Lesbian couple in gay marriage case prepares for Supreme Court decision

Full story: Fox News 1,568
Big change is coming to the lives of the lesbian couple at the center of the fight for same-sex marriage in California no matter how the Supreme Court decides their case. Full Story

“You Get My Truth Here!”

Since: May 09

Nonya!

#730 Apr 10, 2013
Xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text>I don't agree with his methodology. It makes his conclusions bogus.
"studies on which I would rely" is speculative comment at best. You have no idea on what I rely. Like everything else you do, it's just another self-serving lie to try and change the subject. Besides, we're not talking about 'those' studies. We're talking about Regnerus.
Are you a social scientist????

“You Get My Truth Here!”

Since: May 09

Nonya!

#731 Apr 10, 2013
Rick in Kansas wrote:
<quoted text>And I'll raise you 200 Sociologists and other researchers who have serious issues with both the study and questionable peer review process it underwent:
http://familyinequality.wordpress.com/2012/06...
As they do with 'your' studies...doesn't seem to bother you with them....
It was actually approved and published by Social Science Research, a journal in the massive Elsevier family of scientific journals (2700+), it on its own has nowhere near 30 million readers, trusting or not.
I know who published it, and they actually do confirm 30 million scientists refer to them as well as other journals...sorry...you lose...
Do you wanna know what the American Sociological Association really thinks about the Regnerus study?
NOPE!
Did you know that his paper was written and submitted to Social Science Research for review nearly a month BEFORE he had even received the data?
So??? He was showing them his research criteria, the results didn't matter at that time...
Did you know that once he did actually have the data to analyze, it took all of five days to have the completed version of his study back under final review?
Are you complaining because he worked hard on his study, or he didn't work hard enough?
Did you know that the entire length of time that it took for his study to go from conclusions submitted without statistical support to peer reviewed science was all of six weeks?
How's it feel to be a useful idiot?
So now you admit it was in fact 'peer-reviewed'. So what it only too six weeks??...the results of this study might have been highly anticipated by the social science community at large....ever think of that???
How does it feel to bring up such pointless drivel....
Xavier Breath

Hoboken, NJ

#732 Apr 10, 2013
Get That Fool wrote:
<quoted text>
He's aready been cleared of that lie....and the journal is not 'second rate'...it's actually very well known and respected...
He was NOT cleared. How many fucking times do you need to be told that there was no formal investigation? The itty-bitty shitty committee said there wasn't enough evidence to investigate.

And yes, the journal and it's editor are well known right-wing bigots. They are only respected by people who don't know any better.
Xavier Breath

Hoboken, NJ

#733 Apr 10, 2013
Get That Fool wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you a social scientist????
I have a master's degree in psychology, so YES. I had to do plenty of research and paper writing... back BEFORE computers were ubiquitous. We did it the old fashioned way in a LIBRARY, and we ran the statistics MANUALLY.

So don't tell me I don't know what I'm talking about, bitch. Regnerus' study would NEVER have been published anywhere else but that rag. The peer-review was a colossal JOKE.

“You Get My Truth Here!”

Since: May 09

Nonya!

#734 Apr 10, 2013
Xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text>
I have a master's degree in psychology, so YES. I had to do plenty of research and paper writing... back BEFORE computers were ubiquitous. We did it the old fashioned way in a LIBRARY, and we ran the statistics MANUALLY.
You know what's funny is, "MonaLott" used to make the same claim...LOL!!!!
So don't tell me I don't know what I'm talking about,. Regnerus' study would NEVER have been published anywhere else but that rag. The peer-review was a colossal JOKE.
Then you have to discredit every single scientists that reads it and uses its information....which of course we know you can't do....(YAWN).....you are useless....

“You Get My Truth Here!”

Since: May 09

Nonya!

#735 Apr 10, 2013
Xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text>
He was NOT cleared. How many ******* times do you need to be told that there was no formal investigation? The itty-bitty ****** committee said there wasn't enough evidence to investigate.
And yes, the journal and it's editor are well known right-wing bigots. They are only respected by people who don't know any better.
What does your phsycology degree say about your temper?? LOL!!

He WAS cleared, exhonerated, and VINDICATED....you lose...

The journal is NOT discredited in any way...you lose again...

“ reality, what a concept”

Since: Nov 07

this one

#736 Apr 10, 2013
Get That Fool wrote:
As they do with 'your' studies...doesn't seem to bother you with them....
Yeah, right.
Get That Fool wrote:
I know who published it, and they actually do confirm 30 million scientists refer to them as well as other journals...sorry...you lose...
No you didn't dear, not until I told you anyways. You were touting the company that owns the journal as being the ones who published it. Social Science Research has nowhere near 30 million readers, moron.
Get That Fool wrote:
NOPE!
Of course you don't dear, the professional association in his field believes his study to be garbage. Can't let reality get in the way of your warped fantasy now can you?

As to the rest of your babbling useful idiocy in defense of this academic fraud, it's not worth repeating or responding to as once again, you have absolutely no idea what you are talking about.
Xavier Breath

Hoboken, NJ

#737 Apr 10, 2013
Get That Fool wrote:
<quoted text>
You know what's funny is, "MonaLott" used to make the same claim...LOL!!!!
<quoted text>
Then you have to discredit every single scientists that reads it and uses its information....which of course we know you can't do....(YAWN).....you are useless....
No kidding. It's not a secret that I used the name Mona Lott.

I have to discredit? Honey, whoever supports this junk study discredits themselves. Anyone who "uses it" looks like a self-serving bigot. It's either good science or it's not. And in this case, it most definitely isn't. You can say it is, but it's no secret what a clueless hag you are. If one doesn't study gay parents, one CANNOT draw ANY conclusions about them. Regnerus did not research whether his study subject parents were gay or lesbian. He admits as much in an article in Slate, where he wrote apropos of his survey question in which respondents were asked whether their parent had ever had a same-sex romantic relationship. THAT is piss poor methodology.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#739 Apr 10, 2013
Girls, girls, girls.

You can't produce a counter study.

You can't explain how professional organizations validated clearly bogus studies.

You can't explain how every default hetero family fails in comparison with biological parents, but lesbian default parents BEST them.

Now you want us to believe your opinion about Regnerus?

Riiiiggghht.

Smirk.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#741 Apr 10, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
The studies 'validated' by your 'professional' organizations.
And they say that same sex couples can be better parents than some hetero couples, like I stated? cool!
Nobody

Dallas, TX

#742 Apr 11, 2013
#1 SS people CAN'T create another being.#2 your bodies are NOT made for SS.#3 It is NOT a normal thing.#4 SS will screw up a childs head.#5 If SS is ok then having sex with your brother or sister or even your cosins should be ok too, acording to all you SS people.
#6 Do what you want people just leave it out of the goverment, its just costing us more money for another BS thing.

Since: Apr 09

Location hidden

#743 Apr 11, 2013
Nobody wrote:
#1 SS people CAN'T create another being.#2 your bodies are NOT made for SS.#3 It is NOT a normal thing.#4 SS will screw up a childs head.#5 If SS is ok then having sex with your brother or sister or even your cosins should be ok too, acording to all you SS people.
#6 Do what you want people just leave it out of the goverment, its just costing us more money for another BS thing.
#1 So?
#2 Wanna bet?
#3 Homosexuality is perfectly normal for homosexuals
#4 Prove it
#5 That makes no sense, but you're grasping at this point...shocker
#6 So...equality has a price tag? LOL

Same sex marriage is inevitable. Deal with it.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#744 Apr 11, 2013
Nobody wrote:
#1 SS people CAN'T create another being.#2 your bodies are NOT made for SS.#3 It is NOT a normal thing.#4 SS will screw up a childs head.#5 If SS is ok then having sex with your brother or sister or even your cosins should be ok too, acording to all you SS people.
#6 Do what you want people just leave it out of the goverment, its just costing us more money for another BS thing.
1. irrelevant as there is absolutely no requirement of the ability to procreate to enter into marriage.

2. you are incorrect. the human body is perfectly made for sex of all kinds and flavors.

3. homosexuality is a perfectly natural and normal part of our species, always has been, always will be.

4. No, no it will not. Many., many perfectly well adjusted people have been raised by SS couples. Prejudicial bigots like you will screw up your kinds minds far worse than just having a ss couple as parents.

5. stupidest thing I've ever heard...go ahead, if that is what you want.

6. marriage is the purview of the gov't. only the gov't, as it always has been and always will be.

how is it costing the gov't anything? people being able to keep the wealth they earned is not costing the gov't anything. unless you are a wild-assed liberal that doesn't understand economics.

“ reality, what a concept”

Since: Nov 07

this one

#745 Apr 11, 2013
Nobody wrote:
#1 SS people CAN'T create another being.
They can't? Who knew? I really don't mind breaking this to you, but pretty much ever since the law has allowed the biologically impossible to be a legal reality for straight folk who are unable to create the old fashioned way, same sex couples have been given the same respect.
Nobody wrote:
#2 your bodies are NOT made for SS.
It wasn't? I've never run into any particular difficulties.
Nobody wrote:
#3 It is NOT a normal thing.
It isn't? For whom? You? Us? Everybody? Who determined this?
Nobody wrote:
#4 SS will screw up a childs head.
Sweetie, YOU are seriously screwed in the head and you were raised by straight folk, I'm presuming. As long as we keep idiots like YOU away from children, you'll be amazed at how easily they'll get that some folk are homosexual and the rest aren't.
Nobody wrote:
#5 If SS is ok then having sex with your brother or sister or even your cosins should be ok too, acording to all you SS people.
While I imagine that there are folk among the gay and no problem with the gay, not gay folk that also support the notion of incestuous relationships, for whatever reasons, but their opinion is far from universal. Personally, I don't want to have sex with my siblings, never did and would not have been okay with it if it were tried. I know there will NEVER be legal recognition for sibling marriages, what they do in their spare time is up to them. FYI, the only place where you still cannot legally boink your cousin is in Kentucky, they also don't let you marry them either, a restriction on marriage in only about half the states.
Nobody wrote:
#6 Do what you want people just leave it out of the goverment, its just costing us more money for another BS thing.
Dear, if we want our legal rights protected we have to work with the government to do so. If y'all hadn't done so much kicking and screaming in being dragged out of your irrational bigotry, it wouldn't have cost near as much.

“You Get My Truth Here!”

Since: May 09

Nonya!

#746 Apr 11, 2013
Rick in Kansas wrote:
<quoted textNo you didn't dear, not until I told you anyways. You were touting the company that owns the journal as being the ones who published it.
Which I got from the journal's website...I 'know' who published it...you told me nothing new....
Social Science Research has nowhere near 30 million readers, moron.
That 'degree' you lie about sure didn't teach you anything...
Of course you don't dear, the professional association in his field believes his study to be garbage. Can't let reality get in the way of your warped fantasy now can you?
Well 'Dear' many sociologists think the studies you all believe are total garbage...but we can't let reality get in the way of your warped fantasy, now can we???
As to the rest of your babbling useful idiocy in defense of this academic fraud, it's not worth repeating or responding to as once again, you have absolutely no idea what you are talking about.
The only ones calling him a fraud are from the ssm supporters groupls....so who cares...

“You Get My Truth Here!”

Since: May 09

Nonya!

#747 Apr 11, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>
1. irrelevant as there is absolutely no requirement of the ability to procreate to enter into marriage.
60% of Americans find this particular benefit of marriage 'very' relevant.....
2. you are incorrect. the human body is perfectly made for sex of all kinds and flavors.
Actually, it's not....there are a number of 'forced' sexual tests, but that doesn't mean the body is 'designed' for them....
homosexuality is a perfectly natural and normal part of our species, always has been, always will be.
It is a 'deviant' part of human sexuality...always has been, always will be....
4. No, no it will not. Many., many perfectly well adjusted people have been raised by SS couples. Prejudicial bigots like you will screw up your kinds minds far worse than just having a ss couple as parents.
...and many more have not...do they count too??
Francisco dAnconia

Montpelier, VT

#748 Apr 11, 2013
Xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text>
The "peers" LIED about their conflict of interest, silly shyster.
http://thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/4-regner...
Regnerus Scandal Ripped Wide Open As UT Confesses To Major, Systemic Ethics Failures
the new civil rights movement?

WOW, the rabid attacker of sources has no consistency at all..
color me not surprised.
Francisco dAnconia

Montpelier, VT

#749 Apr 11, 2013
Xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text>
"make me"?????
hahahahahaha
ahahahahahahahaha
ahahahahahahaha
You're such a sociopath.
yup, I do 98 % of the time...
you didn't realize?

I am not surprised...

typing out laughter and calling me a sociopath...
classic dude...
Francisco dAnconia

Montpelier, VT

#750 Apr 11, 2013
Xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text>I don't agree with his methodology. It makes his conclusions bogus.
.
and yet you refuse to apply those same critiques to studies with results you agree with...

why, you are a fraud, that's why.
Francisco dAnconia

Montpelier, VT

#751 Apr 11, 2013
Xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text>
I have a master's degree in psychology, so YES..
YOU LIAR.

What did you do at GE for 25 years with a PSYCHOLOGY DEGREE loser?

I smell another 1.5 million condo coming from you...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Barack Obama Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
The President has failed us (Jun '12) 21 min Quirky 284,285
Ben Carson: Race Relations Have 'Gotten Worse' ... 26 min serfs up 54
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 1 hr Guru 180,989
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 1 hr red and right 1,144,595
Obama to send 1,500 more troops to Iraq as camp... 1 hr Swedenforever 311
SC state senator refers to candidate as 'raghead' (Jun '10) 1 hr Swedenforever 1,154
Global warming 'undeniable,' scientists say (Jul '10) 1 hr red and right 33,300

Barack Obama People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE