Parliament has not had assent to a bill refused by a monarch in over 300 years. There is a point. Refute it.<quoted text>
You don't have a point, SuperFAG.
You have humiliated nobody but yourself. You have even admitted that all you do is try to refute me on word usage because you cannot attack the arguments themselves.<quoted text>
You have a SuperEGO that won't allow you to let it go after I have already humiliated you.
It is your fault, dear.
That is why, manchild, all you can do is project your own issues onto other posters.
I was completely unaware that you are an omniscient being that knows everybody inside out.<quoted text>And I still make more money than you and have time for the farm and watch TV three or four hours a day.
How about attacking the arguments instead of the person?<quoted text>
I KNOW, SuperFAG, you can't keep up.
I would suggest putting less thought in your posts but you clearly... are doing that already.
Do I really need to post that big nasty list of points you cannot refute once again?
In your world, correct. In reality, no.<quoted text>We've already established you don't know what "loaded question" is.
Or "red herring".
To this day you refuse to address the point itself.<quoted text>And of course you insisted "unanimous" means "almost everybody".
Why, for all your talk of "humiliating" me, can you never actually address the arguments?