Global warming 'undeniable,' scientis...

Global warming 'undeniable,' scientists say

There are 35524 comments on the TwinCities.com story from Jul 29, 2010, titled Global warming 'undeniable,' scientists say. In it, TwinCities.com reports that:

Scientists from around the world are providing even more evidence of global warming, one day after President Barack Obama renewed his call for climate legislation.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at TwinCities.com.

PHD

Cibolo, TX

#24455 Mar 18, 2013
SpaceBlues wrote:
<quoted text>Did you speak personally or via the Pope?
Did you speak personally to the devil or via a fallen angle?
Bushwhacker

Seattle, WA

#24456 Mar 18, 2013
If you meant angel, we understand... Just dumb and bumbler in a single toilet bowl...
PHD

Cibolo, TX

#24457 Mar 18, 2013
No I meant angle. That would correspond with the scientific science fiction useless cut and paste babble you believe in. There isn't a toilet bowl large enough to flush you know to mankind. Based on you being bush whacked and clap flapper running amuck it's understood why you always in a state of confusion.
Bushwhacker

Seattle, WA

#24458 Mar 18, 2013
If you meant angel, we understand...Either way, you're really dumb. Just dumb and bumbler in a single toilet bowl...
Rusty Houser

Smiths Station, AL

#24460 Mar 18, 2013
The people who want to discuss global warming are so in the dark they haven't seen the forest for the trees.If there is global warming,it is due to overpopulation.That problem is solved with 1 simple rule:Before any gov't check is collected,that person must be sterilized.
Bushwhacker

Seattle, WA

#24461 Mar 18, 2013
Rusty Houser wrote:
The people who want to discuss global warming are so in the dark they haven't seen the forest for the trees.If there is global warming,it is due to overpopulation.That problem is solved with 1 simple rule:Before any gov't check is collected,that person must be sterilized.
Let's start with RawMoney's parents....

“I Luv Carbon Dioxide”

Since: Dec 08

Home, sweet home.

#24462 Mar 18, 2013
HomoSapiensLaptopicus wrote:
Why don't you try learning some science? There IS a way to tell when CO2 is from the burning of fossil fuels. Ever hear of isotope ratios? The CO2 that humans have emitted by burning FFs is ancient carbon, depleted of C-13 & C-14.
CO2 from geological sources are ancient carbon too.

.
HomoSapiensLaptopicus wrote:
CO2 from most other sources is not depleted this way. That's one of the ways we know that the rise in CO2 we've seen since the 1800s is entirely anthropogenic in origin.
CO2 from organic sources is not depleted like ancient geological carbon; true. But there's no way to tell CO2 from your car from CO2 from an underground hot spring or a volcano.

.
HomoSapiensLaptopicus wrote:
We are not doing a conscious experiment by raising atmospheric CO2.
We use fossil fuel because we want to go somewhere, to cool something or to warm our homes and cook our food. That's not an experiment; that's life.

.
HomoSapiensLaptopicus wrote:
We are INADVERTENTLY doing that very, very dangerous experiment on the only home we have.
Experiments can't be done inadvertently, they are controlled and measured. If you believe our CO2 emissions are an experiment then you don't understand science.

Experiments are used to test theories. There's no record of any experimental test of climate change mitigation. Therefor, climate change mitigation is a hoax.

Since: Apr 08

"the green troll"

#24463 Mar 18, 2013
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>CO2 from geological sources are ancient carbon too.
Geological sources are not emitting enough CO2 to explain the rise.

Observable fact.
SpaceBlues

United States

#24464 Mar 18, 2013
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>CO2 from geological sources are ancient carbon too.
.
<quoted text>CO2 from organic sources is not depleted like ancient geological carbon; true. But there's no way to tell CO2 from your car from CO2 from an underground hot spring or a volcano.
.
<quoted text>We use fossil fuel because we want to go somewhere, to cool something or to warm our homes and cook our food. That's not an experiment; that's life.
.
<quoted text>Experiments can't be done inadvertently, they are controlled and measured. If you believe our CO2 emissions are an experiment then you don't understand science.
Experiments are used to test theories. There's no record of any experimental test of climate change mitigation. Therefor, climate change mitigation is a hoax.
Your replies don't make scientific sense. You might fool some lay people, but not people of science.

Deniers like you should watch this video to change their position:



There you could learn the natural CO2 annual rate is 1.0001 ppm while the current man-made annual rate 2 ppm. Two times the four orders of magnitude!

Finally, you are offensive to the nth degree when you compare coal burning to a baby's breath!{Of course, you use language of indirect fooling]
SpaceBlues

United States

#24465 Mar 18, 2013
Immediate correction:

the natural CO2 annual rate is 0.0001 ppm while the current man-made annual rate 2 ppm. Two times the four orders of magnitude!

[0.0001 ppm, not 1000.1 ppm.]
jose

Angier, NC

#24466 Mar 18, 2013
Ok so 3.5 million year camel fosseles were just discovered in the canadian artic because they lived there during a period of global warming(google it) and many of you will read this and still blame everything on modern man, Those of you who do this tell me do you use clothes dryers and spew warm air into the great outdoors or do you use a clothes line and walk the walk as you talk the talk
SpaceBlues

United States

#24467 Mar 18, 2013
jose wrote:
Ok so 3.5 million year camel fosseles were just discovered in the canadian artic because they lived there during a period of global warming(google it) and many of you will read this and still blame everything on modern man,..
Another one!

Read above .. the natural CO2 annual rate is 0.0001 ppm while the current man-made annual rate 2 ppm. Two times the four orders of magnitude!

Do you understand
PHD2

Minneapolis, MN

#24468 Mar 18, 2013
Sure is cold out.

Splain that.
Bushwhacked

Seattle, WA

#24469 Mar 18, 2013
It's warmer, than any other winter in a long time....
Kyle

Rensselaer, IN

#24470 Mar 18, 2013
Jane Says wrote:
we can hold hands and sing kumbya songs to protest pipelines and wear cute t-shirts, make solar ice tea and drive our government supported Prius'. that won't change the fact that China and the Russians are developing resources and we are not. how will the air quality be over liberal states when we are under siege because we are no longer a super power nation?
So, do you support the denial of the science by the wingnuts and oil barons because you can't perceive a workable solution?
Kyle

Rensselaer, IN

#24471 Mar 18, 2013
PHD wrote:
That would correspond with the scientific science fiction useless cut and paste babble you believe in.
Think about this, tard - You can't even find anything to cut and paste. Why? Because there is no science supporting any of the (often contradictory) denialist positions.

By posting more drivel sans any science, you concede yet again.
Kyle

Rensselaer, IN

#24472 Mar 18, 2013
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>There's no record of any experimental test of climate change mitigation. Therefor, climate change mitigation is a hoax.
You said this a few times, but it's so strangely formulated that I don't understand your point. Do you accept the science of climate change, but reject doing anything about it - supposedly on scientific grounds?
PHD2

Minneapolis, MN

#24473 Mar 18, 2013
Kyle wrote:
<quoted text>
So, do you support the denial of the science by the wingnuts and oil barons because you can't perceive a workable solution?
The earth is flat and Russia and China are on the other side and the pollution they produce stays on their side of the planet.
Kyle

Rensselaer, IN

#24474 Mar 18, 2013
jose wrote:
Ok so 3.5 million year camel fosseles were just discovered in the canadian artic because they lived there during a period of global warming(google it) and many of you will read this and still blame everything on modern man, Those of you who do this tell me do you use clothes dryers and spew warm air into the great outdoors or do you use a clothes line and walk the walk as you talk the talk
Moronic denier argument #1- Climate changed before, so we can dismiss all the science.

It's utterly nonsensical. There isn't even a hint of logic there.
Kyle

Rensselaer, IN

#24475 Mar 18, 2013
PHD2 wrote:
Sure is cold out.
Splain that.
It's winter, you flippin' moron. Thanks for the millionth example of moronic denier argument #2.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Barack Obama Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 1 min Incognito4Ever 1,395,122
News Donald Trump Is Unfit to Lead 3 min Tom Clancey 36
News The President has failed us (Jun '12) 5 min Sharrp Shooter 388,061
News 'Injustice': Harrisburg's immigrant community f... 13 min wild child 1
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 14 min Dr Guru 216,714
News News 28 Mins Ago 'Not the America we want': Oba... 39 min WasteWater 278
News Britain pressured for quick EU split as Brexit ... 46 min tomin cali 43
More from around the web