decades old tradition of hunting....

He says.....

But has he seen the movie The Patriot to understand,

PERSONAL Protection, hunting AND National security are intertwined?

Did ya ever thing we'd have a constitutional scholar skirt the Constitution?
And have his recess appointments declared UNconstitutional?

Did ya ever thing the Fort Hook massacre was a workplace violence episode and NOT a mad muslim terrorist event?

Obamma doesn't yet get it,
The lines at gun shows are testimony to trust in his regime!
Obamma vs GOP on guns

San Antonio, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#6
Jan 27, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

1

Obamma cries the GOP is unwilling to compromise on guns....
And he fails to grasp

SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED......
Obamma vs GOP on guns

San Antonio, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7
Jan 27, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

1

Gun show lines tell it all,

Trust in obamma?

HELL NO!
xxxrayted

Beachwood, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#9
Jan 27, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Obamma vs GOP on guns wrote:
Obamma cries the GOP is unwilling to compromise on guns....
And he fails to grasp
SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED......
These idiotic gun control measures were never designed to pass. They were designed to promote their lies.

DumBama introduces legislation that is not only unconstitutional, but knows will never get beyond a Republican Congress. Then he and his minions promote that Republicans want more school children to die. It matters not that any of these measures would have stopped the last several school shootings, but his followers just believe what the Democrat politicians tell them.

We've seen this before. Republicans war against women, pushing granny off a cliff in a wheelchair, Republicans stopping job creation, Republicans want to pollute the air and water. We all know what this is about.

This is just one more.

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10
Jan 27, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

1

Obamma vs GOP on guns wrote:
Obamma cries the GOP is unwilling to compromise on guns....
And he fails to grasp

SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED......
Correct.

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#11
Jan 27, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>These idiotic gun control measures were never designed to pass. They were designed to promote their lies.

DumBama introduces legislation that is not only unconstitutional, but knows will never get beyond a Republican Congress. Then he and his minions promote that Republicans want more school children to die. It matters not that any of these measures would have stopped the last several school shootings, but his followers just believe what the Democrat politicians tell them.

We've seen this before. Republicans war against women, pushing granny off a cliff in a wheelchair, Republicans stopping job creation, Republicans want to pollute the air and water. We all know what this is about.

This is just one more.
That, and the progressives are using it to distract conservatives while their devious real agenda goes on behind the scenes.
I just saw it on another thread. Why Republicans are poised to lose the Second Amendment battle. Or something close to that.
Apparently, the real agenda is to keep us distracted, while they blackmail the gun manufacturers with stock investment withdrawal, among other things.
xxxrayted

Beachwood, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#12
Jan 28, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Dr-Sniper wrote:
<quoted text>
That, and the progressives are using it to distract conservatives while their devious real agenda goes on behind the scenes.
I just saw it on another thread. Why Republicans are poised to lose the Second Amendment battle. Or something close to that.
Apparently, the real agenda is to keep us distracted, while they blackmail the gun manufacturers with stock investment withdrawal, among other things.
I think the picture is much larger which is typical of Democrats.

Democrats heavily rely on government dependents. A good percentage of those dependents are victims. Victims love Democrats and Democrats love victims. The more victims and government dependents, the more those people need Democrats. After all, if you are not a victim and don't need government support, who needs Democrats?

Violent crime has gone down in our country and has been the last couple of decades. It's proportional to more lenient gun laws for innocent civilians and the increase of Concealed Carry Permits. People are taking care of themselves.

Less victims? The hell you say! Now we Democrats have to find a way to create more victims. How can we do that? I know! Sandy Hook!

The legislation being discussed would allow citizens to only have revolver guns. That puts us at an extreme disadvantage to the criminals who will continue using semi-automatics. It weakens our ability to defend ourselves and family. It makes more of us victims, and Democrats are loving it.
Researcher

Killeen, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#13
Jan 28, 2013
 
WASHINGTON (AP)- President Barack Obama says gun-control advocates should be better listeners in the debate over firearms in America.

In an interview with The New Republic, Obama says he has "a profound respect" for the tradition of hunting that dates back for generations.

"And I think those who dismiss that out of hand make a big mistake. Part of being able to move this forward is understanding the reality of guns in urban areas are very different from the realities of guns in rural areas," he says.

Sounds very sensible and reasonable to me.
xxxrayted

Beachwood, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#15
Jan 28, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

1

Researcher wrote:
WASHINGTON (AP)- President Barack Obama says gun-control advocates should be better listeners in the debate over firearms in America.
In an interview with The New Republic, Obama says he has "a profound respect" for the tradition of hunting that dates back for generations.
"And I think those who dismiss that out of hand make a big mistake. Part of being able to move this forward is understanding the reality of guns in urban areas are very different from the realities of guns in rural areas," he says.
Sounds very sensible and reasonable to me.
Except for the fact that hunters are only in single digit numbers (percentage wise) when it comes to gun owners. People don't care about hunting, they care about protecting themselves and their families.

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#16
Jan 28, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

1

xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>I think the picture is much larger which is typical of Democrats.

Democrats heavily rely on government dependents. A good percentage of those dependents are victims. Victims love Democrats and Democrats love victims. The more victims and government dependents, the more those people need Democrats. After all, if you are not a victim and don't need government support, who needs Democrats?

Violent crime has gone down in our country and has been the last couple of decades. It's proportional to more lenient gun laws for innocent civilians and the increase of Concealed Carry Permits. People are taking care of themselves.

Less victims? The hell you say! Now we Democrats have to find a way to create more victims. How can we do that? I know! Sandy Hook!

The legislation being discussed would allow citizens to only have revolver guns. That puts us at an extreme disadvantage to the criminals who will continue using semi-automatics. It weakens our ability to defend ourselves and family. It makes more of us victims, and Democrats are loving it.
I hear you.
I've simply made up my mind, my gun rights are not changing regardless of what congress says. This is the point that I put my foot down.

Here's the link to what I referenced earlier.
http://m.townhall.com/columnists/derekhunter/...

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#17
Jan 28, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

1

Researcher wrote:
WASHINGTON (AP)- President Barack Obama says gun-control advocates should be better listeners in the debate over firearms in America.

In an interview with The New Republic, Obama says he has "a profound respect" for the tradition of hunting that dates back for generations.

"And I think those who dismiss that out of hand make a big mistake. Part of being able to move this forward is understanding the reality of guns in urban areas are very different from the realities of guns in rural areas," he says.

Sounds very sensible and reasonable to me.
How many forums have you copy and pasted this same tired old post to?

That's all nice, but hunting is an added benefit of the 2nd amendment, but not the basis for it.
truth

Norman, OK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#18
Jan 29, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

1

Why do people in pro-union states like Ohio want to vote against their own best interests? Do you not realize how miserable your Rust Belt manufacturing region would be without collective bargaining rights?

Take a look at states like Oklahoma and our citizenry compared to the blue collar citizenry of say OH or MN. You all get to have union covered apprenticeships and medical benefits to keep your common citizenry in good shape with all their teeth. Our right to work states exploit their fellow statesmen and pay us just enough to purchase the fuel to get from home to work.

The Dems are looking out for the everyday people in this country and fighting hard to reconstruct our socety by reeling in jobs that were outsourced. 4.2 million jobs sent to China for exploitative cheap labor by cut-throat Neocons who falsely label themselves conservatives, and these criminals responsible for this still receive cheers from their GOP faithful.
Researcher

Killeen, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#19
Jan 29, 2013
 

Judged:

1

truth wrote:
Why do people in pro-union states like Ohio want to vote against their own best interests? Do you not realize how miserable your Rust Belt manufacturing region would be without collective bargaining rights?
Take a look at states like Oklahoma and our citizenry compared to the blue collar citizenry of say OH or MN. You all get to have union covered apprenticeships and medical benefits to keep your common citizenry in good shape with all their teeth. Our right to work states exploit their fellow statesmen and pay us just enough to purchase the fuel to get from home to work.
The Dems are looking out for the everyday people in this country and fighting hard to reconstruct our socety by reeling in jobs that were outsourced. 4.2 million jobs sent to China for exploitative cheap labor by cut-throat Neocons who falsely label themselves conservatives, and these criminals responsible for this still receive cheers from their GOP faithful.
Thanks for an excellent comment.
xxxrayted

Beachwood, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#20
Jan 29, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

truth wrote:
Why do people in pro-union states like Ohio want to vote against their own best interests? Do you not realize how miserable your Rust Belt manufacturing region would be without collective bargaining rights?
Take a look at states like Oklahoma and our citizenry compared to the blue collar citizenry of say OH or MN. You all get to have union covered apprenticeships and medical benefits to keep your common citizenry in good shape with all their teeth. Our right to work states exploit their fellow statesmen and pay us just enough to purchase the fuel to get from home to work.
The Dems are looking out for the everyday people in this country and fighting hard to reconstruct our socety by reeling in jobs that were outsourced. 4.2 million jobs sent to China for exploitative cheap labor by cut-throat Neocons who falsely label themselves conservatives, and these criminals responsible for this still receive cheers from their GOP faithful.
Maybe what you should do is sit and think about what you wrote. Unions and China. Those two seem to have something in common: American jobs.

Government can't force us to purchase overpriced American made union products. That's a decision individuals have to make for themselves. Unfortunately, the American consumer is focused on price--not quality or solidarity.

Unions are at their lowest amount since the union boom in the 70's. It's fading fast because people realize that unions are a thing of the past. American consumers won't support them and we can't sell overpriced products to other countries. Couple that with automation, and we have all the makings for less jobs in the country.

So how do we get jobs back? We must work for lower wages. Nobody wants to work for lower wages, but it's either that or don't work at all.

The days of doing an idiots job and making a great living are over. That's something we are just going to have to deal with. Unions and denial are the way to solve the problem. It will only make things worse.
xxxrayted

Beachwood, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#21
Jan 29, 2013
 
Correction: Are not the way to solve the problem.
GUN GRABBER

Canton, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#22
Jan 29, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

1

Bury your intruments of death in the back yard now and avoid the rush.

Gun owners so called rights are going down.

If you need a 50 round magazine to hunt deer or pigs, you need more training or a better weapon.

The country is now on Obama's side of this issue. You can't win.

There are some really good air guns on the market now. Might be a good time for you shooters to buy one.
A Nnoyed

Tunbridge Wells, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#23
Jan 29, 2013
 

Judged:

3

"President Barack Obama, accompanied by Vice President Joe Biden, talks about proposals to reduce gun violence at the White House in Washington."

is gun violence really that bad at the White House?!?

I'd imagine Obama isn't a great shot but this is what they talk about?

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 1 - 20 of665
< prev page
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••
•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••