Obama promises more than 600,000 stim...

Obama promises more than 600,000 stimulus jobs

There are 109518 comments on the Newsday story from Jun 8, 2009, titled Obama promises more than 600,000 stimulus jobs. In it, Newsday reports that:

President Barack Obama promised Monday to deliver more than 600,000 jobs through his $787 billion stimulus plan this summer, with federal agencies pumping billions into public works projects, schools and summer youth programs.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

joe

San Anselmo, CA

#115963 Jun 18, 2012
nac wrote:
<quoted text>
What are you trying to say? Do you think gun walking operations are ok? If so, did you think they were ok when Bush was doing it? Be honest.
Are they ok? I don't have a clue. Seems the concept makes sense: if you control the source it's easier to track the guns. As far as execution is concerned, I haven't a clue. This turns out to be one of those instances where an agent became a whistle-blower. I guess we have to decide whether we reward whistle-blowing or punish it. There sure doesn't seem to be anything criminal going on. Issa's on a mission.

Since: Aug 07

South Central Virginia

#115964 Jun 19, 2012
bozo3341 wrote:
we tried three stimulas plans they did not do what was promised. they did run up national debt.
Gov can't not stimulate economies. Russia, Cuba all tried and failed. Economies are stimulated when Consumers have money , confidence in the gov in charge and future to plan ahead and spend money.
Our problem is Federal state and city governments take too much money out of the economy leaving consumers with too little money to effect the direction of our economy.
The people in charge of federal state and city government today have guided us to where we are today. if you like your economic statis today vote for the people in charge
If you need change vote for new faces ideas parties to lead cause the people running things now do not know how to change anything or they would have done so by now.
BS, Government can stimululate economies. However, you are correct that consumers, where ever they may be located, must spend in order to sustain an economy.

stim·u·late
&#8194; &#8194;[stim-yuh-leyt] Show IPA verb, stim·u·lat·ed, stim·u·lat·ing.

verb (used with object)
1. to rouse to action or effort, as by encouragement or pressure; spur on; incite: to stimulate his interest in mathematics.

2. Physiology, Medicine/Medical . to excite (a nerve, gland, etc.) to its functional activity.

3. to invigorate (a person) by a food or beverage containing a stimulant, as coffee, tea, or alcoholic liquor.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/stimul...

The government can stimulate by spending on infrastructure, giving people money, putting into place policies that encourage increased activity, cutting taxes, etc....

By far, the best and the longest lasing effects are through improvements to infrastructure that increase efficiency or lower costs for business activity.

Since: Aug 07

South Central Virginia

#115965 Jun 19, 2012
bozo3341 wrote:
we tried three stimulas plans they did not do what was promised. they did run up national debt.
Gov can't not stimulate economies. Russia, Cuba all tried and failed. Economies are stimulated when Consumers have money , confidence in the gov in charge and future to plan ahead and spend money.
Our problem is Federal state and city governments take too much money out of the economy leaving consumers with too little money to effect the direction of our economy.
The people in charge of federal state and city government today have guided us to where we are today. if you like your economic statis today vote for the people in charge
If you need change vote for new faces ideas parties to lead cause the people running things now do not know how to change anything or they would have done so by now.
Our problem is not taxes. Our problems are:

1. A general lack of jobs and the number of jobs are decreasing due to technological progress. Cell phones replacing land-lines puts people out of work from copper mines, copper wire manufacturers, linemen, those that grow the trees for poles, pole manufactures, those that install the lines in homes and apartments, and others. They are replaced by much fewer workers manufacturing and installing cell towers and hanging transmission devices on those towers. This takes money out of the hands of consumers.

2. Many of the jobs being created simply replace higher paid workers for lower paid workers. This takes money out of the hands of consumers.

3. The greying of America creates a job shift from home construction (higher paying) to eating in resteraunts (lower paying) and other service jobs such as increased travel (lower paying).

4. All of this individually and collectively shifts tax dollars from Defense, food security and other areas to payments to individuals through socialist, wealth redistribution programs such as SS, Medicare, Medicaid, Food Stamps, Housing support, etc....

Since: Aug 07

South Central Virginia

#115966 Jun 19, 2012
Teddy R wrote:
<quoted text>
O rly. So you think good management is running the capital PPE into the ground just to minimize CAPEX even when analysis shows a CAPEX expenditure has returns in excess of cost of capital, and positive effect on corporate Net Worth, eh?
Well, now - that's a fascinatingly original theory.
In that case, Professor Obvious, would you please explain to the class how a CAPEX expenditure has doesn't produce returns in excess of cost of capital, and positive effect on corporate Net Worth on its own merits suddenly does produce positive returns in excess of cost of capital just by virtue of receiving an increased corporate tax bill?
Take your time, Professor. Give us time to stop laughing and thanking the stars you aren't CFO of the businesses we own and work for.
Not only are you fired - you never got hired to begin with - and American business is much the better for it.
Oh - and I fear we're running out of poo here, no matter how much you insist on continuing to bury yourself in it. The game ends when we're out of poo - fair warning.
No, I don't think GOOD management is doing that. You said good managment did that.

What I stated was that managment had a variety of tools at their disposal to use and that each corporation wold use that which best suited them. One of those was to improve the production process.

You were the one that stated a good manager would always improve the production process (and you did not mention costs).

Your Fired!
Teddy R

Mclean, VA

#115967 Jun 19, 2012
okboston wrote:
<quoted text>
No, I don't think GOOD management is doing that. You said good managment did that.
What I stated was that managment had a variety of tools at their disposal to use and that each corporation wold use that which best suited them. One of those was to improve the production process.
You were the one that stated a good manager would always improve the production process (and you did not mention costs).
Your Fired!
Sorry, OKB - we've run out of poo on this subject. You've heaped the whole supply on yourself.

Now go clean up - you're a mess.
TSM

El Paso, TX

#115968 Jun 19, 2012
If I was asked to describe the difference between Romney/Republicans and Obama/Liberals/Democrats it’s simple!!
Romney/Republicans would be like the old Merrill Lynch slogan "We did it the old fashioned way, we earned it."
Obama/Liberals/Democrats would be like the Bonnie and Clyde!!!
nac

Selden, NY

#115969 Jun 19, 2012
joe wrote:
<quoted text>
Are they ok? I don't have a clue. Seems the concept makes sense: if you control the source it's easier to track the guns. As far as execution is concerned, I haven't a clue. This turns out to be one of those instances where an agent became a whistle-blower. I guess we have to decide whether we reward whistle-blowing or punish it. There sure doesn't seem to be anything criminal going on. Issa's on a mission.
Nothing criminal going on??? Wow.
nac

Selden, NY

#115970 Jun 19, 2012
joe wrote:
<quoted text>
Are they ok? I don't have a clue. Seems the concept makes sense: if you control the source it's easier to track the guns. As far as execution is concerned, I haven't a clue. This turns out to be one of those instances where an agent became a whistle-blower. I guess we have to decide whether we reward whistle-blowing or punish it. There sure doesn't seem to be anything criminal going on. Issa's on a mission.
If Mexico was running guns into the US, would that be criminal?
rider

Ishpeming, MI

#115971 Jun 19, 2012
Re: Senator Daniel Inouye on the shadow government - YouTube
Aug 11, 2007 ... Senator Daniel K. Inouye in 1987 Chaired the Senate Select Committee on
Secret Military Assistance to Iran and the Nicaraguan Opposition,...

http://www.youtube.com/watch ...- 155k -
America's Shadow Government: Part One - YouTube
Oct 6, 2008 ... America's Shadow Government: Part One .... xxxdirtyslutxxx in reply to
meushubris (Show the comment) 1 year ago. Vote Up Vote Down Reply ...

http://www.youtube.com/watch ...- 145k -
Teddy R

Mclean, VA

#115972 Jun 19, 2012
okboston wrote:
<quoted text>
Our problem is not taxes. Our problems are:
1. A general lack of jobs and the number of jobs are decreasing due to technological progress. Cell phones replacing land-lines puts people out of work from copper mines, copper wire manufacturers, linemen, those that grow the trees for poles, pole manufactures, those that install the lines in homes and apartments, and others. They are replaced by much fewer workers manufacturing and installing cell towers and hanging transmission devices on those towers. This takes money out of the hands of consumers.
...
Rank neo-Luddite nonsense.

Next you'll be ranting to bring back the buggy whip, livery stable, hand loom, and beaver hat industries.

And the demise of the stone axe and arrowhead craftsman - a national tragedy.

Don't be such a joke.
Teddy R

Mclean, VA

#115973 Jun 19, 2012
nac wrote:
<quoted text>
Nothing criminal going on??? Wow.
By my count, we're up to conspiracy, perjury, contempt of Congress, accessory to murder, and high treason - and that's just Holder!
finding

Jonesboro, AR

#115975 Jun 19, 2012
okboston wrote:
<quoted text>
BS, Government can stimululate economies. However, you are correct that consumers, where ever they may be located, must spend in order to sustain an economy.
stim·u·late
&#8194; &#8194;[stim-yuh-leyt] Show IPA verb, stim·u·lat·ed, stim·u·lat·ing.
verb (used with object)
1. to rouse to action or effort, as by encouragement or pressure; spur on; incite: to stimulate his interest in mathematics.
2. Physiology, Medicine/Medical . to excite (a nerve, gland, etc.) to its functional activity.
3. to invigorate (a person) by a food or beverage containing a stimulant, as coffee, tea, or alcoholic liquor.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/stimul...
The government can stimulate by spending on infrastructure, giving people money, putting into place policies that encourage increased activity, cutting taxes, etc....
By far, the best and the longest lasing effects are through improvements to infrastructure that increase efficiency or lower costs for business activity.
What happen to the stimious money? We had so many shovel ready jobs, where did they go? We have no leader, maybe a community organizer.
nac

Selden, NY

#115977 Jun 19, 2012
Teddy R wrote:
<quoted text>
By my count, we're up to conspiracy, perjury, contempt of Congress, accessory to murder, and high treason - and that's just Holder!
How dare you hold them accountable for their actions?
rider

Ishpeming, MI

#115978 Jun 19, 2012
Deport all slime-ball WASPs!
Teddy R

Mclean, VA

#115981 Jun 19, 2012
rider wrote:
Deport all slime-ball WASPs!
RACIST!
at it again

Bay Shore, NY

#115982 Jun 19, 2012
nbc at it again, there is no doubt about the bias in the media, and anyone who would dispute it, is just not credible.

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/brent-bozell/201...
rider

Ishpeming, MI

#115983 Jun 19, 2012
Teddy R wrote:
<quoted text>
RACIST!
The Legionaries of Christ is a Catholic religious order founded in 1941 by Father Marcial Maciel, who also founded a related lay group, Regnum Christi. These two groups operated worldwide, running schools, universities, missions, seminaries, etc. In 1989, a former Legion priest wrote Pope John Paul II about a history of sexual abuse perpetrated on him and others by Fr. Maciel. In 1997, Gerald Renner and Jason Berry broke the story in the Hartford Current. The Legion and Regnum Christi vigorously denied all accusations against Maciel. In 1998, the victims filed a request for church prosecution in the Vatican with Cardinal Ratzinger. In 2006, after investigating Maciel, Pope Benedict removed him from ministry. Maciel died in 2008, and in 2009 reports surfaced that Maciel had also fathered several children. The Legionaries of Christ are now under Vatican receivership and an investigation of Regnum Christi is underway.

Long after the abuse allegations became public, Maciel, the Legionaries of Christ, and Regnum Christi continued to enjoy support from many conservative leaders and celebrities, who spoke at conferences, assisted in fundraising efforts, etc. They include Rick Santorum, Jeb Bush, Mel Gibson, William Bennett, George Weigel, Mary Ann Glendon, Carlos Slim and the late Fr. Richard John Neuhaus.

Included below is an array of photographs and various reference material from the investigatory documentary film "Vows Of Silence," and from websites run by the Legionaries of Christ and Regnum Christi.

Since: Aug 11

Hagerhill, KY

#115984 Jun 19, 2012
Teddy R wrote:
<quoted text>
You get a C+, gatorbait.
Makeup question to salvage your grade:
1) If there were ways to "slim down the delivery process to recoup the losses to stay in the black" available to you _before_ corp taxes were increased on your business, WHY DIDN'T YOU, and produce better profits? Why are you waiting until you're in a loss-making position before effecting changes for efficiency? Answer - You're an incompetent, lazy manager. You're fired.
And an extra credit question - get this right and you MIGHT pass the test:
2) If you are a competent manager, already running your business at maximum efficiency so there is no possible way to further "slim down the delivery process," when US corporate taxes are raised on your business, pushing you beyond the point where "expenditure increases (can be) passed down to the consumer" because "one can only charge for goods and services what the market will bear," WHAT HAPPENS?
(Big hint - as you seem to need it - from your own post: "It is entirely possible to charge ones way out of business).
Class dismissed.
#1 - You didn't even answer your own question correctly. Try again.

#2 - Unless there is an inadequate market for your product, there is always an answer available to keep things affordable for you and the customer. You may not see it, but it's there. Case in point. Natural gas and fracking. There is always room for improvement when in business and it should be an ongoing process at all times. Cost increases whether through price increase in supply, labor or taxes only causes the process to speed up. If mismanagement has not made plans for eventualities such as machinery break down, replacement, fire, etc, then the company was going to go out of business at any rate regardless of taxes. Another case in point,,, GM.

I have had businesses on the side in the past myself. I don't do well when confronted face to face with sarcasm or belligerence. I do even less well when I have a hand full of rubber checks in my hand at the end of the month. I know all about taxes and private business. Your electric rates, phone rates, banking rates are all higher. You have local tax, school board tax, state tax and Fed tax and it's all at a higher rate than your personal taxes. You at times have to be bonded as well as insured not to mention your state and/or local license. Everything costs and you have to make it up somehow. You charge what the market will bear and find ways to cut costs in some fashion. Whether it be by depreciating your equipment, claiming a section of your home for office space, hire yourself as a book keeper or even your wife. Whatever works. Big corps have it all down to a fine art as well as the ultra wealthy. They have even claimed in public they pay zero taxes and even get rebates for cripes sake.

If these folks aren't paying taxes and even getting rebates, where are all the created jobs from all of this? Billions in profits aren't enough? Profits means just that. Profits means the kitties have all been put into that cover all eventualities. Profits means that is what they put in their pocket and go to the movies or buy a new Mercedes with. They must be doing exactly that because they sure as sh1t aren't hiring anyone.

I guess now you or someone is going to say that Obama has put together a conspiracy to make sure no one hires to many employee's because he hates America so badly that he's willing to actually live here and destroy it when it would be easier to just live in another country that is more to his liking.

The facts say that cutting taxes or keeping them low is not the answer as far as the wealthy go. If you persist in saying that is the way to go you have to be ignoring our current financial situation because lowering taxes is a portion of what caused our current situation. Denying lower taxes helped create the situation doesn't change the facts one iota.

Since: Aug 11

Hagerhill, KY

#115985 Jun 19, 2012
finding wrote:
<quoted text>What happen to the stimious money? We had so many shovel ready jobs, where did they go? We have no leader, maybe a community organizer.
If you'll actually take the time to do some research you'll recall a word that was attached to the stimulus. The word was kickstart. The stimulus was never intended to completely turn the economy around and was made public at that same time. It was intended to kickstart the economy. It did. Congress was supposed to help come up with further plans to completely turn the economy around. When one half of congress wants to protect the wealthy and punish the middle and lower class for living the high life and the other half doesn't, nothing gets done.

Since: Aug 11

Hagerhill, KY

#115986 Jun 19, 2012
okboston wrote:
<quoted text>
Our problem is not taxes. Our problems are:
1. A general lack of jobs and the number of jobs are decreasing due to technological progress. Cell phones replacing land-lines puts people out of work from copper mines, copper wire manufacturers, linemen, those that grow the trees for poles, pole manufactures, those that install the lines in homes and apartments, and others. They are replaced by much fewer workers manufacturing and installing cell towers and hanging transmission devices on those towers. This takes money out of the hands of consumers.
2. Many of the jobs being created simply replace higher paid workers for lower paid workers. This takes money out of the hands of consumers.
3. The greying of America creates a job shift from home construction (higher paying) to eating in resteraunts (lower paying) and other service jobs such as increased travel (lower paying).
4. All of this individually and collectively shifts tax dollars from Defense, food security and other areas to payments to individuals through socialist, wealth redistribution programs such as SS, Medicare, Medicaid, Food Stamps, Housing support, etc....
I disagree with your first line. "Our problem isn't taxes." Our problem is taxes because taxes are the revenue that pays the deficit. Regardless of what the conservatives are saying, the lack of revenue created by Bush drove the deficit up, is still driving it up and will continue to drive it up until revenue is created to drive it back down. It isn't spending that's the problem. The majority of our deficit is coming from already established spending. Cutting this spending would upset our economy even more, again regardless of what conservatives say. All we are able to do at this point in time is borrow and pay the interest on our deficit because we have a huge lack of revenue. This lack of revenue was created by cutting taxes, creating loopholes and deregulation that allowed the collapse of GM, Wall street and our banking industry.
Conservatives will deny this tooth and nail. Common sense and the facts over ride all denials.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Barack Obama Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 20 min PTBW Forever 1,345,428
News The President has failed us (Jun '12) 21 min Xcentrix2 369,788
News Fireworks fly in face-to-face Democratic presid... 24 min ThisLandIsMyLand 14
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 38 min Into The Night 57,144
News In climate bid, Obama stares down melting Alask... 1 hr Into The Night 1,553
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 1 hr Dr Phil 207,281
News The View that Putin's Advisor Has on Obama's Uk... (Nov '14) 4 hr George 5,141
More from around the web