UPDATE 1-White House says didn't heav...

UPDATE 1-White House says didn't heavily edit Benghazi talking points

There are 28 comments on the Reuters story from Nov 17, 2012, titled UPDATE 1-White House says didn't heavily edit Benghazi talking points. In it, Reuters reports that:

The White House did not heavily alter talking points about the attacks on a U.S. diplomatic mission in Libya, an official said on Saturday.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Reuters.

First Prev
of 2
Next Last

“Leonardo Di Vinci died here”

Since: Nov 08


#22 Nov 18, 2012
Gary wrote:
<quoted text>
The budget? What budget?
I'm merely suggesting that the Republicans themselves
could be behind the Benghazi attack since they
are the ones who have so much to gain from it.
And instead of mourning the loss of life, they are glad.
Those four lives lost are just more grist
for their anti-Obama mills.
Republicans are an abomination and capable of any
skullduggery to advance their agenda of destroying
American democracy, the idea of one man one vote
and government of the people, by the people and
for the people.
Such filth!
America is a republic, and Saul Alinsky's rulse for radicals that Obama and Hillary both follow is not in line with the constitution or America. If anyone is scum and filth, it is those that chose free phones over their counries well being.
No Left Winger

Rochester, MN

#23 Nov 18, 2012
Gary wrote:
Talking points?
Whatever. General Petraeus agrees.
Why Obama Chose to Let Them Die in Benghazi

United States

#24 Nov 19, 2012
You cannot respect a President that refuses to send help to an American Ambassador, and 3 American staff members, under fire from his Muslim friends. That is not American, that is Kenyan culture. He is the President, but he cannot demand respect. He has not earned it.
fatbacks x

Portland, OR

#25 Nov 19, 2012
Remember Beirut 4-18-83 and 10-23-83. A condition 4 for security and under a repueg actor.

United States

#26 Nov 19, 2012
And Reagan was vilified for misconduct. This President did what he did by choice, and because he hates our military.

Since: Feb 10

Philadelphia, PA

#27 Nov 20, 2012
RayOne wrote:
The White House did not manipulate MSM and the election reporting. The Benghazi Deception is only about sex now.
No it's not about sex...it's about the lack of integrity and the incompetence and downright arrogance of obama and his administration.

Westmont, IL

#28 Nov 20, 2012
Either the President gave the orders leading up to the BenGhazi massacre, or he didn't. Either way he looks totally inompetent. Is he the President or not? Just who is in charge of the Asylum?

Since: Feb 07

Location hidden

#29 Nov 27, 2012
It is all about sex now, next week Barry will announce that the winner will appear on 'Dancing With the Stars'.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Barack Obama Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 2 min USAsince1680 1,405,121
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 2 min Jacques in Orleans 219,638
News The President has failed us (Jun '12) 5 min Brian_G 391,469
News Global warming 'undeniable,' scientists say (Jul '10) 11 min litesong 35,563
News How Democratic VP Candidate Tim Kaine Evolved o... 27 min Responsibility 14
News The View that Putin's Advisor Has on Obama's Uk... (Nov '14) 30 min Add 6,120
News Democratic National Convention Takeaways: Obama... 38 min Nu Wor Order 10
More from around the web