Obama's non-response to Assad's chemical weapons would encourage a nuclear Iran

Apr 26, 2013 Full story: Debka 34

President Barack Obama faced a tough decision Friday, April 26, on how to handle Bashar Assad's use of chemical weapons just a month after he warned it would be "game changer." The US intelligence community and the White House have now produced evidence that Assad has used chemical weapons against his own people and so crossed the red line Obama ... (more)

Full Story
First Prev
of 2
Next Last
zoobolo

Mesa, AZ

#1 Apr 27, 2013
What a jock... that Assad of Syria is English puppet and his father too ...just like other Arab puppet leaders..Syrian is sucking money out of America Saudi Russia and Iran ...all that killing is for money...they will do anything for money just like their other cousin Arabs and Jews ..what a jock ..you give them money the killing never stop... No money they eat each others shit..lol
Peace for all

Calgary, Canada

#3 Apr 27, 2013
Peace comes first and with the heavy weights China, Russia and America having their own interests and spheres of influences there, no one should disturb no one.They should hold peace above every thing.

Just one mistake started WW2 between Germany and Russia as most bloody front that killed 40 million people just within those 2 countries.

WW3 won't leave any life on planet earth with Russia and America and China each possessing thousands of very powerful all annihilating monsters.

Just look at human life as beauty and charm.And so we don't need wars.

We must all love peace for all as peace is life and happiness and most beautiful thing to possess.

WE MUST LOVE PEACE FOR ALL AND HATE UGLY WARS.AVOID SHEDDING EVEN THE FIRST DROP OF DEAR HUMANITY'S BLOOD.
well

Hamilton, Canada

#4 Apr 27, 2013
Obuma has failed again.
bottlecap

Orlando, FL

#5 Apr 27, 2013
First, NOBODY knows for sure if Assad did, in fact, use chemical weapons.

Second, he has no authority to commit the US Military to involve itself in Syria's affairs. He Did So in Libya and he made himself a WAR CRIMINAL.

Third, the "rebels" are being led by Al Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood, sworn enemies of the United States.
==========
The ONLY Course open is keeping a hands off approach and letting middle-easterners sort out their own problems.
Avenger

Kitchener, Canada

#6 Apr 27, 2013
bottlecap wrote:
First, NOBODY knows for sure if Assad did, in fact, use chemical weapons.
Second, he has no authority to commit the US Military to involve itself in Syria's affairs. He Did So in Libya and he made himself a WAR CRIMINAL.
Third, the "rebels" are being led by Al Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood, sworn enemies of the United States.
==========
The ONLY Course open is keeping a hands off approach and letting middle-easterners sort out their own problems.
False Obama is not a war criminal UN approval was acquired.
False rebels in Syria estimates are 10% of which are al Nusra front.
Try actually following the situations.
mxlplx

United States

#7 Apr 27, 2013
I thought Obama did respond by saying "I wanna see some proof".
mxlplx

United States

#8 Apr 27, 2013
Avenger wrote:
<quoted text>
False rebels in Syria estimates are 10% of which are al Nusra front.
That 10%(or whatever) is leading the pack.
Avenger wrote:
<quoted text>
Try actually following the situations.
I suggest you do likewise.
bottlecap

Orlando, FL

#9 Apr 27, 2013
Avenger wrote:
<quoted text>
False Obama is not a war criminal UN approval was acquired.
False rebels in Syria estimates are 10% of which are al Nusra front.
Try actually following the situations.
UN has no authority over the US Military. What Obama did in Libya was unconstitutional. Also, it is time to kick that NAZI Bankster Organization of Leeches(the UN) out of this country.

I don't agree with Malik Zulu Shabazz very often, but here he tells it like it is.



Yes, we heard the same thing about moderates in Libya and Egypt that you are now saying about Syria. Clearly, if Assad falls, the extremists will use force to take over.
News

Syria

#10 Apr 27, 2013
Do not push Obama to do something wrong, and involve the US in a matter that is bigger than anyone..
Remember Iraq and Afgahnistan
WARNING

Syria

#11 Apr 27, 2013
Do not push Obama to do something wrong and involve the US in a matter that is bigger than anyone..
Remember Iraq and Afghanistan..Surely everybody had also forgotten what happened in Vietnam...This time Russia and China + Iran are on the watch..so be very very careful...
No more old games based on hypothetical ideas. The reality is a 3rd world war. So do not play with fire and remember that Syria is a very difficult number to deal with, for the sake of all !!!
Dead gay

AOL

#12 Apr 27, 2013
Why are we training georgians to kill the pro-russian people of Ossethia? Why is the US trying to wipe Talibans in both Afghanistan and Pakistan? Why are we endorsing Chechen rebels? Why do we terrorize the middle east and eastern Africa with drones?

The chickens will come home to roost!
Peace for all

Calgary, Canada

#13 Apr 27, 2013
Russia and China united have not only warned, they have also moved the troops and the nukes in the area.

Please for the sake of the life of all humanity on planet earth, do not do some thing that might trigger WW3 and demise us all.

Peace comes first and we must not do any thing to slip into WW3.

we must love peace for all and hate the ugly wars.

PEACE, PEACE, PEACE,PEACE WE SING
PEACE IS THE MOST BEAUTIFUL THING
BURRY THE NUKES, BURRY YOUR GUN
TAKE PEACE FLOWERS,AND HAVE FUN

LOVE ALL HUMANS ALL SO PRETTY
OF EACH COUNTRY, VILLAGE , CITY
WAR IS UGLY,KILLS AND HURTS
WITH WW3, WISH NONE SO FLIRTS

PEACEIS LOVE, PEACE IS GLORY
OF THE WAR, PLEASE TELL NO TORY
WW3 WILL KILL US ALL
PEACE IS ONLY LOVE IN THAT WE FALL
Michael

Lynbrook, NY

#14 Apr 27, 2013
Assad is going down soon, with or without U.S. intervention.

Think about it, all that is possible now is that he clings to power, but at what cost? Would not such eventually prompt a war between Turkey and Syria? It could also drag in Egypt, the Saudis, Qatar, Lebanon, and of course Israel...
whodunit

United States

#15 Apr 27, 2013
Are you that Armenian Misha mystery guy that was influencing the elder Boston bomber?
whodunit

United States

#16 Apr 27, 2013
Saudis will never be dragged into anything. They're used to paying others to do the dragging.
Shinichiro Takizawa

Akiruno, Japan

#17 Apr 28, 2013
Chechen Independence war, South Ossetia war, Xinjiang (Uyghur) Independence war, Tibetan Independence war
must be begun now now now!

Please think.

Syrian Civil-war makes 1-Million refuges.

Chechen Independence war and South Ossetia war
can destroy Russia.

Chechen Independence war and South Ossetia war
can make tens of Millions of refuges in Russia.

Xinjiang (Uyghur) Independence war, Tibetan Independence war
can destroy China.

Chechen Independence war and South Ossetia war
can make 100-Million refuges in China.

And, as a result,
Germany and Japan will be destroyed collaterally .
Of course, North-Korea and South-Korea will be destroyed collaterally.

The U.S. must withdraw her American-Forces from Japan, from South-Korea, from Singapore,. from Asia, from Europe, from Afghanistan, and from Pakistan!
The U.S. must make weapons, ships, steel, airplanes, PCs, cars, and home-electric-appliances in the U.S.,
and the U.S. must export those weapons, ships, steel, airplanes, PCs, cars, and home-electric-appliances from the U.S. to the world!

Those-countries which rob the U.S. of money and jobs
must protect themselves by themselves!

We America will win!
This is war!
We America is at war!
We America must win!

We are Americans!

I love the U.S.A.!
I love all Americans!
Remember Pearl Harbor!
Shinichiro Takizawa

Akiruno, Japan

#18 Apr 28, 2013
Russia, China, Germany, Japan, South-Korea, Taiwan, North-Korea, and Iran are evil-empires!
Syrian

Waterford, CT

#19 Apr 28, 2013
bottlecap wrote:
<quoted text>
UN has no authority over the US Military. What Obama did in Libya was unconstitutional. Also, it is time to kick that NAZI Bankster Organization of Leeches(the UN) out of this country.
I don't agree with Malik Zulu Shabazz very often, but here he tells it like it is.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =3z7bj7Bi9hAXX
Yes, we heard the same thing about moderates in Libya and Egypt that you are now saying about Syria. Clearly, if Assad falls, the extremists will use force to take over.
Absolutely agree!!
Syrian

Waterford, CT

#20 Apr 28, 2013
well wrote:
Obuma has failed again.
Obama is just doing what the vast majority of the American population wants him to do... Keep America out of another idiotic Middle Eastern war! They have seen over a decade of fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan, over 7,000 young American lives lost, and over a Trillion taxpayer dollars blown... with little to show for it.
Shinichiro Takizawa

Akiruno, Japan

#21 Apr 28, 2013
You may know "Monroe Doctrine"[1] and America's not joined "League of Nations"[2].
These are the Republicans' traditions.

What is more,
your loving British once said "Splendid isolation"[3].

You are the communists.
Or, you are supporters of feudal-society!
You are NEVER capitalists!
You are NEVER supporters of Democracy!

The U.S. must withdraw her American-Forces from Japan, from South-Korea, from Singapore, from Asia, from Europe, from Afghanistan, and from Pakistan.
The U.S. must wothdraw her Ametrican-Forces now from the wars in which the U.S. now involves.
Of course, the U.S. muist win therse wars now now now!

These are our America's traditions!
Remember Pearl Harbor!

[1]
[Wikipedia]
League of Nations
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/League_of_Nation...

On 8 July 1919, Wilson returned to the United States and embarked on a nation-wide campaign to secure the support of the American people for their countrys entry into the League.

Support, particularly from Republicans, was scanty at best.

Despite Wilson's efforts to establish and promote the League, for which he was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in October 1919, the United States did not join.
Opposition in the Senate, particularly from Republican politicians Henry Cabot Lodge and William Borah and especially in regard to Article X of the Covenant, ensured that the United States would not ratify the agreement.

[2]
[Wikipedia]
Monroe Doctrine
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monroe_Doctorine
The Monroe Doctrine was a policy of the United States introduced on December 2, 1823.
It stated that further efforts by European nations to colonize land or interfere with states in North or South America would be viewed as acts of aggression, requiring U.S. intervention.
At the same time, the Doctrine noted that the United States would neither interfere with existing European colonies nor meddle in the internal concerns of European countries.

President James Monroe first stated the doctrine during his seventh annual State of the Union Address to Congress.
It became a defining moment in the foreign policy of the United States and one of its longest-standing tenets, and would be invoked by many U.S. statesmen and several U.S. presidents, including Theodore Roosevelt, John F. Kennedy, Lyndon B. Johnson, Ronald Reagan and many others.

The intent and impact of the Monroe Doctrine persisted with only minor variations for almost two centuries.
Its primary objective was to free the newly independent colonies of Latin America from European intervention and avoid situations which could make the New World a battleground for the Old World powers.
The doctrine asserted that the New World and the Old World were to remain distinctly separate spheres of influence, for they were composed of entirely separate and independent nations.

[3]
[Wikipedia]
Splendid isolation
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Splendid_isolati...
Splendid Isolation is a popular conception of the foreign policy pursued by Britain during the late 19th century, under the Conservative premierships of Benjamin Disraeli and the Marquess of Salisbury.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Barack Obama Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Vatican backs Obama as Nobel Peace Prize Winner (Oct '09) 15 min TehO 30
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 20 min Bluestater 1,192,476
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 37 min Check1223 51,553
McConnell wants to fast-track Iran bill 57 min RADIO 11
Senate fails to override Obama's veto of Keysto... 1 hr Bob 5
Anti-gay Tenn. billboard stirs religion debate 2 hr KiMare 3,979
Obama: 'Now is the moment' for police to make c... 4 hr Tell it like it is 70
More from around the web